Nesto sam procitao par strana ranije onaj jez je spominjao neke pozivnice... ako sam pogrijesio my bad. Onda samo da pitam dali radis za bosansku firmu,iransku ili kaurskusalik79 wrote: ↑07/01/2020 00:50Od kada to ja radim za njemacku banku?!MorningStar wrote: ↑07/01/2020 00:48Gledaj , znaci ti poznajes tajna znanja tj. pravi vjernici poput Iranskog rezima koje sam Bog vodi su ti uzor. Zasto onda ne iskoristiti to da napravis jednu muslimansku zemlju za primjer uz pomoc tih tajnih superznanja a ne da radis za kaursku njemacku banku![]()
![]()
IRAN
- MorningStar
- Posts: 9431
- Joined: 22/11/2019 18:43
#25351 Re: IRAN
- salik79
- Posts: 27013
- Joined: 16/09/2013 13:15
#25352 Re: IRAN
- salik79
- Posts: 27013
- Joined: 16/09/2013 13:15
#25353 Re: IRAN
Iran je pod nametnutim sankcijama, tako da je tesko raditi za iransku firmu.MorningStar wrote: ↑07/01/2020 00:52Nesto sam procitao par strana ranije onaj jez je spominjao neke pozivnice... ako sam pogrijesio my bad. Onda samo da pitam dali radis za bosansku firmu,iransku ili kaurskusalik79 wrote: ↑07/01/2020 00:50Od kada to ja radim za njemacku banku?!MorningStar wrote: ↑07/01/2020 00:48
Gledaj , znaci ti poznajes tajna znanja tj. pravi vjernici poput Iranskog rezima koje sam Bog vodi su ti uzor. Zasto onda ne iskoristiti to da napravis jednu muslimansku zemlju za primjer uz pomoc tih tajnih superznanja a ne da radis za kaursku njemacku banku![]()
![]()
![]()
- Challenger_
- Posts: 13551
- Joined: 05/03/2013 21:09
- Location: 永恆 - bez podrumskih entiteta i taketo-maketo koalicije
- Contact:
#25354 Re: IRAN
Dobro razmišljanje. Ubilo se za false-flaga..All Israel or the neocons , who are well placed, need to do is to conduct a falseFlag attack on some American entity, military base, personnel or ship, and #blame it on Iran
- oaza85
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: 25/06/2018 09:10
- Location: Rogatica Pekara Centar
#25355 Re: IRAN
salik79 wrote: ↑07/01/2020 00:54Iran je pod nametnutim sankcijama, tako da je tesko raditi za iransku firmu.MorningStar wrote: ↑07/01/2020 00:52Nesto sam procitao par strana ranije onaj jez je spominjao neke pozivnice... ako sam pogrijesio my bad. Onda samo da pitam dali radis za bosansku firmu,iransku ili kaursku![]()
- MorningStar
- Posts: 9431
- Joined: 22/11/2019 18:43
#25356 Re: IRAN
Cuj pa tu je Rusija,Kina i ostale slobodne zemlje kojim te sankcije ne smetaju. Dapace cak je i bolje jer iran ne mora da radi sa sejtanskim firmama.Cuj tesko raditi za iransku firmu. Karta i u teheran dole ruze cvjetaju sve je naj naj, kuce od cokolade a prozori od marmelade.Jos te Bog cuva sa neba.
