Donald J Trump - Predsjednik USA All About

[karanana]

pa o tome i pricam. ima serija na netflixu izasla prosle godine.
pa on je platio oglas da se krivci najstrozije kazne a sud je radio kako je radio. i ta djeca su tu noc radila neke ludorije svuda po parku.

[CPT]

pa o tome i pricam. ima serija na netflixu izasla prosle godine.
pa on je platio oglas da se krivci najstrozije kazne a sud je radio kako je radio. i ta djeca su tu noc radila neke ludorije svuda po parku.

de bar procitaj oglas...

[90minut]

Bukvalno mu je post slovo za slovo tipicno onim redneck desnicarima što pišu po raznoraznim sajtovima.

[Maxxtro]

Samo jedan primjer - pitanje: Jel tebi ovo lici na nesto iskreno,korisno,znacajno ili pak na jeftino kupljenje bodova jednom saradom ?

Nije ti se loadala dobro slika, ne vidim sta je.

A sto se tice demokrata mnogo vise im se zamjera od samo ekstremne ljevice itd prizivanja komunizma. Stvari tipa free universal healthcare
(kako)

Onako kako to radi kompletan civilizovan svijet izuzev Amerike, gdje vise od 50 bankrota nije zbog medicinskih racuna, sta si ti mislio sta zagovaraju? Sta je tu ekstremno?

,inicijative poput uselimo beskucnike u prazne stanove

Strahota Bozija. Tu je to u rangu sa rasizmom.

... , defundirajmo policiju.

Sto je izjava, koja kada se ispravno kvalifikuje i tumaci unutar konteksta i nije nerazumna. Mozes se ne slagati, ali nije ekstremna ili nerazumna. Ne govori se o ukidanju policije koliko god idioti na desnici to pokusavali tumaciti i zastrasivati ljude, nego se radi u preusmjeravanju sredstava koja se koriste za militarizaciju policije i kupovanja viska vojne opreme u neke drustveno korisnije ciljeve. Vjerovao ili ne, mogu drotovi sasvim komotno nastavljati ubijati crnce i sa obicnim pistoljima.
[/quote]

Kao sto rekoh, sve su ovo stvari s kojima se mozes razumno ne slagati, ali nisu ekstremni, nego tradicionalno liberalni i progresivni stavovi. Ovo po meni nije sukob konzervativne i liberalne ideologije, jer ne bih ismijavao nekoga zbog zastupanja tradicionalno konzervativnih stavova, ma koliko se ne slagao sa njima. Jednostavno nema pandana Trumpu na ljevici, jer bi isti bio ismijan i zavrsio bi svoju karijeru i prije nego je zapocela. S druge strane imas idiota, koji kako rekoh ima dokumentovanu historiju rasizma cijim idiotima glasacima, ako nisu rasisti, to nije dealbreaker. I to cak nije ni najgori aspekt njegovog karaktera.

[MorningStar]

Nadao sam se da znas koristiti Google...

Govorio sam oglase za C.P.5 (platio je oglas u vezi crnaca). Stanovi su druga prica gdje se igrao malo rasizma. Jer ti je Google ocigledno nepoznat evo skracena verzija.

afera "stanovi"

1973: The US Department of Justice — under the Nixon administration, out of all administrations — sued the Trump Management Corporation for violating the Fair Housing Act. Federal officials found evidence that Trump had refused to rent to black tenants and lied to black applicants about whether apartments were available, among other accusations. Trump said the federal government was trying to get him to rent to welfare recipients. In the aftermath, he signed an agreement in 1975 agreeing not to discriminate to renters of color without admitting to discriminating before.

afera "oglasi"
1989: In a controversial case that’s been characterized as a modern-day lynching, four black teenagers and one Latino teenager — the “Central Park Five” — were accused of attacking and raping a jogger in New York City. Trump immediately took charge in the case, running an ad in local papers demanding, “BRING BACK THE DEATH PENALTY. BRING BACK OUR POLICE!” The teens’ convictions were later vacated after they spent seven to 13 years in prison, and the city paid $41 million in a settlement to the teens. But Trump in October 2016 said he still believes they’re guilty, despite the DNA evidence to the contrary.

druge afere:
1980s: Kip Brown, a former employee at Trump’s Castle, accused another one of Trump’s businesses of discrimination. “When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,” Brown said. “It was the eighties, I was a teenager, but I remember it: They put us all in the back.”

1991: A book by John O’Donnell, former president of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City, quoted Trump’s criticism of a black accountant: “Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day. … I think that the guy is lazy. And it’s probably not his fault, because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.” Trump at first denied the remarks, but later said in a 1997 Playboy interview that “the stuff O’Donnell wrote about me is probably true.”

1992: The Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino had to pay a $200,000 fine because it transferred black and women dealers off tables to accommodate a big-time gambler’s prejudices.

2004: In season two of The Apprentice, Trump fired Kevin Allen, a black contestant, for being overeducated. “You’re an unbelievably talented guy in terms of education, and you haven’t done anything,” Trump said on the show. “At some point you have to say, ‘That’s enough.’”

2005: Trump publicly pitched what was essentially The Apprentice: White People vs. Black People. He said he “wasn’t particularly happy” with the most recent season of his show, so he was considering “an idea that is fairly controversial — creating a team of successful African Americans versus a team of successful whites. Whether people like that idea or not, it is somewhat reflective of our very vicious world.”

2011: Trump played a big role in pushing false rumors that Obama — the country’s first black president — was not born in the US. He even sent investigators to Hawaii to look into Obama’s birth certificate. Obama later released his birth certificate, calling Trump a ”carnival barker.” (The research has found a strong correlation between “birtherism,” as this conspiracy theory is called, and racism.) Trump has reportedly continued pushing this conspiracy theory in private.

