The Da Vinci Code

ma_zdraoooo · Post by **ma_zdraoooo** » 14/02/2005 14:53

Interesuje me dali je ko citao ovu knjigu ?
Ako jeste, kako vam se dopala ?
Ako niste, obavezno morate procitati !

Truba · Post by **Truba** » 14/02/2005 15:22

ma_zdraoooo wrote:Ako niste, obavezno morate procitati !

kada pročitate obvezno pročitajte i Dekodirani Da Vinčijev kod

novalic · Post by **novalic** » 14/02/2005 15:24

obe procitane, obe odlicne...

Truba · Post by **Truba** » 14/02/2005 15:27

novalic wrote:obe procitane, obe odlicne...

i što veliš

Da li je Isus Sin Božji?

pitt · Post by **pitt** » 14/02/2005 15:28

Odlkicna knjiga koja je bacila jednu novu perspektivu na cijelu misteriju O Mariji Magdaleni kao i u ulozi Crkve u omalozavanju zena. Da je Dan Brown pogodio gdje treba najbolje pokazuju ostre reakcije iz Vatikana kao i kontranapadi sa knjigama kao sto su "prava istina iza da vincijevog koda", razni dokumentarci, i sl.

Preporucio bih knjigu koja je izasla prije Da Vincija sa istim glavnim junakom (Robert Langdon) "Angels & Demons", gdje je misterija Iluminatija opisana.

ma_zdraoooo · Post by **ma_zdraoooo** » 14/02/2005 15:58

komi wrote:
novalic wrote:obe procitane, obe odlicne...
i što veliš

Da li je Isus Sin Božji?

Interesantno je i to da se Vatikan svaki put digne kad ovako nesto izidje.
( trebate pogledati i "The Last Tempation of Christ", Martin Scorsese )

Truba · Post by **Truba** » 14/02/2005 15:59

i neki drugi krugovi se dignu kada se o nečemu drugom govori

ma_zdraoooo · Post by **ma_zdraoooo** » 14/02/2005 16:04

komi wrote:i neki drugi krugovi se dignu kada se o nečemu drugom govori

slijepac vidi ono sto mu kazu

Truba · Post by **Truba** » 14/02/2005 16:07

ma_zdraoooo wrote:
komi wrote:i neki drugi krugovi se dignu kada se o nečemu drugom govori
slijepac vidi ono sto mu kazu

nešto kao... No God but Alah

:D:D

pitt · Post by **pitt** » 14/02/2005 16:13

Ko sa sigurnoscu moze reci sta je bilo istina prije 2000 god? Knjiga daje samo jednu zanimljivu tezu koja je zagolicala mastu mnogih.

novalic · Post by **novalic** » 14/02/2005 16:14

pa normalno je da se "dignu"...

zamisli trenutak da neko na malo literarniji nacin opise poslanika muhameda, mislis li da bi se ostalo skrstenih ruku..
pogledaj sta je bilo kada je salman ruzdi napisao verses sataniques...

ne zaboraviti da se radi o romanu... ne o historijskom dokazu.. .

@komi...

pa zar bi takvo nesto moglo poljuljati moju vjeru u sina bozjega

ma_zdraoooo · Post by **ma_zdraoooo** » 14/02/2005 16:14

komi wrote:
ma_zdraoooo wrote:
komi wrote:i neki drugi krugovi se dignu kada se o nečemu drugom govori
slijepac vidi ono sto mu kazu
nešto kao... No God but Alah :D:D

No God AT ALL !!!!!!

Mislim da se treba znati istina o Isusu, Mariji Magdaleni, i inace o ulozi Crkve ( citaj Mafije ) u stvaranju ovog svijeta kakav jeste. ( usran )

Zreli · Post by **Zreli** » 14/02/2005 16:15

Angela, prepricaj mi knjigu, ako mozes i ne gadi ti se ...

novalic · Post by **novalic** » 14/02/2005 16:19

uskoro ce se moci vidjeti i film ....

ko je lijen citati, neka malo saceka

pitt · Post by **pitt** » 14/02/2005 16:21

Pricali su da ce Harisonu Fordu ponuditi ulogu Langdona

Zreli · Post by **Zreli** » 14/02/2005 16:22

znao sam da ti nesto fali

ma_zdraoooo · Post by **ma_zdraoooo** » 14/02/2005 16:23

novalic wrote:uskoro ce se moci vidjeti i film ....

ko je lijen citati, neka malo saceka

Znas li mozda ko ce glumiti ?
Vidim Matt Damona u ulozi Roberta Langdona
Doduse, on je previse mlad da glumi profesora sa Harvarda

