True detective

Najbolji i najgori filmovi, serije, sve o sedmoj umjetnosti...

Moderator: _BataZiv_0809

Post Reply
User avatar
shmizlica
Posts: 57892
Joined: 18/11/2010 14:35
Location: u oku posmatrača

#801 Re: True detective

Post by shmizlica »

omar little wrote:http://m.imdb.com/news/ni57773767

potvrdili i vince vaughn.
ma daj bjez :roll:
biće to nešto sasvim drugačije u odnosu na prvu :mrgreen:
omar little
Posts: 17275
Joined: 14/03/2008 21:14

#802 Re: True detective

Post by omar little »

madner wrote:Bar nema zena. :D
samo neka dobra glumica i moze spasiti ovaj los kombo sto izabrase :P :D
User avatar
karanana
Posts: 50701
Joined: 26/02/2004 00:00

#803 Re: True detective

Post by karanana »

pa valjda ce ubaciti kakvu dobru sa sex scenom kao sto je bila ona woodijeva cura u prvoj sezoni.

sta fali vinceu? meni je bas cool bio u swingersima i u onom filmu kad im druga zatvore u maleziji a on mora da se vrati da ga na sudu priznanjem spasi.
bull21
Posts: 2238
Joined: 14/06/2011 16:05

#804 Re: True detective

Post by bull21 »

Dude, it's HBO.
Normalno da će biti sexa. I više no što ga treba.
omar little
Posts: 17275
Joined: 14/03/2008 21:14

#805 Re: True detective

Post by omar little »

ma, bice sexa nije to, ne brini se :D, nego su kruzili tracevi da ce u novoj sezoni jedan glavni lik biti zena, detektiv neki. elisabeth moss se spominjala, ona peggy iz mad men. madner provocira samo :D
Amar_Chulle_Custic
Posts: 151
Joined: 24/04/2013 08:37

#806 Re: True detective

Post by Amar_Chulle_Custic »

omar little wrote:
madner wrote:Bar nema zena. :D
samo neka dobra glumica i moze spasiti ovaj los kombo sto izabrase :P :D
pa ja sam mislio da Vudi nema šta raditi u mračnoj i ozbiljnoj seriji i dobro se zajebao xD
omar little
Posts: 17275
Joined: 14/03/2008 21:14

#807 Re: True detective

Post by omar little »

Forget Farrell and Vaughn, here's how True Detective can stay great

The casting of Farrell is disappointing, but all is not lost. The HBO drama can reign supreme again if it follows these rules


Can True Detective get over the loss of Matthew McConaughey? Can True Detective get over the loss of Matthew McConaughey?

The months of ardent speculation about season two of True Detective have finally come to an end. HBO has just announced that season two will feature Colin Farrell as Ray Velcoro, a crooked cop involved with the mob. He will be joined by Vince Vaughn, who will play Frank Semyon, a mobster who is trying to go legit and whose plans are upended by a murder.

The fate of True Detective’s second season now rests in the hands of the star of box office duds Phone Booth, Alexander and a Total Recall remake that no one wanted. In Bruges is pretty great, but lacked the sort of impact to make it a classic. In more commercially successful films, like Horrible Bosses and Minority Report, he’s been cast only as a supporting character. Farrell does not have a reputation for selecting good material, which raises concern about what we can expect from the next iteration of the hit HBO series.

Vaughn, a drooling bullmastiff of an actor, has certainly been in some big box office hits, but isn’t really known for his prowess as a thespian. His most recent movies were cinematic gems Delivery Man and The Internship which made as much money as a slightly busy lemonade stand on your local Main Street.

To make matters worse, the first two episodes will be directed by Justin Lin, who directed Fast and the Furious 6 and the pilot for CBS’s decidedly mediocre new show Scorpion, in which a waitress chases a landing plane in a Ferrari convertible so that she can connect a computer to a wire dangling out of it.

We’re trusting the future of a beloved franchise to these nogoodniks?

