Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ide u Hrvatsku

[livingstone]

Australijski Vrhovni Sud je odlucio:Hrvatski sudovi su pristojni sudovi i stoga nadlezni da sude "Kapetanu Mrgudu"!

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/hi ... 5868782276
Od Hrvatskih "crtaca" se ocekuju da zapocnu "crtic" u kojem bi se takmicili "eustahije brzic" i "kapetan Mrgud" u ratnim "vestinama".

[livingstone]

Republika Hrvatska Vs V.Srbija : 5 : 0
Hrvatska je svojim manevrima uspjela da svi Srbi u svijetu priznaju zlocin i Genocid kao fakt sto su oni svojim prilozima raznim udruzenjima kao sto su "Serbs for Justice" & Co izrazili kao zelju za pomirenjem sa bratskim Hrvatskim narodom protiv kojeg oni nisu nikad imali nista protiv osim sto su se Hrvati slucajno nalazili unutar zacrtane granice "Velike Srbije",i sto je zbog "nerazumijevanja" doslo do nekih "pomeranja"(pravni izraz).

U njihovim saposcenjima oni priznaju krivicu i izrazavaju zabrinutost zbog "proceduralnog" neiskustva mlade Drzave,Republike Hrvatske i ni u kojem slucaju ne izrazavaju neslaganje sa Pravni Sustavom Republike Hrvatske.

Dapace,"Velika Srbija" kao "jedini"(ovo sami ponavljaju kao papagaji a svi "susedi" zanju da su potpisali kapitualciju Snagama NATO)garant stabilnosti u regionu je spremna da ponudi ruku pomirenja svim svojim "susedima",sto je vidljivo to priblizavanje regionu Republike Kosova,gdje smo izgradili veliki Vojni Centar na samoj granici te mlade republike da bi se nasli u blizini ako ta Drzava zapadne u krizu u buducnosti.

Ni u jednom njihovom saopcenju nema ni trunke pristrasnosti prema odlukama Australskih sudova koje oni ocjenjuju kao odluke visokog moralnog i pravnog kvaliteta.

Svi Srbi svijeta se slazu da se Draganu Vasiljkovicu "treba" suditi u Hagu,jer bi tamo bio "posteno" sudjen i gdje bi on mogao da eventualno dokaze svoju "nevinost".

U slucaju i da bude osudjen na neku "simbolicnu" kaznu,bio bi siguran u zatvorima Zapadnih zemalja(vidi slucaj Krstic),jer su zatvori puni "fundamentalista" (to su oni sa velikim bradama),a ni su sa Ravne Gore).

I na kraju,svi Srbi se slazu da je Hag jedini sud koji oni priznaju i koji sudi po Zakonu koji je od "pamtiveka" primjenjivan u Srbiji.!

[livingstone]

Poucan i "istinit' prilog:

Kapetan Mrgud zavrsio "Specijalnu Akademiju" u Australiji:
http://www.serbianmirror.com/arhiva/200 ... 510_12.pdf

[livingstone]

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5870765389

Racun stigao njemu ostalo manje od 100$?
Nikad nije ni imao vise!

[Fair Life]

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5870765389

Racun stigao njemu ostalo manje od 100$?
Nikad nije ni imao vise!

[vidividi]

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5870765389

Racun stigao njemu ostalo manje od 100$?
Nikad nije ni imao vise!

Borio se iz ubijeđenja, a ne radi profiterstva
Kamo sreće da je više ljudi na svim stranama slijedilo taj primjer

[kiky]

[livingstone]

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5870765389

Racun stigao njemu ostalo manje od 100$?
Nikad nije ni imao vise!

Borio se iz ubijeđenja, a ne radi profiterstva
Kamo sreće da je više ljudi na svim stranama slijedilo taj primjer

Momcino,
Vidim da si "klasican Srb", a to znaci da debata sa tobom nece "vredeti" pet para.

Ovdje se radi o namizernijem "bijedniku" na zemaljskoj planeti i ti u svojem prilogu predlazes da bi sve "strane" trebale da budu takve.


Maloumnice:Ovdje se ne radi stranama,nego se radi o Srbskom narodu koji je pocinio Genocid!

I ti pozivas druge strane na taj isti korak: I ti si taj Srb koji zeli da udje u Evropu.