2011: While Trump suggested that Obama wasn’t born in the US, he also argued that maybe Obama wasn’t a good enough student to have gotten into Columbia or Harvard Law School, and demanded Obama release his university transcripts. Trump claimed, “I heard he was a terrible student. Terrible. How does a bad student go to Columbia and then to Harvard?”

Ajmo redom imam vremena

Ne znam ja sta je taj googlet to je nesto sta je to
1973: The US Department of Justice — under the Nixon administration, out of all administrations — sued the Trump Management Corporation Isao trump sve sa kljucevima i iznajmljivao stanove. A evo stvarnog razloga :

Trump said the federal government was trying to get him to rent to welfare recipients.

Kes kes

1989: In a controversial case that’s been characterized as a modern-day lynching, four black teenagers and one Latino teenager — the “Central Park Five” — were accused of attacking and raping a jogger in New York City. Trump immediately took charge in the case, running an ad in local papers demanding, “BRING BACK THE DEATH PENALTY. BRING BACK OUR POLICE!
- Slucaj u kojem je vecina smatrala da je pocinjeno silovanje i ubistvo - Ima li neko pravo tu na misljenje, recimo dali ti mislis da neko koga dosta ljudi kaze da je silovao po foci u ratu ako bude osudjen - bi trebao dobiti smrtnu kaznu ?

1980s: Kip Brown, a former employee at Trump’s Castle, accused another one of Trump’s businesses of discrimination. “When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,” Brown said. “It was the eighties, I was a teenager, but I remember it: They put us all in the back.” - Jel ti to sigurno znas da je trump trazio da ih maknu ? Trump je ocito rasista i to jedini u americi posebno tokom 80ih.

1991: A book by John O’Donnell, former president of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City, quoted Trump’s criticism of a black accountant: “Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day. … I think that the guy is lazy. And it’s probably not his fault, because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.” Trump at first denied the remarks, but later said in a 1997 Playboy interview that “the stuff O’Donnell wrote about me is probably true.” aham definitivno rasista , i jos cionista jer oce da mu jevreji broje kesovinu


1992: The Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino had to pay a $200,000 fine because it transferred black and women dealers off tables to accommodate a big-time gambler’s prejudices. - Trump rasista a ne teskasi koji dodju da bacaju stotine k dolara pa traze da maknu afroamerikance ? Mozda biznis kes racunaica ? Ili pak preferira da izgubi novac i otjera ove afroamerikance koji imaju vise para tu ?????


2005: Trump publicly pitched what was essentially The Apprentice: White People vs. Black People. He said he “wasn’t particularly happy” with the most recent season of his show, so he was considering “an idea that is fairly controversial — creating a team of successful African Americans versus a team of successful whites. Whether people like that idea or not, it is somewhat reflective of our very vicious world.” - sta je ovdje rasisticko... sto tvrdi da u svijetu postiji dosta rasizma i da je to zlo ???



2011: Trump played a big role in pushing false rumors that Obama — the country’s first black president — was not born in the US. He even sent investigators to Hawaii to look into Obama’s birth certificate. Obama later released his birth certificate, calling Trump a ”carnival barker.” (The research has found a strong correlation between “birtherism,” as this conspiracy theory is called, and racism.) Trump has reportedly continued pushing this conspiracy theory in private.

2011: While Trump suggested that Obama wasn’t born in the US, he also argued that maybe Obama wasn’t a good enough student to have gotten into Columbia or Harvard Law School, and demanded Obama release his university transcripts. Trump claimed, “I heard he was a terrible student. Terrible. How does a bad student go to Columbia and then to Harvard?” - ove dvije spadaju u predizbornu kampanju.


Nego sad ima li jos sta rekao ovaj da je cuo od tetke koja je pricala sa komsinicom sa sprata iznad koja se druzi sa muzem sekretarke u administraciji hotela a poznaje racunovodju...




haj ba

[CPT]

ta djeca su tu noc radila neke ludorije svuda po parku.

In 2001, Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer and serial rapist serving life in prison, confessed to officials that he had raped the female jogger. His DNA matched that found at the scene, and he provided other confirmatory evidence. He said he committed the rape alone.

In 2002 Robert Morgenthau, District Attorney for New York County, had his office conduct an investigation and recommended to the state court that the convictions of the five men on all charges be vacated. The court vacated their convictions in 2002, and the state withdrew all charges against the men.

[MorningStar]

Sto je izjava, koja kada se ispravno kvalifikuje i tumaci unutar konteksta i nije nerazumna. Mozes se ne slagati, ali nije ekstremna ili nerazumna. Ne govori se o ukidanju policije koliko god idioti na desnici to pokusavali tumaciti i zastrasivati ljude, nego se radi u preusmjeravanju sredstava koja se koriste za militarizaciju policije i kupovanja viska vojne opreme u neke drustveno korisnije ciljeve. Vjerovao ili ne, mogu drotovi sasvim komotno nastavljati ubijati crnce i sa obicnim pistoljima.

Kao sto rekoh, sve su ovo stvari s kojima se mozes razumno ne slagati, ali nisu ekstremni, nego tradicionalno liberalni i progresivni stavovi. Ovo po meni nije sukob konzervativne i liberalne ideologije, jer ne bih ismijavao nekoga zbog zastupanja tradicionalno konzervativnih stavova, ma koliko se ne slagao sa njima. Jednostavno nema pandana Trumpu na ljevici, jer bi isti bio ismijan i zavrsio bi svoju karijeru i prije nego je zapocela. S druge strane imas idiota, koji kako rekoh ima dokumentovanu historiju rasizma cijim idiotima glasacima, ako nisu rasisti, to nije dealbreaker. I to cak nije ni najgori aspekt njegovog karaktera.