- MorningStar
- Posts: 9431
- Joined: 22/11/2019 18:43
#25357 Re: IRAN
Cekaj kakav sad false flag - pa zar ne cekamo da iran odgovori silno i strahovito - mase se crvenim zastavamaChallenger_ wrote: ↑07/01/2020 00:55Dobro razmišljanje. Ubilo se za false-flaga..All Israel or the neocons , who are well placed, need to do is to conduct a falseFlag attack on some American entity, military base, personnel or ship, and #blame it on Iran
- Challenger_
- Posts: 13551
- Joined: 05/03/2013 21:09
- Location: 永恆 - bez podrumskih entiteta i taketo-maketo koalicije
- Contact:
#25358 Re: IRAN
Još jedno:
PaulCRoberts
As an attack on Iran is an attack on #Russia,China
- sadie_forever
- Posts: 6009
- Joined: 24/08/2014 21:34
#25359 Re: IRAN
zanimljivi su ovi lajkovi ,vidimo koga citatelji najvise podrzavaju 
- MorningStar
- Posts: 9431
- Joined: 22/11/2019 18:43
#25360 Re: IRAN
Alahimanet Sadeta Alahimanetsadie_forever wrote: ↑07/01/2020 01:01 zanimljivi su ovi lajkovi ,vidimo koga citatelji najvise podrzavaju![]()
- sadie_forever
- Posts: 6009
- Joined: 24/08/2014 21:34
#25361 Re: IRAN
56 lajka,dobar siMorningStar wrote: ↑07/01/2020 01:01Alahimanet Sadeta Alahimanetsadie_forever wrote: ↑07/01/2020 01:01 zanimljivi su ovi lajkovi ,vidimo koga citatelji najvise podrzavaju![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- MorningStar
- Posts: 9431
- Joined: 22/11/2019 18:43
#25362 Re: IRAN
Nadam se da onaj defteri sto pusta u raj pakaosadie_forever wrote: ↑07/01/2020 01:0256 lajka,dobar siMorningStar wrote: ↑07/01/2020 01:01Alahimanet Sadeta Alahimanetsadie_forever wrote: ↑07/01/2020 01:01 zanimljivi su ovi lajkovi ,vidimo koga citatelji najvise podrzavaju![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- oaza85
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: 25/06/2018 09:10
- Location: Rogatica Pekara Centar
#25363 Re: IRAN
Ja svaki tvoj post lajkam.sadie_forever wrote: ↑07/01/2020 01:01 zanimljivi su ovi lajkovi ,vidimo koga citatelji najvise podrzavaju![]()
Jesi li udata?
- Kikibombona
- Posts: 34325
- Joined: 29/06/2013 08:48
#25364 Re: IRAN
https://www.institutkurde.org/en/info/t ... 1232551004A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑07/01/2020 00:37 I zato draga djeco, da ne biste lajali na sve oko sebe ko kerovi, da biste imali veću nafaku od 400 eura mjesečno, nemojte slušati Sihirator iz Lukavca.
Loš, loš izbor![]()
Moram, da te ne ostavim u neznanju.
U istocnoj Turskoj, prostoru koji Kurdi markiraju kao Kurdistan, zivi oko 12 miliona Kurda. Mozda je CIA na to mislili. Ili je mislila na pro-PKK Kurde.
6 miliona glasova za HDP = 12 miliona stanovnika, kada se uracunaju oni sto nisu glasali + maloljetnici
...
Ipak, znatan broj Kurda glasa za AKP i dosta manje za CHP. Radi se o religioznim Kurdima, plemenskim Kurdima i anti-komunistima. Dosta Kurda mrzi PKK iz razlicitih razloga (kriminal, regrutacija djece, terorizam itd.) PKK pokazuje odredjene rezerve prema vjeri i otvoreno neprijateljstvo prema plemenskim zajednicama. Turska propaganda time vjesto manipulise i porucuje da PKK zeli unistiti vjeru i plemenske zajednice. Zato dosta Kurda glasa za 'islamsku' AKP. Ima tu jos raznih varijacija.
...
Rekao bih, prema ono sto sam shvatio iz raznih analiza, 3-4 miliona Kurda glasa za turske stranke, narocito na zapadu Turske.
- 6 miliona za HDP
- 3 miliona za turske stranke
- apstinenti i maloljetnici
Izmedju 18 i 20 miliona Kurda u Turskoj.
- asurbanipal
- Posts: 6692
- Joined: 28/06/2010 15:54
- Location: opet sam ti u kafani
#25365 Re: IRAN
Putin Should Take Control of the Iranian Situation Out of Israel’s Hands
Putin Should Take Control of the Iranian Situation Out of Israel’s Hands
Paul Craig Roberts
At this time, it is up to Israel whether or not war occurs between the US and Iran. Israel very much wants this war as a means of putting Iran and Syria into chaos, thus leaving Hezbollah isolated and unsupplied. Then Israel can succeed in occupying southern Lebanon.
The American neoconservatives want Iran in chaos, because then the chaos can be exported into the Muslim regions of the Russian Federation with the purpose of causing sufficient internal turmoil to remove Russia as a constraint on US unilateralism.
