Chmoljo wrote: ↑14/06/2022 23:21 ...
neki dan je napravio piknik. prostro deku nasred boravka, a zvanice su bile usisivač, rezalica, mikser i ventilator. kaže on za usisivač: ovo je Beko. on je moj rođak.
i antologijska mu je od neki dan:
Mama, pitaj me šta sam radio jučer u vrtiću?
ok, šta si radio jučer u vrtiću?
Ne znam.
hadzinicasa wrote: ↑14/06/2022 23:16 Ja sam veca budala sto odgovaram i bavim se tudjim fabrikacijama.
Pusti ba, jasno je svakome ko je pročitao šta si napisala.
Čuj Beko.Chmoljo wrote: ↑14/06/2022 23:21
ma preludi su. sve kažem pisaću njegove provale, ali zaboravim.
ok, moj klinac je zaluđen kućanskim aparatima. uglavnom usisivačima. na YT šalta klipove između crtanih i dječijih kanala i recenzija usisivača. gleda i popravke starih usisivača. al ono religiozno. igračkama se rijetko igra, najviše sa usisvačem. nana ima sve spremno kad dođe, da mu da da se igra.
neki dan je napravio piknik. prostro deku nasred boravka, a zvanice su bile usisivač, rezalica, mikser i ventilator. kaže on za usisivač: ovo je Beko. on je moj rođak.
i antologijska mu je od neki dan:
Mama, pitaj me šta sam radio jučer u vrtiću?
ok, šta si radio jučer u vrtiću?
Ne znam.
ovo i jeste ovako. samo je dawkins coban i scijentista kojem se vrata visih svetova nikada nece otvoriti.n+1 wrote: ↑14/06/2022 21:59 Nekih 20 minuta podcasta "priprema teren" da predstavi Dawkinsu svoju hipotezu, okoliša, snebiva se, da bi na kraju rekao kako smatra da pod utjecajem halucinogenih droga čovjek može vlastitu svijest spustiti na nivo ćelijske strukture i vidjeti DNA, što objašnjava opsesiju drevnih naroda zmijolikim oblicima. Dawkinsova reakcija je PRICELESS.
to ti je copium jer nisi majka.
Nisam bila dijete
al sam se iz nekog razloga posteno prepala kad sam, u gluho doba noci, klikla da cujem glas lorisa, tog divnog pEsnika:Meni se smračilo pred očima kada je pištolj bacio po sred TV-a, tek ga svekrva kupila preko penzionerskog čeka....nije se bila ni prva rata odbila.
Ne mogu vazda, evo tek izašla iz njeBloo wrote: ↑14/06/2022 22:25mrš u kujnu!suspect_zero wrote: ↑14/06/2022 22:23
Mah, lako mi se s' tobom dogovorit...nikakva sam feministkinja
ne bi me iznenadilo, uklapa se u mentalitet nekih forumasica (sa naglaskom na feministice koje su inace ekspert za sve)
Ove ovdje feministice, barem koliko sam mogao ja primjetiti, niti su antivakserke, niti su protiv lijekova, niti mrze čokoladu.
ma nisi skontao al nema vezedale cooper wrote: ↑15/06/2022 01:33
Ove ovdje feministice, barem koliko sam mogao ja primjetiti, niti su antivakserke, niti su protiv lijekova, niti mrze čokoladu.
A dosta njih ima i djecu.
Ne, ovaj tip osobe me podsjeća na neke koji su pisali na temi o koroni.
Prijatelju, očigledno da selektivno čitaš forum, jer takvih na forumu ima kamaru a nisu ni f od feminista.ZyzzSar wrote: ↑15/06/2022 01:58ma nisi skontao al nema vezedale cooper wrote: ↑15/06/2022 01:33
Ove ovdje feministice, barem koliko sam mogao ja primjetiti, niti su antivakserke, niti su protiv lijekova, niti mrze čokoladu.
A dosta njih ima i djecu.
Ne, ovaj tip osobe me podsjeća na neke koji su pisali na temi o koroni.
nije bitno kakvo razmisljanje imaju, nego je bitan stav koji zauzimaju u vezi onoga sta podrzavaju (to je da su eksperti za sve, ostali nemaju pojma, i svima svoje misljenje moraju naglas reci-takve su feministkinje i vegani)
Mada je ovo pretjerana huja ipak zna biti iritantno kad se suočavaš sa roditeljima koji tek tako puste djecu da rade šta hoće, a ne radi se o njihovim kućama, stanovima itd.
auuu, not good...ali nećemo o smračivanju, ovo je trebalo da bude o pozitivnom plakanju.suspect_zero wrote: ↑15/06/2022 00:28 Meni se smračilo pred očima kada je pištolj bacio po sred TV-a, tek ga svekrva kupila preko penzionerskog čeka....nije se bila ni prva rata odbila.
Chmoljo wrote: ↑14/06/2022 23:21Riddle wrote: ↑14/06/2022 22:49
To su ti trenuci sreće i ne bih se stidio i da sam jecao na priredbi.