Hart · Post by **Hart** » 14/02/2005 16:25

...The trouble today is not that people believe nothing, but that they will believe anything.
In the counting houses of Wall Street and the chic restaurants of Greenwich Village, one book above all others is the interminable topic of conversation. The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown, a former teacher of English, has set tongues wagging.
It has sparked off a religious debate, unprecedented among the religiously torpid, not just in America, but further afield. This is the novel for the intelligent post-modern "Christian". With staggering sales to date of over seven million, and a permanent spot heading the New York Times best-sellers list, the book just cannot be ignored.
In November 2003, the American ABC network aired a prime time special on The Da Vinci Code titled "Jesus, Mary and Da Vinci: Exploring Controversial Theories about Religious Figures and the Holy Grail". A recent US News & World Report article claimed that The Da Vinci Code "is riding on the wave of revulsion against corruption in the Catholic Church."
The book thrashes the Catholic Church as a highly misogynist organisation. It is depicted as a vast woman-hating conspiracy, and has one of the leading characters declare that "almost everything our fathers taught us about Christ is false."
All this makes it highly appealing to those women who have abandoned the Church in droves in recent decades. It reinforces their real or imagined prejudices.
Not since the Satanic Verses has a book raised the hackles of orthodox religious believers. In the Gospel according to Dan, it turns out that Mary Magdalene is highborn and very spiritual (definitely not a prostitute). Her union with Jesus was blissful and intense, and their progeny are revered as royal. It's not a bloodline of which the medieval Church approves, however, so it goes underground for twenty centuries, protected first by the Knights Templar and subsequently by their highly secretive administrative branch, the Priory of Sion.
Ordinarily, one could dismiss such a book as nonsense. Tosh, perhaps. Not any more. The mind and imagination of modern paganism is ready to believe anything. A whole generation of Catholics that has little more than the haziest of notions of what Catholicism or even Christianity is about is ready to accept any wisp of religiosity, especially if it is hostile to what is called "institutionalised religion".
Modern religiosity
To be "spiritual" without being religious is the epitome of modern religiosity. In decoded language this means I have no time for Church (with a big C!), but there is a part of me that is attracted to that warm feeling inside that spiritual thoughts bring. These thoughts can be about plants, animals, children or the ozone layer or cosmic energy personified. In America big-time liberal critics like Janet Maslin in the New York Times have exulted in the overdue arrival of an "unputdownable" skewering of organised religion.
Not all reviews of the book have been so ecstatic.
On the other side of the Atlantic, Peter Millar, writing in the Times of London, pulled out all the stops, describing the book as "without doubt, the silliest, most inaccurate, ill-informed, stereotype-driven, cloth-eared, cardboard-cut-out-populated piece of pulp fiction I have read. In my view, the book is unexceptionally written, with minimal character development and a third-rate guidebook sense of place. It is, however, a quick and easy read, largely because most of the chapters are only a few pages long, and just about all of them end as cliff-hangers...."

Fr Martin Tierney

ma_zdraoooo · Post by **ma_zdraoooo** » 14/02/2005 16:34

Hart wrote:
...The trouble today is not that people believe nothing, but that they will believe anything.
In the counting houses of Wall Street and the chic restaurants of Greenwich Village, one book above all others is the interminable topic of conversation. The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown, a former teacher of English, has set tongues wagging.
It has sparked off a religious debate, unprecedented among the religiously torpid, not just in America, but further afield. This is the novel for the intelligent post-modern "Christian". With staggering sales to date of over seven million, and a permanent spot heading the New York Times best-sellers list, the book just cannot be ignored.
In November 2003, the American ABC network aired a prime time special on The Da Vinci Code titled "Jesus, Mary and Da Vinci: Exploring Controversial Theories about Religious Figures and the Holy Grail". A recent US News & World Report article claimed that The Da Vinci Code "is riding on the wave of revulsion against corruption in the Catholic Church."
The book thrashes the Catholic Church as a highly misogynist organisation. It is depicted as a vast woman-hating conspiracy, and has one of the leading characters declare that "almost everything our fathers taught us about Christ is false."
All this makes it highly appealing to those women who have abandoned the Church in droves in recent decades. It reinforces their real or imagined prejudices.
Not since the Satanic Verses has a book raised the hackles of orthodox religious believers. In the Gospel according to Dan, it turns out that Mary Magdalene is highborn and very spiritual (definitely not a prostitute). Her union with Jesus was blissful and intense, and their progeny are revered as royal. It's not a bloodline of which the medieval Church approves, however, so it goes underground for twenty centuries, protected first by the Knights Templar and subsequently by their highly secretive administrative branch, the Priory of Sion.
Ordinarily, one could dismiss such a book as nonsense. Tosh, perhaps. Not any more. The mind and imagination of modern paganism is ready to believe anything. A whole generation of Catholics that has little more than the haziest of notions of what Catholicism or even Christianity is about is ready to accept any wisp of religiosity, especially if it is hostile to what is called "institutionalised religion".
Modern religiosity
To be "spiritual" without being religious is the epitome of modern religiosity. In decoded language this means I have no time for Church (with a big C!), but there is a part of me that is attracted to that warm feeling inside that spiritual thoughts bring. These thoughts can be about plants, animals, children or the ozone layer or cosmic energy personified. In America big-time liberal critics like Janet Maslin in the New York Times have exulted in the overdue arrival of an "unputdownable" skewering of organised religion.
Not all reviews of the book have been so ecstatic.
On the other side of the Atlantic, Peter Millar, writing in the Times of London, pulled out all the stops, describing the book as "without doubt, the silliest, most inaccurate, ill-informed, stereotype-driven, cloth-eared, cardboard-cut-out-populated piece of pulp fiction I have read. In my view, the book is unexceptionally written, with minimal character development and a third-rate guidebook sense of place. It is, however, a quick and easy read, largely because most of the chapters are only a few pages long, and just about all of them end as cliff-hangers...."

