Page 1 of 2

#1 ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 07/11/2012 18:49
by reis1
Drago forumsko pucanstvo, :mrgreen:

prije svega, veliki pozdrav svima vama koji posjecuju ovu sekciju!

'Elem, ja odlucil postat muzicar/kompozitor/producent! Vucem odavna tu neku svoju zelju, ali nikako da se nakanim iliti prisilim sklopiti hardware & software, i postici vjestine potrebne za upotrebu toga, a u cilju kreacije muzicke kompozicije/pjesme. Pa u tom smislu, pokrecem ovu temu, na kojoj cu s vremena na vrijeme postati progres svog ucenja/experimentiranja.

Ukoliko je neko zainteresiran ici u ovom smjeru, bilo bi mi drago da ucestvuje na ovoj temi. A ako neko vec ima iskustva sa tim, bilo bi mi drago da podijeli svoja iskustva sa nama ovdje.

Dobri pozz za pocetak uz nadu da ce tema biti uspjesna. :)

#2 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 07/11/2012 18:59
by reis1
Ono sto me interesira sad na pocetku, jeste savjet o prodavnicama muzicke opreme u nas?

Konkretno, interesira me externa zvucna kartica koja ide preko USB-a na komp, a koja ima MIDI in/out i line in/out konektore. Ono sto je potrebito, jeste da ima dobre ASIO drivere, zbog problema sa latencijom prilikom snimanja/monitoringa (da li je neko imao iskustva sa ovim, ako ima neki savjet, slobodno pucaj). Da li se takvo nesto moze zbaviti za nekih 300-400KM?

#3 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 07/11/2012 20:16
by tatoo
Nek' ti Allah da srece i para za to :D .

Daj malo definisi sta tacno zelis raditi ... Snimati neke svoje projekte, recimo gitara samo i resto software ili zelis snimati/svirati sve instrumente za neke solidan demo nivo ili zelis ici malo jace (i bankrotirati usput)...
To kad utvrdimo, onda mozes poceti razmisljati hoces li izolirati podrum :mrgreen: , sobu ili ides bez toga, pa onda jel cakewalk, ili pro tools ili logic.... Pa koji monitori ... Joj sta je toga :roll: .

No da ti odgovorim na pitanje, ja sam uvijek za Mac baziran setup sa Apogee interfaceom. Apogee duet mada nema spektakularne opcije je vrhunski komad opreme. Skuplji Apogee komadi su po meni top.
Ako je PC nedavno sam slusao kod kolege neke njegove radove sa pro tools i ovim hardwareom i moram priznati da je bilo,odlicno i u cjenovnom rangu koji si ti naveo (dobro mozda 100 vise).

http://www.thomann.de/de/m_audio_fast_track_c600.htm

#4 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 07/11/2012 22:15
by sickle_and_hammer
kod nas imas http://www.artist.ba/mex/pocetna_strana.php, i solidno su opremljeni.
ja sam malo cito/gledo recenzije za externi usb prikljucak i svi hvale http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audi ... -interface, al opet ovo ti je samo ako mislis da snimas gitaru, bass i mozda neki mikrofon da ustekas.

#5 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 07/11/2012 22:53
by reis1
tatoo wrote:Nek' ti Allah da srece i para za to :D .

Daj malo definisi sta tacno zelis raditi ... Snimati neke svoje projekte, recimo gitara samo i resto software ili zelis snimati/svirati sve instrumente za neke solidan demo nivo ili zelis ici malo jace (i bankrotirati usput)...
To kad utvrdimo, onda mozes poceti razmisljati hoces li izolirati podrum :mrgreen: , sobu ili ides bez toga, pa onda jel cakewalk, ili pro tools ili logic.... Pa koji monitori ... Joj sta je toga :roll: .

