Forum Klix.ba

trump i sadasnja administracija su samo i zaista pravo lice amerike. usa su vec dugo militantno, fundamentalisticko drustvo koje se temelji na sili i strahu i prezivljavanju jacega, sa povlastenom bijelom, evangelistickom elitom.

no, nije trump toliki problem, mislim jeste, ali postoje veci, trump je svakako samo (ludjacka) marioneta republikanaca i lobbya, poput manijakalnog psihoticnog djeteta ili rosemary's baby. gori su ti trump enablers, koji ga drze na toj poziciji i hrane jer im je donio pobjedu i jer napokon mogu ostvariti svoje interese. i debili koji su glasali za njega. ( a ti ljudi su zaista na granici retardacije). ali kako je trump zlobni egomanijak, povuci ce sve sa sobom kad bude krenuo. cak i one creepove od svojih sinova. no i ostatak svijeta.
po meni, pence je gori. ako bi dosao na vlast (a moguce je kad trump izgubi podrsku naroda, tad ce ga republikanci sami skinuti), zaista je moguce da organizira drustvo onako kako ga je atwood opisala u "handmaid's tale". ili da bude njegov zacetnik. ako trump ostane, onda ce biti full "idiocracy" .

svako drustvo je uvijek na korak od totalitarizma, kako nam je njemacka 30tih godina pokazala ili iran, afganistan, kina, itd. uvijek je u osjetljivom balansu i potrebna je samo ideologija (religija ili njen substitut poput kulta licnosti) da ga se gurne u totalitaristicku agoniju. a trumpovi sljedbenici njeguju kult licnosti i amerika je vec jako podsjeca na njemacku 30tih godina. isto tako su i tamo postojale demokratske, prosekularne snage koje su hitlera smatrale ludjakom, ismijavale ga, etc. no ni satira ni legalna politicka djelovanja nisu uspjela sprijeciti niti hitlera niti ustroj fasistickog drustva. zaista volim colberta & co., ali oni ne dopiru do dijela stanovnistva koje je izabralo trumpa. niti ce. niti ce utjecati na republikance.

ugl. zanimljivo je sve to gledati, mi mozemo live gledati pad novog "rimskog carstva". pri tom se mozemo samo smijati dok nas jeza hvata

Sorry na dugom postu

vezano za Trumpa i njegov dolazak na mjesto POTUS-a, kao i američko stanje nacije, preporučujem pogledati odličan dokumentarac

DaysleepeR wrote:vezano za Trumpa i njegov dolazak na mjesto POTUS-a, kao i američko stanje nacije, preporučujem pogledati odličan dokumentarac

Odlican, zahvaljujem...

sheilak wrote:amerika je vec jako podsjeca na njemacku 30tih godina

whatever...

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/17/polit ... index.html
Puša ko duša

pocetak kraja, rekla bih.

wewa wrote:pocetak kraja, rekla bih.

nadam se, ali ne bih rekla cak ni da je ovo kraj pocetka. precesto se vec donald trump pokazao kao teflon don u svakom slucaju tu su republikanci da ga brane i pokrivaju.

@daysleeper

gledala, odlican je film.

ultima_palabra wrote:http://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/17/polit ... index.html
Puša ko duša

It's gonna be beautiful, it's gonna be something you've never seen before...
Pa eto, ispunio je predizborno obecanje.
Sad mu je furka da Obamin plan krahira sam od sebe, poslije ce on napraviti nesto novo na zdravim temeljima.
Neka se spremi Torabi, bice posla za njega.

sheilak wrote:trump i sadasnja administracija su samo i zaista pravo lice amerike. usa su vec dugo militantno, fundamentalisticko drustvo koje se temelji na sili i strahu i prezivljavanju jacega, sa povlastenom bijelom, evangelistickom elitom.