Israel and the Neocons have Trump where they want him. Trump’s outrageous and reckless murder of Qasem Soleimani has provoked serious Iranian threats against the US to which Trump has replied with threats. Although there is some indication that Trump has realized his mistake and is trying to calm the situation, a calmed situation is not what Israel and the neoconservatives want.
Polls of the American public indicate that anti-Iranian propaganda has succeeced. All Israel or the neoconservatives, who are well placed, need to do is to conduct a false flag attack on some American entity, military base, personnel or ship, and blame it on Iran. The American press will demand Iranian blood and so will most of Trump’s constituency. As Trump has already committed himself to a response, he will have to deliver.
All wars have unknown and unintended consequences. As a result of Putin’s caution, Iran lacks sufficient air defense to prevent saturation bombing of the country. Washington would send in jihadists rather than its own soldiers, and the jihadist assignment would be to carry turmoil into Russia.
If it looked like Iran was prevailing in the conflict with the US, Trump would save the day for himself by nuking Iran. Indeed, some of the American rightwing are already calling for nuking Iran.
Rather than speculate on the consequences, I ask, “why risk them?”
A defensive alliance between Russia, Iran, and China, and any others inclined to join, would tie Israel’s hands and prevent the outbreak of war. Neither Trump nor Natanyahu are going to go to war with Russia, China, and Iran.
The reason US and Israeli aggression continue unabated is that no defense alliance has formed against them.
As an attack on Iran is an attack on Russia, forming a defensive alliance is a way to prevent the attack, perhaps the only way. An alliance would simply be a formalization of the implied, de facto alliance that already exists. It would actually reduce the threat against Iran and Russia and is the surest way of stabilizing the dangerous situation.
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/0 ... els-hands/
- MorningStar
- Posts: 9431
- Joined: 22/11/2019 18:43
#25366 Re: IRAN
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pentag ... ts-mistake
Secretary of Defense Mark Esper told reporters Monday that the U.S. would not be withdrawing troops from Iraq, despite a letter that surfaced earlier in the day suggesting otherwise.
According to reports by Reuters, the United States military wrote a letter to Iraqi officials -- just one day after Iraqi lawmakers approved a resolution calling to expel U.S. troops from the country -- telling them the U.S. would pull troops from the region and work on repositioning forces in the coming weeks.
TRUMP THREATENS IRAN WITH 'MAJOR RETALIATION' FOR FUTURE ATTACKS, WARNS IRAQ OF SANCTIONS IF US TROOPS OUSTED
Esper, who said he had not seen the letter but noted that it is unsigned, said the contents are not consistent with current U.S. policy.
"There has been no decision to leave Iraq. Period," Esper said.
The confusion over withdrawing troops comes as tensions in the Middle East continue to rise in the days following the death of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani who was killed in a U.S.-led airstrike on Thursday.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-51014352"Bottom line. This was a mistake," Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters. "This was an honest mistake."
Milley called the letter “poorly worded” and said it “implies withdrawal. That’s not what’s happening.”
He clarified that there would be more U.S. troops moving around by helicopter as force protection increases inside Iraq, particularly in the heavily fortified Green Zone, which has been bombarded with rocket attacks over the past three days.
Milley also added that the U.S. military will be "bringing people in from Kuwait,” to add to the nearly 5,000 U.S. troops already on the ground.
US Defence Secretary Mark Esper has denied US troops are pulling out of Iraq, after a letter from a US general there suggested a withdrawal.
The letter said the US would be "repositioning forces in the coming days and weeks" after Iraqi MPs had called for them to leave.
Mr Esper said there had been "no decision whatsoever to leave".
The confusion came amid threats to American forces after the US killed top Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani.
He died in a US drone strike in Baghdad on Friday on the orders of Mr Trump.
Who was Iran's Qasem Soleimani?
Trump under fire for threat to Iranian cultural sites
The killing has sharply increased regional tensions, with Iran threatening "severe revenge".
What was in the letter?
It appeared to have been sent by Brig Gen William H Seely, head of the US military's task force in Iraq, to Abdul Amir, the deputy director of Combined Joint Operations.