No da ti odgovorim na pitanje, ja sam uvijek za Mac baziran setup sa Apogee interfaceom. Apogee duet mada nema spektakularne opcije je vrhunski komad opreme. Skuplji Apogee komadi su po meni top.
Ako je PC nedavno sam slusao kod kolege neke njegove radove sa pro tools i ovim hardwareom i moram priznati da je bilo,odlicno i u cjenovnom rangu koji si ti naveo (dobro mozda 100 vise).

http://www.thomann.de/de/m_audio_fast_track_c600.htm

Vec sam bio bankrotirao (u prahistoriji :D ), tako da cu sad to malo pametnije. Sto u prevodu znaci, minimum minimuma - ali dovoljno za komponiranje. :)

Hardware:
- laptop (imam)
- klavijatura (imam)
- slusalice (imam)
- USB zvucna (ovo mi treba)

Software:
- sequancer - Cubase (mislim da je ovo najbolja solucija)

Dakle, cilj mi je da sve moze stat u krevet, a podrum i pro stvari koje budu potrebite - slj. proljeca... :)

#6 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 07/11/2012 23:00
by reis1
sickle_and_hammer wrote:kod nas imas http://www.artist.ba/mex/pocetna_strana.php, i solidno su opremljeni.
ja sam malo cito/gledo recenzije za externi usb prikljucak i svi hvale http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audi ... -interface, al opet ovo ti je samo ako mislis da snimas gitaru, bass i mozda neki mikrofon da ustekas.
E to buraz, izgleda da ovi artist.ba imaju dosta opreme, ev gledam.

Ono sto meni treba je USB karta koja ima MIDI in/out da mogu prikljucit klavijaturu na laptop. Ev' probavam preko tipkovnice od laptopa, svirat, al ne moze 'vako da si pita :D Dobro bi bilo jos ako USB zvucna karta ima pretpojacalo za mic...

Kako izgleda preko USB-a po pitanju latencije i ASIO drivera, da li neko ima iskustva sa tim?

#7 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 07/11/2012 23:58
by sickle_and_hammer
reis1 wrote: Kako izgleda preko USB-a po pitanju latencije i ASIO drivera, da li neko ima iskustva sa tim?
veze nemam, al imas masu toga na jutuRbe pa vidi jbg. a na kraju krajeva laptop pod misku, u radnju i probas on d fejs, on d plejs, ha ja!

evo solidan džabni bubnjar, ako kome treba.
http://www.hydrogen-music.org/hcms/

#8 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 08/11/2012 21:03
by reis1
Izbor zvucne karte suzen na sljedece:

1. PreSonus AudioBox 22VSL

Image

+ mogucnost dodavanja efekata u direkt monitoring
- izlazi

349KM


2. Focusrite Scarlett 2i4

Image

+ izlazi
- mogucnost dodavanja efekata u direktni monitoring(???)

344KM

#9 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 08/11/2012 22:15
by sickle_and_hammer
reis1 wrote:Izbor zvucne karte suzen na sljedece:

1. PreSonus AudioBox 22VSL

Image

+ mogucnost dodavanja efekata u direkt monitoring
- izlazi

349KM


2. Focusrite Scarlett 2i4

Image

+ izlazi
- mogucnost dodavanja efekata u direktni monitoring(???)

344KM
cupanje kose :D
jbg neznam sta bi ti reko. ja sam pravo obalio za ovom rumenom, em sto je cakana, em sto vele da ima neko jebeno predpojacalo.
kad god sam cito recenzije za oba proizvoda, uvjek je crveni bio pobjednik po pricama drugih, radi kvalitete dobijenog zvuka.

volio bi da ti mogu pomoc ovde, al moraces sam da odlucis!
i koju god da uzmes,mislim da se neces zajebat.
javi sta si ćapio!

#10 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 08/11/2012 22:39
by reis1
sickle_and_hammer wrote:
cupanje kose :D
jbg neznam sta bi ti reko. ja sam pravo obalio za ovom rumenom, em sto je cakana, em sto vele da ima neko jebeno predpojacalo.
kad god sam cito recenzije za oba proizvoda, uvjek je crveni bio pobjednik po pricama drugih, radi kvalitete dobijenog zvuka.

volio bi da ti mogu pomoc ovde, al moraces sam da odlucis!
i koju god da uzmes,mislim da se neces zajebat.
javi sta si ćapio!
Ma imam iz proslih vremena neku Creative-ovu, ali je PCI a ne USB, tj. moRe samo za desktop, a desktop ne moze u krevet... :D Nije dugo bilo drivera za nju kako treba, i onda neki Rus (Rusi su gospoda :) ) napisao driver, bas mocan.

Od ovih, uzeo bih crvenu, ali ne mogu nigdje da nadjem da li mozes ukljuciti efekte na direktni monitoring prilikom recordinga (tj. da u Cubase ide dry sound, a na slusalice zbog dodatih efekata wet sound). Kod plave ta opcija po specifikaciji postoji, tako da je sad-za-sad plava izbor.