Part of what made season one of True Detective great was that bona fide movie stars Woody Harrelson and Matthew McConaughey deigned to do television for it. You knew the script had to be amazing if these two were taking time off from winning Oscars. Their considerable talents as actors is part of what made the show so successful.

Now that the show is going to have an entirely different cast and story, we have two guys whose careers have stalled and are hoping to get a boost by doing some prestige television. It reeks a little bit of desperation on everyone’s part, especially after the #TrueDetectiveSeasonTwo guessing game that imaginatively cast every big-name actor in Hollywood, what we got was bound to disappoint.

But all is not lost (yet). There are still some things that creator Nic Pizzolatto can do to make sure that season two is just as good, if not better, than season one.

Get a great director


What really cemented True Detective as top-notch television is the cinematic genius of Cary Joji Fukunaga, who directed every episode of the season (and won an Emmy for his troubles). Fukunaga’s soaring landscape shots, dreamy flashbacks, and skill with making the Louisiana summer look authentically disgusting and oppressive unified the season with a visual language that was stunning and individual. Having one person with a real vision behind the camera is what season two needs, even if it’s someone with a totally different but equally distinctive style as Fukunaga. Maybe someone like Neil Marshall, who directed the amazing Game of Thrones episodes featuring the Battle of Blackwater and the siege of The Wall. Or maybe Michelle MacLaren, a veteran of Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, and The Leftovers.

Keep it weird

While True Detective was as much of a standard police procedural as any of the other cop drams on TV, what differentiated it was all that “Time is a flat circle” talk that everyone quotes. It walked the line between being grounded in a gritty reality and indulging in the supernatural that really set the show apart. Pizzolatto said that this season would be about “the secret occult history of the American transportation system” so we’re well on our way. The show also never offered any easy answers when it came to its more outré plot points and that’s what made it so much fun to debate and theorize about. Let’s hope that we get just the right amount of clarity for it to make sense, but not so much that it turns into the 19th season of Supernatural.

Make LA fresh

Farrell also confirmed that the season will be set in Los Angeles instead of rural Louisiana like the first season. The backwater aesthetic and story of the show was a major part of it, and something that really set it apart from all the other urban crime dramas that litter the TV landscape. LA especially is home of the modern noir (including everything from Chinatown to Drive). The show is going to have to find that vein that makes the city of Angels seem new and gritty again in an original way that hasn’t been done before. It’s a tough order, because it’s up against so much competition, but hopefully that weirdness will play into it.

Hire more women

There was much noise made about True Detective’s lack of female characters and its treatment of the ones it had. Season two has long rumored to have a major female character (possibly played by the amazing Elizabeth Moss), so lets hope that she’s a fellow detective or someone with a little bit more empowerment than the nags and vicitms of season one. And since we’re talking about hiring women, maybe get one as that visionary director. Jane Campion had tremendous success with the Sundance show Top of the Lake, which was very similar to True Detective. Maybe we need someone like her to give this thing a more feminine spin.

Get Bill Murray

He just makes everything a little bit better, doesn’t he?

http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio ... in-farrell
User avatar
Boateng
Posts: 1409
Joined: 15/02/2011 00:10

#808 Re: True detective

Post by Boateng »

Dovoljno je da se postavi link! :roll:

P.S. Razumjeli smo da nisi zadovoljna izborom glumaca.
User avatar
insaneinthebrain
Posts: 24897
Joined: 12/08/2013 12:51

#809 Re: True detective

Post by insaneinthebrain »

madner wrote:Bar nema zena. :D
mora biti malo golotinje :izet:
User avatar
MedenoSrce
Posts: 9975
Joined: 05/07/2010 17:39
Location: Tree house

#810 Re: True detective

Post by MedenoSrce »

omar little wrote:Forget Farrell and Vaughn, here's how True Detective can stay great

The casting of Farrell is disappointing, but all is not lost. The HBO drama can reign supreme again if it follows these rules


Can True Detective get over the loss of Matthew McConaughey? Can True Detective get over the loss of Matthew McConaughey?