[vidividi]

Vidi ninja,

Da si pročitao ono što sam napisao umjesto onog što želiš da vidiš, uočio bi da sam prokomentarisao da je dotični iz rata izašao bez višespratnih stambeno/poslovno/industrijskih kompleksa, za razliku od mnogih tzv patriota (na svim stranama), jer si i sam prenio informaciju da je čovjek kokuz kome su jarani pokušali da sklepaju zahrđalu raspalu barku.

I dalje stojim iza toga da kamo sreće da je više ljudi koji nisu inkasirali tuđu muku u svoj džep, pogotovo što ta sramota nije bila ekskluzivitet nijedne strane posebno. Tvoje inputiranje teze da ja pozivam na nešto drugo je samo dokaz tvog ideološkog slijepila.

A za ovo "klasičan Srb" i "narod koji je počinio genocid", mogu samo da zaključim da si ti KLASIČAN FAŠISTA, ma koje vjere i nacije bio i da se iskreno nadam da će se moderacija pozabaviti tvojim prosipanjem mržnje po ovom forumu.

[Fair Life]

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5870765389

Racun stigao njemu ostalo manje od 100$?
Nikad nije ni imao vise!

Borio se iz ubijeđenja, a ne radi profiterstva
Kamo sreće da je više ljudi na svim stranama slijedilo taj primjer

Poserem mu se na ubjedjenje !!

Trebali to da ga opravdava??

[michio]

Pustolov čovjek. Ima takvih. Briga njega za pare, važna je priča. Valjda dok laže zaboravlja da je kokuz

[livingstone]

vidividi,

Vasiljkovic Dragan je bio terorista koji je napadao legitimne snage Republike Hrvatske sluzeci se teroristickim metodama i nikada nije ucestvovao u operacijama gdje su se nalazile specijalizirane snage Republike Hrvatske nego je "kokosario" tamo gdje je JNA bila jaka sa oklopnim sredstvima da bi se mogao "kurciti".

Kroz cijevi od "pola cola" odlazio je "neprijatelju" iza ledja da izvodi sabotaze.

U "crticu"!

[livingstone]

Fotka interesantna za "sprdacenje":


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Digo "kais" do sisa:A za "gospoju" mu necu da kazem nista!

[kiky]

Vidi ninja,

Da si pročitao ono što sam napisao umjesto onog što želiš da vidiš, uočio bi da sam prokomentarisao da je dotični iz rata izašao bez višespratnih stambeno/poslovno/industrijskih kompleksa, za razliku od mnogih tzv patriota (na svim stranama), jer si i sam prenio informaciju da je čovjek kokuz kome su jarani pokušali da sklepaju zahrđalu raspalu barku.

I dalje stojim iza toga da kamo sreće da je više ljudi koji nisu inkasirali tuđu muku u svoj džep, pogotovo što ta sramota nije bila ekskluzivitet nijedne strane posebno. Tvoje inputiranje teze da ja pozivam na nešto drugo je samo dokaz tvog ideološkog slijepila.

A za ovo "klasičan Srb" i "narod koji je počinio genocid", mogu samo da zaključim da si ti KLASIČAN FAŠISTA, ma koje vjere i nacije bio i da se iskreno nadam da će se moderacija pozabaviti tvojim prosipanjem mržnje po ovom forumu.

e stari ...
narod ne čita misli neg postove ...
nesudi mu se zbog ubjeđenja ( što je i tako jako smiješna konstatacija ) več što je činio ratne zločine ubijajuči civile, ratne zarobljenike, pljačko, rušio ...
a zločin iz zadnjeg rata jest eksluziva srbijanskog naroda i vojnih formacija samim tim što su ga jedini činili sistematski, planski, strasno, rado i dobrovoljno, sve uz pjesmu, iće i piće ...
( nemože nam niko ništa, jači smo od sudbine ) ...
dokazano i u hagu, a i zna narod koji je imao sreče da to preživi ...
moderacija bi trebala da se pozabavi tvojim žalom za više takvih ...
đaba ti maskiranje u socijalu kad je poruka sasvim jasna ...

[vidividi]

KIky lafe
mlin - vamo
drva - tamo
ma nek si ti mene razotkrio
al, ajde...
pojednici vs komplet narod (a i pojedincima je neko bezbeli ruku zavrtao da počine zločin, dok se vamo išlo dobrovljno i uz pjesmu)?

Jel' se to i ti kiky slažeš sa ovim haverom da je čitav jedan narod genocidan? Svega mi ja sam konto da si ipak iznad šuplje...