Osim ako ne isceprkam neku soluciju laptop-desktop preko mreze... :D

#11 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 10/11/2012 22:14
by reis1
Eh, evo ga... Ipak moze raditi Creativka (nazalost driver radi samo pod WinXP, ne i pod Win7 - ali sta je tu je) :)

Image


kxProject driver za Creative-ove E-Mu 10K1 chip zvucne karte, kojeg je napisao Eugen Gavrilov, je najmocniji driver kojeg sam dosad vidio uopce. Na slj. slici je utility za kontrolu kartice, i ovo komponente se ne izvrsavaju software-ski na CPU, vec hardware-ski na kartici (veoma mocnan driver):

Image

FXBus - software-ski aplikacijski ASIO inputi prema karti
prolog - hardware-ski inputi, "cinc" ulazi na kartici
xrouting - mixeta na kartici
epilog - soft ASIO izlazi i hard "cinc" izlazi sa karte (na zvucnike, slusalice, itd)
ostalo - hardware-ski efekti koji se izvrsavaju na DSP chipu karte

Veoma mocno! :)


OK, sada se moze pokrenuti Cubase i konkretno pocet pravit nest - nadam se uskoro okacim ovdje malo cincilimincili :D

#12 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 11/11/2012 01:36
by sickle_and_hammer
e, a jesil probo na win 7 da okines desni klik na drajver, pa ides na compatibility, pa run this program in compatibility mode for, pa tu okacis win xp?
zna nekad tako da profercera, probaj.

#13 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 11/11/2012 09:19
by chengaba
reis1 wrote:Izbor zvucne karte suzen na sljedece:

1. PreSonus AudioBox 22VSL

Image

+ mogucnost dodavanja efekata u direkt monitoring
- izlazi

349KM


2. Focusrite Scarlett 2i4

Image

+ izlazi
- mogucnost dodavanja efekata u direktni monitoring(???)

344KM
Ja ti imam Scarlett 2i4, i mogu ti je toplo preporučiti. Ovi RCA chinch izlazi meni znače puno, a ne kontam svakako kako misliš Presonus ima mogućnost dodavanja efekata u monitoring. To svakako rješavaš softverski.

#14 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 11/11/2012 17:44
by reis1
sickle_and_hammer wrote:e, a jesil probo na win 7 da okines desni klik na drajver, pa ides na compatibility, pa run this program in compatibility mode for, pa tu okacis win xp?
zna nekad tako da profercera, probaj.
Probao sam vec, ali nece... Instalira driver i radi playback, ali ne prepoznaje sve stvari npr. MIDI... Ali moze pod WinXP, sto mi je dovoljno.

#15 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 11/11/2012 17:47
by Entropio
.

#16 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 11/11/2012 18:02
by reis1
chengaba wrote:
Ja ti imam Scarlett 2i4, i mogu ti je toplo preporučiti. Ovi RCA chinch izlazi meni znače puno, a ne kontam svakako kako misliš Presonus ima mogućnost dodavanja efekata u monitoring. To svakako rješavaš softverski.
Kad snimas glas ili akusticni instrument preko mikrofona kojeg ustekas u neki ulaz kartice, idu dvije linije:
- ulaz - dry sound (bez efekata) - aplikacija za snimanje
- ulaz - dry sound (bez efekata) + efekti hardware-ski na kartici (bez da idu na CPU) - izlaz (na slusalice)

Ako ides software-ski, onda to izgleda:
- ulaz - dry sound (bez efekata) - aplikacija - dry sound (bez efekata) + efekti software-ski na CPU - izlaz na slusalice

ali onda u vecini slucajeva (bar sto sam ja imao iskustva), dobijes visoku latenciju. Npr. ako pjevas, glas ti primjetno kasni na slusalicama - vec 10-15 milisekundi se moze primjetiti, a obicno bude vise. Dekoncentrira i ne mo'sh snimit pjesmu. Pogotovo ako u aplikaciji imas vec 10-tak traka matrice, od kojih svaka ima po par efekata, onda bas kasni sveukupni zvuk na slusalicama.

To me interesira kod Scarlettke, dal mozes ukljuciti hardwareski efekat na samoj kartici (dovoljno je Reverb), tako da u slucaju monitoringa ulaz-karta-izlaz, za dry sound na ulazu mo'sh dobit wet sound na izlazu (slusalicama)???

