jeza u ledja wrote:joker wrote:
BiH bez entiteta (ne jednog vec oba)... A dovoljno je ostati na istom ustavu pa da nam ne bude losije... A oni amandmani su znacili losije. Ako laze Vijece Evrope, Venecijanska komisija i ost. lazem i ja.
Lazes ti! Kao sto su lagali i ove patriJote nakon ove rezolucije, koja kaze izmedju ostalog:
-------------------------------------------------------------
6. The reform package provided, inter alia, for an increase in the number of members of parliament in the state-level House of Representatives (from 42 to 87, with 3 seats reserved for the first time for members of non-constituent peoples, the so-called “Others”). The upper house, the House of Peoples, would have 21 instead of 15 members and only the competence to decide on the veto regarding vital national interests that can be invoked by any of the three constituent peoples. The reform also foresaw the indirect election of a state-level president and 2 vice-presidents, whose powers would be reduced, with a rotation of the 3 members every 16 months instead of 8 as at present, the creation of 2 additional ministries at state level, and a reinforcement of the competences of the Council of Ministers.
7. Although some may have considered these constitutional amendments as being neither comprehensive nor particularly far-reaching, the Assembly considers that they nevertheless represented a first attempt by the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina and their representatives to take their future in their own hands, and it should be welcomed as such.
8. The Assembly therefore strongly regrets that on 26 April 2006, the Parliament of Bosnia and Herzegovina failed, by just two votes, to reach the required two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives in order for the constitutional amendments to pass.
9. The Assembly also notes that the failed amendments should have entered into force by 1 May, five months before the next general election scheduled for 1 October 2006. It is now clear that the new government will be formed, and quite possibly function for its entire four-year mandate, according to the current constitution, which was part of the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreements.
10. This means that the forthcoming elections will be held in violation of Council of Europe commitments, in particular Protocol No. 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights on the prohibition of discrimination (ETS No. 177), because again only Serbs, Bosniacs and Croats will be able to stand as candidates for election as members of the presidency and for the indirect elections of delegates to the House of Peoples, to the exclusion of the so-called “Others”, that is, everybody not identifying themselves with one of the three constituent peoples.
http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/ ... es1513.htm
Dakle u rezoluciji se sa zaljenjem konstatuje da ustavne promjene nisu prihvacene, jer su one bile u skladu sa zeljama i zakljuccima Venecijanske komisije i VE. Stoga, oni koji su glasali protiv tih promjena radili su kontra onoga sto je VE preporucilo, a u korist daljnje etnicke segregacije BiH. Jedini ko je ogranicen i glup u svemu ovome mozes biti samo ti.
Vec sam ovo kacio, ali evo opet, posto si ti zakacio prvi dio rezolucije, a u nastavku se pominje izbacivanje, at least, entitetskog glasanja i preciznije definisanje vitalnog nacionalnog interesa. A u objasnjenju koje ide kao sastavni dio rezolucije ili prilog imas detaljnije opisane propuste i vise njih i to sam vec kacio pa ovdje necu.
Ti u stvari ne lazes, laze se sa namjerom. Ti ustvari grijesis jer si glup pa ne razumijes.
18. As a first step the Assembly expects people and politicians in Bosnia and Herzegovina to again discuss constitutional reform immediately after the October general elections, and if they decide to do this on the basis of the proposals agreed upon so far, to eliminate at least the entity voting in the House of Representatives and to define more precisely the vital national interests and the related veto mechanism. In this respect, the Assembly urges the House of Representatives to take into account all the different recommendations made by the Venice Commission in its provisional opinion dated 7 April 2006, both on the text of the failed amendments and on the steps to be taken in the next phase of constitutional reform.
20.
As a second step the Assembly therefore urges the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina, by October 2010 at the latest, to draft and adopt a new constitution in order to:
20.1.
replace the mechanisms of ethnic representation by representation based on the civic principle, notably by ending the constitutional discrimination against “Others”;
20.2.
find efficient and rational decision-making procedures that are not sacrificed to the principle of involving representatives of each constituent people in any decision;
20.3.
review the territorial organisation of the state and its division into entities, cantons and municipalities and the repartition of competences between the state and the lower levels with a view to increasing efficiency and sustainability;
20.4. examine how to integrate the Brčko District.
21. The Assembly also urges the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina to adopt and/or implement,
as soon as possible, the laws at state and entity level that are necessary in order to fulfil the remaining Council of Europe commitments, notably:
21.1. the laws on higher education that should include accreditation and financing at state level;
21.2. the state-level law on primary and secondary education with a view to ending ethnic segregation in schools;
21.3. the by-laws on a sustainable public broadcasting service;
21.4. the police reform, in accordance with the three principles set by the EU Commission;
21.5. the local government reforms, notably in the federation, and the reunification of Mostar;
21.6. the laws needed for an effective protection of the rights of all minorities;
21.7. the creation of a state-level supreme court to enhance the reform of the judiciary.