The months of ardent speculation about season two of True Detective have finally come to an end. HBO has just announced that season two will feature Colin Farrell as Ray Velcoro, a crooked cop involved with the mob. He will be joined by Vince Vaughn, who will play Frank Semyon, a mobster who is trying to go legit and whose plans are upended by a murder.

The fate of True Detective’s second season now rests in the hands of the star of box office duds Phone Booth, Alexander and a Total Recall remake that no one wanted. In Bruges is pretty great, but lacked the sort of impact to make it a classic. In more commercially successful films, like Horrible Bosses and Minority Report, he’s been cast only as a supporting character. Farrell does not have a reputation for selecting good material, which raises concern about what we can expect from the next iteration of the hit HBO series.

Vaughn, a drooling bullmastiff of an actor, has certainly been in some big box office hits, but isn’t really known for his prowess as a thespian. His most recent movies were cinematic gems Delivery Man and The Internship which made as much money as a slightly busy lemonade stand on your local Main Street.

To make matters worse, the first two episodes will be directed by Justin Lin, who directed Fast and the Furious 6 and the pilot for CBS’s decidedly mediocre new show Scorpion, in which a waitress chases a landing plane in a Ferrari convertible so that she can connect a computer to a wire dangling out of it.

We’re trusting the future of a beloved franchise to these nogoodniks?

Part of what made season one of True Detective great was that bona fide movie stars Woody Harrelson and Matthew McConaughey deigned to do television for it. You knew the script had to be amazing if these two were taking time off from winning Oscars. Their considerable talents as actors is part of what made the show so successful.

Now that the show is going to have an entirely different cast and story, we have two guys whose careers have stalled and are hoping to get a boost by doing some prestige television. It reeks a little bit of desperation on everyone’s part, especially after the #TrueDetectiveSeasonTwo guessing game that imaginatively cast every big-name actor in Hollywood, what we got was bound to disappoint.

But all is not lost (yet). There are still some things that creator Nic Pizzolatto can do to make sure that season two is just as good, if not better, than season one.

Get a great director


What really cemented True Detective as top-notch television is the cinematic genius of Cary Joji Fukunaga, who directed every episode of the season (and won an Emmy for his troubles). Fukunaga’s soaring landscape shots, dreamy flashbacks, and skill with making the Louisiana summer look authentically disgusting and oppressive unified the season with a visual language that was stunning and individual. Having one person with a real vision behind the camera is what season two needs, even if it’s someone with a totally different but equally distinctive style as Fukunaga. Maybe someone like Neil Marshall, who directed the amazing Game of Thrones episodes featuring the Battle of Blackwater and the siege of The Wall. Or maybe Michelle MacLaren, a veteran of Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, and The Leftovers.

Keep it weird

While True Detective was as much of a standard police procedural as any of the other cop drams on TV, what differentiated it was all that “Time is a flat circle” talk that everyone quotes. It walked the line between being grounded in a gritty reality and indulging in the supernatural that really set the show apart. Pizzolatto said that this season would be about “the secret occult history of the American transportation system” so we’re well on our way. The show also never offered any easy answers when it came to its more outré plot points and that’s what made it so much fun to debate and theorize about. Let’s hope that we get just the right amount of clarity for it to make sense, but not so much that it turns into the 19th season of Supernatural.

Make LA fresh

Farrell also confirmed that the season will be set in Los Angeles instead of rural Louisiana like the first season. The backwater aesthetic and story of the show was a major part of it, and something that really set it apart from all the other urban crime dramas that litter the TV landscape. LA especially is home of the modern noir (including everything from Chinatown to Drive). The show is going to have to find that vein that makes the city of Angels seem new and gritty again in an original way that hasn’t been done before. It’s a tough order, because it’s up against so much competition, but hopefully that weirdness will play into it.

