The United Nations’ power to partition Kosovo into two areas of 15% and 85%, the Security Council will be acting under its Chapter VII powers to maintain or restore international peace and security. The “trusteeship” argument is nothing but a bootstrap. By contrast, given the magnitude of the atrocities committed against the Kosovars during the Yugoslavian civil war, the Security Council arguably has the right to permanently disable Serbia from exercising sovereignty over the territory occupied by the Kosovars. But it has no right, in my opinion, to overreach and take away land where no crimes against humanity took place. The northern 15% of Kosovo must retain its Serbian identity.
Anthony D’Amato is Leighton Professor of Law at Northwestern University, where he teaches international law and human rights
za sve one koji kazu "ama ne moze medjunarodna zajednica ukinuti rs", evo dijela vidjenja razvezivanja "kosovskog cvora" od profesora Antoni D. Amata, koji je kao sto je poznato, tokom cijelog razvoja dogadjaja na Balkanu, bio na strani Srba, cak sta vise , zastupao ih je i u svrhu branioca na sudu u Hagu, branio M. Kovacevica, osudjenog za genocid!
U svome izlaganju on kaze:...
"
Uzimajuci u obzir magnitudu (obim, tezinu) zlocina pocinjenih protiv Kosovara, za vrijeme jugoslovenskog gradjanskog rata, Vijece Sigurnosti IMA PRAVO da za stalno ukine suverenitet Srbije nad teritorijom koju drze Kosovari!"....
Ako znamo, da je obim zlocina, pocinjenih nad Kosovarima , samo jedan mali procenat , u odnosu na zlocine pocinjene nad nesrbima od strane rs-a u BiH , te da imamo i presudu Medjunarodnog Suda, koja kaze jasno da su snage rs-a pocinile genocid, nije li neshvatljivo da neko kaze :"Nemate vi pravo traziti ukidanje rs-a!"
Dakle, sve se opet svodi na ono, u kolikoj mjeri ce nas , takozvani "nasi politicari", zajebati i ovaj put!!
.