nasmijala sam se naglasavanju rijeci moc. Ukoliko je nad hiperbola, pre bila nadhiperbola rijeci moc.
Da li su muškarci pametniji?!
Moderators: _BataZiv_0809, Euridika
-
pitt
- Posts: 27093
- Joined: 03/12/2002 00:00
- Location: Steelers Nation
#27
Lijenesojka wrote:Strogo apoliticno kolega.., Angela mi je veoma simpaticna kao pojava.
Neki dan gledam emisiju o istorijati kulinarstva. Cinjenica je vecina zena duzna za domacinstvo- kuhinju. Najveci broj kuhara u domacinstvu je zena. Dakle na ankete vecina zena je zaduzna za kuhinju. Interesatno je da najmanji broj zena vrhnuskih kuuharki i da rade kao sefovi kuhinje, na Zapadu. Kod nas je druga stvar.
Kako to sebi objasnjavamo zene?
kandzija rulz -
sojka
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: 17/03/2004 14:57
- Location: Amargant
- Contact:
#28
Sadisto!pitt wrote:Lijenesojka wrote:Strogo apoliticno kolega..
Neki dan gledam emisiju o istorijati kulinarstva. Cinjenica je vecina zena duzna za domacinstvo- kuhinju. Najveci broj kuhara u domacinstvu je zena. Dakle na ankete vecina zena je zaduzna za kuhinju. Interesatno je da najmanji broj zena vrhnuskih kuuharki i da rade kao sefovi kuhinje, na Zapadu. Kod nas je druga stvar.
Kako to sebi objasnjavamo zene?
-
Hierarchia
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: 29/10/2006 21:54
#31
Danas se to obrnulo. Samo na Zapadu. Kod nas još vlada patrijarhalni sistem, u glavama a vjerovatno i u praksi. Najbolje primjere imate na ovom forumu.sojka wrote:Strogo apoliticno kolega..
Neki dan gledam emisiju o istorijati kulinarstva. Cinjenica je vecina zena duzna za domacinstvo- kuhinju. Najveci broj kuhara u domacinstvu je zena. Dakle na ankete vecina zena je zaduzna za kuhinju. Interesatno je da najmanji broj zena vrhnuskih kuuharki i da rade kao sefovi kuhinje, na Zapadu. Kod nas je druga stvar.
Kako to sebi objasnjavamo zene?
-
chiquitta
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 12/11/2006 23:12
- Location: rajvoSa
#33
hahahahahahahahahahahaha, pa naravno da su muskarci pametniji od zena!!!!!!!
Pa pogledajte samo Policiju - sami muskarci poneka zena zaluta.
Pa drotovi su oducijek bili ogledalo muske inteligencije
Nemojte se sto naljutiti decki, vis te "nase" nuzno zlo bez kojeg ne mozemo, ma koliko "pametni" bili kod vas se ocjenjuje nesto drugo;) 
Pa pogledajte samo Policiju - sami muskarci poneka zena zaluta.
Pa drotovi su oducijek bili ogledalo muske inteligencije
Nemojte se sto naljutiti decki, vis te "nase" nuzno zlo bez kojeg ne mozemo, ma koliko "pametni" bili kod vas se ocjenjuje nesto drugo;) -
pitt
- Posts: 27093
- Joined: 03/12/2002 00:00
- Location: Steelers Nation
#34
Men Smarter than Women, Scientist Claims
By Jeanna Bryner
LiveScience Staff Writer
posted: 08 September 2006
02:39 pm ET
Men are smarter than women, according to a controversial new study that adds another cinder to the fiery debate over whether gender impacts general intelligence.
"For 100 years there's been a consensus among psychologists that there is no sex difference in intelligence," said J. Philippe Rushton, a psychologist at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.
Recent studies, however, have raised questions about the validity of this claim, he said. One such study showed that men have larger brains than women, a 100 gram difference after correcting for body size. Rushton found similar results in a study of gender and brain size.
To determine if there was a link between gender and intelligence, and perhaps between brain size and intelligence, Rushton and a colleague analyzed the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores from 100,000 17- and 18-year-olds.
G-factor
When Rushton and colleagues weighted each SAT question by an established general intelligence factor called the g-factor, they discovered that males surpassed females by an average of 3.6 IQ points.
The g-factor works like this. "If I tell you the last four digits of my telephone number and ask you to repeat them back to me, that's a low g-loaded memory test," Rushton explained. "But if I then ask you to repeat them back to me in the reverse order, that suddenly requires a tremendous amount more cognitive processing. It is a very high loaded g-item.”
