#2951 Re: Inteligentni Dizajn vs. Evolucija
Posted: 19/04/2021 00:01
Nisam.
ima jedan dobar forum za fotografe osnovan od strane Diplodokusa Fotografusa. on je postavljao takve i mislim da sve originalne mozes naci tamo. cak mislim da mu je specijalizacija bila fotografisanje konja od 1.500.000 BC - 143 BC jer ih je pravo volio. samo ne znam da li ces ih moci postavljati na forum zbog copyright -a...-Chesterfield- wrote: ↑18/04/2021 23:28 Ako ima neko fotografije 60 konja u razmaku od milion godina?
Prava ti tetka. Imas opciju foe i bujrum.belfy wrote: ↑18/04/2021 21:03e vidis, ovdje iznad opet pricas kao da ja ne znam sta je hebena abiogeneza. ono sto tebi jos uvijek nije jasno zasto sam ja pitanje onako formulisao si mogao i pitati, pa da ti kao covjeku odgovorim. zato sto je isti stav onih koji ignorisu dokaze o evoluciji, kao i onih koji tvrde da je za postanak zivota potreban krator. nije bitno koje se pitanje postavi, ali je jedno direktnije i teze je mutiti vodu.GAU8 wrote: ↑18/04/2021 17:31Da, kreacionizam izbjegava direktne odgovore i pitanja moraju biti maksimalno fokusirana i ogranicena. Tako je prostor za izbjegavanje manji.
To je prva stvar. Druga stvar, nauka nema ni priblizan odgovor na pitanje kako je NASTAO zivot na zemlji. S druge strane se odavno zna kako su se iz prbog zivota razvijale sve vrste koje su zivjele ili trenutno zive na planeti.
I kada neko pita: "Sta mislis kako je nastao zivot i odakle sve ove vrste" logicno je da ce kreacionisticki odgovor ici u smjeru diskreditacije nauke kako ona ni sama nema objasnjenje za nastanak zivota. Ja samo smatram da to dvoje treba razdvojiti kako bi se smanjio manevarski prostor.
ja sam vrlo dobro svjestan odgovora koje mogu dobiti. meni samo, opet, nije jasno kako ti ne vidis da ti ne smanjujes taj manevarski prostor, nego cinis upravo suprotno. evo cak i sa ovim svojim postom.
nisi na forumu od jucer, a konverzacija ti je kao da si se jucer registrovao. pamtim te kao boljeg. ne znam sta se desilo u medjuvremenu. da li je na tom accountu druga osoba sada?
Eto recimo Wikipedia se pojavi medju prvim rezultatima sa finim clankom kada se pretrazuje pojam "Hybrid Speciacion"Capljina74 wrote: ↑18/04/2021 20:53 Guglao, ali izlazi samo spevijavija.
Hibtidnu nisam našao. Zato ti rekoh, ostavi koji link.
Samo mojne dokaz da bude hibrid vuka i psa ili kojota...
Дај озбиљних линкова.GAU8 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 08:55Eto recimo Wikipedia se pojavi medju prvim rezultatima sa finim clankom kada se pretrazuje pojam "Hybrid Speciacion"Capljina74 wrote: ↑18/04/2021 20:53 Guglao, ali izlazi samo spevijavija.
Hibtidnu nisam našao. Zato ti rekoh, ostavi koji link.
Samo mojne dokaz da bude hibrid vuka i psa ili kojota...
Sa Wikipedie za svaki citat imas link na "ozbiljan" izvor. Nije ti valjda lijeno da istrazujes.Capljina74 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 09:11Дај озбиљних линкова.GAU8 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 08:55Eto recimo Wikipedia se pojavi medju prvim rezultatima sa finim clankom kada se pretrazuje pojam "Hybrid Speciacion"Capljina74 wrote: ↑18/04/2021 20:53 Guglao, ali izlazi samo spevijavija.
Hibtidnu nisam našao. Zato ti rekoh, ostavi koji link.
Samo mojne dokaz da bude hibrid vuka i psa ili kojota...
