Razlika izmedju DVD-R, DVD+R, DvD_RW i DVD-RW
Moderator: Benq
-
The_Fluid
- Posts: 5591
- Joined: 02/08/2002 00:00
- Location: Earth
#1 Razlika izmedju DVD-R, DVD+R, DvD_RW i DVD-RW
There's DVD+R, DVD+RW, DVD-R, DVD-RW, and even DVD-ROM! So what's the difference between all of these different names, aren't all DVDs the same? Well, it's not quite that simple.
Let's first start with the most obvious difference: some have R and some have RW. The "R" stands for readable, while the "W" stands for writeable.
The main difference between DVD-R and DVD-RW, or DVD+R and DVD+RW is that the R disc formats can only be written to once, and then it is only readable and can’t be erased for the rest of its digital life. While RW discs are can be written to and erased many times, they are both readable and writeable.
"R" discs are perfect if they are only needed to be written to once, such as giving some files to a friend or transferring them between PCs. "RW" discs have their strength in the ability to be used many times over, which is great for routine system backups, etc. And naturally, the RW discs are slightly more expensive than the R discs, but you'll have to decide if the trade offs are worth the money.
Now, onto the difference between DVD-R and DVD+R. As I just described above, DVD-R & DVD-RW are sister discs, the difference being one is writeable once, while the other is writeable multiple times. The same thing is true for DVD+R & DVD+RW. So the question is, what's the difference between the plus and minus?
In order to explain this we must take a trip back in time. When DVDs were first being developed, there was no industry standard. Multiple companies were competing to develop what they hoped would be the dominant form of the future.
The DVD-R DVD+R difference can easily be summarized by the following:
* The DVD-R/RW standard was developed by Pioneer, and is used primarily by Apple and Pioneer. These "minus" discs can only be written to in one layer on the discs surface. In addition, this format is supported by the DVD forum, but is in no way an industry standard. DVD-R/RW discs are cheaper than the "plus" format.
* The DVD+R/RW format is supported by Philips, Dell, Sony, HP, and Mcft. These discs can be written to in multiple layers, giving them slightly better and more disc storage than the "minus" format. Because of this additional capacity, they are slightly more expensive than "minus" discs.
A couple final things to clear up is the difference between DVD-ROM and DVD+RW, or the other DVD formats I mentioned above. The DVD-ROM drive can only read DVDs, while the other DVD drives can read and write data to DVDs.
And naturally the DVD+RW CD+RW difference can be explained by the "DVD" or "CD" prefix. DVDs, on average, can store up to 4.7 GB of data, while a CD can only store about 700 MB of data, or about 15% of a DVD's capacity. While CDs are slightly cheaper, in my opinion, the benefits of DVDs are much greater.
So now that you've learned about the difference between DVD-R, DVD+R, DVD-RW, DVD+RW, and even DVD-ROM, which one is right for you? The easiest way to determine which is more beneficial is to watch the industry trends. A few years ago all pre-built computers were shipping with DVD-ROM drives. Today, most PCs have a burnable DVD drive.
I feel that the benefits of having a burnable DVD drive far outweigh any additional costs. They store much more data, and they are ideal for storing your home movies to watch on your DVD player.
My advice is to look at DVD burners that support all of the major formats I've mentioned above, DVD-R, DVD+R, DVD-RW, and DVD+RW. While a DVD drive that supports all of these formats may be slightly more expensive, it will allow you to use any type of DVD disc to burn to, and you'll be protected from any industry shifts to one format or the other.
Let's first start with the most obvious difference: some have R and some have RW. The "R" stands for readable, while the "W" stands for writeable.
The main difference between DVD-R and DVD-RW, or DVD+R and DVD+RW is that the R disc formats can only be written to once, and then it is only readable and can’t be erased for the rest of its digital life. While RW discs are can be written to and erased many times, they are both readable and writeable.
"R" discs are perfect if they are only needed to be written to once, such as giving some files to a friend or transferring them between PCs. "RW" discs have their strength in the ability to be used many times over, which is great for routine system backups, etc. And naturally, the RW discs are slightly more expensive than the R discs, but you'll have to decide if the trade offs are worth the money.
