Forum Klix.ba

Zahuktalo se.

KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑05/11/2021 17:47

Hakiz wrote: ↑05/11/2021 16:11 Te koje od muškarca naprave pravog su najbolje.

Napravi me boljim, a onda ja odem sa onom čija klasa nisam bio dok me ova nije poboljšala. A njoj ostanem vječno zahvalan.

Ovo je obična izmišljotina.

Hoš probat?

ljubicasti limun wrote: ↑05/11/2021 16:11

murga225883 wrote: ↑05/11/2021 14:49

A ko zapocinje man right activists?

Pa men's right activists Jer ne mogu naci zenu, pa se bune jer im se oduzima pravo na to da prisile zenu da budu s njima.

Analogija ti je slicna onoj da se nacisti bune zbog recimo pokreta otpora u Francuskoj ili u Varsavskom getu.

Kakva analogija, o čemu pričaš? Reče čovjek da feministkinje nemaju muda da učestvuju u ratovima ,nešto u tom smislu. Glupljeg komentara na temu ženskih prava od tog 'muškarci ginu u ratu' ne može biti. Ali stvarno. Da ne traćim vrijeme. Poplava

Tito_i_Partija wrote: ↑05/11/2021 16:01

piupiu wrote: ↑05/11/2021 02:20

Ne vidim da feministkinje zpočinju ratove? Have I missed something?

Yes, you have missed something.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condoleezza_Rice

Rice was a proponent of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. After Iraq delivered its declaration of weapons of mass destruction to the United Nations on December 8, 2002, Rice wrote an editorial for The New York Times entitled "Why We Know Iraq Is Lying".[71] In a January 10, 2003, interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Rice made headlines by stating regarding Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's nuclear capabilities: "The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."[72]

In October 2003, Rice was named to run the Iraq Stabilization Group, to "quell violence in Iraq and Afghanistan and to speed the reconstruction of both countries."[73] By May 2004, The Washington Post reported that the council had become virtually nonexistent.[74]

Leading up to the 2004 presidential election, Rice became the first National Security Advisor to campaign for an incumbent president. She stated that while: "Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with the klix attacks on America, Saddam Hussein's Iraq was a part of the Middle East that was festering and unstable, [and] was part of the circumstances that created the problem on September 11."[75]

E, moram priznati da ti je ta dobra

Sve zapadne feministkinje koje su podržavale ratove na Bliskom istoku su posebna priča. Samo što su Condolezza i Colin Powell (ne znam je l' i on bio feministkinja) takva rijetkost, devijacija takorekuć, medju klikom koja odlučuje i hajruje na ratovima da im to možeš otpisati na strukturalnu devijaciju.

moonca wrote: ↑05/11/2021 16:13 uvijek se doceka .na nogama..

Fakat

piupiu wrote: ↑05/11/2021 23:04

ljubicasti limun wrote: ↑05/11/2021 16:11

Pa men's right activists Jer ne mogu naci zenu, pa se bune jer im se oduzima pravo na to da prisile zenu da budu s njima.

Analogija ti je slicna onoj da se nacisti bune zbog recimo pokreta otpora u Francuskoj ili u Varsavskom getu.

Kakva analogija, o čemu pričaš? Reče čovjek da feministkinje nemaju muda da učestvuju u ratovima ,nešto u tom smislu. Glupljeg komentara na temu ženskih prava od tog 'muškarci ginu u ratu' ne može biti. Ali stvarno. Da ne traćim vrijeme. Poplava

Ako hoćeš baš da se pošteno ismiješ (ili isplačeš, zavisi od perspektive), otiđi na temu "Pitanje za ženomrsce", tu se osim o (muškim) ratovima pričalo i o muškoj nadmoći jer štite žene od provalnika u kući, sami nosaju frižidere itd...sve u svemu, diskusija je baš bila "na nivou"

KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑05/11/2021 17:45

piupiu wrote: ↑05/11/2021 15:55

Jednim udarcem ubiješ i poštovanje i strast. Pljas!

Kao iz viceva o oralcu i ljubljenju djece.

Jao, imaju dvije genijalne scene u "Analyse this" na ovu temu, ne mogu da nadjem onu o ljubljenu djece

piupiu wrote: ↑29/10/2021 15:51 Je l' ovo Nikola čitao forum?

Čega se lik dosjetio da uzima pare zapadnim ambasadama.

žene, feminizam vam želi oduzeti ovakve scene

piupiu wrote: ↑06/11/2021 00:41

KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑05/11/2021 17:45

Kao iz viceva o oralcu i ljubljenju djece.

Jao, imaju dvije genijalne scene u "Analyse this" na ovu temu, ne mogu da nadjem onu o ljubljenu djece

Hakiz wrote: ↑05/11/2021 21:59

KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑05/11/2021 17:47

Ovo je obična izmišljotina.

Hoš probat?