Pa i imas smatrati ih liberalnim i progresivnim a nekome su ti isti stavovi uvod u unistenje amerike kakvu poznavaju - tj. za konzervatice.

Itekako je nerazumna, policija nije problem - problem je dublji socio-ekonomski problem afroamerikanaca. Koliko ima mrtvih u obracunima bandi po geto-ima i hoodovima u kojim upravo ginu afroamerikanci a rjesenje za to je .... smanjimo finansiranje policiji ??????

E to ko je idiot i sa koje strane... u principu svatko misli da je na njegovoj strani ok not great not terrible ali oni na drugoj su kompletni idioti.. i eto sta dobijemo.

[MorningStar]

ta djeca su tu noc radila neke ludorije svuda po parku.

In 2001, Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer and serial rapist serving life in prison, confessed to officials that he had raped the female jogger. His DNA matched that found at the scene, and he provided other confirmatory evidence. He said he committed the rape alone.

In 2002 Robert Morgenthau, District Attorney for New York County, had his office conduct an investigation and recommended to the state court that the convictions of the five men on all charges be vacated. The court vacated their convictions in 2002, and the state withdrew all charges against the men.

i ovaj Trump je 89'e trebao protrljati kuglu i viditi da ce 2001 netko drugi priznati iako su svi mislili da su krivi ukljucujuci i sud ???????

[Maxxtro]

• 1973: The US Department of Justice — under the Nixon administration, out of all administrations — sued the Trump Management Corporation for violating the Fair Housing Act. Federal officials found evidence that Trump had refused to rent to black tenants and lied to black applicants about whether apartments were available, among other accusations. Trump said the federal government was trying to get him to rent to welfare recipients. In the aftermath, he signed an agreement in 1975 agreeing not to discriminate to renters of color without admitting to discriminating before.
• 1980s: Kip Brown, a former employee at Trump’s Castle, accused another one of Trump’s businesses of discrimination. “When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,” Brown said. “It was the eighties, I was a teenager, but I remember it: They put us all in the back.”
• 1988: In a commencement speech at Lehigh University, Trump spent much of his speech accusing countries like Japan of “stripping the United States of economic dignity.” This matches much of his current rhetoric on China.
• 1989: In a controversial case that’s been characterized as a modern-day lynching, four black teenagers and one Latino teenager — the “Central Park Five” — were accused of attacking and raping a jogger in New York City. Trump immediately took charge in the case, running an ad in local papers demanding, “BRING BACK THE DEATH PENALTY. BRING BACK OUR POLICE!” The teens’ convictions were later vacated after they spent seven to 13 years in prison, and the city paid $41 million in a settlement to the teens. But Trump in October 2016 said he still believes they’re guilty, despite the DNA evidence to the contrary.
• 1991: A book by John O’Donnell, former president of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City, quoted Trump’s criticism of a black accountant: “Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day. … I think that the guy is lazy. And it’s probably not his fault, because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.” Trump at first denied the remarks, but later said in a 1997 Playboy interview that “the stuff O’Donnell wrote about me is probably true.”
• 1992: The Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino had to pay a $200,000 fine because it transferred black and women dealers off tables to accommodate a big-time gambler’s prejudices.
• 1993: In congressional testimony, Trump said that some Native American reservations operating casinos shouldn’t be allowed because “they don’t look like Indians to me.”
• 2000: In opposition to a casino proposed by the St. Regis Mohawk tribe, which he saw as a financial threat to his casinos in Atlantic City, Trump secretly ran a series of ads suggesting the tribe had a “record of criminal activity [that] is well documented.”
• 2004: In season two of The Apprentice, Trump fired Kevin Allen, a black contestant, for being overeducated. “You’re an unbelievably talented guy in terms of education, and you haven’t done anything,” Trump said on the show. “At some point you have to say, ‘That’s enough.’”
• 2005: Trump publicly pitched what was essentially The Apprentice: White People vs. Black People. He said he “wasn’t particularly happy” with the most recent season of his show, so he was considering “an idea that is fairly controversial — creating a team of successful African Americans versus a team of successful whites. Whether people like that idea or not, it is somewhat reflective of our very vicious world.”
• 2010: In 2010, there was a huge national controversy over the “Ground Zero Mosque” — a proposal to build a Muslim community center in Lower Manhattan, near the site of the 9/11 attacks. Trump opposed the project, calling it “insensitive,” and offered to buy out one of the investors in the project. On The Late Show With David Letterman, Trump argued, referring to Muslims, “Well, somebody’s blowing us up. Somebody’s blowing up buildings, and somebody’s doing lots of bad stuff.”
• 2011: Trump played a big role in pushing false rumors that Obama — the country’s first black president — was not born in the US. He even sent investigators to Hawaii to look into Obama’s birth certificate. Obama later released his birth certificate, calling Trump a ”carnival barker.” (The research has found a strong correlation between “birtherism,” as this conspiracy theory is called, and racism.) Trump has reportedly continued pushing this conspiracy theory in private.
• 2011: While Trump suggested that Obama wasn’t born in the US, he also argued that maybe Obama wasn’t a good enough student to have gotten into Columbia or Harvard Law School, and demanded Obama release his university transcripts. Trump claimed, “I heard he was a terrible student. Terrible. How does a bad student go to Columbia and then to Harvard?”
• Trump launched his campaign in 2015 by calling Mexican immigrants “rapists” who are “bringing crime” and “bringing drugs” to the US. His campaign was largely built on building a wall to keep these immigrants out of the US.
• As a candidate in 2015, Trump called for a ban on all Muslims coming into the US. His administration eventually implemented a significantly watered-down version of the policy.
• When asked at a 2016 Republican debate whether all 1.6 billion Muslims hate the US, Trump said, “I mean a lot of them. I mean a lot of them.”
  He argued in 2016 that Judge Gonzalo Curiel — who was overseeing the Trump University lawsuit — should recuse himself from the case because of his Mexican heritage and membership in a Latino lawyers association. House Speaker Paul Ryan, who endorsed Trump, later called such comments “the textbook definition of a racist comment.”
• Trump has been repeatedly slow to condemn white supremacists who endorse him, and he regularly retweeted messages from white supremacists and neo-Nazis during his presidential campaign.
• He tweeted and later deleted an image that showed Hillary Clinton in front of a pile of money and by a Jewish Star of David that said, “Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!” The tweet had some very obvious anti-Semitic imagery, but Trump insisted that the star was a sheriff’s badge, and said his campaign shouldn’t have deleted it.
• Trump has repeatedly referred to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) as “Pocahontas,” using her controversial — and later walked-back — claims to Native American heritage as a punchline.
• At the 2016 Republican convention, Trump officially seized the mantle of the “law and order” candidate — an obvious dog whistle playing to white fears of black crime, even though crime in the US is historically low. His speeches, comments, and executive actions after he took office have continued this line of messaging.
• In a pitch to black voters in 2016, Trump said, “You’re living in poverty, your schools are no good, you have no jobs, 58 percent of your youth is unemployed. What the hell do you have to lose?”
• Trump stereotyped a black reporter at a press conference in February 2017. When April Ryan asked him if he plans to meet and work with the Congressional Black Caucus, he repeatedly asked her to set up the meeting — even as she insisted that she’s “just a reporter.”
• In the week after white supremacist protests in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August 2017, Trump repeatedly said that “many sides” and “both sides” were to blame for the violence and chaos that ensued — suggesting that the white supremacist protesters were morally equivalent to counterprotesters that stood against racism. He also said that there were “some very fine people” among the white supremacists. All of this seemed like a dog whistle to white supremacists — and many of them took it as one, with white nationalist Richard Spencer praising Trump for “defending the truth.”
• Throughout 2017, Trump repeatedly attacked NFL players who, by kneeling or otherwise silently protesting during the national anthem, demonstrated against systemic racism in America.
• Trump reportedly said in 2017 that people who came to the US from Haiti “all have AIDS,” and he lamented that people who came to the US from Nigeria would never “go back to their huts” once they saw America. The White House denied that Trump ever made these comments.
  Speaking about immigration in a bipartisan meeting in January 2018, Trump reportedly asked, in reference to Haiti and African countries, “Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?” He then reportedly suggested that the US should take more people from countries like Norway. The implication: Immigrants from predominantly white countries are good, while immigrants from predominantly black countries are bad.
• Trump denied making the “shithole” comments, although some senators present at the meeting said they happened. The White House, meanwhile, suggested that the comments, like Trump’s remarks about the NFL protests, will play well to his base. The only connection between Trump’s remarks about the NFL protests and his “shithole” comments is race.
• Trump mocked Elizabeth Warren’s presidential campaign, again calling her “Pocahontas” in a tweet before adding, “See you on the campaign TRAIL, Liz!” The capitalized “TRAIL” is seemingly a reference to the Trail of Tears — a horrific act of ethnic cleansing in the 19th century in which Native Americans were forcibly relocated, causing thousands of deaths.
• Trump tweeted that several black and brown members of Congress — Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) — are “from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe” and that they should “go back” to those countries. It’s a common racist trope to say that black and brown people, particularly immigrants, should go back to their countries of origin. Three of four of the members of Congress whom Trump targeted were born in the US