Now, onto the difference between DVD-R and DVD+R. As I just described above, DVD-R & DVD-RW are sister discs, the difference being one is writeable once, while the other is writeable multiple times. The same thing is true for DVD+R & DVD+RW. So the question is, what's the difference between the plus and minus?
In order to explain this we must take a trip back in time. When DVDs were first being developed, there was no industry standard. Multiple companies were competing to develop what they hoped would be the dominant form of the future.
The DVD-R DVD+R difference can easily be summarized by the following:
* The DVD-R/RW standard was developed by Pioneer, and is used primarily by Apple and Pioneer. These "minus" discs can only be written to in one layer on the discs surface. In addition, this format is supported by the DVD forum, but is in no way an industry standard. DVD-R/RW discs are cheaper than the "plus" format.
* The DVD+R/RW format is supported by Philips, Dell, Sony, HP, and Mcft. These discs can be written to in multiple layers, giving them slightly better and more disc storage than the "minus" format. Because of this additional capacity, they are slightly more expensive than "minus" discs.
A couple final things to clear up is the difference between DVD-ROM and DVD+RW, or the other DVD formats I mentioned above. The DVD-ROM drive can only read DVDs, while the other DVD drives can read and write data to DVDs.
And naturally the DVD+RW CD+RW difference can be explained by the "DVD" or "CD" prefix. DVDs, on average, can store up to 4.7 GB of data, while a CD can only store about 700 MB of data, or about 15% of a DVD's capacity. While CDs are slightly cheaper, in my opinion, the benefits of DVDs are much greater.
So now that you've learned about the difference between DVD-R, DVD+R, DVD-RW, DVD+RW, and even DVD-ROM, which one is right for you? The easiest way to determine which is more beneficial is to watch the industry trends. A few years ago all pre-built computers were shipping with DVD-ROM drives. Today, most PCs have a burnable DVD drive.
I feel that the benefits of having a burnable DVD drive far outweigh any additional costs. They store much more data, and they are ideal for storing your home movies to watch on your DVD player.
My advice is to look at DVD burners that support all of the major formats I've mentioned above, DVD-R, DVD+R, DVD-RW, and DVD+RW. While a DVD drive that supports all of these formats may be slightly more expensive, it will allow you to use any type of DVD disc to burn to, and you'll be protected from any industry shifts to one format or the other.
- Qler
- Posts: 25930
- Joined: 18/10/2004 14:49
- Location: Sarajevo
#5
ma kad su se tek poceli proizvoditi DVD-evi pionner i sony se zahebavali i svako napravio svoj standard,. Prvo su bili samo DVD+R snimaci ili samo DVD-r p asu onda proizvodjaci optickih uredjaja (Plextor, NEC i tako) skontali da od tog nema fajde, i sda proizvode pisace koji pisu i + i - standard. Jedino sto su - malo jeftiniji a + su DL (dual layer) eto, ukratko 
e sad, koji bi mi vi DVD pisac preporucili?! NEsto kontam, kada sam prije dvije i po godine kupovo racunar, kupio sam CD-RW PLEXWRITER i masno ga platio, i nikad nisam pozalio ni sekunde. Kontam isplati li se sad kupovati opet plextora samo DVD, citam u infu da je ovaj novi beton, da se brzina snimanja moze povecati jednostavnim update-om firmware-a! Ima li ga ko?! Ispalti li se dati vise love za njega, nego za recimo NEC ili LG?!
evo link za plextora
e sad, koji bi mi vi DVD pisac preporucili?! NEsto kontam, kada sam prije dvije i po godine kupovo racunar, kupio sam CD-RW PLEXWRITER i masno ga platio, i nikad nisam pozalio ni sekunde. Kontam isplati li se sad kupovati opet plextora samo DVD, citam u infu da je ovaj novi beton, da se brzina snimanja moze povecati jednostavnim update-om firmware-a! Ima li ga ko?! Ispalti li se dati vise love za njega, nego za recimo NEC ili LG?!
