USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
- Challenger_
- Posts: 13551
- Joined: 05/03/2013 21:09
- Location: 永恆 - bez podrumskih entiteta i taketo-maketo koalicije
- Contact:
#751 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Postavite rezultat, Tita vam, kad sve bude prebrojano.
- GandalfSivi
- Posts: 22699
- Joined: 09/09/2006 00:38
- Contact:
#752 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
@jeza u ledja
I nemoj me nervirati svega ti, kasni mi avion 50 min, popilo se
I nemoj me nervirati svega ti, kasni mi avion 50 min, popilo se
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
#753 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Pa kad pijes tu neku ruznu pivu. Sta je to, neki jeftini IPA? 
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
#754 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Ja se vala ne sjecam, al moguce da si u pravu. Uglavnom cujem ono kao vodi, vjerovatni pobjednik, ne znaju se jos konacni rezultati ali izgleda da je odigrao dobro, i tako. Sigurno nisam vidio u pisanim medijima. To bi ti bilo lako nac a i ja nisam siguran jesam li u pravu.GandalfSivi wrote: ↑06/02/2020 14:06Jebiga Jezu, sad se vec zajebajemo. Ja sam cuo jedno 40 puta (bukvalno) da je proglasen pobjednikom, te da Sanders i pored toga sto dobro stoji je morao pobijediti ovo, jer je prosli put uzeo skoro 50% glasova a sada samo 26%. Pored toga, vidio sam Bittigiega na TV-u jedno 20 puta, a Sandersa mozda 3.jeza u ledja wrote: ↑06/02/2020 13:58 Bez obzira na tvoju frustriranost medijima, ja nigdje ne procitah/cuh da se Buttigieg proglasio pobjednikom.
Kazem ti, bez obzira na uspjeh koji Pete jeste napravio, on je ispao pobjednik bez konacnih rezultata. Nije okay...
- GandalfSivi
- Posts: 22699
- Joined: 09/09/2006 00:38
- Contact:
#755 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Evo zove Perez na ponovno brojanje glasova
Hoce li se znati konacni rezultati prije New Hampshirea, ili ce ostati ko je jamio jamio?
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
#756 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Evo ti pa slusaj:
U prvih nekoliko sekundi kaze "....which made our victory possible." Ja konto nesto se promjenilo, guglo da vidim. Nije. I sam Bernie poslije kaze da kasni par boba za Buttigiegom, iako se moze promjeniti, I poslije kaze da je sve to zajedno nebitno.
U prvih nekoliko sekundi kaze "....which made our victory possible." Ja konto nesto se promjenilo, guglo da vidim. Nije. I sam Bernie poslije kaze da kasni par boba za Buttigiegom, iako se moze promjeniti, I poslije kaze da je sve to zajedno nebitno.
- GandalfSivi
- Posts: 22699
- Joined: 09/09/2006 00:38
- Contact:
#757 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Vidio sam. Bil’ ti svega ti? Tri dana lik suti, Pete sam sebe proglasio pobjednikom isto vece, mediji preuzeli, a vamo 0.1 posto razlike i 6000 glasova u Bernijevu korist. I odma se nadje levat da ga pita sto bi mu vjerovali. Pa sto niko Petea ne upita to?jeza u ledja wrote: ↑06/02/2020 22:02 Evo ti pa slusaj:
U prvih nekoliko sekundi kaze "....which made our victory possible." Ja konto nesto se promjenilo, guglo da vidim. Nije. I sam Bernie poslije kaze da kasni par boba za Buttigiegom, iako se moze promjeniti, I poslije kaze da je sve to zajedno nebitno.
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
#758 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Pa pitali su ga, opetovano, od samog pocetka - jel zna nesto sto drugi ne znaju.GandalfSivi wrote: ↑06/02/2020 22:43
Vidio sam. Bil’ ti svega ti? Tri dana lik suti, Pete sam sebe proglasio pobjednikom isto vece, mediji preuzeli, a vamo 0.1 posto razlike i 6000 glasova u Bernijevu korist. I odma se nadje levat da ga pita sto bi mu vjerovali. Pa sto niko Petea ne upita to?
