Haris.ba wrote: ↑10/10/2023 15:42
Jordan1961 wrote: ↑10/10/2023 15:35
Ako ne razumijes geostrateski znacaj Izraela za US onda je dalja rasprava bespredmetna.
Ti kazes sa naftom nekakve veze ima. Ja ti fino objasnio sta znaci floskula geostrateski znacaj u kontekstu Izraela.
Veliki si mag geostrategije, nema sta,
Ja bih na tvom mjestu prvo procitao par clanaka (ako su ti knjige pretezak poduhvat) pa onda raspravljao na tu temu.
".....Indeed, much of the region was shaped by Britain after World War I and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. The British invented new countries like Jordan, reshaped the political order in Arabia, redefined the Persian Gulf and so on. Britain was Rome reborn. The Romans were obsessed with access to Egyptian grain. The British were obsessed with access to the oil of the Persian Gulf. They were transitioning from a coal-driven to an oil-driven economy but could not do so without controlling the Middle East. Controlling a region, however, is fraught with danger. The more you control, the more things threaten you.
After World War II, there was the famed changing of the guard, with the British sounding Kipling’s recessional and the Americans taking Britain’s place. The American challenge was the Soviets. The Soviets saw the region not so much as a source of oil but as a place where they could cut off American oil and thus cripple the U.S., and a location by which they could access the Mediterranean Sea and Indian Ocean. The second act of the post-Ottoman Middle East was the U.S.-Soviet competition. The Soviets triggered coups in places like Syria, Iraq and Egypt, while the U.S. sought to build an alliance structure to resist them."
Za slucaj da imas problem sa engleskim probaj Chat GPT (ne preporucujem Google translate).