Santic_Aleksa wrote: ↑08/02/2020 14:15
ne miješam ja ništa, ja se satrah govoreći da islam ne poznaje formulaciju muslimanska imena, poznaje samo - lijepa imena, a to su ona sa lijepim značenjem
Itekako postoje:
Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
Names fall into three categories:
1. names that are used only by the Muslims
2. names that are used only by the disbelievers
3. names that are common to both groups.
The first category includes names such as Muhammad, Ahmad, Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Uthmaan, ‘Ali, Talhah and az-Zubayr. They – i.e., ahl adh-dhimmah – should not be allowed to use these names.
The second category includes names such as Jurjus (George), Butrus (Peter), Yuhanna (John), Matta (Matthew) and the like. They should not be prevented from using these names, but it is not permissible for the Muslims to use these names, because that would entail resembling them in that which is unique to them.
The third category includes names such as Yahya (John), ‘Eesa (Jesus), Ayyoob (Job), Dawood (David), Sulaymaan (Solomon), Zayd, ‘Amr, ‘Abdullah, ‘Atiyyah, Mawhoob, Salaam, and so on. These names are not disallowed for either ahl adh-dhimmah or Muslims.
End quote from Ahkaam Ahl adh-Dhimmah (3/1317)
ako razumijes engleski sve ce ti bit jasno(ova imena koja su navedena navedena su za arapsko podrucje,u Bosni recimo Armin spada pod muslimansko ime a Sara pod zajednicko i ako Sara ima islamski korijen a Armin ne).dok recimo slavica spada pod nemuslimansko..znaci sve sto islam zeli je da se musliman razlikuje od nemuslimana
Narod zna 
