Škobo Habu wrote: ↑15/12/2025 13:29
Haris.ba wrote: ↑15/12/2025 12:49
Kao neko ko se nije zelio izjasniti se deklarises. Ne gubis identitet time sto ga ne zelis reci. Pa i u ovom sistemu.
Nije da on nije pripadnik nekog naroda. Ocito je Hrvat.
Samo, nije htio da to njegovo izjasnjavanje odredjuje za koga moze glasati, i ko za njega moze glasati.
Ovakav pristup samo funkcioniše u kakvom paralelnom univerzumu.
Na kraju, rezultat njegove apelacije sve kaže.
Postavim zakon, postavim dijelove iz presude. Dzaba. Slijepo kod ociju.
Rezultat apelacije je takav da nije ni razmatrana u sustini jer je Slavenov zahtjev proglasen za actio popularis.
Pa cak, ni tada nisu smjeli biti tako bezobrazni da napisu da ipak diskriminacije mozda nije bilo.
Neko drugi ce opet podnijeti apelaciju. Vec se pripremaju osobe koje ce to uraditi. I onda nece pomoci ni Hrvatska kao umjesac, ni visoki predstavnik.
215. The Court does not in any way disregard the discriminatory nature of the rules governing eligibility to the House of Peoples and the Presidency from the perspective of the passive aspect of the right to vote, as already recognised in the Sejdić and Finci group of cases, which regrettably remain unexecuted to this date, and as emphasised repeatedly by many other international bodies (see paragraphs 55, 56, 57-62, 68, 70-72 above). Nor does it deny that the applicant too might have been affected by those rules to some degree. However, having regard to the considerations in the foregoing paragraphs, and particularly in the absence of a sufficient explanation as to how the impugned electoral rules had a concrete impact on the free expression of his opinion on an equal footing with the other voters with whom he compared himself, the Court finds that the applicant’s claims amount to an abstract critique of the “state of the law” of an actio popularis nature. In the Court’s view, the applicant’s elusiveness in respect of his complaints as noted in paragraphs 190-194 above may in fact be explained by his overriding concern with the general organisation of the constitutional and electoral system, as opposed to specific issues directly concerning his individual rights.