no, nije trump toliki problem, mislim jeste, ali postoje veci, trump je svakako samo (ludjacka) marioneta republikanaca i lobbya, poput manijakalnog psihoticnog djeteta ili rosemary's baby. gori su ti trump enablers, koji ga drze na toj poziciji i hrane jer im je donio pobjedu i jer napokon mogu ostvariti svoje interese. i debili koji su glasali za njega. ( a ti ljudi su zaista na granici retardacije). ali kako je trump zlobni egomanijak, povuci ce sve sa sobom kad bude krenuo. cak i one creepove od svojih sinova. no i ostatak svijeta.
po meni, pence je gori. ako bi dosao na vlast (a moguce je kad trump izgubi podrsku naroda, tad ce ga republikanci sami skinuti), zaista je moguce da organizira drustvo onako kako ga je atwood opisala u "handmaid's tale". ili da bude njegov zacetnik. ako trump ostane, onda ce biti full "idiocracy" .

svako drustvo je uvijek na korak od totalitarizma, kako nam je njemacka 30tih godina pokazala ili iran, afganistan, kina, itd. uvijek je u osjetljivom balansu i potrebna je samo ideologija (religija ili njen substitut poput kulta licnosti) da ga se gurne u totalitaristicku agoniju. a trumpovi sljedbenici njeguju kult licnosti i amerika je vec jako podsjeca na njemacku 30tih godina. isto tako su i tamo postojale demokratske, prosekularne snage koje su hitlera smatrale ludjakom, ismijavale ga, etc. no ni satira ni legalna politicka djelovanja nisu uspjela sprijeciti niti hitlera niti ustroj fasistickog drustva. zaista volim colberta & co., ali oni ne dopiru do dijela stanovnistva koje je izabralo trumpa. niti ce. niti ce utjecati na republikance.

ugl. zanimljivo je sve to gledati, mi mozemo live gledati pad novog "rimskog carstva". pri tom se mozemo samo smijati dok nas jeza hvata

Sorry na dugom postu

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... d=SK216DHP

pa zar se fakat i ovdje koristite the argumentom trump supportera- what about hillary?! ona nije predsjednik, koga ona jos zanima. demokrati su prica za sebe, jednako korumpirani i zeznuli su sami sebe kada su onemogucili pobjedu sandersa. us dvopartijski sistem je fakat sjeban, gdje se smjenjuju dvije u biti jednake i jednako korumpirane partije sa istim ciljevima, samo drugacijim predznakom. treba im temeljita preobrazba, citavom njihovom izbornom sistemu.

kad malo bolje razmislim, us je fakat bizarno drustvo, cudno, u gotovo svemu.

Meni je bizarna njihova ljubav prema oruzju. Sve diraj al pravo da svaka budala nosi oruzje ne.

Nesto za Jeza
http://pushtrumpoffacliffagain.com/

sheilak wrote:kad malo bolje razmislim, us je fakat bizarno drustvo, cudno, u gotovo svemu.

Ako smijem pitati da li ti zivis u USA i odakle takav zakljucak?

Aerodrom u Rusiji

Opet Russia Today.

Čega se pametan stidi, budala se time ponosi.

Ko bi rekao da ce mi Trump iz dana u dan postati sve drazi.

Kat wrote:Nesto za Jeza
http://pushtrumpoffacliffagain.com/

lajk!

http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/amer ... 83785.aspx



btw, obzirom na dijagnozu, želje ovakvih spodoba će se i ostvariti. svakako neće dočekati drugi Trumpov mandat, a pitanje je hoće li uopšte od ovog momenta biti ikakav faktor.

Da fuck...?

DONALD TRUMP AGAIN SHOWS THAT HE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT U.S. OR WORLD HISTORY

President Donald Trump’s interview Wednesday with The New York Times contained plenty of interesting nuggets, from his negative comments about Jeff Sessions, Robert Mueller and James Comey to his claims that French President Emmanuel Macron really “loves holding my hand.” Buried in there, though, was just the latest installment of Trump’s alternative rendering of world history.