Hire more women

There was much noise made about True Detective’s lack of female characters and its treatment of the ones it had. Season two has long rumored to have a major female character (possibly played by the amazing Elizabeth Moss), so lets hope that she’s a fellow detective or someone with a little bit more empowerment than the nags and vicitms of season one. And since we’re talking about hiring women, maybe get one as that visionary director. Jane Campion had tremendous success with the Sundance show Top of the Lake, which was very similar to True Detective. Maybe we need someone like her to give this thing a more feminine spin.

Get Bill Murray

He just makes everything a little bit better, doesn’t he?

<span><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio ... in-farrell" class="smarterwiki-linkify">http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio ... </a></span>
Nemam velikih ocekivanja od nove sezone. Drago bi mi bilo da me iznenade.

Bit ce nekog seksa sad dal sa zenama il bez njih nije bitno, izjasnio se madner sta bi vise volio :D
User avatar
madner
Posts: 57524
Joined: 09/08/2004 16:35

#811 Re: True detective

Post by madner »

Pa bice djevojaka, zena je kada pokusaju da bidne karakter. :D
User avatar
karanana
Posts: 50701
Joined: 26/02/2004 00:00

#812 Re: True detective

Post by karanana »

uh kako je dobra ona woodijeva plavka bila. uh scene kad on dolazi kod nje.....
a ni woodijeva zena nije bila za bacit. dapache....i woodijeva zena je bila za bacit.
Last edited by karanana on 24/09/2014 16:52, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
dječak sa šibicama
Posts: 50316
Joined: 29/06/2011 23:39

#813 Re: True detective

Post by dječak sa šibicama »

Ja glumaca, mogli su i Adama Sandlera nagovoriti :roll:
User avatar
Saian
Posts: 16025
Joined: 08/04/2004 21:50

#814 Re: True detective

Post by Saian »

omar little wrote:
Get Bill Murray

He just makes everything a little bit better, doesn’t he?
ne moRe tachnije

http://www.ranker.com/list/the-7-greate ... istin-wong
The legend, in case you haven't heard it before, usually goes something like this: "My [brother/buddy/cousin] was in [Chicago/New York/Los Angeles] a couple years ago, just walking around, when all of a sudden some guy runs up from behind him and [gives him a bear hug/puts his hands over his eyes/puts him in a headlock and gives him a noogie]. So he spins around and it's freaking Bill Murray, man. Bill Murray! From Ghostbusters, man! No, no—the tall one. You know, he was in Caddyshack? Anyway, Murray looks at my [brother/buddy/cousin] right in the eye, and says, 'No one will ever believe you.' And then he just walks away! How nuts is that, dude?!"

Great story, right? And maybe, if you're the kind of person who believes Murray deserves a Nobel Prize for Groundhog Day, sort of plausible? GQ's Dan Fierman asked him about it during their interview, in an attempt to get a definitive answer. Here's what Murray said:

[long pause] I know. I know, I know, I know. I've heard about that from a lot of people. A lot of people. I don't know what to say. There's probably a really appropriate thing to say. Something exactly and just perfectly right. [long beat, and then he breaks into a huge grin] But by God, it sounds crazy, doesn't it? Just so crazy and unlikely and unusual?
omar little
Posts: 17275
Joined: 14/03/2008 21:14

#815 Re: True detective

Post by omar little »

Boateng wrote:Dovoljno je da se postavi link! :roll:

P.S. Razumjeli smo da nisi zadovoljna izborom glumaca.
ajde :-)

toliko ti smeta kako neko posta tekst na temi da si odlucio post o tome napisati, bokte mazo :-)
User avatar
madner
Posts: 57524
Joined: 09/08/2004 16:35

#816 Re: True detective

Post by madner »

Samo opusteno, evo karanana nas je sve podsjetio na vrhunac prosle sezone. :D
User avatar
karanana
Posts: 50701
Joined: 26/02/2004 00:00