It starts: "Sir, in due deference to the sovereignty of the Republic of Iraq, and as requested by the Iraqi Parliament, and the Prime Minister, CJTF-OIR (Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve) will be repositioning forces over the course of the coming days and weeks to prepare for onward movement."
The letter says certain measures, including increased air traffic, will be conducted "during hours of darkness" to "ensure the movement out of Iraq is conducted in a safe and efficient manner".
It would also "alleviate any perception that we may be bringing more Coalition Forces into the IZ (Green Zone in Baghdad)".
How has it been explained?
Mr Esper told reporters in Washington: "There's been no decision whatsoever to leave Iraq. I don't know what that letter is... We're trying to find out where that's coming from, what that is.
"But there's been no decision made to leave Iraq. Period."
The highest-ranking US soldier, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, then appeared at a briefing, saying the letter was "a mistake".
He said it was a draft which was poorly worded, had not been signed and should not have been released. It was being circulated for input, including from Iraqis.
"[The letter] was sent over to some key Iraqi military guys in order to get things co-ordinated for air movements, etc. Then it went from that guy's hands to another guy's hands and then it went to your hands. Now it's a kerfuffle."
Gen Milley reiterated that US troops were not leaving.
- sadie_forever
- Posts: 6009
- Joined: 24/08/2014 21:34
#25367 Re: IRAN

https://www.instagram.com/fatemeh.danesh.pajooh/?hl=en
ovo je pranunuk Homeinija,a instagram je njegove zene ...vidi se da su elita poput saudijskih princeva...not
- Kikibombona
- Posts: 34325
- Joined: 29/06/2013 08:48
#25368 Re: IRAN
Tramp i Republikanska stranka o Kasimu Sulejmaniju
E moj Salik, nasao se neko ko im je pokazao gdje im je mjesto!
E moj Salik, nasao se neko ko im je pokazao gdje im je mjesto!
- Point.
- Posts: 33107
- Joined: 28/10/2008 00:24
- Location: Bagni di Lucca
#25369 Re: IRAN
Moj Kiki, brinem za tvoje mentalno zdravlje, al ozbiljno kažem. Svako ko vjeruje jednom dokazanom, pataloškom lažovu poput ublehe Trumpa je zreo za posjet hećimu što gleda u mozgove dok nije kasno. Nije sramota, jebiga čovjek nekad pogriješi.Kikibombona wrote: ↑07/01/2020 01:40 Tramp i Republikanska stranka o Kasimu Sulejmaniju
E moj Salik, nasao se neko ko im je pokazao gdje im je mjesto!
- rocco_siffredi
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: 25/07/2015 14:13
#25370 Re: IRAN
Vjerujes covjeku koji okolo placa kurve da govore da mu se jos moze diciKikibombona wrote: ↑07/01/2020 01:40 Tramp i Republikanska stranka o Kasimu Sulejmaniju
E moj Salik, nasao se neko ko im je pokazao gdje im je mjesto!
-
aerodinamika
- Posts: 955
- Joined: 21/04/2019 13:42
#25371 Re: IRAN
nadam se da nece zapocet sukob dok vecina ucesnika teme spava
-
aerodinamika
- Posts: 955
- Joined: 21/04/2019 13:42
#25372 Re: IRAN
https://ejmagnier.com/2020/01/05/fragme ... nis-death/
a meanwhile Kasim:
i onda se ispredaju legende
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imad_MughniyehWhen Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu assassinated the deputy head of the Military Council (the highest authority in the Lebanese Hezbollah, which is headed by its Secretary-General, Hassan Nasrallah), Hajj Imad Mughniyah in Damascus, Syria, Hezbollah could not avenge him until today.
And when Israel bombed hundreds of Syrian and Iranian targets in Syria, the “Axis of the Resistance” justified its lack of retaliation by the typical sentence: “We do not want to be dragged along by the timing of the engagement imposed by the enemy,” as a senior official in this axis told me.
If Israel and the US could know Sayyed Nasrallah’s whereabouts, they would not hesitate a moment to assassinate him. They may be aware: the reaction may be limited to burning flags and holding conferences and manifesting in front of an embassy.