Inace pola pitanja su bila levatska, i reflektuju potrebnu novinara, a pogotovo Sandersovih navijaca, da ga egg on na neku pricu o belosvetskim nepravdama.
- alijagoro
- Posts: 8013
- Joined: 06/03/2008 18:02
#759 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Stalo na 96 odnosno na 97 procenata od sinoc,cime li oni broje ove glasove.
Last edited by alijagoro on 06/02/2020 23:43, edited 1 time in total.
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
- dale cooper
- Posts: 31260
- Joined: 03/04/2007 09:55
- Location: Twin Peaks/Red Room
#761 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Nije to ni daleko od istine čini mi se.
- alijagoro
- Posts: 8013
- Joined: 06/03/2008 18:02
#762 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Priroda je sad in
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
#763 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Iowa, jebiga. 
- Point.
- Posts: 33427
- Joined: 28/10/2008 00:24
- Location: Bagni di Lucca
#764 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Bittigieg, kako se izgovara ovo. Jebeno
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
- Point.
- Posts: 33427
- Joined: 28/10/2008 00:24
- Location: Bagni di Lucca
#766 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Kakvo je to prezime u pm. Malo neobično čak i za jenkije.
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
#767 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Maltesko.
Btw slicno arapskom, pogotov tamo Magreb, ono sa Bou-pa nesto, sto je isto sto Abu- nesto. Otac od, ili sin od
. Tako nekako. Malta cudna kombinacija.
Btw slicno arapskom, pogotov tamo Magreb, ono sa Bou-pa nesto, sto je isto sto Abu- nesto. Otac od, ili sin od
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
#768 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Znaci cudnog prezimena, otac akademik koji je sljego preko bare, sa Harvarda, manjina, mlad, pobjedio u Iowi...zvuci poznato?

Last edited by jeza u ledja on 07/02/2020 00:08, edited 1 time in total.
- oaza85
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: 25/06/2018 09:10
- Location: Rogatica Pekara Centar
- Kaligrafija
- Posts: 3887
- Joined: 24/12/2010 11:37
- Location: Lociranje u tijeku...
#770 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
A mora da mu je neko slavensko porijeklo, garant nekad bilo Butičić...
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
#771 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Aha, evo ima ovdje:
Buttigieg (Maltese: Buttiġieġ [butːid͡ʒɪːt͡ʃ]) is a Maltese surname, derived from Sicilian Arabic أبو الدجاج Abu-l-dajāj(i), meaning chicken owner or poulterer (literally, "father of chickens").[1]
People with the name include:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buttigieg
Buttigieg (Maltese: Buttiġieġ [butːid͡ʒɪːt͡ʃ]) is a Maltese surname, derived from Sicilian Arabic أبو الدجاج Abu-l-dajāj(i), meaning chicken owner or poulterer (literally, "father of chickens").[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buttigieg
- oaza85
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: 25/06/2018 09:10
- Location: Rogatica Pekara Centar
#772 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Zanimljivo, u to njegovom gradu umro je Ivan Mestrovic.
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
#773 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Sto je jos zanimljivije, ja znam lika koji je skolski haver s njim.
Kad niko nije cuo jos za njega, on mi prvi reko idi na skup kao javi mu se kad bude dolazio, reci da me znas.
(Kad je imao skupove po ucionicama, prije cirka godinu dana).
A Mestrovic je vidim izgleda tamo predavao, na Notre Dame, pa ga tako zadesila smrt tamo.
A Mestrovic je vidim izgleda tamo predavao, na Notre Dame, pa ga tako zadesila smrt tamo.
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50537
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
#774 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
99% glasova pobrojano, Buttigieg ima 564, Sanders 562 delegata, ili cega vec. Manje od 0.1% razlike.
Ali Buttigieg. I dalje. Vodi.

Doduse na CNN kazu da su svi pobrojani. Helem nejse, Iowa cao.
Ali Buttigieg. I dalje. Vodi.
Doduse na CNN kazu da su svi pobrojani. Helem nejse, Iowa cao.
