Odakle ti to da Rusi nisu gađali vladine zgrade? Stvarno notorna glupost.dječak sa šibicama wrote: ↑18/11/2024 10:12 Nema potrebe da Donald salje oruzje Moskvi, zavrne pipu Kijevu. End of story.
Posljedice ce snositi Kijev to je neminovno. Do sada Rusi nisu gadjali vladine zgrade, a vjerovanje kako oni to "ne mogu jer su slabi" je sjajna taktika, pokazalo se do sada.
Pa zna se sta je Ruski odgovor, mogu poslati Hutima nesto efektivnije, pomoci Iranu ili SK. Za Kiev nema razlike.saimidin wrote: ↑18/11/2024 10:25Čak i ako na početku daju manji broj raketa, pregovara se da ne daju više ili nikako, sada je samo pitanje šta putler baca na sto kao svoj argument u pregovaranjumadner wrote: ↑18/11/2024 09:57 Razlog zasto slabi Trumpovu poziciju je sto je ovo bila prijetnja zbog koje bi Rusi trebali pregovarati.
Jaca poziciju Zelenskom samo ako mu je i obezbjedio dovoljno raketa da moze zaprijetiti Rusima udarima po njijhovoj infrastrukturi. Trebalo je ovo uraditi prije i tako sprijeciti Ruske napade na elektrane, onda bi imalo dosta vise smisla.
djecak i njegovo vjerovanje u alternativne istočnjačke cinjenice name a more iconic piju kisnicu duodječak sa šibicama wrote: ↑18/11/2024 10:46 Pusti sporedne zgrade, zna se na sta mislim pod vladine zgrade, vrhovnu radu ili Zelenskog spavacu sobu.
Iako on odavno ne spava u njoj, vjv.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-fina ... nald-trumpOn Thursday, its stock sank on reports that the Trump transition team is planning to eliminate the seventy-five-hundred-dollar federal tax credit for E.V. buyers that the Biden Administration expanded as part of its green-industrial policy. If this cancellation stalls further adoption of E.V.s, it would seem likely to hurt Tesla—but the outlook isn’t so clear. Since Joe Biden came to office, legacy automakers like Ford and General Motors have invested heavily in new E.V.s and E.V. plants, but so far they haven’t made a huge dent in Tesla’s market share, which is still hovering at around fifty per cent. Musk now seems to be betting that eliminating the credits would prompt other automakers to cut back their expansion plans for the E.V. market, or even abandon them entirely, which would reinforce Tesla’s dominant position. “I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” he said during a July earnings call. “But, long term, probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.” On Thursday, Musk responded to the news that Trump was, indeed, moving toward eliminating the tax credits. “In my view, we should end all government subsidies, including those for EVs, oil and gas,” he wrote on X.
Looking ahead, Musk has made clear that he believes Tesla’s future hinges on its autonomous driving system, known as Autopilot, which it has been investing heavily in for years and pressing regulators to approve for a rollout. Last year, Musk said that Tesla’s high stock-market valuation was “primarily on the basis of autonomy.” But his plan to turn Tesla into a producer of driverless vehicles has run into obstacles. The day-to-day regulation of motor vehicles takes place at the state level, and Tesla, which was long based in California, has been making slow progress with lawmakers in Sacramento. Moreover, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (N.H.T.S.A.) has found that Tesla’s driver-assisted version of Autopilot contributed to hundreds of crashes and more than a dozen fatalities. The agency is now evaluating the effectiveness of a software update that Tesla issued last December.
Despite the ongoing federal investigation, during a Tesla earnings call in October, Musk called for a “federal approval process for autonomous vehicles,” which would dispense with lengthy state-by-state applications. He didn’t explain why such a system would work better for Tesla, but, given that Trump’s reëlection was in the offing, perhaps no explanation was really needed. “There will be a knock on the door for N.H.T.S.A., and it’s Musk,” Ives, the Tesla-stock bull, said. Ives predicted that switching to a federal system of regulation could speed up approval of driverless cars by at least two or three years. “This is what the stock is starting to reflect,” he added.
In another apparent paradox, Trump’s proposals to impose tariffs of up to sixty per cent on imports from China, where Tesla has its biggest factory, could also end up helping the carmaker. The new tariffs would reinforce the barriers that keep out cheap Chinese E.V.s, which I wrote about earlier this year, and which potentially represent an existential threat to all American carmakers, Tesla included. On the other hand, the tariffs could raise Tesla’s own costs. Although Tesla doesn’t import the vehicles it makes in China to the United States, it does import some of the components of its American-made cars, and their prices could rise sharply—unless, of course, the second Trump Administration granted it the same sort of carve-out from the new tariffs that the first Trump Administration granted to Apple after a personal appeal by its C.E.O., Tim Cook. Is Trump likely to grant Musk such an invaluable favor? “We have to protect our geniuses. We don’t have that many of them,” the President-elect remarked on Election Night.
Osmi Socrates wrote: ↑18/11/2024 18:02 Na kraju će Trump ubjediti MAGA idiote da voze električne aute.
Ne znam šta će MTG misliti o tome. Vjerovatno će i ona kupiti Teslu.
Gdje ja ono pročita, treba Joe oprostiti studentima