So the g-factor "is really the active ingredient of the test," Rushton said. "It's the single best, most predictive part of the test."
Rushton suspects that the results are due to males having more brain tissue than females on average. "It's a very reasonable hypothesis that you just need more brain tissue dedicated to processing high ‘g' information," Rushton said.
The study, which Rushton co-wrote with Douglas Jackson, also of the University of Western Ontario, is detailed in the current issue of the journal Intelligence.
Flawed conclusion
Bruce Bracken, a psychologist at the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia, who was not involved in the new study, said he thinks Rushton and Jackson make a convincing argument for the sample they used.
"The difference appears to be real," Bracken said.
But he questions the team's conclusions. "I believe that the differences probably lie in the variables they hadn't considered," Bracken said.
One plausible explanation is that more females than males decide to go to college and thus take the SAT test. The study did in fact include about 10,000 more females than males.
"This suggests that more males are deciding to do something else," Bracken said. "It may be that the males who would not have scored as high on the SAT chose not to take it, and they chose another route."
A more reliable study, he said, would be to match each male with a very similar female and then compare the results.
The debate goes on
The findings add fuel to a still smoldering debate ignited by former Harvard President Lawrence Summers, who stated early last year that males have a higher intrinsic aptitude in science and engineering.
In a letter from Summers days after his controversial statements, he wrote: "Despite reports to the contrary, I did not say, and I do not believe, that klix are intellectually less able than boys, or that women lack the ability to succeed at the highest levels of science. As the careers of a great many distinguished women scientists make plain, the human potential to excel in science is not somehow the province of one gender or another.”
While Rushton called his results significant, he doesn't think they are a basis for uprooting the field of education.
"I don't think it has any real implications for education policy or schoolwork," he said. "In fact, females actually get better grades than males.”
Plus, he doesn't think the IQ difference would show up in everyday activities. "For the vast majority of people in the vast majority of jobs, it really doesn't translate into very much," he said.
But when it comes to Nobel Prize winners, he said that men could outnumber women 10-to-1. "Where it will really show up is at the very high end of the distribution," Rushton said.
Rushton has left the door open for opposing views and findings that might contradict his new study.
"I wouldn't say it's the last word. We really do need more research on it before we can be absolutely certain," Rushton said.
By Jeanna Bryner
LiveScience Staff Writer
posted: 08 September 2006
02:39 pm ET
Men are smarter than women, according to a controversial new study that adds another cinder to the fiery debate over whether gender impacts general intelligence.
"For 100 years there's been a consensus among psychologists that there is no sex difference in intelligence," said J. Philippe Rushton, a psychologist at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.
Recent studies, however, have raised questions about the validity of this claim, he said. One such study showed that men have larger brains than women, a 100 gram difference after correcting for body size. Rushton found similar results in a study of gender and brain size.
To determine if there was a link between gender and intelligence, and perhaps between brain size and intelligence, Rushton and a colleague analyzed the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores from 100,000 17- and 18-year-olds.
G-factor
When Rushton and colleagues weighted each SAT question by an established general intelligence factor called the g-factor, they discovered that males surpassed females by an average of 3.6 IQ points.
The g-factor works like this. "If I tell you the last four digits of my telephone number and ask you to repeat them back to me, that's a low g-loaded memory test," Rushton explained. "But if I then ask you to repeat them back to me in the reverse order, that suddenly requires a tremendous amount more cognitive processing. It is a very high loaded g-item.”
So the g-factor "is really the active ingredient of the test," Rushton said. "It's the single best, most predictive part of the test."
Rushton suspects that the results are due to males having more brain tissue than females on average. "It's a very reasonable hypothesis that you just need more brain tissue dedicated to processing high ‘g' information," Rushton said.
The study, which Rushton co-wrote with Douglas Jackson, also of the University of Western Ontario, is detailed in the current issue of the journal Intelligence.
Flawed conclusion
Bruce Bracken, a psychologist at the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia, who was not involved in the new study, said he thinks Rushton and Jackson make a convincing argument for the sample they used.
"The difference appears to be real," Bracken said.
But he questions the team's conclusions. "I believe that the differences probably lie in the variables they hadn't considered," Bracken said.
One plausible explanation is that more females than males decide to go to college and thus take the SAT test. The study did in fact include about 10,000 more females than males.
"This suggests that more males are deciding to do something else," Bracken said. "It may be that the males who would not have scored as high on the SAT chose not to take it, and they chose another route."
A more reliable study, he said, would be to match each male with a very similar female and then compare the results.