- GandalfSivi
- Posts: 22699
- Joined: 09/09/2006 00:38
- Contact:
#775 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Malo matematike, ako je ko zainteresovan
From the Sanders campaign:
February 6, 2020
DES MOINES, Iowa – Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign on Thursday celebrated winning the popular vote in the first and second round of the Iowa caucus and released publicly discrepancies in the State Delegate Equivalent data it submitted to the Iowa Democratic Party.
“Tonight's release of data by the Iowa Democratic Party confirms Sen. Bernie Sanders won the Iowa caucus,” Sanders’ Senior Advisor Jeff Weaver said. “We also feel confident that the discrepancies we’re providing tonight, in addition to those widely identified in the national media, mean that the SDE count will never be known with any kind of certainty. Given the rules changes we fought for that required the release of the popular vote count, SDEs are now an antiquated and meaningless metric for deciding the winner of the Iowa caucus.”
Below is the list of discrepancies in the State Delegate Equivalent calculations that were submitted to but not yet considered by the party.
14 instances for a total of 2.50383 SDE
Storm Lake 1 - Sanders down 1 delegate (.0785 SDE)
In this 7-delegate precinct, according to IDP data, Buttigieg’s 1.974358974 was correctly rounded up to 2. However, Warren’s 1.256410256, which was tied with Yang, was incorrectly rounded up to 2 despite Sanders’ 2.333333333 being closer to 3. The correct allocation should be Sanders 3 delegates, Buttigieg 2, and Warren and Yang with 1.
Warren County Norwalk Precinct 1 - Sanders down 1 delegate, Buttigieg over 1 delegate (0.23333)
In this precinct, Buttigieg received an extra 3rd delegate after already rounding up to 2. Sanders, at third place with 1.346938776, should have received the extra delegate, bringing him to 2 alongside Biden and Buttigeig. The correct allocation should be Buttigieg, Biden and Sanders 2 and Warren and Klobuchar with 1.
Des Moines 7 - Sanders down 1 delegate, Buttigieg over 1 delegate (0.2798 SDE)
In this 9-delegate precinct, Sanders was at 4.826815642, Warren was at 2.463687151 and Buttigieg was at 2.664804469 before rounding. Sanders’ 4.8 was closer to 5 than Buttigeig’s 2.7 was to 3. Therefore, Sanders should have 5 delegates while Buttigieg has 2.
Woodbury 6/Sioux City 6 - Sanders down 1 delegate (0.2125 SDE)
The 9 delegates in this precinct are not distributed properly. Before rounding, there is Sanders at 2.668965517, Warren at 2.110344828, Buttigieg at 1.675862069, Biden at 1.613793103, Klobuchar at 1.551724138. Two delegates must be lost after rounding everyone up. With 2.67, Sanders is closer to 3 than Biden is to 2 at 1.61 and Klobuchar is to 2 at 1.55. Sanders should have 3 delegates instead of 2, with Warren 2, Buttigieg 2, Biden 1, and Klobuchar 1.
Ocheyedan - Sanders down 1 delegate (.1 SDE)
Each of the 3 candidates who reached viability in this 3-delegate precinct should have received a delegate. Before rounding, Sanders and Klobuchar were both at 0.6, which rounds to 1. However, Sanders was not awarded his only delegate, which instead went to Buttigieg as his second delegate. This should be reversed to make it Sanders 1, Klobuchar 1, and Buttigieg 1.
Bellair/Lincoln - Sanders down 1 delegate (.08 SDE)
Each of the 4 candidates who reached viability in this 4-delegate precinct should have received a delegate. Before rounding, Sanders and Klobuchar were both at 0.6153846154, which rounds to 1. However, Sanders was not awarded his only delegate, which instead went to Biden as Biden’s second delegate. This should be reversed to make it Sanders 1, Klobuchar 1, Biden 1, and Buttigieg 1.
