#101 Re: Be afraid, be very afraid
Posted: 09/02/2023 22:03
Čini se da AI takeover neće biti u Terminator fazonu. 

Pa ako preuzimaju onlyfans, prije će biti da nas žele izjebati do nestanka, nego li samo terminisati. Što je, meni lično, sasvim ok.


Koja banka u BiH obradjuje podatke koristeci AI?Hakiz wrote: ↑05/02/2023 15:18Ne možeš biti siguran da ti podaci neće biti zloupotrebljeni kada ih daješ državnoj instituciji, a kamoli privatnoj firmi. Uostalom, dao si već podatke privatnoj firmi koja ih obrađuje koristeći AI, to jeste banci. A vjerovatno ne samo njoj.
Jedino možeš izabrati čija zloupotreba tvojih podataka ti manje smeta pa tome daš podatke, a onome za koga ne želiš da ih zloupotrebljava ne daješ. A da će na neki, benigniji ili maligniji način biti zloupotrebljeni, kome god ih daš, možeš biti skoro siguran.

Pa ima logike. Covjek trosi resurse i zagadjuje, pa manje ljudi - manje zagadjenja.Njanjavi wrote: ↑02/04/2023 00:44 https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/03/3 ... p-climate-
Retard se rokno. Neki ludak iz belgije bio nafuran lose oko klime i heftama prico sa nekim chat botom i mic po mic udje mu pod kozu i drz ga nedaj naumpadne budaletini da predloži botu da ona spasi planetu od klime ako se on zrtvuje i rokne se.
I bot ucini nešto najpametnije sto je mogao, ohrabri retarda i lik se rokne.
Treba vise ovoga da pomogne naturalnu selekciju hljeba mi![]()
Ne znas ti to koristiti ljudino.tranquil wrote: ↑16/04/2023 16:25 Probao sam, ovo je navikano i više nego što sam mislio. Zamolio sam ga da generiše par filmskih review-a za klasike kao što su "Kum", "Apokalipsa danas" ili "Klub boraca", ali u stilu Mrenice. On to nije uradio, nego je napravio neke koherentne, pismene, i lične politike lišene review-e, koji nisu bili plagijati drugih.
Here is GPT-4's answer (first try and unedited). Some people say, GPT-4 performs an elaborate form of pattern recognition and cannot reason. Do you think so, too? Note that the result is correct (which is quite remarkable, given the nature and difficulty of the puzzle), but that there are some subtle errors in the argumentation. It's the kind of errors also a human might make. That is very interesting."Alice and Bob are each given a number, 1 / (x + 3), where x is a positive integer. Both know only their number and know that the two numbers are different. The following conversation ensues, in which both always tell the truth:
Mysterious voice: Which one of you has the bigger number?
Alice: I don't know
Bob: Me neither
Alice: Still no idea
Bob: Now I know
Alice: Now I even know both numbers
What is the reciprocal of the product of the two numbers?"
Ig you are interested in this, you might enjoy reading https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712 . There is also presentation by the first author of that paper on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbIk7-JPB2c"Let's break down the conversation and try to deduce the numbers:
Alice and Bob are each given a number in the form 1 / (x + 3), where x is a positive integer.
Alice and Bob know that the two numbers are different.
Mysterious voice: which one of you has the bigger number?
Alice: I don't know
Since Alice doesn't know, it means her number can't be the smallest possible (1/4, when x = 1), because then she would be certain that Bob's number is smaller. So Alice's number must be in the form 1/(x + 3) where x > 1.
Bob: Me neither
Bob also doesn't know, which means his number can't be the smallest possible number given that Alice's number can't be 1/4. So the smallest possible number for Bob would be 1/5 (when x = 2). Therefore, Bob's number must be in the form 1/(x + 3) where x > 2.
Alice: Still no idea
Alice still doesn't know, which means her number can't be the smallest possible number given the information that Bob's number is in the form 1/(x + 3) where x > 2. So the smallest possible number for Alice would be 1/6 (when x = 3). Therefore, Alice's number must be in the form 1/(x + 3) where x > 3.
Bob: Now I know
At this point, Bob can determine his number. Given that Alice's number must be in the form 1/(x + 3) where x > 3, the smallest possible number for Alice would be 1/7 (when x = 4). Now, if Bob's number was also in the form 1/(x + 3) where x > 4, he would still not be able to tell which number is bigger. However, since he knows, it means his number must be 1/6 (when x = 3).
Alice: Now I even know both numbers
Now that Alice knows that Bob has figured out his number, she can deduce that Bob's number must be 1/6. And since Alice and Bob have different numbers, and Alice's number must be in the form 1/(x + 3) where x > 3, her number must be the next smallest possible, which is 1/7 (when x = 4).
So, Alice's number is 1/7 and Bob's number is 1/6. To find the reciprocal of the product of the two numbers, we first calculate the product:
(1/7) * (1/6) = 1/42
Now, we find the reciprocal of the product:
1 / (1/42) = 42
Thus, the reciprocal of the product of the two numbers is 42."