The debate goes on
The findings add fuel to a still smoldering debate ignited by former Harvard President Lawrence Summers, who stated early last year that males have a higher intrinsic aptitude in science and engineering.
In a letter from Summers days after his controversial statements, he wrote: "Despite reports to the contrary, I did not say, and I do not believe, that klix are intellectually less able than boys, or that women lack the ability to succeed at the highest levels of science. As the careers of a great many distinguished women scientists make plain, the human potential to excel in science is not somehow the province of one gender or another.”
While Rushton called his results significant, he doesn't think they are a basis for uprooting the field of education.
"I don't think it has any real implications for education policy or schoolwork," he said. "In fact, females actually get better grades than males.”
Plus, he doesn't think the IQ difference would show up in everyday activities. "For the vast majority of people in the vast majority of jobs, it really doesn't translate into very much," he said.
But when it comes to Nobel Prize winners, he said that men could outnumber women 10-to-1. "Where it will really show up is at the very high end of the distribution," Rushton said.
Rushton has left the door open for opposing views and findings that might contradict his new study.
"I wouldn't say it's the last word. We really do need more research on it before we can be absolutely certain," Rushton said.
-
emac
- Posts: 237
- Joined: 28/09/2004 22:02
#35
Do 20 vijeka nauka je bila privilegija bogatih i muskaraca i jos uvijek je taj proces izjednacavanja u toku, sto sve rezultira ovakvim spiskom sa koje bi ja skinuo i te tri zene.reformator wrote:Najveći umovi suvremenog doba.
1.Isak Njutn
2.Albert Ajnštajn
3.Nikola Tesla
4.Leonardo da Vinči
5.Galileo Galilej
6.Bendzamin Franklin
7.Volfgang Amadeus Mocart
8.Tomas Edison
9.Stiven Hoking
9.Johan Kepler
10.Čarls Darvin
11.Marija Kiri
12.Aleksander Grejam Bel
13.Verner Fon Braun
14.Henrijet Livit
15.Barbara Maklintok
16.Mahatma Gandi
17.Noam Čomski
Listu je sastavio "Lajvsajens" poznati elektronski časopis za veličanje naučnih dostignuća,a na osnovu glasanja svojih čitatelja.
Zanimljivo je da su na spisku odabranih samo tri naučnice -Marija Kiri,Henrijet Livit i Barbara Maklintok-i dvojica velikana koji nisu istraživači-Volfgang Amadeus Mocart i Mahatma Gandi.
Relativno je u kojim situacijama je koji pol inteligentniji ali opet po meni u ovom trenutku, muskarci su pametniji.
-
freak_with_a_laptop
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: 12/10/2006 13:01
- Location: Kifino selo
#36
napredni ste, nema sta - respect
Ima nas napredni kolko hoces
Marie Curie
Liese Meitner
Gerty Cori
Inès Armand
Clara Schumann
Anne Morrow Lindbergh
Flora Tristan
Dian Fossey
Anna Freud
Maria Montessori
Sofia Kowalewskaja
Daphe du Maurier
Benazir Bhutto
Bertha von Suttner
Clara Zetkin
Rosa Luxemburg
Cosima Wagner
Golda Meir
Indira Gandhi
Klara von Assisi
itd itd itd
Ovo samo mali izbor sto mi je u prvi tren na um palo, hos' jos?
-
freak_with_a_laptop
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: 12/10/2006 13:01
- Location: Kifino selo
#38
ko mi recepitt wrote:sve plagijatorke
jel' tebe koja plagirala? -
Dolina avalona
- Posts: 474
- Joined: 12/07/2006 21:13
- Location: BiH
#40
Dosla neka zena pred vrelo zelja. Ubaci novcic i rece, -Zelim da imam inteligenciju, logiku i vozacke sposobnosti-. Kad puff, zena se pretvori u muskarca...
-
freak_with_a_laptop
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: 12/10/2006 13:01
- Location: Kifino selo
#41
I'll copy you and abuse the rightpitt wrote:ja sam copyrightedfreak_with_a_laptop wrote:ko mi recepitt wrote:sve plagijatorke
-
Salko sto je u vodu skako
- Posts: 4278
- Joined: 10/02/2006 11:59
- Location: Nemila kod Zenice
#43
freak_with_a_laptop wrote:I'll copy you and abuse the rightpitt wrote:ja sam copyrightedfreak_with_a_laptop wrote: ko mi rece
-
anais_nin
- Posts: 21856
- Joined: 06/07/2005 09:35
- Location: Mostar u srcu, guza u Torontu
#44 Re: Da li su muškarci pametniji?!
opet statistika i interpretacija rezultatareformator wrote:Težina (ne) odlucuje.
