mirsek wrote:Khilafa wrote:
1. Napisao si "streljanih VOJNIKA", to nisu civili.
2. Nije lijepo zaradjivati pare za ubijanje muslimana.
3. Ja cekam dok je zeleno na semaforu.
Jeste li bas svakom od njih provjerili da nije musliman i da je ubio bar jednog muslimana prije nego ste ih onako masovno strijeljali ?
Uostalom oni su ZAROBLJENICI.
Bog daje pravo u borbi da ubijes, ali ne i zarobljene ljude.
Veze vi nemate o istinskom islamu.
Sta Allah kaze za jehude ??
Jeste li ijedan metak svih ovih godina ispalili na izrahellskog vojnika??
Ti bi malo mogao barem wikipediju pogledat i različite izvore i različita tumačenja po mezhebima za zarobljenike, prije no što tako jeftino daš definitivan komentar/odgovor. Zašto ne istražiš malo više pa da se onda usudiš uopšte komentarisat i davat definitivne odgovore na tako kompleksnu tematiku:
There has been disagreement whether adult male prisoners of war may be executed, although Muhammad did execute men on many occasions. One traditional opinion holds that executing prisoners of war is strictly forbidden; this is the most-widely accepted view, and one upheld by the Hanafi madhab.[21]
However, the opinion of the Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali and Jafari madhabs is that adult male prisoners of war may be executed.[22] Conventionally, execution was conditional on the reasonable belief that male prisoners would pose a genuine and immediate threat to the Muslim community if allowed to live. The decision for an execution is to be made by the Muslim leader. This opinion was also upheld by the Muslim judge, Sa'id bin Jubair (665-714 AD) and 'Abu Yusuf Ya'qub a classical jurist from the Hanafi school of jurisprudence.[4] El Fadl argues the reason Muslim jurists adopted this position was largely because it was consistent with the war practices of the Middle Ages.[21]
Most contemporary Muslim scholars prohibit altogether the killing of prisoners and hold that this was the policy practiced by Prophet Muhammad.[23] The 20th-century Muslim scholar, Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi states that no prisoner should be "put to the sword" in accordance with a saying of Muhammad.[24]
Yusuf Ali, another 20th century Muslim scholar, while commenting on verse [Quran 9:6], writes,
Even those the enemies of Islam, actively fighting against Islam, there may be individuals who may be in a position to require protection. Full asylum is to be given to them, and opportunities provided for hearing the Word of Allah...If they do not see their way to accept Islam, they will require double protection: (1) from the Islamic forces openly fighting against their people, and (2) from their own people, as they detached themselves from them. Both kinds of protection should be ensured for them, and they should be safely escorted to a place where they can be safe.[25]
Maududi further states that Islam forbids torturing, especially by fire, and quotes Muhamad as saying, "Punishment by fire does not behoove anyone except the Master of the Fire [God]."[24]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoners_of_war_in_Islam