Opet da razjasnim, šta je kep činio utvrdiće sud, a ne ti ni ja a ni australijski crnokošuljaši.
Samo kad pogledam ko je šta iz rata iznio a šta izgubio, vazda ću cijenit' one koji su rat ušli jer su vjerovali u nešto nego one koji su ušli da bi se nahapali. Na čijoj god strani ratovali. Nek' se i zabavili samnom zbog toga

[kiky]

KIky lafe
mlin - vamo
drva - tamo
ma nek si ti mene razotkrio
al, ajde...
pojednici vs komplet narod (a i pojedincima je neko bezbeli ruku zavrtao da počine zločin, dok se vamo išlo dobrovljno i uz pjesmu)?

Jel' se to i ti kiky slažeš sa ovim haverom da je čitav jedan narod genocidan? Svega mi ja sam konto da si ipak iznad šuplje...

Opet da razjasnim, šta je kep činio utvrdiće sud, a ne ti ni ja a ni australijski crnokošuljaši.
Samo kad pogledam ko je šta iz rata iznio a šta izgubio, vazda ću cijenit' one koji su rat ušli jer su vjerovali u nešto nego one koji su ušli da bi se nahapali. Na čijoj god strani ratovali. Nek' se i zabavili samnom zbog toga

dal je narod genocidan pokazuju njegova djela ...
ti prosudi sam ...
slažem se da če sud utvrdit šta je kep radio u hrvatskoj ...
zato su ga i zvali na besplatan odmor u najdraži mu šibenik al nešto nije baš bio sretan il češ reč da šibenik nevalja ...
njegova djela i rukotvorine su nadaleko poznata i širom bosne al otom potom ...
a za lovu mu nije problem ...
ko što rekoh, boravište mu je free ...
sve inkluzive ....

[livingstone]

vidividi,
Krivica Vasiljkovica Dragana je vec dokazana na Sudu u Sidneju i utvrdjeno je da je:kriminalac sa vezama u kriminalnom podzemlju,da je silovao u Bosni,da je mucio i naredjivao ubijanje zatvorenika i likvidirao zatvorenike u Republici Hrvatskoj,ukratko da je ratni zlocinac i sve Australisjke novine tu vijest objavljuju legalno jer je to faktualno utvrdjeno.
To je dokazano:Citaj raniji post gdje ce se od njega ocekivati da plati 700 000 Australijskih dolara u ime sudskih troskova Novinske Kompanije News Ltd.

[osa]

Opet da razjasnim, šta je kep činio utvrdiće sud, a ne ti ni ja a ni australijski crnokošuljaši.
Samo kad pogledam ko je šta iz rata iznio a šta izgubio, vazda ću cijenit' one koji su rat ušli jer su vjerovali u nešto nego one koji su ušli da bi se nahapali. Na čijoj god strani ratovali. Nek' se i zabavili samnom zbog toga

On je takve obučavao...kako ne kontaš?
Nebitno, šta je on dobroga donio Srbiji i Srbijancima ili hrvatskim građanima srpske nacionalnosti?

on obučavao, pričuva od pričuve u australijskoj vojsci, koja uzgred nije ratovala od 2. sv. rata, a jake obuke...

[kiky]

Opet da razjasnim, šta je kep činio utvrdiće sud, a ne ti ni ja a ni australijski crnokošuljaši.
Samo kad pogledam ko je šta iz rata iznio a šta izgubio, vazda ću cijenit' one koji su rat ušli jer su vjerovali u nešto nego one koji su ušli da bi se nahapali. Na čijoj god strani ratovali. Nek' se i zabavili samnom zbog toga

On je takve obučavao...kako ne kontaš?
Nebitno, šta je on dobroga donio Srbiji i Srbijancima ili hrvatskim građanima srpske nacionalnosti?

on obučavao, pričuva od pričuve u australijskoj vojsci, koja uzgred nije ratovala od 2. sv. rata, a jake obuke...

po osi taj dragan može bit miran jer če ga ionako pustit zbog nedostatka dokaza ...
samo nešto me bune oni ljudi na televiziji koji svjedoče o tome šta je ta zvijer radila ...
neko tu lupa opasno ---
ili osa ili oni svjedoci ....
a ima ih ...