Žene zaostaju 3,6 bodova u općoj inteligenciji jer imaju sto grama laksi mozak.
Da li su muskarci pametniji?Najnovije istraživanje u Kanadi potvrdno odgovara,dodajući ugljevlje na rasplamsalu raspravu da li pol utiče na opću inteligneciju.
Sto godina vladalo je saglasje među psiholozima da je svejdeno da li ste žensko ili muško.Skorašnja proučavanja stavila su pod sumnju ovu tvrdnju,a odranije je poznato da je muški mozak,u prosjeku,stotinjak grama teži.
Filip Rašton sa Univerziteta Zapadni Ontario tražio je,sa svojim suradnicima,zagonetnu nit koja povezuje moždanu veličinu i inteligenciju da bi utvrdio imaju li u tome ikakvog udjela polne razlike.Proučio je 100.000 provjera školskih sposobnosti na uzrastu od 17 i 18 godina.Kada je svako pitanje iz testa izmjerio uspostavljenim činiocem opće inteligencije(g-faktor),ustanovio je da muškarci nadmašuju žene za 3,6 bodova.
Drukčije misle
Ričard Hejer profesor psihologije na Univerzitetu Kalifornija u Irvinu istražio je da žene u razmišljanju koriste više bijelu,a muškarci sivu moždanu masu.Bog je stvorio,uvjetno rečeno,dvije vrste mozga,osmišljene za podjednako ponašanje.
pa dobro na tom specificnom testu iz te specificne grupe muskaraca, muskarci imali vise bodova ali gdje iz toga proizilazi da su SVI muskarci pametniji od SVIH zena???? 
ja tu tezu nigdje ne vidim na IQ utice jako puno raznih faktora, od genetike, okoline, obrazovanja i stimlacije koje mozak prima, kasnijih povreda itd itd, velicina mozga bazirana na polnim razlikama moze biti samo jedan od tih faktora koji na neki nacin uticu na IQ ali je apsolutno nemoguce iz ovoga izvuci zakljucak da su muskarci PAMETNIJI od zena mislim ako cemo vec naucno naglabat....-
Salko sto je u vodu skako
- Posts: 4278
- Joined: 10/02/2006 11:59
- Location: Nemila kod Zenice
#45 Re: Da li su muškarci pametniji?!
dobro si mu objasnila...i neka si...da mu ti nisi objasnila objasnio bi mu ja...anais_nin wrote:opet statistika i interpretacija rezultatareformator wrote:Težina (ne) odlucuje.
Žene zaostaju 3,6 bodova u općoj inteligenciji jer imaju sto grama laksi mozak.
Da li su muskarci pametniji?Najnovije istraživanje u Kanadi potvrdno odgovara,dodajući ugljevlje na rasplamsalu raspravu da li pol utiče na opću inteligneciju.
Sto godina vladalo je saglasje među psiholozima da je svejdeno da li ste žensko ili muško.Skorašnja proučavanja stavila su pod sumnju ovu tvrdnju,a odranije je poznato da je muški mozak,u prosjeku,stotinjak grama teži.
Filip Rašton sa Univerziteta Zapadni Ontario tražio je,sa svojim suradnicima,zagonetnu nit koja povezuje moždanu veličinu i inteligenciju da bi utvrdio imaju li u tome ikakvog udjela polne razlike.Proučio je 100.000 provjera školskih sposobnosti na uzrastu od 17 i 18 godina.Kada je svako pitanje iz testa izmjerio uspostavljenim činiocem opće inteligencije(g-faktor),ustanovio je da muškarci nadmašuju žene za 3,6 bodova.
Drukčije misle
Ričard Hejer profesor psihologije na Univerzitetu Kalifornija u Irvinu istražio je da žene u razmišljanju koriste više bijelu,a muškarci sivu moždanu masu.Bog je stvorio,uvjetno rečeno,dvije vrste mozga,osmišljene za podjednako ponašanje.
-
Salko sto je u vodu skako
- Posts: 4278
- Joined: 10/02/2006 11:59
- Location: Nemila kod Zenice
#46
evo zasto je muski mozak tezi od zenskog i to za otprilike 100 grama...
-
reformator
- Posts: 282
- Joined: 02/11/2006 09:27
#49
Žene u 21-oj su kratke i jasne.zena21 wrote:reformator wrote:Jesu li muškarci pametniji od žena?Kratko i jasno.