evo link za plextora
-
The_Fluid
- Posts: 5591
- Joined: 02/08/2002 00:00
- Location: Earth
#6
Qler wrote:ma kad su se tek poceli proizvoditi DVD-evi pionner i sony se zahebavali i svako napravio svoj standard,. Prvo su bili samo DVD+R snimaci ili samo DVD-r p asu onda proizvodjaci optickih uredjaja (Plextor, NEC i tako) skontali da od tog nema fajde, i sda proizvode pisace koji pisu i + i - standard. Jedino sto su - malo jeftiniji a + su DL (dual layer) eto, ukratko
e sad, koji bi mi vi DVD pisac preporucili?! NEsto kontam, kada sam prije dvije i po godine kupovo racunar, kupio sam CD-RW PLEXWRITER i masno ga platio, i nikad nisam pozalio ni sekunde. Kontam isplati li se sad kupovati opet plextora samo DVD, citam u infu da je ovaj novi beton, da se brzina snimanja moze povecati jednostavnim update-om firmware-a! Ima li ga ko?! Ispalti li se dati vise love za njega, nego za recimo NEC ili LG?!
evo link za plextora
Kupih prije par mjeseci pioneer dvr-108, dual layer i zadovoljan sam sa njim, no plextor je itekako dobar izbor, posebno model koji si naveo. Ja bih kupio isti no nisu ga imali na lageru u to vrijeme. Sve najbolje pri kupovini.
- Qler
- Posts: 25930
- Joined: 18/10/2004 14:49
- Location: Sarajevo
#7
hvala! Nego ima li ko da hoce kupiti plextorov cd pisac i sony-ev cd citac
da se malo poguram finansijski za dvd pisaca 
inace, iskustvo koje imam sa plextorom je vise nego odlicno
ovaj pisac me slusa ko seoska mlada
fakat mi ga zao prodati, ali nemam neku prakticnu upotrebu sako kupim dvd pisac 
inace, iskustvo koje imam sa plextorom je vise nego odlicno
-
The_Fluid
- Posts: 5591
- Joined: 02/08/2002 00:00
- Location: Earth
#8
predlazem ti da stavis to na sa-x oglase, ja sam tako prodao stari cd-writerQler wrote:hvala! Nego ima li ko da hoce kupiti plextorov cd pisac i sony-ev cd citacda se malo poguram finansijski za dvd pisaca
inace, iskustvo koje imam sa plextorom je vise nego odlicnoovaj pisac me slusa ko seoska mlada
fakat mi ga zao prodati, ali nemam neku prakticnu upotrebu sako kupim dvd pisac
-
Skvidji
- Posts: 278
- Joined: 04/02/2005 20:24
- Location: sector "T" till 3PM after 3PM till 8AM I'm at sector "G"
- Contact:
#10
ja sam kupio nedavno, nema mjesec, pionnera i pravo sam zadovoljan, evo ko neka specifikacija:
Cijena: 140 KM
Model DVR-MCC * Podržane brzine DVD-R: 8x, DVD-RW: 4x, DVD+R 8x, DVD+R DL (Double Layer) 2.4x, DVD+RW 4x, CD-R 40x, CD-RW 24x * Brzina čitanja 16x max. DVD-ROM / 40x max. CD-ROM * Vrijeme pristupa 160 ms * Međuspremnik 2 MB * Kompatibilni formati DVD (DVD-5; Single layer, Single side 4.7GB) - samo čita, DVD (DVD-9; Dual layer, Single side 8.54GB) - samo čita, DVD (DVD-10; Single layer, Dual side 9.4GB) - samo čita, DVD (DVD-18; Dual layer, Dual side 17.09GB) - samo čita, DVD-R Ver.1.0 (for authoring 3.95GB) - samo čita, DVD-R Ver.2.0 (for authoring 4.7GB) - samo čita, DVD-R Ver.2.0 (for general 4.7GB), DVD-RW Ver.1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 (4.7GB), DVD+R Ver.1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, DVD+R DL (Double Layer), DVD+RW Ver.1,1 and 1.2, CD-ROM Mode1 - samo čita, CD-ROM XA Mode2 (form 1, form2) - samo čita, Photo CD (single and multiple session), Video CD, CD-DA, CD-Extra, CD-Text, CD-R, CD-RW (Supports AM2), HS CD-RW (Supports AM2), US CD-RW (Supports AM2), US+ CD-RW (Supports AM2) * Sučelje IDE (ATAPI)
Pozdrav!
