Forum Klix.ba

lajkujMe wrote: ↑07/05/2022 08:36 https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1522 ... g3t5A&s=19

Kae Wagner na official Telegram.
Ako ne bude mobilizacije izgubicemo rat

Because several people have asked: yes, I do expect this part of Ukraine to be completely liberated over the next week: the 4–5 BTGs the RFA still has east of Siverskyi Donets were badly depleted and lost their capability to run offensive operations already weeks ago. By now, they have lost their capability to run effective defence operations too: without artillery support, they could not run even local counterattacks of the kind they’re still running (in order to slow down the Ukrainian advance).

What is scary is what the Ukrainian troops are finding in the wake of the RFA. Think that something like ‘utmost devastation’ is the best description. On their retreat, the Russians have blown up at least three bridges, they have looted all farms and destroyed them, and I haven’t seen a single house or apartment building remaining intact on any of videos taken on the liberated territories. What happened with civilians during the two months of occupation… sigh… On the positive side, the RFA is leaving behind lots of destroyed vehicles, and dozens of troops that are captured.

Ah yes, and many are asking about artillery and what difference it makes. Crucial point in a war of this kind is the ‘tonnage’. Literally: how many tones of high explosives can one side unleash upon the other — and then over what range and with what precision. The side that can hit the other with more tones of high explosives, from longer range, and with better precision is, literally, ‘murdering’ the other side. Artillery is simply the best way of delivering that ‘tonnage’ of high explosives upon the enemy: no air power, and nothing lese can match the amount of explosives artillery can deliver upon the enemy.

Over the last two months, the Ukrainians mostly used their old 2S1 Gvozdika self-propelled- and D-30 towed howitzers. Both were outranged by longer-ranged Russian 2S19s, which in turn meant that most of the time they had to be on the move, in order to avoid counter-battery fire, rather than firing. NATO-made 155mm howitzers were supposed to change that and then more, because they’re firing such goodies like rocket-assisted and laser-guided shells…. Until the Russians began deploying their 2S7 Pions. Calibre? 203mm. Range? 37–47km (depending on the shell-type). I.e. that’s a weapon at least matching NATO-delivered, radar-supported howitzers calibre 155mm.

glockov kolac wrote: ↑07/05/2022 07:41 Odale vam to da Al Jazeera naginje Rusiji?

A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑07/05/2022 09:57

glockov kolac wrote: ↑07/05/2022 07:41 Odale vam to da Al Jazeera naginje Rusiji?

Ma svako malo uleti neki prekodrinski putinoljub sa ciljem da provocira u stilu kako to muslimani podržavaju Ruse, a vi ne.

A priča o Al Jazeera bi kao trebala biti dokaz. Niđe veze za Al Jazeeru. Ljudi kao i svaki medij su dužni da prenesu izjave obje strane, makar to bile fekalije ruskog MOD.

sumirprimus wrote: ↑07/05/2022 09:48

Spoiler

Show

Because several people have asked: yes, I do expect this part of Ukraine to be completely liberated over the next week: the 4–5 BTGs the RFA still has east of Siverskyi Donets were badly depleted and lost their capability to run offensive operations already weeks ago. By now, they have lost their capability to run effective defence operations too: without artillery support, they could not run even local counterattacks of the kind they’re still running (in order to slow down the Ukrainian advance).

What is scary is what the Ukrainian troops are finding in the wake of the RFA. Think that something like ‘utmost devastation’ is the best description. On their retreat, the Russians have blown up at least three bridges, they have looted all farms and destroyed them, and I haven’t seen a single house or apartment building remaining intact on any of videos taken on the liberated territories. What happened with civilians during the two months of occupation… sigh… On the positive side, the RFA is leaving behind lots of destroyed vehicles, and dozens of troops that are captured.

Ah yes, and many are asking about artillery and what difference it makes. Crucial point in a war of this kind is the ‘tonnage’. Literally: how many tones of high explosives can one side unleash upon the other — and then over what range and with what precision. The side that can hit the other with more tones of high explosives, from longer range, and with better precision is, literally, ‘murdering’ the other side. Artillery is simply the best way of delivering that ‘tonnage’ of high explosives upon the enemy: no air power, and nothing lese can match the amount of explosives artillery can deliver upon the enemy.