Fr Martin Tierney

"Catholic Church is depicted as a vast woman-hating conspiracy"

5.000.000 VJESTICA su potamanili u roku od 300 godina, vecinom u Evropi. To ti ispadne 4 zene na dan. Pa ti sad gledaj

novalic · Post by **novalic** » 14/02/2005 16:45

je li ovaj podatak od 5 mil vjestica provjeren.. mislim, ja sam isto puno o tome citala... pa nigdje ne nadjoh taj broj... gdje se to moze procitati...

Truba · Post by **Truba** » 14/02/2005 16:50

novalic wrote: zamisli trenutak da neko na malo literarniji nacin opise poslanika muhameda, mislis li da bi se ostalo skrstenih ruku..

ma dovoljno je znati što se desilo Teu Van Gogu

dok je recimo Bunuel umro prirodnom smrću (koliko znam)... a što je sve bljuvao po katoličkoj vjeri
a da ne govorimo o Pedru (kojemu nikako da zapamtim prezime

:D:D ) Almodovaru

:D:D

ma_zdraoooo · Post by **ma_zdraoooo** » 14/02/2005 16:57

A wrote:Novalicko, da je tad 5 miliona zena ubijeno, makar u dugom periodu od 300 godina, obzirom na ukupno stanovnistvno zemalja koje su praktikovale spaljivanje vjestica, doslo bi do demografskog kolapsa.

Hmmm, interesantno. A 6 miliona jevreja u roku od 4-5 godina ?

novalic · Post by **novalic** » 14/02/2005 17:02

i men' se cini da je koja nulica dodana.. u vrijeme inkvizicije trebalo je nafatati tol'ke vjestice... ali nema veze, da su spalili i jednu, previse su...
kontam ja da nam nikako nije strano pretjerivanje...

al' kad se opet javi moron koji stavlja pod pitanje holokust...

meni dodje da ga pljunem

novalic · Post by **novalic** » 14/02/2005 17:05

A wrote:Novalicko, da je tad 5 miliona zena ubijeno, makar u dugom periodu od 300 godina, obzirom na ukupno stanovnistvno zemalja koje su praktikovale spaljivanje vjestica, doslo bi do demografskog kolapsa.

i vise drveta ni za sibice ne bi ostalo

ma_zdraoooo · Post by **ma_zdraoooo** » 14/02/2005 17:07

novalic wrote:i men' se cini da je koja nulica dodana.. u vrijeme inkvizicije trebalo je nafatati tol'ke vjestice... ali nema veze, da su spalili i jednu, previse su...
kontam ja da nam nikako nije strano pretjerivanje...

al' kad se opet javi moron koji stavlja pod pitanje holokust...

meni dodje da ga pljunem

Kupi naocale, potrebne su ti. Vrati se nazad pa procitaj njegov post, i onda OPET procitaj moj post.
Mrzim kad se javljaju moroni koji ne citaju postove

Dodje mi da ih pljunem !

The Da Vinci Code

#1 The Da Vinci Code

#2 Re: The Da Vinci Code

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12

#13

#14

#15

#16

#17

#18

#19

#20

#21

#22

#23

#24

#25