Mislis da bih postavljao Wiki kao primjer sa nisam prvo ja licno procitao da je upravo to zadovoljeno.Capljina74 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 11:51 Naravno jer nemam vremena.
Na Viki nisu iznijeli potvrdu koji bi zadovoljio ni jedan od ovih zahtjeva:
(1) there must be evidence of hybridization between species, (2) the hybrids must be reproductively isolated from the parental species, and (3) there should be evidence that hybridization is the cause of the isolation (Schumer et al., 2014).
A sve zahtjeva istraživanje.
Već rekoh da je kod životinja hibrid slijepa ulica i to je zacementirano.
Zato trebaju dobri tekstovi da se istraži.
Critics of evolution often fall back on the maxim that no one has ever seen one species split into two. While that's clearly a straw man, because most speciation takes far longer than our lifespan to occur, it's also not true. We have seen species split, and we continue to see species diverging every day.
Prvo što upade u oči je da iz šale pišu za otkup da je delfin, ali kontam da bi približili ljudima priču.GAU8 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 12:03 https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/sc ... ervations/
Critics of evolution often fall back on the maxim that no one has ever seen one species split into two. While that's clearly a straw man, because most speciation takes far longer than our lifespan to occur, it's also not true. We have seen species split, and we continue to see species diverging every day.
Nije uopste bitno da li je upitanju biljka ili zivotinja. Cak i samo jedna jedina vrsta da se pojavila nakon "momenta sveukupne kreacije" kompletan koncept kreacionizma pada u vodu.Capljina74 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 12:44Prvo što upade u oči je da iz šale pišu za otkup da je delfin, ali kontam da bi približili ljudima priču.GAU8 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 12:03 https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/sc ... ervations/
Critics of evolution often fall back on the maxim that no one has ever seen one species split into two. While that's clearly a straw man, because most speciation takes far longer than our lifespan to occur, it's also not true. We have seen species split, and we continue to see species diverging every day.
Drugo,
Orka je jedna jedina vrsta. Gdje oni nadjoše više orki!?
Orka je Orcinus orca i to je to.
Čitamo se. I ovo je na brzinu, jer sam u kolima.
Biljke stvarno nemam pojma. Daleko je od mog faha, ne bi da ulazim u to. Jednostavno pojma nemam i ne bi ko bombaš Apsi da šibam.
Tekst govori nesto sasvim drugo. Mislim da se ti nisi dovoljno udubioCapljina74 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 13:12 Dobro.
Samo se treba udubiti u to što pišu. Evo situacije sa psima i Orkom gdje postoji jedna vrsta, a po njima više vrsta.
I kako objasnjavas ovo?...These data suggested there are indeed at least three different species of killer whale. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the different species of orca have been separated for 150,000 to 700,000 years.
Why did the orcas split? The truth is, we don't know. Perhaps it was a side effect of modifications for hunting different prey sources, or perhaps there was some kind of physical barrier between populations that has since disappeared...
I to sve po definiciji vrste koju si i sam naveo.there were the two new species of American goatsbeards (or salsifies, genus Tragopogon) that sprung into existence in the past century. In the early 1900s, three species of these wildflowers - the western salsify (T. dubius), the meadow salsify (T. pratensis), and the oyster plant (T. porrifolius) - were introduced to the United States from Europe. As their populations expanded, the species interacted, often producing sterile hybrids. But by the 1950s, scientists realized that there were two new variations of goatsbeard growing. While they looked like hybrids, they weren't sterile. They were perfectly capable of reproducing with their own kind but not with any of the original three species - the classic definition of a new species.
Lik se fakat pravi mutav. Niko te ne pita sta nisi, nego sta jesi.Capljina74 wrote: ↑18/04/2021 21:59 Kada se nalupaš kao mooodo o samar nije teško biti pametan. Dovoljno znanje srednje škole.
Rekoh već, na tvoju žalost, da nisam kreacionista.