Imad Mughniyeh was killed on 12 February 2008 by a car bomb blast around 23:00 in the Kafr Sousa neighborhood of Damascus, Syria. According to The Sunday Times, Mughniyeh was at a reception marking the 29th anniversary of the Iranian Revolution hosted by the Iranian ambassador to Syria, Ahmad Musavi. Mughniyeh left the party shortly after 22:30 and walked to his Mitsubishi Pajero.The spare tire had been replaced by one with a high explosive, which detonated as Mughniyeh walked past. The blast completely destroyed the car, left minimum damage on nearby buildings, and killed only Mughniyeh- A Syrian government investigation found that he was killed by a car bomb parked nearby and detonated by remote.
ukratko na papiru bajno, u stvarnosti kvarnoReactions
Hassan Nasrallah appeared via video link and in the eulogy delivered for his fallen comrade, declared: "You crossed the borders. Zionists, if you want an open war, let it be an open war anywhere."
Iran condemned the killing as "yet another brazen example of organised state terrorism by the Zionist regime" (Israel).
A symbolic tomb was erected for Mughniyeh in the Behesht-e-Zahra cemetery of Tehran
a meanwhile Kasim:
ultra super obavjestajac, koji vodi tzv osovinu otpora, plus organizacija koju vodi stavljena na listu teroristickih organizacija, a lik koristi mobitel ko obican covjekHe did not take any security precautions but used his phone (which he called a companion spy) freely because he believed that when the decision came to assassinate him, he would follow his klix. He looked forward to becoming a martyr because he had already lived long.”
i onda se ispredaju legende
-
Zeleni12
- Posts: 434
- Joined: 30/08/2015 16:42
#25373 Re: IRAN
A zanimljivo da su vehabijama sije bile prihvatljive dok je u Iranu vlast imao sah Reza Pahlavi, dok je Amerika kontrolisala Iran. Cak su sijski ucenjaci drzali predavanja u Meki i Medini, i to je trajalo sve do iranske revolucije 1979. godine. Nakon svrgavanja saha, sije su vehabijama postali najveci neprijatelji.sadie_forever wrote: ↑06/01/2020 08:03Ma to je zivi haos kod njih,imas Nusretovce,onda ove saffovce i onda najzesce sto su bili oko ebu Muhameda ,koji je sad navodno postao neka ekstremna sekta rafidije---cudo,svojevremeno su bh dani o njima pisali dostaZeleni12 wrote: ↑06/01/2020 07:53Da, oni te nusretovce, bosnicevce nazivaju haridzijama, tekfirdzijama, a sebe, koji tekfire, sije i pojedine sunije, nazivaju ispravnim muslimanima, i ne pada im na pamet da su i oni ustvari tekfirdzije, u nesto blazoj varijanti od od tzv. haridzija.sadie_forever wrote: ↑06/01/2020 07:42
Meni je zanimljivo kako imaju duple arsine..svi znamo koliko su bili protiv Nusreta Imamovica ,Bilala Bosnica i tu struju sto su tekfirili "tagutski rezim saudijske arabije!..pa su ih prozvali haridzijama,i ako su ista shvatanja imali vecinom
sad oni rade to isto,samo sto to rade prema drugim mezhebima,sto znaci..samo im ne diraj u saudiju sve ce ti drugo proci,.Znam da je dok je bio vehabija tekfirio i reisa,i talibane,i ebu Hanifu,i Nusreta itd itd..mislim niko nije bio musliman za njega
![]()
- jeza u ledja
- Posts: 50289
- Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20
#25374 Re: IRAN
Sve objasnio covjek. Republikanski senator.
- salik79
- Posts: 27013
- Joined: 16/09/2013 13:15
#25375 Re: IRAN
Dabli ti namjerno konstantno provlacis ovo "obavjestajac", ili si fakat padobranac koji je negdje nesto nacuo?! Od kada je sehid Sulejmani bio obavjestajac?!aerodinamika wrote: ↑07/01/2020 02:59 ultra super obavjestajac, koji vodi tzv osovinu otpora, plus organizacija koju vodi stavljena na listu teroristickih organizacija, a lik koristi mobitel ko obican covjek![]()
i onda se ispredaju legende
I, kakve, u ovom slucaju, ima veze njegovo smaknuce sa telefonom koji je koristio?!
