Bobovac postaje oltar domovine Hrvatima BiH ???

Rasprave na razne teme... Ako ne znate gdje poslati poruku, pošaljite je ovdje.

Moderators: Benq, O'zone

seas of cheese
Posts: 211
Joined: 01/10/2004 14:20

#26 Re: Bobovac postaje oltar domovine Hrvatima BiH ???

Post by seas of cheese »

RPM wrote:Više stotina vjernika, vojnika, policajaca, političara te kulturnih i javnih djelatnika, okupili su se jučer na starom gradu Bobovcu, gdje se obilježava 526. obljetnica od smrti posljednje bosanske kraljice Katarine...

U svojoj nadahnutoj propovijedi kardinal Puljić istaknuo je važnost ovog mjesta u povijesti Hrvata, te se još jednom zauzeo za mir i toleranciju među svim narodima, ali se malo kritički osvrnuo i na jedinstvo hrvatskog naroda u BiH.

http://www.bljesak.info/modules.php?nam ... &sid=12644


... sama kraljica Katarina je bila odgojena kao patarenka. Prije vjencanja presla je na katolicku vjeru i vjencala se sa Stjepanom Tomasem po katolickom obredu. Vjencanje je obavljeno po svoj prilici na Uzasasce na 26. maja/svibnja 1446. ... najglavnija oporucna odluka kraljice Katarine, kao zakonite predstavnice bosanskog kraljevstva, odnosi se upravo na kraljevinu Bosnu: ostavila je Svetoj stolici, ako se njezina djeca ne povrate na katolicku vjeru.

(Izvor: Bazilije Pandzic, "Bosanska Kraljica Katarina" Hrvatski Kalendar 1978 Str. 179-184)

... elem ne kontam (ma kontam ba) ... srednjevjekovna bosna bastini bosansko krstjanstvo a ne hrvatstvo, bastiniti katolicanstvo ne znaci hrvatstvo, primiti katolicanstvo ne znaci primiti hrvatstvo, cemu i do kada svojatanje (povjesti) bosne od strane onih koji su se dobrovoljno odrekli i odricu bosanstva ???
koja crna kraljica i njeno carstvo. mozda je odsjedala u nekakvoj stali...
Prenj
Posts: 7014
Joined: 20/07/2004 08:59

#27 Re: Bobovac postaje oltar domovine Hrvatima BiH ???

Post by Prenj »

seas of cheese wrote:koja crna kraljica i njeno carstvo. mozda je odsjedala u nekakvoj stali...
U vrijeme kada se cijela prica o Katarini desava tvoji vec uveliko slave 70+ godina pod Turcima ...
seas of cheese
Posts: 211
Joined: 01/10/2004 14:20

#28 Re: Bobovac postaje oltar domovine Hrvatima BiH ???

Post by seas of cheese »

Prenj wrote:
seas of cheese wrote:koja crna kraljica i njeno carstvo. mozda je odsjedala u nekakvoj stali...
U vrijeme kada se cijela prica o Katarini desava tvoji vec uveliko slave 70+ godina pod Turcima ...
moji? a tvoji? sta rade tvoji?

ja sam mislio da smo svi bosanci, nasi....
Prenj
Posts: 7014
Joined: 20/07/2004 08:59

#29 Re: Bobovac postaje oltar domovine Hrvatima BiH ???

Post by Prenj »

seas of cheese wrote:
Prenj wrote:
seas of cheese wrote:koja crna kraljica i njeno carstvo. mozda je odsjedala u nekakvoj stali...
U vrijeme kada se cijela prica o Katarini desava tvoji vec uveliko slave 70+ godina pod Turcima ...
moji? a tvoji? sta rade tvoji?

ja sam mislio da smo svi bosanci, nasi....
Zasto onda omalovazavanje zadnje bosanske kraljice?
seas of cheese
Posts: 211
Joined: 01/10/2004 14:20

#30 Re: Bobovac postaje oltar domovine Hrvatima BiH ???