This time, while discussing his recent trip to Paris and his hand-holding exploits, Trump turned his attention to the topic of former French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte.

“Well, Napoleon finished a little bit bad,” Trump said as he recalled a trip to Napoleon’s tomb. “But I asked that. So I asked the president, So what about Napoleon? He said, ‘No, no, no. What he did was incredible. He designed Paris.’

After some words that are garbled on the audio track, Trump went on, “The street grid, the way they work, you know, the spokes. He did so many things even beyond. And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death. How many times has Russia been saved by the weather [garbled]?”

Garbling aside, there is much to unpack here. First, “Napoleon finished a little bad.” Well, sure, if that’s how you’d describe a series of catastrophic military invasions that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of French troops, and being forced to abdicate and sent into exile, twice, before dying on a remote island, likely from stomach cancer.

But it gets worse from there. Whatever Trump heard Macron say, it is unlikely to have been praise for Napoleon’s redesign of Paris. At least not the same Napoleon Trump was talking about moments before. It was, after all, Napoleon III, Bonaparte’s nephew, who commissioned the grand redesign of France’s capital city some 30 years after his uncle had died.

Next came Trump’s account of Napoleon’s failure in Russia. Napoleon did encounter disaster in Russia, when Russian troops lured the French army deeper and deeper into the country, where tens of thousands of soldiers died of exhaustion, thirst or starvation in the scorching summer heat. After reaching a deserted and burned-down Moscow, Napoleon ordered a retreat, as winter was approaching, Tens of thousands more troops then perished in the brutal cold and snow.

As to what Napoleon’s “extracurricular activities” were, perhaps only Trump knows.

Trump’s history lesson then continued with his account of Adolf Hitler’s failed invasion of Russia and Russian fighters’ expertise in the cold, before, without pause, he returned to modern domestic issues.

“But the Russians have great fighters in the cold,” he said. “They use the cold to their advantage. I mean, they’ve won five wars where the armies that went against them froze to death [cross talk]. It’s pretty amazing.

“So, we’re having a good time. The economy is doing great.”

It is far from the first time Trump has displayed a greater appetite to talk about world history than to learn about it. On a trip to Warsaw earlier this month, he decided to give a Polish nationalist history lesson that some derided as sounding as if he had just skimmed the country’s Wikipedia page. Describing how Poland faced both Nazi and Soviet invasion during World War II, Trump said, “That’s trouble. That’s tough.”

Indeed. But Trump’s questionable recounting of history is not limited to events outside of the United States. In May, he attracted ridicule when posing a question about something that is considered such common knowledge it is even included on the U.S. citizenship test.

“People don’t ask that question, but why was there the Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out?” he asked.

Of course, the most widely agreed upon reason is slavery. Trump also said that Andrew Jackson was angry about the Civil War and could potentially have stopped it. Jackson died in 1845, 16 years before the Civil War began.

Trump has shown similarly questionable knowledge of a president he has said he greatly admires, Abraham Lincoln. As well as misattributing a quote to him, Trump has suggested that the well-known fact that Lincoln was a member of the Republican Party is far from well known.

“Most people don’t even know he was a Republican, right? Does anyone know?” he said last year. “A lot of people don’t know that. We have to build that up a little more.”

Newsweek.

In other news...WaPo veceras javlja da se Trump raspituje medju advokatima koga moze pomilovati, ljude iz administracije, familiju, pa cak i sebe.

Dze Nixon da mu javi kako to ide?

Jezo jos nije prihvatio cinjenicu da ce trunpinu trpit jos najmanje 4 god

zenit dozic wrote:Jezo jos nije prihvatio cinjenicu da ce trunpinu trpit jos najmanje 4 god

Jedina cinjenica u tvojoj recenici je da tebi matematika ne ide bas najbolje, ali ako nista, moze te utjesiti spoznaja da dijelis misljenje sa milionima Amerikanaca sa slicnim intelektom.