Vidio, vidio...GAU8 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 13:52Tekst govori nesto sasvim drugo. Mislim da se ti nisi dovoljno udubioCapljina74 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 13:12 Dobro.
Samo se treba udubiti u to što pišu. Evo situacije sa psima i Orkom gdje postoji jedna vrsta, a po njima više vrsta.
I kako objasnjavas ovo?...These data suggested there are indeed at least three different species of killer whale. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the different species of orca have been separated for 150,000 to 700,000 years.
Why did the orcas split? The truth is, we don't know. Perhaps it was a side effect of modifications for hunting different prey sources, or perhaps there was some kind of physical barrier between populations that has since disappeared...I to sve po definiciji vrste koju si i sam naveo.there were the two new species of American goatsbeards (or salsifies, genus Tragopogon) that sprung into existence in the past century. In the early 1900s, three species of these wildflowers - the western salsify (T. dubius), the meadow salsify (T. pratensis), and the oyster plant (T. porrifolius) - were introduced to the United States from Europe. As their populations expanded, the species interacted, often producing sterile hybrids. But by the 1950s, scientists realized that there were two new variations of goatsbeard growing. While they looked like hybrids, they weren't sterile. They were perfectly capable of reproducing with their own kind but not with any of the original three species - the classic definition of a new species.
U periodu 2-3 decenije se pojave 3 nove cvijetne vrste.Capljina74 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 16:27Vodio, vodio...GAU8 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 13:52Tekst govori nesto sasvim drugo. Mislim da se ti nisi dovoljno udubioCapljina74 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 13:12 Dobro.
Samo se treba udubiti u to što pišu. Evo situacije sa psima i Orkom gdje postoji jedna vrsta, a po njima više vrsta.
I kako objasnjavas ovo?...These data suggested there are indeed at least three different species of killer whale. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the different species of orca have been separated for 150,000 to 700,000 years.
Why did the orcas split? The truth is, we don't know. Perhaps it was a side effect of modifications for hunting different prey sources, or perhaps there was some kind of physical barrier between populations that has since disappeared...I to sve po definiciji vrste koju si i sam naveo.there were the two new species of American goatsbeards (or salsifies, genus Tragopogon) that sprung into existence in the past century. In the early 1900s, three species of these wildflowers - the western salsify (T. dubius), the meadow salsify (T. pratensis), and the oyster plant (T. porrifolius) - were introduced to the United States from Europe. As their populations expanded, the species interacted, often producing sterile hybrids. But by the 1950s, scientists realized that there were two new variations of goatsbeard growing. While they looked like hybrids, they weren't sterile. They were perfectly capable of reproducing with their own kind but not with any of the original three species - the classic definition of a new species.
But just because we can't see all speciation events from start to finish doesn't mean we can't see species splitting. If the theory of evolution is true, we would expect to find species in various stages of separation all over the globe.
....
These data suggested there are indeed at least three different species of killer whale.
Ne ubija gušenjem nego diseminovanom intravaskularnom koagulacijom koja dovodi do infarkta jetre, srčanog mišića..., moždanog udara i niz stvari na plućima.
Već ti rekoh da biljke nisu nešto u šta sam upućen. Ne mogu da pričam o nečemu samo na osnovu tekstova sa interneta pa da bacam bombe kao Apsi ovdje.GAU8 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 16:35U periodu 2-3 decenije se pojave 3 nove cvijetne vrste.Capljina74 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 16:27Vodio, vodio...
But just because we can't see all speciation events from start to finish doesn't mean we can't see species splitting. If the theory of evolution is true, we would expect to find species in various stages of separation all over the globe.
....
These data suggested there are indeed at least three different species of killer whale.
Kako se to poklapa sa kreacionizmom ili inteligentnim dizajnom?
Bitna je reproduktivna barijera koja se pojavila kod biljaka.Capljina74 wrote: ↑19/04/2021 19:36
Psi su jedna vrsta. Zajedno sa vukovima čine veliku vrstu Canis lupus.
Čitam ostale tekstove. Ovaj ništa impresivno nema.