Post by seas of cheese »

Prenj wrote:
seas of cheese wrote:
Prenj wrote: U vrijeme kada se cijela prica o Katarini desava tvoji vec uveliko slave 70+ godina pod Turcima ...
moji? a tvoji? sta rade tvoji?

ja sam mislio da smo svi bosanci, nasi....
Zasto onda omalovazavanje zadnje bosanske kraljice?
zato sto je to cisto supljiranje.

ona je bila kraljica a bobovac kraljevski grad otprilike onoliko koliko je i josip pejakovic visoki predstavnik.
Prenj
Posts: 7014
Joined: 20/07/2004 08:59

#31

Post by Prenj »

Stavrogine,

ako Bobovac to nije, gdje je onda bosanski kraljevski grad u XV stoljecu?
User avatar
pitt
Posts: 27093
Joined: 03/12/2002 00:00
Location: Steelers Nation

#32

Post by pitt »

Ih, sad ce ti on poceti kako Bosna nikad nije bila drzava ni kraljevina, kako je to sve majcica serbia, Nemanjici itd itd :-) :-)
seas of cheese
Posts: 211
Joined: 01/10/2004 14:20

#33

Post by seas of cheese »

Prenj wrote:Stavrogine,

ako Bobovac to nije, gdje je onda bosanski kraljevski grad u XV stoljecu?
ama kakav bobovac, o cemu pricas, to je obicno smetiliste. i moldavija i somalija i tunguzija ima vece dvore i kraljevske gradove...
Prenj
Posts: 7014
Joined: 20/07/2004 08:59

#34

Post by Prenj »

seas of cheese wrote:
Prenj wrote:Stavrogine,

ako Bobovac to nije, gdje je onda bosanski kraljevski grad u XV stoljecu?
ama kakav bobovac, o cemu pricas, to je obicno smetiliste. i moldavija i somalija i tunguzija ima vece dvore i kraljevske gradove...
Kakvo god, to 'smetljiste' opstaje 70 godina dulje no smetljiste na istoku. A Jajce se drzi jos skoro 70 godina ... za to vrijeme tri pokoljenja istocnih susjeda vrijedno kuluce ...
vodolija_33
Posts: 2068
Joined: 11/11/2003 00:00
Location: Sarajevo

#35

Post by vodolija_33 »

seas of cheese wrote:
Prenj wrote:Stavrogine,

ako Bobovac to nije, gdje je onda bosanski kraljevski grad u XV stoljecu?
ama kakav bobovac, o cemu pricas, to je obicno smetiliste. i moldavija i somalija i tunguzija ima vece dvore i kraljevske gradove...
A ja ti mišljenja, Allahselamet :( Kako je bezze :(
seas of cheese
Posts: 211
Joined: 01/10/2004 14:20

#36

Post by seas of cheese »

Prenj wrote:
seas of cheese wrote:
Prenj wrote:Stavrogine,

ako Bobovac to nije, gdje je onda bosanski kraljevski grad u XV stoljecu?
ama kakav bobovac, o cemu pricas, to je obicno smetiliste. i moldavija i somalija i tunguzija ima vece dvore i kraljevske gradove...
Kakvo god, to 'smetljiste' opstaje 70 godina dulje no smetljiste na istoku. A Jajce se drzi jos skoro 70 godina ... za to vrijeme tri pokoljenja istocnih susjeda vrijedno kuluce ...
koliko si iskompleksiran srbofobijom, to nije normalno...

nego, sta ima veze to sto su oni "tada" vec 70 godina pod turcima?!

sta fali turcima?! toliko toga su ostavili u bosni, kako tursku upravu u srbiji mozes da vidis kao nesto lose po srbe, a da budes bosanski patriota?! ako nista, to bi trebala biti dobra stvar, jer je turska ostavila duboke korjene u bosni, a ako je srbija imala slicno iskustvo, utoliko su im i proslost i sudbina slicnije...
RPM
Posts: 1109
Joined: 11/01/2004 00:00

#37

Post by RPM »

seas of cheese wrote: ama kakav bobovac, o cemu pricas, to je obicno smetiliste. i moldavija i somalija i tunguzija ima vece dvore i kraljevske gradove...
... srednjevjekovna bosna je imala 99 gradova, i prva kovala svoj novac od svih juznoslavenskih drzava ... bosanski gradovi su bili skromni kao i njeni stanovnici bosanki krstjani, minimalisti koji su prezirali ovozemaljsko materijalno sto je posljedica samog heretickog ucenja.