#17 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 12/11/2012 01:08
by chengaba
reis1 wrote:
chengaba wrote:
Ja ti imam Scarlett 2i4, i mogu ti je toplo preporučiti. Ovi RCA chinch izlazi meni znače puno, a ne kontam svakako kako misliš Presonus ima mogućnost dodavanja efekata u monitoring. To svakako rješavaš softverski.
Kad snimas glas ili akusticni instrument preko mikrofona kojeg ustekas u neki ulaz kartice, idu dvije linije:
- ulaz - dry sound (bez efekata) - aplikacija za snimanje
- ulaz - dry sound (bez efekata) + efekti hardware-ski na kartici (bez da idu na CPU) - izlaz (na slusalice)

Ako ides software-ski, onda to izgleda:
- ulaz - dry sound (bez efekata) - aplikacija - dry sound (bez efekata) + efekti software-ski na CPU - izlaz na slusalice

ali onda u vecini slucajeva (bar sto sam ja imao iskustva), dobijes visoku latenciju. Npr. ako pjevas, glas ti primjetno kasni na slusalicama - vec 10-15 milisekundi se moze primjetiti, a obicno bude vise. Dekoncentrira i ne mo'sh snimit pjesmu. Pogotovo ako u aplikaciji imas vec 10-tak traka matrice, od kojih svaka ima po par efekata, onda bas kasni sveukupni zvuk na slusalicama.

To me interesira kod Scarlettke, dal mozes ukljuciti hardwareski efekat na samoj kartici (dovoljno je Reverb), tako da u slucaju monitoringa ulaz-karta-izlaz, za dry sound na ulazu mo'sh dobit wet sound na izlazu (slusalicama)???
Ma nema ti druže ova PreSonus nikakve hardverske efekte, ovo su ti samo USB interfejsi ništa više, pogrešno si ti nešto to skont'o.

A vidim ti iz posta gore da hoćeš da ideš preko asio drivera.
Ja recimo pogasim u control panelu zvučne drivere (asio, realtek i sl.) i rokam samo drivere od interfejsa.
I mene je zajebavalo što mi dođe do latencije pogotovo kada se navalja traka, dok nisam otkrio da uopšte ne trebaju asio driveri i samo mi dolaze u konflikt sa driverima od interfejsa.

A to za monitoring možeš jednako riješiti i sa focusrite i sa presonus interfejsom - staviš sluše i imaš i na jednoj i drugoj ovaj regler kojim regulišeš da li slušaš direktni monitoring, ili iz nekog DAW-a i sl. (znači da li slušaš input ili playback), i onda možeš odvajati kako ti paše šta ti je u monitoru, šta ti se snima i sl.

Nećeš pogriješiti uglavnom ni sa jednom karticom, jedino eto što focusrite ima više izlaza.

#18 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 12/11/2012 12:28
by reis1
chengaba wrote:
Ma nema ti druže ova PreSonus nikakve hardverske efekte, ovo su ti samo USB interfejsi ništa više, pogrešno si ti nešto to skont'o.

A vidim ti iz posta gore da hoćeš da ideš preko asio drivera.
Ja recimo pogasim u control panelu zvučne drivere (asio, realtek i sl.) i rokam samo drivere od interfejsa.
I mene je zajebavalo što mi dođe do latencije pogotovo kada se navalja traka, dok nisam otkrio da uopšte ne trebaju asio driveri i samo mi dolaze u konflikt sa driverima od interfejsa.

A to za monitoring možeš jednako riješiti i sa focusrite i sa presonus interfejsom - staviš sluše i imaš i na jednoj i drugoj ovaj regler kojim regulišeš da li slušaš direktni monitoring, ili iz nekog DAW-a i sl. (znači da li slušaš input ili playback), i onda možeš odvajati kako ti paše šta ti je u monitoru, šta ti se snima i sl.

Nećeš pogriješiti uglavnom ni sa jednom karticom, jedino eto što focusrite ima više izlaza.

Cek jbg. sad si me zadevero... :mrgreen:

Gore boldano, kad okrenes regler na input (tj. skroz iskljucis playback iz DAW-a tj. ukljucis direktni monitoring), jel mozes negdje u aplikacijici drivera ukljucit npr. efekt reverberacije??? Ili je kakav ulazi zvuk (dry) takav i izlazi (dry)???

