izvrsni direktor wrote: ↑27/08/2023 19:11
_BataZiv_0809 wrote: ↑27/08/2023 17:07
Oj hljebe. Ne samo da ti treba tamosnji fakultet, nego i drzavljastvo ako hoces u advokaturu (za Austriju znam pouzdano. Zavrsis fax u Becu, ali mozes samo u arbitrazama zastupat).
Drugo je advokatura jbg.
Prijatelj je kao pravnik se sljepao po bosni u projektima oko ljudskih prava, dobro poznate jan zlatan k ublehe. Otisao u njemacku gdje radi kao pravnik u nekoj crkvenoj organizaciji na projektima borbe za ljudska prava i inkluziciju azilanata. Obzirom da je placen po tarifnom ugovoru, bukvalno mu je print screen sa anabin stranice bio dovoljan da bude placen kao pravnik.
Moguce jasta, ali valja imati radno iskustvo i biti sposoban u svojoj oblasti.
mozda u nekom NGO
Evo primjer, moze i
@_BataZiv_0809 baciti oko
https://www.taylorwessing.com/de/insigh ... german-law
No limitation/exclusion for gross negligence (Keine Ausschlüsse für grobe Fahrlässigkeit); gross negligence is understood as the infringement to an unusually high degree of the required due diligence and the non-observance of what should have been evident to anyone in the present case (Wurmnest, Münchner Kommentar zum BGB, Vol. 2, 7th Edition 2016, § 309 No. 7 nos. 20). Although § 309 No. 7 lit. b German Civil Code in general only applies to B2C agreements, it is recognized by German Courts that the provision itself is an indicator for an unreasonable disadvantage in the sense of § 307 German Civil Code, meaning that such clauses are mostly invalid in B2B terms and conditions as well (BGH, Judgement of 19-06-2013, VIII ZR 183/12 = NJW 2014, 211; BGH, Judgement of 19-09-2007, VIII ZR 141/06 = NJW 2007, 3774; Wurmnest, Münchner Kommentar zum BGB, Vol. 2, 7th edition 2016, § 309 No. 7 nos. 33; Grüneberg, Palandt, 76th Edition 2016, § 309 nos. 55).
Another – frequently recommended – alternative could be Swiss law since Swiss law does not provide for any control of standard terms or general terms and conditions by law or jurisdiction (provided that it does not deal with consumer products). Swiss law might have the disadvantage that it is not possible in agreements (no matter if individual agreements or standard terms) to exclude or reduce liability for intent and gross negligence (whereas in Germany the threshold is for intent only). But in all other cases, even in standard clauses and general terms and conditions, more modifications would be possible than under German law.
Another alternative, frequently cited, is the use of Austrian law since Austrian jurisdiction is not as strict as German law with respect to control of standard clauses and general terms and conditions; nevertheless, Austrian law does provide for such control, but the jurisdiction is not as detailed as in Germany.
I recimo napraviti uporedni prikaz za naš pravni okvir...
Ljudska prava su univerzalna i time se može baviti i na engleskom jeziku. NGO i ta veselja.
On kao pravnik iz BiH u Njemačkom bi prvo morao da savlada pravni registar (to su ovi pravni izrazi koji se uče i na bosanskom jeziku), onda iščita zakone jer se razlikuju (neki manje, neki više), pa slučajeve kao što je navedeno...
Građansko pravo da li je u potnuposti isto..hajd ovi što se presele iz BiH u Austirjupa se i mogu prisjetiti Građanskog zakonika...