... btw. seas of cheese jel' to najbolje sto znas? ... :lol:
seas of cheese
Posts: 211
Joined: 01/10/2004 14:20

#38

Post by seas of cheese »

vodolija_33 wrote:
seas of cheese wrote:
Prenj wrote:Stavrogine,

ako Bobovac to nije, gdje je onda bosanski kraljevski grad u XV stoljecu?
ama kakav bobovac, o cemu pricas, to je obicno smetiliste. i moldavija i somalija i tunguzija ima vece dvore i kraljevske gradove...
A ja ti mišljenja, Allahselamet :( Kako je bezze :(
da si malo putovala, vidila bi da sam u pravu.

nijedna zemlja u evropi ne moze se pohvaliti siromasnijom "kulturnom" ostavstinom od bosne. dzaba sad falsifikovanje i uvelicavanje proslosti koje nije bilo, ili je istoriski nebitna.
seas of cheese
Posts: 211
Joined: 01/10/2004 14:20

#39

Post by seas of cheese »

RPM wrote:
seas of cheese wrote: ama kakav bobovac, o cemu pricas, to je obicno smetiliste. i moldavija i somalija i tunguzija ima vece dvore i kraljevske gradove...
... srednjevjekovna bosna je imala 99 gradova, i prva kovala svoj novac od svih juznoslavenskih drzava ... bosanski gradovi su bili skromni kao i njeni stanovnici bosanki krstjani, minimalisti koji su prezirali ovozemaljsko materijalno sto je posljedica samog heretickog ucenja.

... btw. seas of cheese jel' to najbolje sto znas? ... :lol:
najbolje sto znam?!

a ko je tebe informisao? tunjo filipovic? rusmir mahmutcehajic? ili neki novi kvaziintelektualac i politikant? :lol: :lol:
Prenj
Posts: 7014
Joined: 20/07/2004 08:59

#40

Post by Prenj »

Za dalje studije o predmetu diskusije toplo preporucujem knjigu koju je napisao akademik Pavao Andjelic "Bobovac i Kraljeva Sutjeska, stolna mjesta bosanskih vladara u XIV i XV stoljeću", Veselin Masleša, Biblioteka Kulturno nasljeđe, Sarajevo 1973. koja je ponovo izdata ove godine.
Kvazi i nacional-istoricarima referentna literatura svakako nije potrebna. Oni zakljucke i inace stvaraju iz svog bolesnog mozga.
RPM
Posts: 1109
Joined: 11/01/2004 00:00

#41

Post by RPM »

seas of cheese wrote:
najbolje sto znam?!

a ko je tebe informisao? tunjo filipovic? rusmir mahmutcehajic? ili neki novi kvaziintelektualac i politikant? :lol: :lol:

... no dobrica cosic and san company sigurno nisu .... :lol:
... Prenj, slazem se s tobom ... :roll:
vodolija_33
Posts: 2068
Joined: 11/11/2003 00:00
Location: Sarajevo

#42

Post by vodolija_33 »

seas of cheese wrote:
vodolija_33 wrote:
seas of cheese wrote: ama kakav bobovac, o cemu pricas, to je obicno smetiliste. i moldavija i somalija i tunguzija ima vece dvore i kraljevske gradove...
A ja ti mišljenja, Allahselamet :( Kako je bezze :(
da si malo putovala, vidila bi da sam u pravu.

