Joint work of the14th brigade Chervona Kalina and K2 battalion of the 54th brigade. The capture of the
Ukrajina
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#163626 Re: Ukrajina
Joint work of the14th brigade Chervona Kalina and K2 battalion of the 54th brigade. The capture of the
-
Bossona
- Posts: 5896
- Joined: 21/12/2020 03:28
#163627 Re: Ukrajina
sumirprimus wrote: ↑24/05/2023 10:57
na stranu zaebancija, ali kako shvatit da na drzavnim kanalima objave ovakvu vijest, d +a je predsjenik vrhovnog suda donoio kao slucajno putleru mapu iz 17 vijeka na kome nema ukrjaine. iz 17 vijeka.
Širenje Rusije na srednjevjekovnoj zločinačkoj ideologiji krvi i tla koju u 21 vijeku nastavlja Putin po uzoru na Hitlera. https://www.rbth.com/history/327269-histography
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#163629 Re: Ukrajina
Remont pa neobjektivni bubovi
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
-
CrveniKuk
- Posts: 3347
- Joined: 22/04/2022 21:54
#163632 Re: Ukrajina
Po ovom tvitu, Ukrajinci imaju leteća vojna vozila.
- SanskiBiser
- Posts: 9153
- Joined: 14/05/2007 02:18
- Location: Unsko-Sansko-Migrantski Kanton
#163633 Re: Ukrajina
Prvo ih parkirane i napustene ispred garaze u tom kompleksu pogranicne garde pogodili sa dva krasnopola, bilo je i civilih vozila sto su ovi iz ruske legije oteli od gradjana...na snimku ruskog drona ,IR kamera , vidi se gdje su bili parkirani a ljudi nigdje...nakon toga izgleda montiranje da impresivnije steta izgleda mozda iskopali i jarak maksuz za to haj ga znaj...
Last edited by SanskiBiser on 24/05/2023 17:40, edited 1 time in total.
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#163634 Re: Ukrajina
E ovo je manga nema licimurski labavo, pljuj po murici a na zapad se uvali, nego u kontru patirotski
-
toska
- Posts: 4939
- Joined: 26/09/2016 14:08
#163635 Re: Ukrajina
Rusija je ustvari zadnja preostala kolonijalna imperija, šta bi istok i sredina Rusije imali sa tom državom?Bossona wrote: ↑24/05/2023 16:52
Širenje Rusije na srednjevjekovnoj zločinačkoj ideologiji krvi i tla koju u 21 vijeku nastavlja Putin po uzoru na Hitlera. https://www.rbth.com/history/327269-histography
kolonije su očuvane vjerovatno radi kopnene veze, ono što eu države nisu imale.
mentalni sklop je ostao isti i širiti imperiju imperativ, otud i ovaj rat
- duminjo
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: 03/09/2011 12:43
- Location: Sarajevo
#163636 Re: Ukrajina
Klix je mjerodavan ko i moj dedo rahmetli.agent_zero wrote: ↑24/05/2023 15:47Jesu bošnjaci, ali ne sda botovi na člancima. Osim ako su tebi bošnjaci samo oni koji podržavaju sda.duminjo wrote: ↑24/05/2023 15:12
Zadnja komplet recenica ti je laž.
Bošnjaci u BIH su skoro pa 100% za NATO, zapad, EU i protiv Rusije tj za Ukrajinu.
Ne znam sto ti, osim uvreda, trebaju i lazi koje osnovac nece progutati.
Jel vidis sada sta ste postali i kako je bilo kakva kvalitetna diskusija, sa vama takvima, skoro nemoguca?![]()
Kome i zbog čega se praviš lud, otvori svaki članak na klixu barem u zadnja 2-3 dana, pa pročitaj šta pišu sda kozojebi skupa sa svojom ovodrinskom i prekodrinskom četničkom bratijom.
Da se razumijemo, SDA je nesto najgore sto se Bosni moglo desiti i dešavalo zadnjih 20ak godina. Gorih nema, simbol korupcije i svega losega.
Al im postajete ozbiljna konkurencija i postajete isti kao oni pa gdje god okreneš, pljuvanje bez ikakvog smisla i povoda. Zato, teško nama ostalima sa vama.
Jednostavno pregonite.
Toliko o tome, ja bih o Ukrajini da ne fasujemo
-
CrveniKuk
- Posts: 3347
- Joined: 22/04/2022 21:54
#163637 Re: Ukrajina
Koliko je cijena jedne artiljerijske granate 155 mm? Ako je neko zna, lahko ćemo preračunati koliko će granata biti napravljeno od 260 miliona eura.