[livingstone]

Ponasanje Australijskog Sistema je diskutabilno:

On je sve te godine bio pozivan kao ugledan gost u Beogradskoj Australijskoj Ambasadi u kojoj je bilo uvijek oko 50 Federalnih policajaca i pripadnika raznih Obavjetsajnih sluzbi i "mesao" se sa elitom.
Mozete zamisliti,koliko je Australijska Drzava osramocena,jer je taj vjerovatno vodio Klaru Mandic tamo a u Australiji je Zidovski lobi veoma jak i on je tako sa "jevtinim" trikovima zadovoljavao sve koji su ucestvovali u "prljavoj igri" na Balkanu.
Valjda ce i on nekad odluciti da kaze nesto o tome ili je jos na snazi upozorenje za njega:"Ako vam kaze ko sam,ubit ce me!"U Australiji je "relevantnim" Organima dostavljena informacija da koristim svoj Australijski pasos koji mu je izdat na ime Daniel Snedden a na Eropskoj listi i USA se vodi kao Vasiljkovic Dragan i slobodno putuje Evropom sve te godine i kupuje specijane nocne nisane za Srbijansku vojsku i mijesa se sa svim mogucim dilerima.

Putuje u Izrael, uz pomoc Klare Mandic i tamo dobiva podrsku.
Putuje u Grcku gdje je proglasen herojem Grcke.

On na sav glas novinarima objavljuje da je stalno bio u kontaktu sa "ASIO",Austalijskom vrhovnom spijunskom organizacijom koja je godinama kidnapoval obicne radnike sa ulice za koje je sumnjala da su simpatizeri komunista i vozala ih po predgradjima i ispitivala bez ikakvih zakonskih osnova.
Dovoljno je bilo sa neki Srb pokaze nekog Hrvata ili Slovenca koji nisu htjeli sa njima i to bi bilo stavljeno u pogon.
Ima toga jos i danas ali manje.

[Fair Life]

Ponasanje Australijskog Sistema je diskutabilno:

On je sve te godine bio pozivan kao ugledan gost u Beogradskoj Australijskoj Ambasadi u kojoj je bilo uvijek oko 50 Federalnih policajaca i pripadnika raznih Obavjetsajnih sluzbi i "mesao" se sa elitom.
Mozete zamisliti,koliko je Australijska Drzava osramocena,jer je taj vjerovatno vodio Klaru Mandic tamo a u Australiji je Zidovski lobi veoma jak i on je tako sa "jevtinim" trikovima zadovoljavao sve koji su ucestvovali u "prljavoj igri" na Balkanu.
Valjda ce i on nekad odluciti da kaze nesto o tome ili je jos na snazi upozorenje za njega:"Ako vam kaze ko sam,ubit ce me!"U Australiji je "relevantnim" Organima dostavljena informacija da koristim svoj Australijski pasos koji mu je izdat na ime Daniel Snedden a na Eropskoj listi i USA se vodi kao Vasiljkovic Dragan i slobodno putuje Evropom sve te godine i kupuje specijane nocne nisane za Srbijansku vojsku i mijesa se sa svim mogucim dilerima.

Putuje u Izrael, uz pomoc Klare Mandic i tamo dobiva podrsku.
Putuje u Grcku gdje je proglasen herojem Grcke.

On na sav glas novinarima objavljuje da je stalno bio u kontaktu sa "ASIO",Austalijskom vrhovnom spijunskom organizacijom koja je godinama kidnapoval obicne radnike sa ulice za koje je sumnjala da su simpatizeri komunista i vozala ih po predgradjima i ispitivala bez ikakvih zakonskih osnova.
Dovoljno je bilo sa neki Srb pokaze nekog Hrvata ili Slovenca koji nisu htjeli sa njima i to bi bilo stavljeno u pogon.
Ima toga jos i danas ali manje.

Da li ste znali da je Klara Mandic bila bivsa zena Borisovog (Tadica) oca Ljubimira Tadica? Ponegdje jos zive "spekulacije" da je Boris njezin sin.

[kiky]

srbijanska politika je perverznija od najperveznijeg pornića ...

[HarnagaHarnaga]

"vidividi"
Jel' se to i ti kiky slažeš sa ovim haverom da je čitav jedan narod genocidan? Svega mi ja sam konto da si ipak iznad šuplje...

