#9526 Re: Donald J Trump - Predsjednik USA All About
Posted: 04/06/2017 15:28
Ko kaze da me tangira zar ne vidis da sam spreman za vracanje Kosova?
Nego samo mi objasni sto nisam Hrvat?
Nego samo mi objasni sto nisam Hrvat?
NajdraziVodjaa wrote:Ali eto ako nista drago mi je sto sam clan ovog foruma i sto sam otkrio da sam srbin, vracam se vjeri pradjedova...ako bude kakve frke ti i ja cemo tri prsta u zrak i idemo vratiti Kosovo.
Inace ta logika mi je prejaka, ako nisi fan ovih pedoliberala, feminista, imigranata i satro izbjeglica ne mozes nista drugo biti do srbiniako su kad su imigranti u pitanju srbi izgleda bili najblazi npr. u Hrvatskojs e redovno premlacuju i sikaniraju imigranti kako od strane policije tako od lokalaca da ne pricam da je medju hrvatima Trump duplo popularniji nego medju srbima a niko me ne prozva da sam hrvat, samo srbin
But then he decided to slam the mayor of the city attacked, who had calmly warned his fellow Londoners: “Londoners will see an increased police presence today and over the course of the next few days. There’s no reason to be alarmed.” Trump took the second part out of context and responded viciously, “At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is ‘no reason to be alarmed!'” (The mayor, of course, was telling them not to be alarmed by the heightened police presence.)
pogresno si me razumio. pod "mi" nisam mislio na svijet vec na nas u bosni. ne mogu sebe natjerat da pisem kako me vise sekiraju kisele kise u amazonu od suhe cesme iza ponoci u vlastitom stanu. ne mogu reci da me vise brine sirenje pukotine na antarktiku od sirenja pukotina u nasim novcanicima.Gojeni H wrote:I nemamo previse

naravno da je bitan kao i kjoto..naravno da je bitno od smanjenja plinova,sirenja obnovljivih izvora energije, zaustavljanja sirenja pustinjskih povrsina..vivaldi wrote:tvoj komentar je generalno ok, ali tu ima hrpa bitnih faktora koje u ovoj histeriji aposlutno niko ne uzima u obzir niti ih spominje cak ni periferno.sumirprimus wrote:al ovo za klimatske promjene. to se tice svih nas, jebte zivimo u bosni koja je jedna od najzagadjenijih zemalja u europi, i ti branis trumpa radi napustanja ovog sporazuma???
- prva stvar, 99,99% ljudi na planeti nikada nije procitalo ni jednu jedinu recenicu iz pariskog sporazuma (pocesvi od mene), sto ih naravno ne sprjecava da trampu jebu mater na sav glas jer je upravo "unistio planetu".
....
taj famozni pariski sporazum je ocigledno "guma iz gaca", rastegljiv i po duzini i po sirini kojeg je obama "skrojio" vise zbog sebe nego zbog planete, a svijet koji vec godinama pati od globalnih politickih neuspjeha, objerucke ocajnicki prihvatio i predstavio kao uspjeh. na mikro planu to ti je ono otprilike ko ova gospoda iz brisela sto vec 10-15 godina kada god dodju u bosnu konstatuju "ogroman napredak" , a mi u mjestu stojimo. ali jednostavno ocajnicki ima trebaju neki uspjesi, pa makar imaginarni. sada je tramp medjutim ovaj sporazum skrojio po svojoj politickoj mjeri pa je drama jer je nepopularan. a sto se tice planete, ne cini mi se da je ona bila u fokusu ni tamnom ni narandzastom.

I ja sam mislio na Bosnu. Da nije nekoliko prijatelja i Fude mi oka forumaskog, pucao bi mi kufer za Amerikom, al' skroz.vivaldi wrote:
pogresno si me razumio. pod "mi" nisam mislio na svijet vec na nas u bosni. ne mogu sebe natjerat da pisem kako me vise sekiraju kisele kise u amazonu od suhe cesme iza ponoci u vlastitom stanu. ne mogu reci da me vise brine sirenje pukotine na antarktiku od sirenja pukotina u nasim novcanicima. ...planeta je u kurcu i oko toga nema diskusije, ali bosna, gabon i barbados sasvim sigurno ne mogu zagletovat antarktik.
Jesi mi enigma, fakat. Ne znam kako ne vidis poveznicu - americko djelovanje vs. Brexit vs. situacija u Evropi. A nisam teoreticar zavjere.mene vise iznenadjuje ponasanje evrope. otkako su ameri odnedavno poceli sa uvodjenjem demokratije na bliskom istoku u ervopi je otpoceo festival vatrometa bez presedana u novijoj istoriji i milionski nekontrolisani stampedo bez presedana. bodljikave zice se razapinju po granicama, zbog migranata puca jedinstvo konitnenta na sve strane, a dobrim dijelom je uticalo i na brexit...
ko je na bilo koju pojedinacnu stvar od svega toga mogao pomisliti prije samo 15 godina, a kamoli na sve zajedno!? neke evropske metropole su blizu toga da im se sigurnosni rejting spusti na "level kandahar".
evorpski parlament i druge insticuije umjesto da su u konstatsnom vandrendom i kriznom zasjedanju, u analiziranju uzroka, revizije vlastitih politickih poteza i predlaganja rjesenja, lakonski prelazi preko svega, al zato studiozno naprdjuju o trampovim tweetovima. ma daaaaaaaaaaaj
Nista se ne sekiraj, sve je pod kontrolom.Gojeni H wrote:I ja sam mislio na Bosnu. Da nije nekoliko prijatelja i Fude mi oka forumaskog, pucao bi mi kufer za Amerikom, al' skroz.
Taman da im obeca uvodjenje parnih masina u proizvodnju.Fudo387 wrote:Nista se ne sekiraj, sve je pod kontrolom.Gojeni H wrote:I ja sam mislio na Bosnu. Da nije nekoliko prijatelja i Fude mi oka forumaskog, pucao bi mi kufer za Amerikom, al' skroz.
Lozi one levate sto ne znaju ni da zive u AmerikU, jebes mu sve, rodilo se u najbogatijoj zemlji svijeta i ne mrda iz onih brda
po kentakiju i virdziniji, a jarane, nista tamo nema, isto Bosansko Grahovo. Al' jebi ga, imaju pravo glasa.
Rudnici su cuca, ne isplati se, slaba fajda od toga.
Hmm kod jedinog dosadašnjeg slučaja impiČiranja potpredsjednik koji je zamijenio predsjednika (Ford) čim je ušao u ured potpisao je ukaz da se ovaj ne može dalje proganjati zbog bilo čega što je počinio za vrijeme mandata. Tricky Dicky je poslije živio kao bubreg u loju, malo osramoćen ali ne možeš imat baš sve u životu...mO k3 wrote:Da li je bivši predsjednik kome je izglasan impeachment ima imunitet mislim da li ga mogu zakonski Ganjati ???
sumirprimus wrote:naravno da je bitan kao i kjoto..naravno da je bitno od smanjenja plinova,sirenja obnovljivih izvora energije, zaustavljanja sirenja pustinjskih povrsina..i ovo je borba clean i green protiv coal i oil...obama je radio u granicama moguceg,ali je ipak pristao na pariz.ovaj dump nema sanse.vrijeme ce ga pregazit svakako.
probacu jos jednom pod pretpostavkom da je neki nesporazum, mada ni u jednom mom zarezu, a kamoli recenici nije bilo povoda da mi pojasnjavate bukvalno elemntarne stvari. ali evo jos jednom cu pokusat pojednostavit.Gojeni H wrote:I ja sam mislio na Bosnu. