Danasnji "feminizam"
-
Hakiz
- Posts: 48335
- Joined: 30/07/2015 20:01
#17527 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Hoš probat?
- piupiu
- Posts: 16761
- Joined: 05/01/2008 05:08
#17528 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Kakva analogija, o čemu pričaš? Reče čovjek da feministkinje nemaju muda da učestvuju u ratovima ,nešto u tom smislu. Glupljeg komentara na temu ženskih prava od tog 'muškarci ginu u ratu' ne može biti. Ali stvarno. Da ne traćim vrijeme. Poplavaljubicasti limun wrote: ↑05/11/2021 16:11Pa men's right activistsJer ne mogu naci zenu, pa se bune jer im se oduzima pravo na to da prisile zenu da budu s njima.
Analogija ti je slicna onoj da se nacisti bune zbog recimo pokreta otpora u Francuskoj ili u Varsavskom getu.
- piupiu
- Posts: 16761
- Joined: 05/01/2008 05:08
#17529 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
E, moram priznati da ti je ta dobraTito_i_Partija wrote: ↑05/11/2021 16:01Yes, you have missed something.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condoleezza_Rice
Rice was a proponent of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. After Iraq delivered its declaration of weapons of mass destruction to the United Nations on December 8, 2002, Rice wrote an editorial for The New York Times entitled "Why We Know Iraq Is Lying".[71] In a January 10, 2003, interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Rice made headlines by stating regarding Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's nuclear capabilities: "The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."[72]
In October 2003, Rice was named to run the Iraq Stabilization Group, to "quell violence in Iraq and Afghanistan and to speed the reconstruction of both countries."[73] By May 2004, The Washington Post reported that the council had become virtually nonexistent.[74]
Leading up to the 2004 presidential election, Rice became the first National Security Advisor to campaign for an incumbent president. She stated that while: "Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with the klix attacks on America, Saddam Hussein's Iraq was a part of the Middle East that was festering and unstable, [and] was part of the circumstances that created the problem on September 11."[75]
Sve zapadne feministkinje koje su podržavale ratove na Bliskom istoku su posebna priča. Samo što su Condolezza i Colin Powell (ne znam je l' i on bio feministkinja) takva rijetkost, devijacija takorekuć, medju klikom koja odlučuje i hajruje na ratovima da im to možeš otpisati na strukturalnu devijaciju.
- piupiu
- Posts: 16761
- Joined: 05/01/2008 05:08
-
no_sikiriki
- Posts: 24476
- Joined: 11/12/2012 13:21
#17531 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Ako hoćeš baš da se pošteno ismiješ (ili isplačeš, zavisi od perspektive), otiđi na temu "Pitanje za ženomrsce", tu se osim o (muškim) ratovima pričalo i o muškoj nadmoći jer štite žene od provalnika u kući, sami nosaju frižidere itd...sve u svemu, diskusija je baš bila "na nivou"piupiu wrote: ↑05/11/2021 23:04Kakva analogija, o čemu pričaš? Reče čovjek da feministkinje nemaju muda da učestvuju u ratovima ,nešto u tom smislu. Glupljeg komentara na temu ženskih prava od tog 'muškarci ginu u ratu' ne može biti. Ali stvarno. Da ne traćim vrijeme. Poplavaljubicasti limun wrote: ↑05/11/2021 16:11
Pa men's right activistsJer ne mogu naci zenu, pa se bune jer im se oduzima pravo na to da prisile zenu da budu s njima.
Analogija ti je slicna onoj da se nacisti bune zbog recimo pokreta otpora u Francuskoj ili u Varsavskom getu.
- piupiu
- Posts: 16761
- Joined: 05/01/2008 05:08
#17532 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Jao, imaju dvije genijalne scene u "Analyse this" na ovu temu, ne mogu da nadjem onu o ljubljenu djece
- Artest
- Posts: 3942
- Joined: 12/05/2012 17:04
- saint_mirad
- Posts: 4409
- Joined: 25/02/2020 23:09
#17534 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
žene, feminizam vam želi oduzeti ovakve scene


-
KraljicaIzJajca
- Posts: 5744
- Joined: 02/06/2021 10:04
#17535 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
-
KraljicaIzJajca
- Posts: 5744
- Joined: 02/06/2021 10:04
#17536 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
- Nowicki
- Posts: 340
- Joined: 07/05/2020 15:20
#17537 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Inače, ovo bi po feminizmu bila "toksična muškost". Patrijarhalni obrazac ponašanja po kojem muškarac doživljava ženu inferiornom.
- un1ted
- Posts: 9957
- Joined: 20/10/2012 13:29
- Location: Tema onih koji zaradjuju do 500KM viewtopic.php?f=77&t=82867&p=17676078#p17676
#17538 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Hahahahahah sah mat
-
KraljicaIzJajca
- Posts: 5744
- Joined: 02/06/2021 10:04
#17539 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Ne, to želi radikalni feminizam.
- S4mpion
- Posts: 19317
- Joined: 24/11/2011 21:16
-
Hakiz
- Posts: 48335
- Joined: 30/07/2015 20:01
#17541 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Ko rizikujeKraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 09:50To su gluposti
Al' mogu probati na tebi, pod faktorom rizika.
![]()
Ja sam spreman na sve eventualnosti, pa ako smiješ...
-
KraljicaIzJajca
- Posts: 5744
- Joined: 02/06/2021 10:04
#17542 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Soften je MekušacHakiz wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:24Ko rizikujeKraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 09:50
To su gluposti
Al' mogu probati na tebi, pod faktorom rizika.
![]()
![]()
Ja sam spreman na sve eventualnosti, pa ako smiješ...![]()
Weaken je Slabić
Da li si i dalje spreman na rizik.
-
Hakiz
- Posts: 48335
- Joined: 30/07/2015 20:01
#17543 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Sammo ti probaj, pa šta budeKraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:43Soften je Mekušac
Weaken je Slabić
Da li si i dalje spreman na rizik.![]()
-
KraljicaIzJajca
- Posts: 5744
- Joined: 02/06/2021 10:04
#17544 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Nemam ni ja iskustva u tome.Hakiz wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:45Sammo ti probaj, pa šta budeKraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:43
Soften je Mekušac
Weaken je Slabić
Da li si i dalje spreman na rizik.![]()
![]()
Bit ćeš mi ZekoPlejMen ( čitaj: seksi ime za PokusniKunić)
-
Hakiz
- Posts: 48335
- Joined: 30/07/2015 20:01
#17545 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Da na kraju ti ne završiš kao Honey BunnyKraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:48Nemam ni ja iskustva u tome.![]()
Bit ćeš mi ZekoPlejMen ( čitaj: seksi ime za PokusniKunić)![]()
Učićemo zajedno
-
KraljicaIzJajca
- Posts: 5744
- Joined: 02/06/2021 10:04
#17546 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Hakiz wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:53Da na kraju ti ne završiš kao Honey BunnyKraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/11/2021 12:48
Nemam ni ja iskustva u tome.![]()
Bit ćeš mi ZekoPlejMen ( čitaj: seksi ime za PokusniKunić)![]()
![]()
Učićemo zajedno![]()
-
KraljicaIzJajca
- Posts: 5744
- Joined: 02/06/2021 10:04
-
no_sikiriki
- Posts: 24476
- Joined: 11/12/2012 13:21
#17550 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
sjetih se jednog dobrog eseja sa fakultetskih dana
IF MEN COULD MENSTRUATE (Gloria Steinem, skraćena verzija)
What would happen, for instance, if suddenly, magically, men could menstruate and women could not?
The answer is clear—menstruation would become an enviable, boast-worthy, masculine event:
Men would brag about how long and how much.
Boys would mark the onset of menses, that longed-for proof of manhood, with religious ritual and stag parties.
Congress would fund a National Institute of Dysmenorrhea to help stamp out monthly discomforts.