-
Bobi
- Forum administrator
- Posts: 37805
- Joined: 30/10/2002 00:00
- Location: http://www.klix.ba
- Grijem se na: J.P."Grijanje"Zenica
- Vozim: TDI sve crveno
- Contact:
- japin_mutapi
- Posts: 11827
- Joined: 11/06/2011 19:00
- Location: Uostalom, mislim da genocidne Kartagene treba demontirati.
#163639 Re: Ukrajina
slava ukrajini
- Čitalac
- Posts: 8182
- Joined: 08/03/2011 07:45
- Location: mediteran, uglavnom
#163640 Re: Ukrajina
Vojna pomoć Poljske (naoružanje, municija i oprema) isporučena Kijevu od početka agresije premašila je tri milijarde eura, saopštio je premijer Morawiecki.
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#163641 Re: Ukrajina
Ajmo sveligasi aludira na koji film ?
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#163642 Re: Ukrajina
Druga stvar je druga recenica konacno osjete pravi strah 
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#163643 Re: Ukrajina
Pobunjenici daju pres. Ovo je za autonomije, nek sami odluce o svojoj sudbini treba poslat unproforce izmedju njih i. ruja
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
- GandalfSivi
- Posts: 22569
- Joined: 09/09/2006 00:38
- Contact:
#163645 Re: Ukrajina
Apokalipsa sada
-
toska
- Posts: 4939
- Joined: 26/09/2016 14:08
#163646 Re: Ukrajina
google izbaciju odmah naglašene rezultate i odgovori variraju od 400, 500, 800, 2000 i 3300$ ili Eura.
po nekim indirektnim podacima koje sam još od rata slušao, ja bih se kladio na cijenu 2000+
-
saimidin
- Posts: 3246
- Joined: 20/05/2011 17:53
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#163648 Re: Ukrajina
Zanimljiv tred kako su ih oborili
Thread Reader
Archie Irving
@ArchieIrving2
Haven't seen much discussion about whether the Patriot system may have been responsible for the recent Russian aircraft losses, so here is my take.
This looks to me like a possible use case for PAC-2 from well within Ukrainian territory using link16.
First and foremost, PAC-2 have a range of up to 160 km, which puts a lot of Ukrainian territory within PAC-2 range. There is enough distance from the border to put a patriot launcher without significantly increasing risk.
Image
But, Patriot radar can't track targets that far, right? Yes, but that doesn't really matter. Patriot systems can receive targeting data through link16 datalink. This means you can put other radars closer to the border communicating over-the-horizon targets to PAC-2.
There isn't a lot of public info regarding PAC-2 datalink capabilities, but they certainly exist, demonstrated by IBCS flight test 5, where F-35 + TPS-59 radar communicated targeting data over link-16 to a Patriot system which intercepted using PAC-2.
What does this mean? Other radars on link16 can communicate with a patriot system, allowing interceptions well over the horizon, and at lower altitudes. This also allows aircraft on link16 to feed targeting to Patriot - maybe even allowing Su-27 and Mig-29 to take part.
Because of this, Russian pilots could have had no RWR warnings from the patriot system until the PAC-2 enters terminal phase. Russian systems would have certainly picked up the missiles on Radar, but wouldn't know it was targeting them until too late.
So, any compatible Ukrainian/NATO Radar in track while scan that could pick up these targets would have been able to transmit targeting data to a PAC-2 without alerting the pilots to lock or missile launch. As a result, its possible that the pilots didn't defend before the max -
abort range. With knowledge of being fired upon, any pilot worth their while would be able to defend against a PAC-2 that far out - but without any defensive maneuvering, it would be almost impossible to survive PAC-2 after it enters its terminal phase.
What I don't yet know is whether PAC-2 can communicate on link16 themselves, or if they require the Patriot system to upload link16 data. If it is the former (which I suspect), then a single patriot launcher theoretically can be used closer to the border, as to reduce risk.
In that case, all you would require is the launcher and a communication/command system to receive and upload datalink to the launcher. The rest of the battery could be positioned deep in Ukraine, where command and radar systems are at little risk.
Either way, the reason I think this is more likely than MANPADS is this: MANPADS make sense for helicopters with a known flight path, but not less for fighters. Even with known flight path, an SOF team would have a small and unlikely window to launch, with low chance of success.
Additionally, you might as well accept that you won't be getting that SOF team back. No amount of Russian incompetence should have you confident that an SOF team has a great chance of extracting from more than 50KM into Russian territory after taking out such high value targets.