Izvinjavam se posto pitanje nije upuceno meni, ali su svi postovi predmet opste rasprave te tako mislim da se imam pravo ukljuciti. Ja ne mislim da je kompletan jedan narod genocidan, ali mislim da je 90% Srba ili bilo direktno ukljuceno u genocid nad Bosnjacima od 1992 - 1995, ili ga je na razne nacine potpomagalo odnosno opravdavalo. Sta vise smatram da je taj procenat tu negdje i dan danas. Medjutim, zbog Bogica Bogicevica, zbog Janka Pejanovica, zbog Vlastimira Mijovica, zbog Slavise Sucura i Jovana Divljaka... ma zbog samo jednog Srbina koji je bio protiv, ne mozemo reci da je cijeli narod genocidan..

Opet da razjasnim, šta je kep činio utvrdiće sud, a ne ti ni ja a ni australijski crnokošuljaši.

Svi se slazemo, mada mi nije jasno ko su ti "australijski crnokosuljasi"

vazda ću cijenit' one koji su rat ušli jer su vjerovali u nešto nego one koji su ušli da bi se nahapali

.
E vidis, ja cu vazda vise cijeniti one koji su usli da bi se "nahapali" nego oni koji su usli da bi klali, silovali, palili i rusili posto su vjerovali u nesto drugo, odnosno vjerovali da tako treba da rade, jer su narodi kojima to rade niza rasa, a oni izabrani pojedinci koji treba da stvari dovedu u red. Malo se ti skontaj sta pricas.

[livingstone]

The Hon Brendan O’Connor MP, Minister for Home Affairs
icon1 Posted by admin in Featured Articles. on 05 29th, 2010 | no responses

Wednesday, 19 May 2010



Honorable Minister,

As the elected delegate for Serbian Diaspora in Australia for NSW, ACT, QLD and NZ which according to ABS represents more than 46,0001 voters at the federal level, the plight and incarceration of Daniel Snedden (born as Dragan Vasiljkovic) has been brought to my attention.

Daniel Snedden ( after spending nearly 4 years in jail without any Australian charges or convictions) is in custody again pending a determination by you of an extradition request to Croatia following the decision of the High Court judges to overrule their Full Federal Court colleagues. The basis for their decision has been that – “there is manifestly no evidence that he would not be given a fair trial in Croatia”. Unfortunately this does not accord with the current practice in Croatia, as so clearly set out in the reasons of the Full Federal Court (including racial discrimination), and as also documented, amongst others, by the latest European Union Progress report on Croatia as well as those of Amnesty International. All such evidence confirms that the legacy of the 1991 – 95 violent succession war by Croatia against Yugoslavia still “continues to overshadow human rights in Croatia”, particularly against the Serbian minority.

The decision as to whether or not to extradite Daniel Snedden rests with your Office, and we urge you when you are considering the issues prior to making your judgement to consider the above division in the 2 highest Courts of Australia and the following aspects of the case before you:

1. Snedden is an Australian citizen and the bona fides of the allegations against him should be examined by the Australian Courts in the first instance.

2. There is no reciprocity or mutuality in the extradition process such that Croatian citizens cannot be extradited to Australia, that is this is a one-way extradition agreement. When Croatian president Ivo Josipovic “welcomed the arrest” of Snedden on 13/5/10, he did not mention that his country under its constitution cannot extradite its citizens to Australia and had repudiated the principles of mutuality and reciprocity in inter-country relationships.

3. Snedden has an unfinished defamation legal process before the Australian Courts which has a direct bearing on the judicial status of the plaintiff.

4. The International Crimes Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia expressed in writing that it has no interest in Daniel Snedden.

5. Snedden was a highly successful and charismatic personality who successfully organised the defence of the Serbian constituent and indigenous population (later branded a minority by the Croatians) in the Krajina region of the current new country Croatia – which experienced one of the largest ethnic cleansing operation by the Croatian military in the Balkans after he had left. Delivering him into the hands of his former foes is highly unlikely to result in his unbiased treatment. The Full Federal Court referred to this in its decision.

In supporting the above claims that Daniel Snedden would not be given a fair trial in Croatia I have included the following reports and press releases by Amnesty International in the last 3 years:

* Briefing to the European Commission and member states of the European Union (EU) on the progress made by the Republic of Croatia in prosecution of war crimes

23 April 2010

Report EUR 64/002/2010

This briefing is submitted by Amnesty International on the occasion of the discussion between the European Commission, the European Union Member States and the Government of the Republic of Croatia on the progress made by Croatia in fulfilling its commitments in the area of the judiciary and human rights. In particular, it provides an analysis of the latest measures undertaken by the Croatian authorities in the investigation and prosecution of war crimes and in providing the victims of wartime atrocities with access to justice and reparation as stipulated by international law.