#817 Re: True detective

Post by karanana »

definitivno sex sa plavkom.
zatim ona scena onog ganjanja po hoodu sa onim crncima. fenomenalno snimljeno. ima li naziv za tu vrstu/stil snimanja i pokretanja kamere. mislim da je, ko je pratio, isti stil kamere koristen i u game of thrones epizodi borbe na zidu izmedju branitelja i onih wildlingsa kad wildlingsi ulete u utvrdu. ono kamera hoda zajedno sa glumcima, vrlo efektno i kao da si tamo. trebali su to koristiti i kod scene sexa sa plavkom.
User avatar
Boateng
Posts: 1409
Joined: 15/02/2011 00:10

#818 Re: True detective

Post by Boateng »

User avatar
Tito_i_Partija
Posts: 12337
Joined: 11/03/2014 15:56
Location: Kod Sebije na pregledu

#819 Re: True detective

Post by Tito_i_Partija »

Ja kmecanja u picku materinu...pa zar vi stvarno mislite da Nic i HBO nemaju pojma sta rade? Ono, "posrecilo" im se sa McConaughey-om i Harrelsonom, pa sad k'o neki amateri traze glavne glumce za drugu sezonu na nekoj pijaci. Nemaju ljudi pojma, et' daj ba bilo koga samo da nastavimo sezonu koliko-toliko. Kao da vam je prva HBO serija sto gledate pa nemate pojma koji su to mozgovi...a Nic licno radi casting, pa valjda zna covjek koji glumci najbolje pasu za pricu koju je on od pocetka do kraja napisao.

De malo sabura ljudi. Sjetite se kakve je filmove pravio McConaughey prije ove serije, pa ce vam valjda sve bit' jasno.

A za ovaj clanak iz Guardiana cu samo rec da ne pamtim kad sam zadnji put vidio toliki idiotizam. Vala i oni danas daju svakom da za njih pise clanke.
nema me tamo
Posts: 13597
Joined: 30/10/2013 18:58

#820 Re: True detective

Post by nema me tamo »

Izbor glumaca vrh!
Bravo za Hbo.
User avatar
dale cooper
Posts: 31115
Joined: 03/04/2007 09:55
Location: Twin Peaks/Red Room

#821 Re: True detective

Post by dale cooper »

Nisam zabrinut dok ne budem vidio prvu epizodu. Ni Farrell ni Vaughn nisu loši glumci,
više glumci koji su sa jedne strane imali nesretan i loš izbor projekata (Farrell) ili koji su
stereotipisani kao komični frat-boy klauni (Vaughn). Ja ovo gledam kao šansu njih
dvojice da se iskupe i pokažu šta zaista mogu. Uostalom kao što je to uradio i McConaughey zadnjih
par godina.
User avatar
madner
Posts: 57524
Joined: 09/08/2004 16:35

#822 Re: True detective

Post by madner »

Ni jedan od njih nema glumacki talent Woodija a Farrel ne lici na murjaka.
ted10
Posts: 254
Joined: 15/09/2013 17:36

#823 Re: True detective

Post by ted10 »

Dobri glumci i Colin i Vince :thumbup:
nema me tamo
Posts: 13597
Joined: 30/10/2013 18:58

#824 Re: True detective

Post by nema me tamo »

madner wrote:Ni jedan od njih nema glumacki talent Woodija a Farrel ne lici na murjaka.

Kako kome npr meni su isti kalibar glumaca..
S tim da više volim gledat Colina nego Woodija..
Samo se ti tripuješ zato što je prva sezona bila vrh pa kao nisi siguran da li ce bit' ova..
Sve u svemu po imenima mi je bolji duo sto ce bit' u drugoj sezoni, eh sad da li ce rad pisaca i režisera bit isti to cemo tek vidjeti.
User avatar
dale cooper
Posts: 31115
Joined: 03/04/2007 09:55
Location: Twin Peaks/Red Room

#825 Re: True detective

Post by dale cooper »

madner wrote:Ni jedan od njih nema glumacki talent Woodija a Farrel ne lici na murjaka.
Šta god to značilo. :D
Post Reply