nijedna zemlja u evropi ne moze se pohvaliti siromasnijom "kulturnom" ostavstinom od bosne. dzaba sad falsifikovanje i uvelicavanje proslosti koje nije bilo, ili je istoriski nebitna.
Ali se zato može pohvalit' hajvanom, raznovrsnim. :x Idi na Zapad, pa poštuj tuđu baštinu a pusti nas da pošujemo to "smetljište", kako ga ti nazva.
Last edited by vodolija_33 on 25/10/2004 16:29, edited 1 time in total.
seas of cheese
Posts: 211
Joined: 01/10/2004 14:20

#43

Post by seas of cheese »

RPM wrote:
seas of cheese wrote:
najbolje sto znam?!

a ko je tebe informisao? tunjo filipovic? rusmir mahmutcehajic? ili neki novi kvaziintelektualac i politikant? :lol: :lol:

... no dobrica cosic and san company sigurno nisu .... :lol:
... Prenj, slazem se s tobom ... :roll:
zaboravi dobricu decko, idi na department za slavistiku ili eastern european studies na bilo koji respektovani univerzitet u svijetu (oxford, cambridge, yale, hrvard, stanford, sorbone...), i nadji mi katedru za bosanski jezik ili za bosansku istoriju - ne postoji.

falsifikovana istorija nepostojeceg naroda nepostojeceg jezika ne priznaje se nigdje osim na sarajevskom univerzitetu - cija diploma, naravno, nigdje nije priznata.

zna se zasto.
seas of cheese
Posts: 211
Joined: 01/10/2004 14:20

#44

Post by seas of cheese »

Prenj wrote:Za dalje studije o predmetu diskusije toplo preporucujem knjigu koju je napisao akademik Pavao Andjelic "Bobovac i Kraljeva Sutjeska, stolna mjesta bosanskih vladara u XIV i XV stoljeću", Veselin Masleša, Biblioteka Kulturno nasljeđe, Sarajevo 1973. koja je ponovo izdata ove godine.
Kvazi i nacional-istoricarima referentna literatura svakako nije potrebna. Oni zakljucke i inace stvaraju iz svog bolesnog mozga.
pavao andjelic 1973... proustaska propaganda za vrijeme maspoka, nista neobicno. ni to da ti je ovo mala cinjenica promakla...
User avatar
manijak1
Posts: 47640
Joined: 16/01/2003 00:00
Location: https://www.klix.ba/
Contact:

#45

Post by manijak1 »

i nadji mi katedru za bosanski jezik ili za bosansku istoriju - ne postoji.
zna se zasto.
Pa nisi ti tako loš :D :D još da kažeš zašto :D bilo bi u redu ali kao da gledam - završićeš na smetilištu od Majdanpeka. :D :D
Džaba i tebi podmetanja i laži i Velika Nemanjina :D
Prenj
Posts: 7014
Joined: 20/07/2004 08:59

#46

Post by Prenj »

seas of cheese wrote:
RPM wrote:
seas of cheese wrote:
najbolje sto znam?!

a ko je tebe informisao? tunjo filipovic? rusmir mahmutcehajic? ili neki novi kvaziintelektualac i politikant? :lol: :lol:

... no dobrica cosic and san company sigurno nisu .... :lol:
... Prenj, slazem se s tobom ... :roll:
zaboravi dobricu decko, idi na department za slavistiku ili eastern european studies na bilo koji respektovani univerzitet u svijetu (oxford, cambridge, yale, hrvard, stanford, sorbone...), i nadji mi katedru za bosanski jezik ili za bosansku istoriju - ne postoji.

falsifikovana istorija nepostojeceg naroda nepostojeceg jezika ne priznaje se nigdje osim na sarajevskom univerzitetu - cija diploma, naravno, nigdje nije priznata.

