Forum Klix.ba

ma_zdraoooo wrote:Ako niste, obavezno morate procitati !

novalic wrote:obe procitane, obe odlicne...

komi wrote:

novalic wrote:obe procitane, obe odlicne...

i što veliš

Da li je Isus Sin Božji?

komi wrote:i neki drugi krugovi se dignu kada se o nečemu drugom govori

ma_zdraoooo wrote:

komi wrote:i neki drugi krugovi se dignu kada se o nečemu drugom govori

slijepac vidi ono sto mu kazu

komi wrote:

ma_zdraoooo wrote:

komi wrote:i neki drugi krugovi se dignu kada se o nečemu drugom govori

slijepac vidi ono sto mu kazu

nešto kao... No God but Alah :D:D

novalic wrote:uskoro ce se moci vidjeti i film ....

ko je lijen citati, neka malo saceka

...The trouble today is not that people believe nothing, but that they will believe anything.
In the counting houses of Wall Street and the chic restaurants of Greenwich Village, one book above all others is the interminable topic of conversation. The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown, a former teacher of English, has set tongues wagging.
It has sparked off a religious debate, unprecedented among the religiously torpid, not just in America, but further afield. This is the novel for the intelligent post-modern "Christian". With staggering sales to date of over seven million, and a permanent spot heading the New York Times best-sellers list, the book just cannot be ignored.
In November 2003, the American ABC network aired a prime time special on The Da Vinci Code titled "Jesus, Mary and Da Vinci: Exploring Controversial Theories about Religious Figures and the Holy Grail". A recent US News & World Report article claimed that The Da Vinci Code "is riding on the wave of revulsion against corruption in the Catholic Church."
The book thrashes the Catholic Church as a highly misogynist organisation. It is depicted as a vast woman-hating conspiracy, and has one of the leading characters declare that "almost everything our fathers taught us about Christ is false."
All this makes it highly appealing to those women who have abandoned the Church in droves in recent decades. It reinforces their real or imagined prejudices.
Not since the Satanic Verses has a book raised the hackles of orthodox religious believers. In the Gospel according to Dan, it turns out that Mary Magdalene is highborn and very spiritual (definitely not a prostitute). Her union with Jesus was blissful and intense, and their progeny are revered as royal. It's not a bloodline of which the medieval Church approves, however, so it goes underground for twenty centuries, protected first by the Knights Templar and subsequently by their highly secretive administrative branch, the Priory of Sion.
Ordinarily, one could dismiss such a book as nonsense. Tosh, perhaps. Not any more. The mind and imagination of modern paganism is ready to believe anything. A whole generation of Catholics that has little more than the haziest of notions of what Catholicism or even Christianity is about is ready to accept any wisp of religiosity, especially if it is hostile to what is called "institutionalised religion".
Modern religiosity
To be "spiritual" without being religious is the epitome of modern religiosity. In decoded language this means I have no time for Church (with a big C!), but there is a part of me that is attracted to that warm feeling inside that spiritual thoughts bring. These thoughts can be about plants, animals, children or the ozone layer or cosmic energy personified. In America big-time liberal critics like Janet Maslin in the New York Times have exulted in the overdue arrival of an "unputdownable" skewering of organised religion.
Not all reviews of the book have been so ecstatic.
On the other side of the Atlantic, Peter Millar, writing in the Times of London, pulled out all the stops, describing the book as "without doubt, the silliest, most inaccurate, ill-informed, stereotype-driven, cloth-eared, cardboard-cut-out-populated piece of pulp fiction I have read. In my view, the book is unexceptionally written, with minimal character development and a third-rate guidebook sense of place. It is, however, a quick and easy read, largely because most of the chapters are only a few pages long, and just about all of them end as cliff-hangers...."

Fr Martin Tierney

Hart wrote:

...The trouble today is not that people believe nothing, but that they will believe anything.
In the counting houses of Wall Street and the chic restaurants of Greenwich Village, one book above all others is the interminable topic of conversation. The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown, a former teacher of English, has set tongues wagging.
It has sparked off a religious debate, unprecedented among the religiously torpid, not just in America, but further afield. This is the novel for the intelligent post-modern "Christian". With staggering sales to date of over seven million, and a permanent spot heading the New York Times best-sellers list, the book just cannot be ignored.
In November 2003, the American ABC network aired a prime time special on The Da Vinci Code titled "Jesus, Mary and Da Vinci: Exploring Controversial Theories about Religious Figures and the Holy Grail". A recent US News & World Report article claimed that The Da Vinci Code "is riding on the wave of revulsion against corruption in the Catholic Church."
The book thrashes the Catholic Church as a highly misogynist organisation. It is depicted as a vast woman-hating conspiracy, and has one of the leading characters declare that "almost everything our fathers taught us about Christ is false."
All this makes it highly appealing to those women who have abandoned the Church in droves in recent decades. It reinforces their real or imagined prejudices.
Not since the Satanic Verses has a book raised the hackles of orthodox religious believers. In the Gospel according to Dan, it turns out that Mary Magdalene is highborn and very spiritual (definitely not a prostitute). Her union with Jesus was blissful and intense, and their progeny are revered as royal. It's not a bloodline of which the medieval Church approves, however, so it goes underground for twenty centuries, protected first by the Knights Templar and subsequently by their highly secretive administrative branch, the Priory of Sion.
Ordinarily, one could dismiss such a book as nonsense. Tosh, perhaps. Not any more. The mind and imagination of modern paganism is ready to believe anything. A whole generation of Catholics that has little more than the haziest of notions of what Catholicism or even Christianity is about is ready to accept any wisp of religiosity, especially if it is hostile to what is called "institutionalised religion".
Modern religiosity
To be "spiritual" without being religious is the epitome of modern religiosity. In decoded language this means I have no time for Church (with a big C!), but there is a part of me that is attracted to that warm feeling inside that spiritual thoughts bring. These thoughts can be about plants, animals, children or the ozone layer or cosmic energy personified. In America big-time liberal critics like Janet Maslin in the New York Times have exulted in the overdue arrival of an "unputdownable" skewering of organised religion.
Not all reviews of the book have been so ecstatic.
On the other side of the Atlantic, Peter Millar, writing in the Times of London, pulled out all the stops, describing the book as "without doubt, the silliest, most inaccurate, ill-informed, stereotype-driven, cloth-eared, cardboard-cut-out-populated piece of pulp fiction I have read. In my view, the book is unexceptionally written, with minimal character development and a third-rate guidebook sense of place. It is, however, a quick and easy read, largely because most of the chapters are only a few pages long, and just about all of them end as cliff-hangers...."

Fr Martin Tierney

novalic wrote: zamisli trenutak da neko na malo literarniji nacin opise poslanika muhameda, mislis li da bi se ostalo skrstenih ruku..

A wrote:Novalicko, da je tad 5 miliona zena ubijeno, makar u dugom periodu od 300 godina, obzirom na ukupno stanovnistvno zemalja koje su praktikovale spaljivanje vjestica, doslo bi do demografskog kolapsa.

A wrote:Novalicko, da je tad 5 miliona zena ubijeno, makar u dugom periodu od 300 godina, obzirom na ukupno stanovnistvno zemalja koje su praktikovale spaljivanje vjestica, doslo bi do demografskog kolapsa.

novalic wrote:i men' se cini da je koja nulica dodana.. u vrijeme inkvizicije trebalo je nafatati tol'ke vjestice... ali nema veze, da su spalili i jednu, previse su...
kontam ja da nam nikako nije strano pretjerivanje...

al' kad se opet javi moron koji stavlja pod pitanje holokust...

meni dodje da ga pljunem