Vecina ovih tacaka u izolaciji, uz znacajnu mentalnu gimnastiku bi se i mogla odagnati kao idiotizam kojima je on ocito vican. Ali sve zajedno, ko ne vidi da je ovaj covjek rasista je jednostavno idiot, nema smisla uljepsavati rijeci.

[MorningStar]

Joe Biden once called state-mandated school integration “the most racist concept you can come up with,” and Barack Obama “the first sort of mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean.” He was a staunch opponent of “forced busing” in the 1970s, and leading crusader for mass incarceration throughout the ‘80s and ‘90s. Uncle Joe has described African-American felons as “predators” too sociopathic to rehabilitate — and white supremacist senators as his friends.

And, as of this writing, a plurality of black Democrats want him to be their party’s 2020 nominee.

Whether Biden can retain that support, after voters learn more about his problematic past, could very well determine the outcome of the party’s primary race. To explore that question, let’s pick through the former vice-president’s hefty baggage on racial justice — and then, the case for thinking that Obama’s halo will prove to be brighter than the shadow of Biden’s record is dark.
Biden helped kill the most effective policy for improving black educational attainment that America has ever known.

Joe Biden was for desegregating America’s schools, until his constituents were against it. When the Delaware Democrat launched his first campaign for the Senate in 1972, the Supreme Court had just ruled that the Constitution required policymakers to pursue “the greatest possible degree of klix desegregation” — and that forcing white students to attend schools in black neighborhoods, and vice versa, was a legitimate means of doing so. Being an enlightened liberal, Biden began his candidacy as an advocate for such policies. He accused Republicans of demagoguing the busing issue, and appealing to white voters’ ugliest instincts.

But as his campaign progressed, and Biden discerned that the arc of history was bending toward white backlash, the young candidate bent with it. He became a caricature of a white northern liberal — arguing that forced busing was appropriate for the South (where segregation was the product of racist laws), but unnecessary for the North (where, Biden pretended, it merely reflected the preferences of the white and black communities).