zna se zasto.
Evo kako najpoznatija enciklopedija svijeta - Britannica, opisuje taj dio bosanske istorije:
Britannica wrote:A Bosnian state of some kind existed during most of the period from 1180 to 1463, despite periodic aggression from the neighbouring kingdom of Hungary, which maintained a theoretical claim to sovereignty over Bosnia. Bosnia enjoyed periods of power and independence, especially under three prominent rulers: Ban Kulin (1180-1204), Ban Stjepan Kotromanic (1322-53), and King Tvrtko I (1353-91). Under Kotromanic, Bosnia expanded southward, incorporating the principality of Hum (modern Herzegovina). During the reign of Tvrtko I, Bosnia expanded farther south and acquired a portion of the Dalmatian coast. For a brief period in the late 14th century, Bosnia was the most powerful state in the western Balkans, though the Greater Bosnia of Tvrtko's final decades was an exception: for most of the medieval period, Bosnia was mainly a landlocked state, isolated and protected by its impenetrable terrain.
The final decades of the medieval Bosnian state were troubled by civil war, Hungarian interference, and the threat of Turkish invasion. Turkish armies began raiding Serbia in the 1380s and crossed into Bosnian-ruled Hum (Herzegovina) in 1388; King Tvrtko I sent a large force to fight against them alongside the Serbian army at the Battle of Kosovo Polje in the following year. Tvrtko's successor, King Ostoja, struggled for possession of the crown against Tvrtko's illegitimate son, Tvrtko II, who was supported first by the Turks and then by the Hungarians after Ostoja's death. The nobleman Stefan Vukcic also engaged in tactical alliances against the Bosnian rulers, establishing his own rule over the territory of Hum and giving himself the title herceg (duke), from which the name Herzegovina is derived. Turkish forces captured an important part of central Bosnia in 1448, centred on the settlement of Vrhbosna, which they developed into the city of Sarajevo. In 1463 they conquered most of the rest of Bosnia proper, although parts of Herzegovina and some northern areas of Bosnia were taken over by Hungary and remained under Hungarian control until the 1520s. Vukcic and his son were gradually forced out of their domains, and the last fortress in Herzegovina fell to the Turks in 1482.
User avatar
manijak1
Posts: 47640
Joined: 16/01/2003 00:00
Location: https://www.klix.ba/
Contact:

#47

Post by manijak1 »

proustaska propaganda za vrijeme maspoka pa nešto 73
Maspok je bio okončan krajem '72 .
seas of cheese
Posts: 211
Joined: 01/10/2004 14:20

#48

Post by seas of cheese »

Prenj wrote:
seas of cheese wrote:
RPM wrote:
... no dobrica cosic and san company sigurno nisu .... :lol:
... Prenj, slazem se s tobom ... :roll:
zaboravi dobricu decko, idi na department za slavistiku ili eastern european studies na bilo koji respektovani univerzitet u svijetu (oxford, cambridge, yale, hrvard, stanford, sorbone...), i nadji mi katedru za bosanski jezik ili za bosansku istoriju - ne postoji.

falsifikovana istorija nepostojeceg naroda nepostojeceg jezika ne priznaje se nigdje osim na sarajevskom univerzitetu - cija diploma, naravno, nigdje nije priznata.