Sanitary supplies would be federally funded and free.
Military men, right-wing politicians, and religious fundamentalists would cite menstruation (“men-struation”) as proof that only men could serve in the Army (“you have to give blood to take blood”), occupy political office (“can women be aggressive without that steadfast cycle governed by the planet Mars?”), be priests and ministers (“how could a woman give her blood for our sins?”) or rabbis (“without the monthly loss of impurities, women remain unclean”).
Male radicals, left-wing politicians, and mystics, however, would insist that women are equal, just different, and that any woman could enter their ranks if she were willing to self-inflict a major wound every month (“you MUST give blood for the revolution”), recognize the preeminence of menstrual issues, or subordinate her selfness to all men in their Cycle of Enlightenment. Street guys would brag (“I’m a three pad man”) or answer praise from a buddy (“Man, you lookin’ good!”) by giving fives and saying, “Yeah, man, I’m on the rag!” TV shows would treat the subject at length. So would newspapers. (SHARK SCARE THREATENS MENSTRUATING MEN. JUDGE CITES MONTHLY STRESS IN PARDONING RAPIST.) And movies. Men would convince women that intercourse was more pleasurable at “that time of the month.” Lesbians would be said to fear blood and therefore life itself—though probably only because they needed a good menstruating man.
Of course, male intellectuals would offer the most moral and logical arguments. How could a woman master any discipline that demanded a sense of time, space, mathematics, or measurement, for instance, without that in-built gift for measuring the cycles of the moon and planets—and thus for measuring anything at all? In the rarefied fields of philosophy and religion, could women compensate for missing the rhythm of the universe? Or for their lack of symbolic death-and-resurrection every month?
In fact, if men could menstruate, the power justifications could probably go on forever.
If we let them.
IF MEN COULD MENSTRUATE (Gloria Steinem, skraćena verzija)
What would happen, for instance, if suddenly, magically, men could menstruate and women could not?
The answer is clear—menstruation would become an enviable, boast-worthy, masculine event:
Men would brag about how long and how much.
Boys would mark the onset of menses, that longed-for proof of manhood, with religious ritual and stag parties.
Congress would fund a National Institute of Dysmenorrhea to help stamp out monthly discomforts.
Sanitary supplies would be federally funded and free.
Military men, right-wing politicians, and religious fundamentalists would cite menstruation (“men-struation”) as proof that only men could serve in the Army (“you have to give blood to take blood”), occupy political office (“can women be aggressive without that steadfast cycle governed by the planet Mars?”), be priests and ministers (“how could a woman give her blood for our sins?”) or rabbis (“without the monthly loss of impurities, women remain unclean”).
Male radicals, left-wing politicians, and mystics, however, would insist that women are equal, just different, and that any woman could enter their ranks if she were willing to self-inflict a major wound every month (“you MUST give blood for the revolution”), recognize the preeminence of menstrual issues, or subordinate her selfness to all men in their Cycle of Enlightenment. Street guys would brag (“I’m a three pad man”) or answer praise from a buddy (“Man, you lookin’ good!”) by giving fives and saying, “Yeah, man, I’m on the rag!” TV shows would treat the subject at length. So would newspapers. (SHARK SCARE THREATENS MENSTRUATING MEN. JUDGE CITES MONTHLY STRESS IN PARDONING RAPIST.) And movies. Men would convince women that intercourse was more pleasurable at “that time of the month.” Lesbians would be said to fear blood and therefore life itself—though probably only because they needed a good menstruating man.
Of course, male intellectuals would offer the most moral and logical arguments. How could a woman master any discipline that demanded a sense of time, space, mathematics, or measurement, for instance, without that in-built gift for measuring the cycles of the moon and planets—and thus for measuring anything at all? In the rarefied fields of philosophy and religion, could women compensate for missing the rhythm of the universe? Or for their lack of symbolic death-and-resurrection every month?
In fact, if men could menstruate, the power justifications could probably go on forever.
If we let them.