Kod ovi Presonus po specifikaciji to moze (dakle ne osnovna verzija Presonus AudioBox vec Presonus AudioBox 22VSL koja ima kao bolje XMAX preampove i ove efekt procesore).

(Mada mislim da je i ovo kod Presonusa emulacija, tj. nisam nigdje upratio da ima DSP cip na sebi, vec driver emulira efekte na CPU.)

#19 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 12/11/2012 12:38
by reis1
Koliko sam upratio, ovo je najosnovnijapocetna Focusrite-ova zvucna koja dolazi sa hardware efekt procesorima "on the board": Focusrite Saffire Pro 24 DSP, 599KM, ali je FireWire ne USB.

Ima jos nekih koje ovo omogucavaju, ali su opet PCI karte... nikad dva dobra spojit.

Ma sve u svemu, ne mo'sh uzet sveobuhvatnu zvucnu bez 600-700KM... toliko je bila i ova Creativova prije 10 god.

#20 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 18/11/2012 02:36
by reis1
Ak' zatreba kasnije, za buducu referencu, jos ova zk. M-Audio ProFire 610 moze biti interesantna...

#21 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 18/11/2012 02:47
by reis1
Ok, sada se moze preci na Cubase-a:

Image

:D

Frrrrst tac:



:)

#22 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 19/11/2012 22:06
by reis1
Cubase dynamics:

- Compressor/Limiter


Image

How severely the compressor reduces the signal is determined by the compression ratio and compression threshold. A ratio of 2:1 or less is considered mild compression, reducing the output by a factor of two for signals that exceed the compression threshold. Ratios above 10:1 are considered hard limiting. Limiting refers to the processing that prevents the signal from getting any louder (that is, it prevents any increase in the signal’s amplitude) at the output.
- Threshold - sets the level at which compression begins.
- Ratio - relationship between the output level and the input level. If you have the ratio set to 2:1, any signal levels above the threshold setting will be compressed such that for every 1 dB of level increase into the compressor, the output will only increase 0.5 dB. As you increase the ratio, the compressor gradually becomes a limiter.
- Hard/Soft Knee - With hard-knee compression, the gain reduction applied to the signal occurs as soon as the signal exceeds the level set by the threshold. With soft-knee compression, the onset of gain reduction occurs gradually after the signal has exceeded the threshold
- Makeup Gain - When compressing a signal, gain reduction usually results in an overall reduction of level. The gain control allows you to restore the loss in level due to compression (like readjusting the volume).
- Compressor Sidechain. When a connector is inserted into this jack, the signal path is broken. The control signal can then be processed by an equalizer, for example, to reduce sibilance (de-essing) in a vocal track. The control signal is then returned to the unit via the connector.

Limiter is a compressor that is set to prevent any increase in the level of a signal above the threshold. For example, if you have the threshold knob set at 0 dB, and the ratio turned fully clockwise, the compressor becomes a limiter at 0 dB, so that the output signal cannot exceed 0 dB regardless of the level of the input signal.


- Expander/Noise Gate

Image

Expansion decreases the level of a signal after the signal goes below the expansion threshold. The amount of level reduction is determined by the expansion ratio. For example, a 2:1 expansion ratio reduces the level of a signal by a factor of two. (e.g., if a level drops 5 dB below the expansion threshold, the expander will reduce it to 10 dB below the threshold. For example, a 2:1 expansion ratio reduces the level of a signal by a factor of two. (e.g., if a level drops 5 dB below the expansion threshold, the expander will reduce it to 10 dB below the threshold.). Ratios of 4:1 and higher act much like a noise gate.
- Hold time is used to keep the gate open for a fixed period after the signal drops below the gate threshold.
- Range - If the range is set at 0 dB, there will be no change in the signal as it crosses the threshold. If the range is set to -60 dB, the signal will be gated (reduced) by 60 dB, etc.
- Key Listen - allows the user to listen to the signal that is being filtered by the gate.
- Frequency Key Filter - some gates offer a variable frequency control allowing the user to set a specific frequency band that the will cause the gate to open or close.


Noise gating i
s the process of removing unwanted sounds from a signal by attenuating all signals below a set threshold. How fast the gate opens to let the “good” signal through is determined by the attack time. How long the gate stays open after the signal has gone below the threshold is determined by the hold time. How fast the gate closes is determined by the release. How much the gate attenuates the unwanted signal while closed is determined by the range.