To su gluposti

Al' mogu probati na tebi, pod faktorom rizika.

saint_mirad wrote: ↑06/11/2021 09:01 žene, feminizam vam želi oduzeti ovakve scene

Inače, ovo bi po feminizmu bila "toksična muškost". Patrijarhalni obrazac ponašanja po kojem muškarac doživljava ženu inferiornom.

saint_mirad wrote: ↑06/11/2021 09:01 žene, feminizam vam želi oduzeti ovakve scene

Hahahahahah sah mat

saint_mirad wrote: ↑06/11/2021 09:01 žene, feminizam vam želi oduzeti ovakve scene

Ne, to želi radikalni feminizam.

saint_mirad wrote: ↑06/11/2021 09:01 žene, feminizam vam želi oduzeti ovakve scene

Auuu, u kost.

KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 09:50

Hakiz wrote: ↑05/11/2021 21:59

Hoš probat?

To su gluposti

Al' mogu probati na tebi, pod faktorom rizika.

Ko rizikuje

Ja sam spreman na sve eventualnosti, pa ako smiješ...

Hakiz wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:24

KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 09:50

To su gluposti

Al' mogu probati na tebi, pod faktorom rizika.

Ko rizikuje

Ja sam spreman na sve eventualnosti, pa ako smiješ...

Soften je Mekušac

Weaken je Slabić

Da li si i dalje spreman na rizik.

KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:43

Hakiz wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:24

Ko rizikuje

Ja sam spreman na sve eventualnosti, pa ako smiješ...

Soften je Mekušac

Weaken je Slabić

Da li si i dalje spreman na rizik.

Sammo ti probaj, pa šta bude

Hakiz wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:45

KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:43

Soften je Mekušac

Weaken je Slabić

Da li si i dalje spreman na rizik.

Sammo ti probaj, pa šta bude

Nemam ni ja iskustva u tome.

Bit ćeš mi ZekoPlejMen ( čitaj: seksi ime za PokusniKunić)

KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:48

Hakiz wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:45

Sammo ti probaj, pa šta bude

Nemam ni ja iskustva u tome.

Bit ćeš mi ZekoPlejMen ( čitaj: seksi ime za PokusniKunić)

Da na kraju ti ne završiš kao Honey Bunny

Učićemo zajedno

Hakiz wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:53

KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:48

Nemam ni ja iskustva u tome.

Bit ćeš mi ZekoPlejMen ( čitaj: seksi ime za PokusniKunić)

Da na kraju ti ne završiš kao Honey Bunny

Učićemo zajedno

Hakiz wrote: ↑06/11/2021 13:07

sjetih se jednog dobrog eseja sa fakultetskih dana


IF MEN COULD MENSTRUATE (Gloria Steinem, skraćena verzija)



What would happen, for instance, if suddenly, magically, men could menstruate and women could not?

The answer is clear—menstruation would become an enviable, boast-worthy, masculine event:

Men would brag about how long and how much.

Boys would mark the onset of menses, that longed-for proof of manhood, with religious ritual and stag parties.

Congress would fund a National Institute of Dysmenorrhea to help stamp out monthly discomforts.

Sanitary supplies would be federally funded and free.

Military men, right-wing politicians, and religious fundamentalists would cite menstruation (“men-struation”) as proof that only men could serve in the Army (“you have to give blood to take blood”), occupy political office (“can women be aggressive without that steadfast cycle governed by the planet Mars?”), be priests and ministers (“how could a woman give her blood for our sins?”) or rabbis (“without the monthly loss of impurities, women remain unclean”).

Male radicals, left-wing politicians, and mystics, however, would insist that women are equal, just different, and that any woman could enter their ranks if she were willing to self-inflict a major wound every month (“you MUST give blood for the revolution”), recognize the preeminence of menstrual issues, or subordinate her selfness to all men in their Cycle of Enlightenment. Street guys would brag (“I’m a three pad man”) or answer praise from a buddy (“Man, you lookin’ good!”) by giving fives and saying, “Yeah, man, I’m on the rag!” TV shows would treat the subject at length. So would newspapers. (SHARK SCARE THREATENS MENSTRUATING MEN. JUDGE CITES MONTHLY STRESS IN PARDONING RAPIST.) And movies. Men would convince women that intercourse was more pleasurable at “that time of the month.” Lesbians would be said to fear blood and therefore life itself—though probably only because they needed a good menstruating man.

Of course, male intellectuals would offer the most moral and logical arguments. How could a woman master any discipline that demanded a sense of time, space, mathematics, or measurement, for instance, without that in-built gift for measuring the cycles of the moon and planets—and thus for measuring anything at all? In the rarefied fields of philosophy and religion, could women compensate for missing the rhythm of the universe? Or for their lack of symbolic death-and-resurrection every month?

In fact, if men could menstruate, the power justifications could probably go on forever.

If we let them.