Ja nemam djecu još, ali sestrići su mi bili nešto tako. Kad sam se spremao za vozački ispit, ovaj stariji šatro učio sa mnom. Iz nekog razloga je volio raskrsnice i jako ga je zabavljalo kako ja objašnjavam problem na slici. I majke mi, jednom kaže, dajo, tu nema semafora, a ovaj ti dolazi s desne strane, moraš ga pustiti. Rekoh, možeš komotno umjesto mene na ispit, bolje znaš od nekih koji su sa mnom tamo. Naučilo dijete pravila, a nije ni u školu pošlo.
A ovo ćeš shvatiti, igrao ja Witchera i zaskoči me neki vampir. Kaže, dajo, blek blad, brzo!
Isto spužve, života mi, sve živo kupe.
ma preludi su. sve kažem pisaću njegove provale, ali zaboravim.
ok, moj klinac je zaluđen kućanskim aparatima. uglavnom usisivačima. na YT šalta klipove između crtanih i dječijih kanala i recenzija usisivača. gleda i popravke starih usisivača. al ono religiozno. igračkama se rijetko igra, najviše sa usisvačem. nana ima sve spremno kad dođe, da mu da da se igra.
neki dan je napravio piknik. prostro deku nasred boravka, a zvanice su bile usisivač, rezalica, mikser i ventilator. kaže on za usisivač: ovo je Beko. on je moj rođak.
i antologijska mu je od neki dan:
Mama, pitaj me šta sam radio jučer u vrtiću?
ok, šta si radio jučer u vrtiću?
Ne znam.
Klipovi nekako nisu representative ako se radi o amber, al klipovi nekako jesu representative ako se radi o dzoniju.Exclusive: Amber Heard says she’ll stand by ‘every word’ of her testimony until her ‘dying day’
In a sit-down interview with Savannah Guthrie, Amber Heard reflected on the defamation case brought forth by ex-husband Johnny Depp and what she insists is the truth.
Nearly two weeks after a jury ruled that she had defamed her ex-husband, Johnny Depp, Amber Heard continues to defend herself.
In an exclusive interview with Savannah Guthrie, airing in two parts Tuesday and Wednesday this week on TODAY and in a special Friday on Dateline, the “Aquaman” actor said she won’t back down from her testimony in court and that Depp physically and psychologically abused her.
“To my dying day (I) will stand by every word of my testimony,” Heard said in the interview regarding the former couple’s high-profile defamation case.
The six-week trial saw the couple’s lawyers sift through and scrutinize the darkest moments of their relationship. For his part, Depp sought to absolve himself of allegations made by Heard in a 2018 Washington Post op-ed in which she described herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.” Though Heard never named Depp, the actor’s attorneys argued that the opinion piece referenced claims she made at the time of their 2016 divorce. Depp has denied all allegations of abuse.
Depp sued Heard for $50 million, claiming the accusations in the op-ed impacted his career. Heard countersued for $100 million, claiming Depp’s former lawyer defamed her when he called her claims of abuse “a hoax.”
The seven-person jury ultimately ruled in Depp’s favor after finding “clear and convincing evidence” that Heard defamed him. He was awarded $15 million in compensatory and punitive damages. A judge reduced the punitive damages, making the total $10.4 million. Heard was awarded $2 million when the jury found Depp’s lawyer defamed her on one count.
Speaking to Heard, Savannah touched on the toll of audio recordings presented to the jury to corroborate both Heard and Depp’s testimonies. Those recordings became a central talking point online and in the courtroom, as Depp’s legal team called into question Heard’s credibility.
“I am looking at a transcript that says — he says, ‘You start physical fights,’ And you say, ‘I did start a physical fight. I can’t promise you I won’t get physical again,’” Savannah read, adding, “This is in black and white. I understand context. But you’re testifying, and you’re telling me today, ‘I never started a physical fight,’ and here you are on tape saying you did.”
In response, Heard reiterated her testimony during the trial in which she claimed to only become physical with her ex-husband when trying to defend herself.
“As I testified on the stand about this, is that when your life is at risk, not only will you take the blame for things that you shouldn’t take the blame for. But when you’re in an abusive dynamic, psychologically, emotionally and physically, you don’t have the resources that, say, you or I do, with the luxury of saying, ‘Hey, this is black and white,’” she replied. “Because it’s anything but when you’re living in it.”
Following up with Heard’s assertion that she only became physical in response to violence, Savannah pointed to another tape that came up during the trial.
“You’re taunting him and saying, ‘Oh, tell the world, Johnny Depp, I, a man, am a victim of domestic violence,’” Savannah said of the audio.
“Twenty-second clips or the transcripts of them are not representative of even the two hours or the three hours that those clips are excerpt(ed) from,” Heard replied.
Directing the interview to the closing arguments, Savannah touched on a moment in which Depp’s lawyer called Heard’s testimony the “performance of a lifetime” and accused her of acting for the jury.