Once in the Senate, Biden continued to triangulate, voting for most, though not all, f the anti-busing amendments that came before him. But for his overwhelmingly white constituents, nothing less than massive resistance to busing would suffice. The New Castle County Neighborhood Schools Association booed Biden off the stage at one event in 1974. One year later, the Delaware senator broke ranks with northern liberals— and joined his virulently racist North Carolina colleague Jesse Helms in voting to kneecap all federal efforts to integrate schools, anywhere in the country. Specifically, Biden voted to bar the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare from requiring schools to provide information on the racial makeup of their student bodies — thereby making it nigh-impossible for Uncle Sam to withhold federal funds from school districts that refused to integrate.
Get 60% off for Father’s Day and get unlimited access to Intelligencer and everything else New York
LEARN MORE »

The measure was rejected. Nevertheless, Biden persisted. And his cowardly example inspired other self-professed liberals to throw racial justice under the bus. As the historian Jason Sokol writes:

Immediately after the Helms amendment was tabled, Biden proposed his own amendment to the $36 billion education bill, stipulating that none of those federal funds could be used by school systems “to assign teachers or students to schools … for reasons of race.” His amendment would prevent “some faceless bureaucrat” from “deciding that any child, black or white, should fit in some predetermined ratio.”


… Like the Helms gambit, [Biden’s provision] would still gut Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. But this time, a number of liberal senators that had opposed Helms’s amendment now supported Biden: Warren Magnuson and Scoop Jackson of Washington, where Seattle faced impending integration orders; and Thomas Eagleton and Stuart Symington of Missouri, where Kansas City confronted a similar fate. Mike Mansfield, the majority leader from Montana, also jumped on board. Watching his liberal colleagues defect, Republican Jacob Javits of New York mused, “They’re scared to death on busing.” The Senate approved Biden’s amendment. Biden had managed to turn a 48-43 loss for the anti-busing forces into a 50-43 victory.

The NAACP called Biden’s proposal “an anti-black amendment.” The Senate’s sole African-American member, Ed Brooke, called it “the greatest symbolic defeat for civil rights since 1964.” But Biden helped his fellow liberals reconcile themselves to the wrong side of history by recasting integrationists as the real racists.

“The new integration plans being offered are really just quota systems to assure a certain number of blacks, Chicanos, or whatever in each school. That, to me, is the most racist concept you can come up with,” Biden said in a 1975 interview recently unearthed by the Washington Post. “What it says is, ‘In order for your child with curly black hair, brown eyes, and dark skin to be able to learn anything, he needs to sit next to my blond-haired, blue-eyed son.’ That’s racist!”

Biden echoed this in remarks to NPR that same year, saying, “I think the concept of busing … that we are going to integrate people so that they all have the same access and they learn to grow up with one another and all the rest, is a rejection of the whole movement of black pride … a rejection of the entire black awareness concept, where black is beautiful, black culture should be studied; and the cultural awareness of the importance of their own identity, their own individuality.”

As of 2007, Biden believed that this stance had aged well. In a memoir released that year, the soon-to-be presidential candidate derided busing as “a liberal trainwreck.” Education experts disagree. Since some municipalities did integrate their schools through busing (however temporarily), while others did not, scholars have been able to evaluate the policy’s efficacy. In 2011, researchers at Berkeley found that black students who had spent five years in desegregated schools went on to earn (on average) 25 percent more than those who remained in segregated schools (or, in Biden’s phrasing, schools that honored the “black awareness concept”). Other studies have found that racial segregation impairs learning for black students so severely, it outweighs the positive effects associated with higher household income — while integration enhances educational outcomes more profoundly than increasing a school’s safety. Meanwhile, contrary to so many white parents’ fears, integration was not associated with any negative effect on white students’ educational performance.

The rationale for integration is not, as Biden suggested, that black kids need to sit next to blue-eyed ones in order to retain information. Rather, it is that, in a racially stratified society, overwhelmingly African-American schools will (almost inevitably) be sites of concentrated poverty, underinvestment, and relatively low social capital (i.e., places where children from low-income families will be unlikely to form connections with children from higher-income ones). Biden never ceased expressing his concern for black children’s inadequate educational opportunities. But he has done more to perpetuate those inadequacies than to remedy them.
Biden worked tirelessly, over several decades, to make America’s (profoundly racist) criminal-justice system more punitive than any other advanced democracy’s.

It is hard to name an infamously unjust feature of America’s criminal-justice system that Joe Biden didn’t help to bring about. Mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug offenders, the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine, civil asset forfeiture, and extensive use of the death penalty — the Delaware senator was involved in establishing them all.

Biden is famous for his lead role in crafting the 1994 crime bill, or, as the senator preferred to call it (as recently as 2015), the “1994 Biden Crime Bill.” Some aspects of that legislation remain popular within the Democratic Party — among them, the Violence Against Women Act, a federal assault-weapons ban, and funds for “community oriented” policing. But in 2019 America — a place where our nation’s violent crime rate is near historic lows, while its incarceration rate hovers around world-historic highs — the bill’s broader legacy is ignominious. The Brennan Center succinctly summarized that legacy on the 20th anniversary of the bill’s passage:

It expanded the death penalty, creating 60 new death penalty offenses under 41 federal capital statutes. It eliminated education funding for incarcerated students, effectively gutting prison education programs. Despite a wealth of research showing education increases post-release employment, reduces recidivism, and improves outcomes for the formerly incarcerated and their families, this change has not been reversed.


And the bill created a wave of change toward harsher state sentencing policy. That change was driven by funding incentives: the bill’s $9.7 billion in federal funding for prison construction went only to states that adopted truth-in-sentencing (TIS) laws, which lead to defendants serving far longer prison terms. Within 5 years, 29 states had TIS laws on the books, 24 more than when the bill was signed. New York State received over $216 million by passing such laws. By 2000 the state had added over 12,000 prison beds and incarcerated 28 percent more people than a decade before.

As a result of these policies — and many others — the United States imprisons a higher proportion of its population today than any other developed country. This is not because Americans commit more crimes — victimization rates in the United States are comparable to those in Western Europe. Rather, it is because we impose harsher sentences on convicts than any other nation deems conscionable.