Over the last two months, the Ukrainians mostly used their old 2S1 Gvozdika self-propelled- and D-30 towed howitzers. Both were outranged by longer-ranged Russian 2S19s, which in turn meant that most of the time they had to be on the move, in order to avoid counter-battery fire, rather than firing. NATO-made 155mm howitzers were supposed to change that and then more, because they’re firing such goodies like rocket-assisted and laser-guided shells…. Until the Russians began deploying their 2S7 Pions. Calibre? 203mm. Range? 37–47km (depending on the shell-type). I.e. that’s a weapon at least matching NATO-delivered, radar-supported howitzers calibre 155mm.

Moze ovako sanski?
Izdvojeno,dijelovi,
by kuper

A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑07/05/2022 09:57

glockov kolac wrote: ↑07/05/2022 07:41 Odale vam to da Al Jazeera naginje Rusiji?

Ma svako malo uleti neki prekodrinski putinoljub sa ciljem da provocira u stilu kako to muslimani podržavaju Ruse, a vi ne.

A priča o Al Jazeera bi kao trebala biti dokaz. Niđe veze za Al Jazeeru. Ljudi kao i svaki medij su dužni da prenesu izjave obje strane, makar to bile fekalije ruskog MOD.

lajkujMe wrote: ↑07/05/2022 09:25 Zanimljiv clanak za Laserske precizne rakete koje su donirane od strane Amerikanaca.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/w ... -a-mystery


Ne zna se s cim ce ih ispaljivati.
Volio bih da dobiju neki helikopter za ovo
A suska se da su Ukrajinski piloti helikoptera na obuci u Britaniji.

A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑07/05/2022 10:13

lajkujMe wrote: ↑07/05/2022 09:25 Zanimljiv clanak za Laserske precizne rakete koje su donirane od strane Amerikanaca.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/w ... -a-mystery


Ne zna se s cim ce ih ispaljivati.
Volio bih da dobiju neki helikopter za ovo
A suska se da su Ukrajinski piloti helikoptera na obuci u Britaniji.

Pa piše u članku. Lanseri od 7 ili 19 ovih raketa, montirani na Bayre ili Mi17.

Domet do 5km. Odstupanje od mete pola metra.
Nije loše, jer može napasti puno ciljeva u jednom naletu. Vjerujem da će ove od 7 komada ići na Bayru, što je odlična opcija jer povećava vatrenu moć, niska cijena rakete...

Zumbul2 wrote: ↑07/05/2022 10:15 Ima li šta novo o Makarovu? Nije valjda da je bio šupljak. Nešta se stišalo oko toga.

A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑07/05/2022 10:13

lajkujMe wrote: ↑07/05/2022 09:25 Zanimljiv clanak za Laserske precizne rakete koje su donirane od strane Amerikanaca.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/w ... -a-mystery


Ne zna se s cim ce ih ispaljivati.
Volio bih da dobiju neki helikopter za ovo
A suska se da su Ukrajinski piloti helikoptera na obuci u Britaniji.

Pa piše u članku. Lanseri od 7 ili 19 ovih raketa, montirani na Bayre ili Mi17.

Domet do 5km. Odstupanje od mete pola metra.
Nije loše, jer može napasti puno ciljeva u jednom naletu. Vjerujem da će ove od 7 komada ići na Bayru, što je odlična opcija jer povećava vatrenu moć, niska cijena rakete...

emirolini wrote: ↑07/05/2022 10:18 Pisu da ce Ukrajinci dobiti i A10tke, kazu da su Ukrajinci vec trenirali na njima?

Idealno za kolone.

Meni ima smisla jer A10tke su manje vise umirovljene u Americkoj avijaciji ali su i dalje omiljeno oruzje za close air support marinaca.

emirolini wrote: ↑07/05/2022 10:20

Zumbul2 wrote: ↑07/05/2022 10:15 Ima li šta novo o Makarovu? Nije valjda da je bio šupljak. Nešta se stišalo oko toga.

Nije supljak, ceka se potvrda da je potonuo, ili ako su nekim cudom uspjeli ugasiti vatru onda ce ga odvuci u Sev. Na Krim pa ce biti slike. Uglavnom, nista od njeg u naredne dvije godine.

emirolini wrote: ↑07/05/2022 10:20

Zumbul2 wrote: ↑07/05/2022 10:15 Ima li šta novo o Makarovu? Nije valjda da je bio šupljak. Nešta se stišalo oko toga.

Nije supljak, ceka se potvrda da je potonuo, ili ako su nekim cudom uspjeli ugasiti vatru onda ce ga odvuci u Sev. Na Krim pa ce biti slike. Uglavnom, nista od njeg u naredne dvije godine.