This sort of operation puts you at massive risk of ending up seeing them end up as propaganda on Russian telegram, with low chance of success. Its a lot harder to run around in enemy territory carrying 4+ sets of MANPADS then it is to do so without.
A doubt I have; if the Mi-8 were travelling at low altitude, the chance that any ground based radar in Ukraine was tracking them is effectively zero. E-3 AWACS has unclassified range of 400km detection, which would put it well out of range on Poland border.
Considering the extensive use of E-3 in Poland despite this fact, who knows how far it can see. There may be some doubts as to whether Ukrainian systems are actually using link16 - IMO, there has to be significant use of link16 by now as to integrate with NATO -
AWACS, Rivet joint and supplied NASAMS, PATRIOT and HIMARS + more. Maybe I'm wrong, but MANPADS or S-300 seems just as if not more unlikely to me. Also, PAC-2 is more likely to kill all 4 sets of pilots than MANPADS, so
. Will be interesting to see what is actually the case /End
Thread Reader
Archie Irving
@ArchieIrving2
Haven't seen much discussion about whether the Patriot system may have been responsible for the recent Russian aircraft losses, so here is my take.
This looks to me like a possible use case for PAC-2 from well within Ukrainian territory using link16.
First and foremost, PAC-2 have a range of up to 160 km, which puts a lot of Ukrainian territory within PAC-2 range. There is enough distance from the border to put a patriot launcher without significantly increasing risk.
Image
But, Patriot radar can't track targets that far, right? Yes, but that doesn't really matter. Patriot systems can receive targeting data through link16 datalink. This means you can put other radars closer to the border communicating over-the-horizon targets to PAC-2.
There isn't a lot of public info regarding PAC-2 datalink capabilities, but they certainly exist, demonstrated by IBCS flight test 5, where F-35 + TPS-59 radar communicated targeting data over link-16 to a Patriot system which intercepted using PAC-2.
What does this mean? Other radars on link16 can communicate with a patriot system, allowing interceptions well over the horizon, and at lower altitudes. This also allows aircraft on link16 to feed targeting to Patriot - maybe even allowing Su-27 and Mig-29 to take part.
Because of this, Russian pilots could have had no RWR warnings from the patriot system until the PAC-2 enters terminal phase. Russian systems would have certainly picked up the missiles on Radar, but wouldn't know it was targeting them until too late.
So, any compatible Ukrainian/NATO Radar in track while scan that could pick up these targets would have been able to transmit targeting data to a PAC-2 without alerting the pilots to lock or missile launch. As a result, its possible that the pilots didn't defend before the max -
abort range. With knowledge of being fired upon, any pilot worth their while would be able to defend against a PAC-2 that far out - but without any defensive maneuvering, it would be almost impossible to survive PAC-2 after it enters its terminal phase.
What I don't yet know is whether PAC-2 can communicate on link16 themselves, or if they require the Patriot system to upload link16 data. If it is the former (which I suspect), then a single patriot launcher theoretically can be used closer to the border, as to reduce risk.
In that case, all you would require is the launcher and a communication/command system to receive and upload datalink to the launcher. The rest of the battery could be positioned deep in Ukraine, where command and radar systems are at little risk.
Either way, the reason I think this is more likely than MANPADS is this: MANPADS make sense for helicopters with a known flight path, but not less for fighters. Even with known flight path, an SOF team would have a small and unlikely window to launch, with low chance of success.
Additionally, you might as well accept that you won't be getting that SOF team back. No amount of Russian incompetence should have you confident that an SOF team has a great chance of extracting from more than 50KM into Russian territory after taking out such high value targets.
This sort of operation puts you at massive risk of ending up seeing them end up as propaganda on Russian telegram, with low chance of success. Its a lot harder to run around in enemy territory carrying 4+ sets of MANPADS then it is to do so without.
A doubt I have; if the Mi-8 were travelling at low altitude, the chance that any ground based radar in Ukraine was tracking them is effectively zero. E-3 AWACS has unclassified range of 400km detection, which would put it well out of range on Poland border.
Considering the extensive use of E-3 in Poland despite this fact, who knows how far it can see. There may be some doubts as to whether Ukrainian systems are actually using link16 - IMO, there has to be significant use of link16 by now as to integrate with NATO -
AWACS, Rivet joint and supplied NASAMS, PATRIOT and HIMARS + more. Maybe I'm wrong, but MANPADS or S-300 seems just as if not more unlikely to me. Also, PAC-2 is more likely to kill all 4 sets of pilots than MANPADS, so
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