The organization continues to be concerned that both case selection by the prosecution, as well as an extensive use of mitigating circumstances in cases where the accused were members of the Croatian Army and police forces, provide for bias in the judiciary against Croatian Serbs.

According to Amnesty International’s research, most of the prosecutions which have taken place since the end of the war relate to crimes committed by members of the Croatian Serb population while the crimes committed by members of the Croatian Army and police forces remain largely unaddressed.

The report goes on to say that:

“The research of Amnesty International and many other NGOs and international organizations indicates that the events in Sisak and surrounding villages followed a pattern which included killings, torture and enforced disappearances of Croatian Serbs in the town of Sisak; cases of killings, torture and other ill-treatment in the ORA detention facility in Sisak; as well as the 22 August 1991 military operation conducted by the “Thunders” unit in the surrounding villages. The estimates on the numbers of victims vary from 35 to more than 600 with the most reliable number of around 100 persons killed or disappeared, almost all of them Croatian Serbs.” (pp 07)

The UN Human Rights Committee, which in October 2009 reviewed the second periodic report submitted by the government of Croatia on its implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), raised concerns about “reports that many potential cases of war crimes remain unresolved, and that the selection of cases has been disproportionally directed at ethnic Serbs”. (pp 09)

* Croatia: Briefing to the United Nations Committee against Torture

15 April 2010

Report EUR 64/001/2010

This briefing outlines Amnesty International’s concerns about the failure of the authorities to take adequate measures to implement some of the provisions of the Convention and some of the recommendations made by the Committee against Torture (hereafter, the Committee) following its examination of Croatia’s third periodic report in May 2004 (UN Doc: CAT/C/CR/32/3). Amnesty International considers that these failures have resulted in ongoing violations of the rights of individuals which are guaranteed under the Convention.

In its Concluding Observations on the Republic of Croatia in May 2004 the Committee expressed its concerns in relation to torture and ill-treatment which occurred in the context of the 1991-1995 war. Those concerns included:

“(i) The reported failure of the State party to carry out prompt, impartial and full investigations, to prosecute the perpetrators and to provide fair and adequate compensation to the victims;

(ii) Allegations that double standards were applied at all stages of the proceedings against Serb defendants and in favour of Croat defendants in war crime trials;

(iii) The reported harassment, intimidation and threats faced by witnesses and victims testifying in proceedings and the lack of adequate protection from the State party.”

The Committee recommended that Croatia undertake “effective measures to ensure impartial, full and prompt investigations into all allegations of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, the prosecution and punishment of the perpetrators as appropriate and irrespective of their ethnic origin, and the provision of fair and adequate compensation for the victims.”

Amnesty International is concerned that despite some efforts undertaken in the recent years the authorities have failed to adequately implement the above-mentioned recommendations by the Committee. (pp 06)

* Croatia: Croatia urged to end impunity for war crimes and to defend journalists

3 November 2009

Document EUR 64/002/2009

* Croatia: Briefing to the Human Rights Committee on the Republic of Croatia

21 January 2009

Report EUR 64/001/2009

This briefing outlines Amnesty International’s concerns about the failure of the Croatian authorities to meet its obligations to respect and protect the rights to life, to freedom from torture and other ill-treatment and to a remedy for violations of these rights without discrimination; as well as the right to freedom of expression, as required under Articles 6, 7, 2 and 26 and 19 of the ICCPR (respectively), in particular in relation to the human rights violations which took place during the 1991-1995 war.

In particular, this briefing highlights concerns related to:

The failure of the Croatian authorities to provide an effective remedy for war crimes committed by the members of the Croatian Army and police forces against Croatian Serbs and members of other minority communities by failing to ensure independent, impartial and thorough investigations and prosecutions of these war crimes which includes:

* Discrimination in charging depending on the ethnicity of the accused and the victim;
* Discriminatory use of the in absentia trials;
* Discrimination in sentencing depending on the ethnicity of the accused.

Croatia’s failure to guarantee the right to freedom of expression by not undertaking adequate measures to protect journalists from attacks and intimidation and by not investigating, prosecuting and punishing those responsible for these attacks.