Sioux 6 Orange City 1 - Sanders down 1 delegate (.0875 SDE)
The 10 delegates were misassigned following a rounding interpretation error. Second alignment had Klobuchar 15, Buttigieg 20, Sanders 23 and Warren 26. Before rounding, it was Klobuchar 1.61290, Buttigieg 2.15053, Sanders 2.47312 and Warren 2.79570. Warren was awarded a 4th delegate after rounding up to 3. Instead, that final delegate should have gone to Sanders, who was closer to 3 than Warren was to 4. The final count should be Warren 3, Sanders 3, Buttigieg 2 and Klobuchar 2.
Guthrie Gold - Sanders down 1 delegate (.0857 SDE)
Before rounding, Biden, Klobuchar and Buttigieg were all at 2.93548 with Sanders at 2.48387 and Warren at 2.25806. Buttigieg was already rounded up to 3 when awarded a 4th delegate. Given IDP rules, that final delegate should have been awarded to Sanders after rounding up his 2.48 to 3 alongside Biden, Klobuchar and Buttigieg. Warren would still have 2.
Independence 2 - Sanders down 1 delegate (.1368 SDE)
Only 5 of the 6 delegates were awarded. After rounding, Biden recieved 3 delegates while Sanders and Klobuchar only received 1 each. Sanders’ 1.2 is higher than Klobuchar’s 1.09, so the last delegate should go to Sanders, making the final count Biden 3, Sanders 2, Klobuchar 1.
Adair 04 SE - Sanders down 1 delegate (.0784 SDE)
The following has been corroborated with Adair County Chair Thadeus Hawley. All 10 delegates were awarded, but the distribution is incorrect. According to IDP data, the second alignment has Warren 9, Biden 7 and Sanders, Klobuchar and Buttigieg each with 6. However, Sanders receives only 1 delegate when the other two candidates at the same level received 2. Sanders, Klobuchar and Buttigieg’s 1.7647 is closer to 2 than Warren’s 2.6471 is to 3. Given this, each candidate should be awarded 2 delegates, including Sanders.
Muscatine 9 - Sanders down 1 delegate (.1667 SDE)
In this precinct, only 8 of the 9 delegates were awarded. According to IDP data, the second alignment has Sanders 44, Buttigieg 42 and Biden 26. This calculates to 3.5357 for Sanders, 3.3750 for Buttigieg and 2.0893 for Biden, yet Sanders and Buttigeg were both awarded 3 delegates and Biden awarded 2, with the 9th delegate never awarded. According to rounding rules, Sanders should be awarded the 9th delegate for a total of 4. Buttigieg would remain at 3 and Biden at 2.
Des Moines 14 - Sanders down 1 county delegate (.2798 SDE)
In Des Moines 14, per IDP data, the second alignment left Buttigieg with 52, Sanders with 50, Warren with 31 and Biden with 25. This should have resulted in 2 delegates for Buttigieg and Sanders and 1 delegate for Warren and Biden. However, according to the information listed by the IDP, Warren was awarded 2 delegates while Sanders was awarded 1, despite having more caucusgoers. We ask for this to be reversed for a final count of Buttigieg 2, Sanders 2, Warren 1 and Biden 1.
North Liberty 6 - Sanders down 1 delegate (.405 SDE)
In North Liberty 6, the IDP lists second round results as Sanders 107 to Warren 105. The raw delegate total should have been 2.97 to 2.92 per the IDP data. However, the caucus chair decided to call this lead a tie and hold a coin flip, which landed in Warren's favor. In IDP rules, a tie is only when candidates have the same exact number. Per those rules, this result was not a tie and the delegate should have been awarded to Sanders, who had a larger number. Final count should be Buttigieg 4, Sanders 4 and Warren 3.
Des Moines 80 - Sanders down 1 delegate, Buttigieg over 1 delegate (.2798 SDE)
Only 9 of the 10 delegates in this precinct have been awarded with 2 for Biden, 4 for Buttigieg and 4 for Sanders. Before rounding, it is Biden 2.0, Buttigieg 2.75 and Sanders 4.2, which would round to 5 in a 10-delegate precinct. The chair decided there was a tie for the 10th delegate and called for a coin flip, that went for Buttigieg. There was not a tie and that delegate should be awarded to Sanders to make the final count Sanders 5, Buttigeig 3 and Biden 2 for a total of 10 delegates.