Noise gates were originally designed to help eliminate extraneous noise and unwanted artifacts from a recording, such as hiss, rumble, or transients from other instruments in the room. Since hiss and noise are not as loud as the instrument being recorded, a properly set gate will only allow the intended sound to pass through; the volume of everything else is lowered.

#23 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 19/11/2012 22:12
by reis1
Vjezba trilera - malo fuseraja... :D



Kada bih se mogao vratiti do Nove godine na 70% onoga sto se prije moglo odsvirati, puna saka brade! :D Al' dobro, lakapo, bit ce ovo sve bolje i bolje...

#24 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 26/11/2012 17:48
by reis1
What is dynamic range?

Dynamic range can be defined as the ratio between the loudest possible audio level and the lowest possible level. The average dynamic range of an orchestral performance can range from -50 dBu to +10 dBu, on average. This equates to a 60 dB dynamic range. Rock music, on the other hand, has a much smaller dynamic range: typically -10 dBu to +10 dBu, or 20 dB.

Why do we need compression?

You are mixing a rock performance with an average dynamic range of 20 dB. You wish to add an uncompressed vocal to the mix. The average dynamic range of an uncompressed vocal is around 40 dB. In other words, a vocal performance can go from -30 dBu to +10 dBu. The passages that are +10 dBu and higher will be heard over the mix. However, the passages that are at -30 dBu and below will never be heard over the roar of the rest of the mix. A compressor can be used in this situation to reduce (compress) the dynamic range of the vocal to around 10 dB. The vocal can now be placed at around +5 dBu. At this level, the dynamic range of the vocal is from 0 dBu to +10 dBu. The lower level phrases will now be well above the lower level of the mix, and louder phrases will not overpower the mix, allowing the vocal to “sit in the track.”

For example, a vocalist who moves around in front of the microphone while performing, making the output level vary up and down unnaturally. A compressor can be applied to the signal to help correct this recording problem by reducing the louder passages enough to be compatible with the overall performance.

Why do we need noise gates?

You now have a 20 dB dynamic range for the vocal channel. Problems arise when noise or instruments (air conditioner, loud drummer, etc.) in the background of the vocal mic become more audible after the lower end of the dynamic range is raised. The noise-gate threshold could be set at the bottom of the dynamic range of the vocal, say -10 dBu, such that the gate would shut out the unwanted signals between the phrases.

#25 Re: ja odlucio postat muzicar

Posted: 26/11/2012 18:34
by reis1
Equalizers (EQ)

Sub-Bass (16 Hz to 60 Hz). The lowest of these bass frequencies are felt, rather than heard, as with freeway rumbling or an earthquake. These frequencies give your mix a sense of power even when they only occur occasionally. However, overemphasizing frequencies in this range will result in a muddy mix.
Bass (60 Hz to 250 Hz). Because this range contains the fundamental notes of the rhythm section, any EQ changes will affect the balance of your mix, making it fat or thin. Too much emphasis will make for a boomy mix.
Low Mids (250 Hz to 2 kHz). In general, you will want to emphasize the lower portion of this range and deemphasize the upper portion. Boosting the range from 250 Hz to 500 Hz will accent ambience in the studio and will add clarity to bass and lower frequency instruments. The range between 500 Hz and 2 kHz can make midrange instruments (guitar, snare, saxophone, etc.) “honky,” and too much boost between 1 kHz and 2 kHz can make your mix sound thin or “tinny.”
High Mids (2 kHz to 4 kHz). The attack portion of percussive and rhythm instruments occurs in this range. High mids are also responsible for the projection of midrange instruments.
Presence (4 kHz to 6 kHz). This frequency range is partly responsible for the clarity of a mix and provides a measure of control over the perception of distance. If you boost this frequency range, the mix will be perceived as closer to the listener. Attenuating around 5 kHz will make the mix sound further away but also more transparent.
Brilliance (6 kHz to 16 kHz). While this range controls the brilliance and clarity of your mix, boosting it too much can cause some clipping so keep an eye on your main meter.

Mixing/equalization advices:
- Solo just the instrument with which you are working. Most engineers start building their mix with the drums and work from the bottom up (kick, snare, toms, hi-hat, overheads). Each instrument resonates primarily in a specific frequency band
- Step away from the mix. Your ears get fatigued, just like the rest of you. If you are working particularly hard on one instrument, your ears will be quite literally numbed to that frequency range