And for the bulk of his political career, Joe Biden made mandating such sentences one of his defining causes. As a high-ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Biden didn’t just craft the 1994 crime bill — he also ushered a variety of other draconian measures into law.

As with busing, Biden leaned left on criminal justice early in his career. In 1981, he criticized Republicans for pushing longer sentences for nonviolent offenders when prisons were already overcrowded. But, as with busing, Biden was one of the first liberals to discern the rightward shift in public opinion on criminal justice — and quite possibly, the most enthusiastic convert to the gospel of law-and-order liberalism. During the 1980s, Biden helped pass laws reinstating the federal death penalty, abolishing federal parole, increasing penalties for marijuana possession, expanding the use of civil asset forfeiture, and establishing a 100-to-1 sentencing disparity for possession of crack cocaine (used disproportionately by poor nonwhite people) and powder cocaine (used disproportionately by rich white people).

Biden’s support for these measures wasn’t a wholly defensive responsive to public outrage over violent crime. Rather, it was a proactive effort to capitalize on the electorate’s increasingly draconian mood.

In 1989, George H. W. Bush gave a national address outlining his plans to ramp up the war on drugs. Biden delivered the Democratic response, and savaged the Republican’s plan to drastically increase incarceration for drug crimes — from the right.

“Quite frankly, the president’s plan is not tough enough, bold enough, or imaginative enough to meet the crisis at hand,” Biden told the American people. “In a nutshell, the president’s plan does not include enough police officers to catch the violent thugs, enough prosecutors to convict them, enough judges to sentence them, or enough prison cells to put them away for a long time.”

Four years later, Biden remained at the cutting edge of law-and-order liberalism. In a Senate floor speech recently spotlighted by CNN’s KFile, Biden raised awareness of the (mythical) threat posed by super-predators — a rising generation of inner city children so comprehensively failed by their parents and society, they had developed into incurable sociopaths whom the state could quarantine but never rehabilitate.

There is a “cadre of young people, tens of thousands of them, born out of wedlock, without parents, without supervision, without any structure, without any conscience developing because they literally … because they literally have not been socialized, they literally have not had an opportunity,” Biden explained. He then he urged his colleagues to support aid to such youths now, or else they would “become the predators 15 years from now.”

In the same speech, Biden warned of dealing with the "cadre of young" people without "conscious developing" that would become "predators" that were "beyond the pale" who would have be taken out of society. https://t.co/JA8WJAUAZC pic.twitter.com/NC0mJSenrn
— andrew kaczynski (@KFILE) March 7, 2019

As for the already existing predators, “they are beyond the pale many of those people, beyond the pale,” Biden said. “We have no choice but to take them out of society … rehabilitation, when it occurs, we don’t understand it and notice it, and even when we notice it and we know it occurs, we don’t know why. So you cannot make rehabilitation a condition for release.”

The super-predator proved to be a myth. But the specter of inner cities teeming with irredeemable monsters and abandoned children helped rationalize both mass incarceration, and its racially inequitable character.

Uncle Joe says the darndest (and/or most racially insensitive) things.

Beyond his role in perpetuating systemic racism (through his opposition to school integration, and support for mass incarceration), Biden has long displayed a penchant for political incorrectness. His suggestion that Barack Obama was the first clean and articulate African-American to run for president is probably the most infamous of his gaffes. But the former vice-president also told a crowd of black voters in 2012 that Mitt Romney would “put you all back in chains,” and has a habit of badly impersonating Indian convenience-store clerks and call-center employees. But Biden’s most troubling “racially tinged” remarks might be those he does not regard as such. Specifically, the former vice-president has long boasted of his warm — and often legislatively productive — relationships with white supremacist southern senators.

“I’ve been around so long, I worked with James Eastland,” Biden said at a rally for Democratic Senate candidate Doug Jones in the fall of 2017. “Even in the days when I got there, the Democratic Party still had seven or eight old-fashioned Democratic segregationists. You’d get up and you’d argue like the devil with them. Then you’d go down and have lunch or dinner together. The political system worked. We were divided on issues, but the political system worked.”

Biden’s sentiments read like a satire of nostalgia for bipartisan comity, laying bare the amorality and elitism inherent to celebrating collegiality for its own sake. Needless to say, a political system in which a man who believed that his dark-skinned constituents belonged to an “inferior race” — and must be quarantined to their own institutions to prevent the “mongrelization” of the white race — was not one that “worked” for said constituents.

And Eastland isn’t the only white supremacist Biden can’t help expressing grudging admiration for. The Democratic front-runner also warmly eulogized Strom Thurmond at his funeral, and his insistence on fondly recalling his relationship with Jesse Helms “grates on even members of his own team, who have told him as much,” according to a recent report from the New York Times.

Biden’s faith in such senators’ entitlement to dignity, and capacity for redemption, stands in marked contrast to his erstwhile views on rehabilitating “predators” and “violent thugs.”
Why Biden might well win the Democratic nomination with strong African-American support anyway.

Late last month, Emerson College polled South Carolina Democrats on their preferences for the party’s 2020 nominee. Among African-American Democrats, there was little competition: Joe Biden boasted 43 percent of the demographic’s support — his closest competitor, Bernie Sanders, claimed a meager 15 percent. Kamala Harris’s support sat at 9. Emerson’s findings are consistent with broader national surveys of the 2020 primary, which consistently paint Biden as the front-runner — thanks, in no small part, to his popularity among black voters.

How do we reconcile Biden’s considerable complicity in racial injustice with his enviable popularity among his party’s African-American base?