zna se zasto.
Evo kako najpoznatija enciklopedija svijeta - Britannica, opisuje taj dio bosanske istorije:
Britannica wrote:A Bosnian state of some kind existed during most of the period from 1180 to 1463, despite periodic aggression from the neighbouring kingdom of Hungary, which maintained a theoretical claim to sovereignty over Bosnia. Bosnia enjoyed periods of power and independence, especially under three prominent rulers: Ban Kulin (1180-1204), Ban Stjepan Kotromanic (1322-53), and King Tvrtko I (1353-91). Under Kotromanic, Bosnia expanded southward, incorporating the principality of Hum (modern Herzegovina). During the reign of Tvrtko I, Bosnia expanded farther south and acquired a portion of the Dalmatian coast. For a brief period in the late 14th century, Bosnia was the most powerful state in the western Balkans, though the Greater Bosnia of Tvrtko's final decades was an exception: for most of the medieval period, Bosnia was mainly a landlocked state, isolated and protected by its impenetrable terrain.
The final decades of the medieval Bosnian state were troubled by civil war, Hungarian interference, and the threat of Turkish invasion. Turkish armies began raiding Serbia in the 1380s and crossed into Bosnian-ruled Hum (Herzegovina) in 1388; King Tvrtko I sent a large force to fight against them alongside the Serbian army at the Battle of Kosovo Polje in the following year. Tvrtko's successor, King Ostoja, struggled for possession of the crown against Tvrtko's illegitimate son, Tvrtko II, who was supported first by the Turks and then by the Hungarians after Ostoja's death. The nobleman Stefan Vukcic also engaged in tactical alliances against the Bosnian rulers, establishing his own rule over the territory of Hum and giving himself the title herceg (duke), from which the name Herzegovina is derived. Turkish forces captured an important part of central Bosnia in 1448, centred on the settlement of Vrhbosna, which they developed into the city of Sarajevo. In 1463 they conquered most of the rest of Bosnia proper, although parts of Herzegovina and some northern areas of Bosnia were taken over by Hungary and remained under Hungarian control until the 1520s. Vukcic and his son were gradually forced out of their domains, and the last fortress in Herzegovina fell to the Turks in 1482.

a evo kako katolicka enciklopedija tvrdi da u bosni odvajkada zive etnicki srbi (ili samo 98%).


Population

According to the census of 22 April 1895, Bosnia has 1,361,868 inhabitants and Herzegovina 229,168, giving a total population of 1,591,036. The number of persons to the square mile is small (about 80), less than that in any of the other Austrian crown provinces excepting Salzburg (about 70). This average does not vary much in the six districts (five in Bosnia, one in Herzegovina). The number of persons to the square mile in these districts is as follows: Doljna Tuzla, 106; Banjaluka, 96; Bihac, 91; Serajevo, 73, Mostar (Herzegovina), 65, Travnik, 62. There are 5,388 settlements, of which only 11 have more than 5,000 inhabitants, while 4,689 contain less 500 persons. Excluding some 30,000 Albanians living in the south-east, the Jews who emigrated in earlier times from Spain, a few Osmanli Turks, the merchants, officials. and Austrian troops, the rest of the population (about 98 per cent) belong to the southern Slavonic people, the Serbs. Although one in race, the people form in religious beliefs three sharply separated divisions: the Mohammedans, about 550,000 persons (35 per cent), Greek Schismatics, about 674,000 persons (43 per cent), and Catholics, about 334,000 persons (21.3 per cent). The last mentioned are chiefly peasants. The Mohammedans form the mass of the population in the region called the Krajina in the north-west, in the district of Serajevo and in the south-eastern part of the territory; the Greek Schismatics preponderate in the district of Banjaluka. The Catholics of the Latin Rite exceed the other two denominations only in the district of Travnik and in northern Herzegovina. There are in addition 8,000 Jews and 4,000 Protestants. Divided according to occupation 85 per cent of the population are farmers or wine-cultivators (1,385,291). There are 5,833 large estates, the owners of which are chiefly Mohammedans, 88,970 cultivators of land not their own (kmeten), 88,867 free peasants who own the land they till, and 22,625 peasants who own farming-land and also cultivate the land of others. The population of the towns is small.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02694a.htm
mIRCerka
Posts: 28084
Joined: 20/08/2004 15:21
Location: Bolje biti frustrirani mjesanac nego cistokrvni idiot.

#49 Re: w

Post by mIRCerka »

Prenj wrote: Dubravko Lovrenovic je, dok je bio ministar kulture, uspio iskopati nesto para za ciscenje okoline Bobovca.
Znam..i sta je dobio za to? Ni hvala..... :(
seas of cheese
Posts: 211
Joined: 01/10/2004 14:20

#50

Post by seas of cheese »

manijak1 wrote:
proustaska propaganda za vrijeme maspoka pa nešto 73
Maspok je bio okončan krajem '72 .
logicno da knjiga ne moze biti izdata istog momenta, nego par mjeseci poslje.
Post Reply