Cijena: 140 KM
Model DVR-MCC * Podržane brzine DVD-R: 8x, DVD-RW: 4x, DVD+R 8x, DVD+R DL (Double Layer) 2.4x, DVD+RW 4x, CD-R 40x, CD-RW 24x * Brzina čitanja 16x max. DVD-ROM / 40x max. CD-ROM * Vrijeme pristupa 160 ms * Međuspremnik 2 MB * Kompatibilni formati DVD (DVD-5; Single layer, Single side 4.7GB) - samo čita, DVD (DVD-9; Dual layer, Single side 8.54GB) - samo čita, DVD (DVD-10; Single layer, Dual side 9.4GB) - samo čita, DVD (DVD-18; Dual layer, Dual side 17.09GB) - samo čita, DVD-R Ver.1.0 (for authoring 3.95GB) - samo čita, DVD-R Ver.2.0 (for authoring 4.7GB) - samo čita, DVD-R Ver.2.0 (for general 4.7GB), DVD-RW Ver.1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 (4.7GB), DVD+R Ver.1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, DVD+R DL (Double Layer), DVD+RW Ver.1,1 and 1.2, CD-ROM Mode1 - samo čita, CD-ROM XA Mode2 (form 1, form2) - samo čita, Photo CD (single and multiple session), Video CD, CD-DA, CD-Extra, CD-Text, CD-R, CD-RW (Supports AM2), HS CD-RW (Supports AM2), US CD-RW (Supports AM2), US+ CD-RW (Supports AM2) * Sučelje IDE (ATAPI)
Pozdrav!
-
JBL
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: 17/08/2004 00:06
#11
snimanja moze povecati jednostavnim update-om firmware-a! Ima li ga ko?! Ispalti li se dati vise love za njega, nego za recimo NEC ili LG?!
evo link za plextora[/quote]
Zavisi koliko przis diskova, za malu kolicinu sprzenih dvd medija uzmi Nec 3500 inace investiraj u Plextora. LG je u svakom slucaju s.... roba. A ni NEC cesto nije bas daleko od toga.
inace koristim imam NEC(dual layer), Plextor (dual layer) in jedan stari TEAC (8x
).
kao CD citac je TEAC bolji od prva dva iako je prezivio vec nekoliko godina kao przilica
evo link za plextora[/quote]
Zavisi koliko przis diskova, za malu kolicinu sprzenih dvd medija uzmi Nec 3500 inace investiraj u Plextora. LG je u svakom slucaju s.... roba. A ni NEC cesto nije bas daleko od toga.
inace koristim imam NEC(dual layer), Plextor (dual layer) in jedan stari TEAC (8x
kao CD citac je TEAC bolji od prva dva iako je prezivio vec nekoliko godina kao przilica
-
Enticer
- Posts: 723
- Joined: 21/12/2004 13:44
- Location: Sarajevo
#12
Zavisi koliko przis diskova, za malu kolicinu sprzenih dvd medija uzmi Nec 3500 inace investiraj u Plextora. LG je u svakom slucaju s.... roba. A ni NEC cesto nije bas daleko od toga.JBL wrote:snimanja moze povecati jednostavnim update-om firmware-a! Ima li ga ko?! Ispalti li se dati vise love za njega, nego za recimo NEC ili LG?!
evo link za plextora
inace koristim imam NEC(dual layer), Plextor (dual layer) in jedan stari TEAC (8x
kao CD citac je TEAC bolji od prva dva iako je prezivio vec nekoliko godina kao przilica[/quote]
LG je zakon!!!