One answer is the Biden’s apparent strength with such voters is illusory. The (likely) candidate is coasting off of his name recognition and association with Barack Obama. Once the primary campaign puts the history summarized above under the spotlight — along with Biden’s myriad other heresies against progressivism, including his support for bankruptcy reforms that hurt low-income consumers, his shoddy treatment of Anita Hill, and his advocacy for the Iraq War — black voters will see through his “malarkey.” This is quite plausible.

But a recent focus group conducted by Democratic consultant Danny Barefoot of Anvil Strategies offers some limited evidence that it is nonetheless mistaken.

So, I’m working with a client today to conduct a focus group of black women who are likely to vote in the South Carolina Democratic Presidential primary. I have the client’s permission to tweet out anecdotes and observations, but they’d prefer not to be named.
— Danny Barefoot (@dannybarefoot) March 5, 2019

Now we’re on to Biden. One woman says it’s the closest we can get to a 3rd term for Obama w/o electing Michelle. Lots of chuckles but also lots of heads nodding in agreement. Another says she would vote for him today but isn’t sure if he’s too “old” or “sloppy” to take on Trump.
— Danny Barefoot (@dannybarefoot) March 5, 2019

Now we’ll move on to some negative message testing against Biden.
— Danny Barefoot (@dannybarefoot) March 5, 2019

Yeah…most of these hits just aren’t landing. In response to a short description of Biden’s opposition to integration efforts one woman asks if we’re honestly asking her to believe he is a segregationist. https://t.co/yoAxPHBa4J
— Danny Barefoot (@dannybarefoot) March 5, 2019

Another explanation is that black voters find Biden’s heresies against racial liberalism forgivable. The man might have played a leading role in opposing busing, but he was ultimately responding to mobilized, majoritarian opposition that was all but certain to prevail no matter what position he chose to take. As for mass incarceration, the crack epidemic was truly a scourge, and even many African-American community leaders embraced the logic of “tough on crime” in its wake. It’s also conceivable that some portion of black Democratic primary voters agree, to this day, with Biden’s Clinton-era views on criminal justice. A significant minority of African-American Democrats identify as conservative, and indicate a broadly positive view of the police.

As is the case in so many American communities, the most prominent black activist groups and public intellectuals tend to be both more ideological — and more ideologically left wing — than the median black voter. The average American votes less on the basis of ideology than identity. Black Democrats identify strongly with Barack Obama, and Obama spent eight years vouching for Biden’s fitness for high office. That might count for more than the misgivings of elite progressive commentators like myself.

Republicans identify most with conservatism, Democrats identify most with Obama; Democrats split in ideological identificationhttps://t.co/7NKhd2QsTf pic.twitter.com/kLQP0vVZgp
— Matt Grossmann (@MattGrossmann) March 6, 2019

Regardless, in 2019, Biden evinces support for his party’s consensus on decarceration. Meanwhile, thanks to conservative courts, busing is a long-dead issue, of no contemporary political relevance. Within the Democratic coalition, the forces of racial liberalism are unmistakably ascendant. Whether that coalition has someone accountable to it in the next White House will almost certainly do more to determine federal policy on civil rights than the question of precisely whom that Democratic someone is. And with most polls suggesting that Biden is Team Blue’s most viable general-election candidate, one can construct a perfectly rational argument for why black voters and racial-justice advocates should rally behind Uncle Joe.

That said, given the size and quality of the Democratic field — and the severity of Biden’s ideological offenses — I, for one, hope they conclude that he is unfit for rehabilitation.








Haj mozemo sad i ovako.

[CPT]

ta djeca su tu noc radila neke ludorije svuda po parku.

In 2001, Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer and serial rapist serving life in prison, confessed to officials that he had raped the female jogger. His DNA matched that found at the scene, and he provided other confirmatory evidence. He said he committed the rape alone.

In 2002 Robert Morgenthau, District Attorney for New York County, had his office conduct an investigation and recommended to the state court that the convictions of the five men on all charges be vacated. The court vacated their convictions in 2002, and the state withdrew all charges against the men.

i ovaj Trump je 89'e trebao protrljati kuglu i viditi da ce 2001 netko drugi priznati iako su svi mislili da su krivi ukljucujuci i sud ???????

Ako '89 nije znao da se igra zivotima djece onda bi bar u 2020 trebao. On jos uvijek tvrdi da su oni to uradili iako je 100% potvrdjeno da nisu.
I dalje se siri kako su nekoga silovali ili bar radili "neke ludarije"

[MorningStar]

Ako '89 nije znao da se igra zivotima djece onda bi bar u 2020 trebao. On jos uvijek tvrdi da su oni to uradili iako je 100% potvrdjeno da nisu.
I dalje se siri kako su nekoga silovali ili bar radili "neke ludarije"

Pises gluposti klasicne, nije se on igrao nego trazio smrtnu kaznu ako sud presudi. Adresirati na sud - ponavljam da li ti smatras da je smrtna kazna najbolja za silovatelje iz rata i slicno ??? A ne vidim da trazi smrtu kaznu za "neke ludarije" nego je to spomenuo jer to i jesu radili pa je sud pogresnu presudu donio , i ne tvrdi da su silovali nakon priznanja ovog u zatvoru nego si i sam napisao sta tvrdi- ili mislis setas ulicom i afroamer si stane patrola pokupi te stavi u zatvor i optuzi za silovanje.


Mislim da je dosta to od mene prema tebi, i salutiraj titi kad budes prolazio u blizini opstine

[CPT]

Ako '89 nije znao da se igra zivotima djece onda bi bar u 2020 trebao. On jos uvijek tvrdi da su oni to uradili iako je 100% potvrdjeno da nisu.
I dalje se siri kako su nekoga silovali ili bar radili "neke ludarije"

Pises gluposti klasicne, nije se on igrao nego trazio smrtnu kaznu ako sud presudi. Adresirati na sud - ponavljam da li ti smatras da je smrtna kazna najbolja za silovatelje iz rata i slicno ??? A ne vidim da trazi smrtu kaznu za "neke ludarije" nego je to spomenuo jer to i jesu radili pa je sud pogresnu presudu donio , i ne tvrdi da su silovali nakon priznanja ovog u zatvoru nego si i sam napisao sta tvrdi- ili mislis setas ulicom i afroamer si stane patrola pokupi te stavi u zatvor i optuzi za silovanje.