###
PAID FOR BY BERNIE 2020
From the Sanders campaign:
February 6, 2020
DES MOINES, Iowa – Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign on Thursday celebrated winning the popular vote in the first and second round of the Iowa caucus and released publicly discrepancies in the State Delegate Equivalent data it submitted to the Iowa Democratic Party.
“Tonight's release of data by the Iowa Democratic Party confirms Sen. Bernie Sanders won the Iowa caucus,” Sanders’ Senior Advisor Jeff Weaver said. “We also feel confident that the discrepancies we’re providing tonight, in addition to those widely identified in the national media, mean that the SDE count will never be known with any kind of certainty. Given the rules changes we fought for that required the release of the popular vote count, SDEs are now an antiquated and meaningless metric for deciding the winner of the Iowa caucus.”
Below is the list of discrepancies in the State Delegate Equivalent calculations that were submitted to but not yet considered by the party.
14 instances for a total of 2.50383 SDE
Storm Lake 1 - Sanders down 1 delegate (.0785 SDE)
In this 7-delegate precinct, according to IDP data, Buttigieg’s 1.974358974 was correctly rounded up to 2. However, Warren’s 1.256410256, which was tied with Yang, was incorrectly rounded up to 2 despite Sanders’ 2.333333333 being closer to 3. The correct allocation should be Sanders 3 delegates, Buttigieg 2, and Warren and Yang with 1.
Warren County Norwalk Precinct 1 - Sanders down 1 delegate, Buttigieg over 1 delegate (0.23333)
In this precinct, Buttigieg received an extra 3rd delegate after already rounding up to 2. Sanders, at third place with 1.346938776, should have received the extra delegate, bringing him to 2 alongside Biden and Buttigeig. The correct allocation should be Buttigieg, Biden and Sanders 2 and Warren and Klobuchar with 1.
Des Moines 7 - Sanders down 1 delegate, Buttigieg over 1 delegate (0.2798 SDE)
In this 9-delegate precinct, Sanders was at 4.826815642, Warren was at 2.463687151 and Buttigieg was at 2.664804469 before rounding. Sanders’ 4.8 was closer to 5 than Buttigeig’s 2.7 was to 3. Therefore, Sanders should have 5 delegates while Buttigieg has 2.
Woodbury 6/Sioux City 6 - Sanders down 1 delegate (0.2125 SDE)
The 9 delegates in this precinct are not distributed properly. Before rounding, there is Sanders at 2.668965517, Warren at 2.110344828, Buttigieg at 1.675862069, Biden at 1.613793103, Klobuchar at 1.551724138. Two delegates must be lost after rounding everyone up. With 2.67, Sanders is closer to 3 than Biden is to 2 at 1.61 and Klobuchar is to 2 at 1.55. Sanders should have 3 delegates instead of 2, with Warren 2, Buttigieg 2, Biden 1, and Klobuchar 1.
Ocheyedan - Sanders down 1 delegate (.1 SDE)
Each of the 3 candidates who reached viability in this 3-delegate precinct should have received a delegate. Before rounding, Sanders and Klobuchar were both at 0.6, which rounds to 1. However, Sanders was not awarded his only delegate, which instead went to Buttigieg as his second delegate. This should be reversed to make it Sanders 1, Klobuchar 1, and Buttigieg 1.
Bellair/Lincoln - Sanders down 1 delegate (.08 SDE)
Each of the 4 candidates who reached viability in this 4-delegate precinct should have received a delegate. Before rounding, Sanders and Klobuchar were both at 0.6153846154, which rounds to 1. However, Sanders was not awarded his only delegate, which instead went to Biden as Biden’s second delegate. This should be reversed to make it Sanders 1, Klobuchar 1, Biden 1, and Buttigieg 1.
Sioux 6 Orange City 1 - Sanders down 1 delegate (.0875 SDE)
The 10 delegates were misassigned following a rounding interpretation error. Second alignment had Klobuchar 15, Buttigieg 20, Sanders 23 and Warren 26. Before rounding, it was Klobuchar 1.61290, Buttigieg 2.15053, Sanders 2.47312 and Warren 2.79570. Warren was awarded a 4th delegate after rounding up to 3. Instead, that final delegate should have gone to Sanders, who was closer to 3 than Warren was to 4. The final count should be Warren 3, Sanders 3, Buttigieg 2 and Klobuchar 2.