“Says the lawyer for the man who convinced the world he had scissors for fingers?” Heard remarked in reference to the 1990 film “Edward Scissorhands” in which Depp starred. “I had listened to weeks of testimony — insinuating that or saying quite directly that, you know, I’m a terrible actress. So I’m a bit confused how I could be both.”
Heard and Savannah also spoke about the First Amendment, a right the actor lamented on an Instagram that she felt she’d lost as a result of the trial.
“Here’s the thing about the First Amendment: The First Amendment protects free speech. It doesn’t protect lies that amount to defamation, and that was the issue in the case,” Savannah noted, emphasizing that truth was at the heart of the trial and what the jury was tasked with determining.
“And that’s all I spoke. And I spoke it to power,” Heard replied. “And I paid the price.”
https://www.today.com/today/amp/rcna33338
Šta očekivati drugo od lažljive kuje.Niemand wrote: ↑15/06/2022 12:35Klipovi nekako nisu representative ako se radi o amber, al klipovi nekako jesu representative ako se radi o dzoniju.Exclusive: Amber Heard says she’ll stand by ‘every word’ of her testimony until her ‘dying day’
In a sit-down interview with Savannah Guthrie, Amber Heard reflected on the defamation case brought forth by ex-husband Johnny Depp and what she insists is the truth.
Nearly two weeks after a jury ruled that she had defamed her ex-husband, Johnny Depp, Amber Heard continues to defend herself.
In an exclusive interview with Savannah Guthrie, airing in two parts Tuesday and Wednesday this week on TODAY and in a special Friday on Dateline, the “Aquaman” actor said she won’t back down from her testimony in court and that Depp physically and psychologically abused her.
“To my dying day (I) will stand by every word of my testimony,” Heard said in the interview regarding the former couple’s high-profile defamation case.
The six-week trial saw the couple’s lawyers sift through and scrutinize the darkest moments of their relationship. For his part, Depp sought to absolve himself of allegations made by Heard in a 2018 Washington Post op-ed in which she described herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.” Though Heard never named Depp, the actor’s attorneys argued that the opinion piece referenced claims she made at the time of their 2016 divorce. Depp has denied all allegations of abuse.
Depp sued Heard for $50 million, claiming the accusations in the op-ed impacted his career. Heard countersued for $100 million, claiming Depp’s former lawyer defamed her when he called her claims of abuse “a hoax.”
The seven-person jury ultimately ruled in Depp’s favor after finding “clear and convincing evidence” that Heard defamed him. He was awarded $15 million in compensatory and punitive damages. A judge reduced the punitive damages, making the total $10.4 million. Heard was awarded $2 million when the jury found Depp’s lawyer defamed her on one count.
Speaking to Heard, Savannah touched on the toll of audio recordings presented to the jury to corroborate both Heard and Depp’s testimonies. Those recordings became a central talking point online and in the courtroom, as Depp’s legal team called into question Heard’s credibility.
“I am looking at a transcript that says — he says, ‘You start physical fights,’ And you say, ‘I did start a physical fight. I can’t promise you I won’t get physical again,’” Savannah read, adding, “This is in black and white. I understand context. But you’re testifying, and you’re telling me today, ‘I never started a physical fight,’ and here you are on tape saying you did.”
In response, Heard reiterated her testimony during the trial in which she claimed to only become physical with her ex-husband when trying to defend herself.
“As I testified on the stand about this, is that when your life is at risk, not only will you take the blame for things that you shouldn’t take the blame for. But when you’re in an abusive dynamic, psychologically, emotionally and physically, you don’t have the resources that, say, you or I do, with the luxury of saying, ‘Hey, this is black and white,’” she replied. “Because it’s anything but when you’re living in it.”
Following up with Heard’s assertion that she only became physical in response to violence, Savannah pointed to another tape that came up during the trial.
“You’re taunting him and saying, ‘Oh, tell the world, Johnny Depp, I, a man, am a victim of domestic violence,’” Savannah said of the audio.
“Twenty-second clips or the transcripts of them are not representative of even the two hours or the three hours that those clips are excerpt(ed) from,” Heard replied.
Directing the interview to the closing arguments, Savannah touched on a moment in which Depp’s lawyer called Heard’s testimony the “performance of a lifetime” and accused her of acting for the jury.
“Says the lawyer for the man who convinced the world he had scissors for fingers?” Heard remarked in reference to the 1990 film “Edward Scissorhands” in which Depp starred. “I had listened to weeks of testimony — insinuating that or saying quite directly that, you know, I’m a terrible actress. So I’m a bit confused how I could be both.”
Heard and Savannah also spoke about the First Amendment, a right the actor lamented on an Instagram that she felt she’d lost as a result of the trial.
“Here’s the thing about the First Amendment: The First Amendment protects free speech. It doesn’t protect lies that amount to defamation, and that was the issue in the case,” Savannah noted, emphasizing that truth was at the heart of the trial and what the jury was tasked with determining.
“And that’s all I spoke. And I spoke it to power,” Heard replied. “And I paid the price.”
https://www.today.com/today/amp/rcna33338