Mislim da je dosta to od mene prema tebi, i salutiraj titi kad budes prolazio u blizini opstine

On se igrao populizma sa zivotima djece iako je znao sta ta prica znaci za crnce. Znao je da ce sa tom pricom podilaziti rasistima koji su takve price redovno koristilo za vjesanje crnaca decenijama. Ako mu vec nije smetala smrt djece onda bi trebao znati sta to znaci za zajednicu u kojoj zivi

[ultima_palabra]

to je to. sad je trump kriv za sve nedace i probleme amerike od 1600. pa na ovamo. i ovi cuche i kenjaju i eto niko kao oni, bravo za njih, iz sigurnosti capitol hilla i njihovih vila i imanja. pa i kad je obama bio, svake godine je policija ubijala 1000 ljudi od cega su 30-40% crnci.
sve na jadnog trumpa svalise. i koliko god trump bio debilchina i kreten i lazov i sve ostalo, nisu ni ovi nista bolji, ustvarri ove hinje su puno gore. zato mi je trump i drazi, zato je i pobijedio 2016, jer svoje debilnosti iskazuje iskreno i kao obican covjek. nije on ni rasista ni fasista ni konzervativac ni desnica. on je biznismen koji je nasao svoju strategiju, svoj nich kako da dobije 50 miliona glasova. pa nije sad budala da nesto uradi sto bi kompromitovalo te glasove.

Pa nije ni Dodik, a ni Milosevic. Biznismen i cinovnik koji su skontali koja prica prolazi. Treba zbog toga imati simpatije za njih?

[glog]

--removed--

[The 51st State]

Na zalost amerika vise nije svjetska sila broj 1, tako da se principijelno nista nece promijeniti za svijet bio ili ne bio tramp.

Kina je odsad svjetionik gdje ce ostatak planete da gleda i upravlja svoe interese. Losa vijest ali racionalno gledajuci to je tako.

Tamp je samo pokusavao da radi damage control ali eto sjebase ga unutrasnja previranja i nesanirani antagonizmi u americkom drustvu.

A o kakvim se antagonizmima radi fino ilustruje ovaj tvit

[sinuhe]

I Washington i Jefferson su robovlasnistvo, peculiar insitution, smatrali problematicnim. Amerika i Zapad su se uvijek mijenjali ka boljem iznutra bez vanjskog uplitanja. Hoce li im muslimani, Srbi i komunisti barem to priznati.

[video]

I Washington i Jefferson su robovlasnistvo, peculiar insitution, smatrali problematicnim. Amerika i Zapad su se uvijek mijenjali ka boljem iznutra bez vanjskog uplitanja. Hoce li im muslimani, Srbi i komunisti barem to priznati.

A bas ono muslimani, ljudi koji vjeruju u Islam, moraju nesto nekom priznat.
I to bas ta vjerska zajednica

[The 51st State]

floskula, mijenjali su se u skladu sa kretanjem robno novcanih tokovai rastucih potreba, kako je falilo sirovina i radne snage tako su i olavljavali dizgine sto ih naravno nije sprjecavalo da pokazuju svoju zlocinacku stranu sirom svijeta bez posebnog kriticizma.
sad su ih kinezi prejebali u njihovoj igri i to je kraj.

[madner]

USA je jos uvijek daleko ispred Kine, samo ova unutrasnja polarizacija od strane ekstremne ljevice nije im nista dobro donjela.

[The 51st State]

i rim je bio ispred konkurencije kad su mu se temelji urusili, kina ih je prejebala ekonomski i to je pocetak kraja dominacije i na ostalim poljima.

[MorningStar]

i rim je bio ispred konkurencije kad su mu se temelji urusili, kina ih je prejebala ekonomski i to je pocetak kraja dominacije i na ostalim poljima.

New age might be coming, imaju kinezi jos dosta da sustizu ali ako stignu i prestignu imam osjecaj da dosta ovih sto danas kukaju zla amerika ce istu od g*vana praviti

[The 51st State]

i rim je bio ispred konkurencije kad su mu se temelji urusili, kina ih je prejebala ekonomski i to je pocetak kraja dominacije i na ostalim poljima.

New age might be coming, imaju kinezi jos dosta da sustizu ali ako stignu i prestignu imam osjecaj da dosta ovih sto danas kukaju zla amerika ce istu od g*vana praviti

to je jasno sto sam i sam indirektno rekao. nema kod kineza vamo tamo suplja prica, mi smo borg i cao.

liberalni zapad mora sam sebe preispitati kako da se nosi sa tim u buducnosti.

[ultima_palabra]

Trump je srozao liderstvo Amerike na svim poljima. Jedini neamerikanci koji podrzavaju njegov reizbor su oni koji generalno preziru Ameriku.

Sad se vidi da je i trgovinski rat sa Kinom bio samo sarada. U slucaju kakvog veceg belaja, Amerika bi se samo sklonila u stranu, u stilu izolacionista iz 40tih koji su kritikovali FDR i zagovarali sporazum sa Hitlerom.

[laga-nini]

definitivno najuspješniji američki predsjednik do korone..najbolja ekonomija najmanja zaposlenost najmanje ratova al sad se pogubio jer on nema u sebi tu socijalnu notu a kako bi je i ima al u principu za razvoj zemlje je bitnije da ima ekonomsku notu..