* Croatia: Further information on fear for safety: Drago Hedl (m)
5 December 2008

Urgent Action EUR 64/007/2008

On 4 December, police investigations identified a man who is believed to be responsible for the latest death threats against Croatian journalist Drago Hedl. The case was sent to the County Prosecutor in Osijek for further investigation.

* Croatian journalists under attack | Amnesty International

1 December 2008

Story

* Croatia: Government must investigate attacks against journalists

29 November 2008

Press Release

* Croatia: Fear for safety: Drago Hedl (m)

28 November 2008

Urgent Action EUR 64/006/2008

Journalist Drago Hedl has received a series of death threats, most recently on 27 November. The threats are believed to be connected to his investigative reports linking a high-level Croatian politician to the killing of Croatian Serbs in the town of Osijek during the 1991-1995 war. Drago Hedl’s life is in danger.

I therefore urge you when considering making your determination in relation to the extradition request to Croatia in respect of Daniel Snedden to exercise your unencumbered judgement and decline extradition and not open the floodgates for similar abuses of our judicial system for the political ends of other countries.

I look forward to meeting with you at the earliest opportunity, once satisfactory arrangements have been made.

Yours sincerely

Dragan Milovanović

DELEGATE OF SERBIAN DIASPORA FOR NSW, ACT, QLD & NZ



___________________

1 Officially ABS Census data (B08 ANCESTRY(a) BY COUNTRY OF BIRTH OF PARENTS) stipulates that there is 95,365 SERBS living in Australia, however unofficially there is more than 200,000 SERBS living in Australia. This discrepancy between the official ABS and unofficial data is due to the fact that SERBS as predominant constituent population lived in all of the Republics of former Yugoslavia (Note 2/3 of todays Croatia, Serbia with Kosovo and Metohija, all of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro are ancient Serbian lands that fell into occupation by Ottoman Empire from 1389 til 1912) These Republics have become new Balkan countries due to break up of former Yugoslavia. Hence when answering question pertaining to country of birth of parents they have thus entered the names of former Republics. Also many Serbian refugees from Serbian Krajina part of today’s Croatia have not declared themselves as Serbs in fear of persecution.
No Comments

[livingstone]

Ugovor Izmedju "Velike Srbije" i Australije:

EXTRADITION OF AUSTRALIANS TO NON-RECIPROCAL COUNTRIES
icon1 Posted by admin in Featured Articles. on 06 7th, 2010 | no responses

Dear Senator Brandis

Thank you for your letter of 4 May 2010 relating to the Public Policy general principal of Reciprocity that governs extradition treaties. It has been brought to my attention that the information in your second paragraph is not correct, as Extradition between Australia and Croatia has only existed since 2003, and this as “one-way” extraditions of Australians ( but not reciprocal).

Historically there was a Treaty between Great Britain and Serbia of 1900, and with the end of WW1, territories of the former Austro-Hungarian empire in the western Balkans were joined to Serbia and the State changed its name to the Kingdom of Serbs Croats & Slovenes. That country changed its name in 1929 to Yugoslavia. With the end of WW2, further territories along the Adriatic coast were ceded by Italy to Yugoslavia. Australia and Yugoslavia as successor states continued to respect the 1900 Treaty.

However in 1990 the Yugoslav Republic of Croatia adopted a new Constitution which had a clause 9 that states:

Državljanin Republike Hrvatske ne može biti prognan iz Republike Hrvatske niti mu se može oduzeti državljanstvo, a ne može biti ni izručen drugoj državi.

In translation it states:

No citizen of the Republic of Croatia shall be exiled from the Republic or be deprived of citizenship, and shall not be extradited to another state.

The Republic then violently and unilaterally seceded from Yugoslavia. It has amended its constitution in 2000 & 2001, but has not amended Clause 9.

This Constitutional clause is a repudiation of the principles of Reciprocity. The new Croatia cannot extradite its citizens to Australia. It cannot be said that Croatia was ever a successor State for the purposes of the 1900 Treaty or extradition purposes. The Croatian media speak of up to 5,000 of its citizens being potentially liable for extradition.

The Extradition (Croatia) Regulation 2004 is clearly based on an aberration of Public Policy as there is no Reciprocity. It can be seen as not in the Australian National Interest. Was the Minister even told of this in 2003/2004 when Regulations were being drafted?

This is why we are seeking your help to assist in the calling for the repeal of this Regulation by the Attorney General.



We await your early reply.

Yours sincerely,

S Milanovic

PRESIDENT

04.06.2010