Guthrie Gold - Sanders down 1 delegate (.0857 SDE)
Before rounding, Biden, Klobuchar and Buttigieg were all at 2.93548 with Sanders at 2.48387 and Warren at 2.25806. Buttigieg was already rounded up to 3 when awarded a 4th delegate. Given IDP rules, that final delegate should have been awarded to Sanders after rounding up his 2.48 to 3 alongside Biden, Klobuchar and Buttigieg. Warren would still have 2.
Independence 2 - Sanders down 1 delegate (.1368 SDE)
Only 5 of the 6 delegates were awarded. After rounding, Biden recieved 3 delegates while Sanders and Klobuchar only received 1 each. Sanders’ 1.2 is higher than Klobuchar’s 1.09, so the last delegate should go to Sanders, making the final count Biden 3, Sanders 2, Klobuchar 1.
Adair 04 SE - Sanders down 1 delegate (.0784 SDE)
The following has been corroborated with Adair County Chair Thadeus Hawley. All 10 delegates were awarded, but the distribution is incorrect. According to IDP data, the second alignment has Warren 9, Biden 7 and Sanders, Klobuchar and Buttigieg each with 6. However, Sanders receives only 1 delegate when the other two candidates at the same level received 2. Sanders, Klobuchar and Buttigieg’s 1.7647 is closer to 2 than Warren’s 2.6471 is to 3. Given this, each candidate should be awarded 2 delegates, including Sanders.
Muscatine 9 - Sanders down 1 delegate (.1667 SDE)
In this precinct, only 8 of the 9 delegates were awarded. According to IDP data, the second alignment has Sanders 44, Buttigieg 42 and Biden 26. This calculates to 3.5357 for Sanders, 3.3750 for Buttigieg and 2.0893 for Biden, yet Sanders and Buttigeg were both awarded 3 delegates and Biden awarded 2, with the 9th delegate never awarded. According to rounding rules, Sanders should be awarded the 9th delegate for a total of 4. Buttigieg would remain at 3 and Biden at 2.
Des Moines 14 - Sanders down 1 county delegate (.2798 SDE)
In Des Moines 14, per IDP data, the second alignment left Buttigieg with 52, Sanders with 50, Warren with 31 and Biden with 25. This should have resulted in 2 delegates for Buttigieg and Sanders and 1 delegate for Warren and Biden. However, according to the information listed by the IDP, Warren was awarded 2 delegates while Sanders was awarded 1, despite having more caucusgoers. We ask for this to be reversed for a final count of Buttigieg 2, Sanders 2, Warren 1 and Biden 1.
North Liberty 6 - Sanders down 1 delegate (.405 SDE)
In North Liberty 6, the IDP lists second round results as Sanders 107 to Warren 105. The raw delegate total should have been 2.97 to 2.92 per the IDP data. However, the caucus chair decided to call this lead a tie and hold a coin flip, which landed in Warren's favor. In IDP rules, a tie is only when candidates have the same exact number. Per those rules, this result was not a tie and the delegate should have been awarded to Sanders, who had a larger number. Final count should be Buttigieg 4, Sanders 4 and Warren 3.
Des Moines 80 - Sanders down 1 delegate, Buttigieg over 1 delegate (.2798 SDE)
Only 9 of the 10 delegates in this precinct have been awarded with 2 for Biden, 4 for Buttigieg and 4 for Sanders. Before rounding, it is Biden 2.0, Buttigieg 2.75 and Sanders 4.2, which would round to 5 in a 10-delegate precinct. The chair decided there was a tie for the 10th delegate and called for a coin flip, that went for Buttigieg. There was not a tie and that delegate should be awarded to Sanders to make the final count Sanders 5, Buttigeig 3 and Biden 2 for a total of 10 delegates.
###
PAID FOR BY BERNIE 2020
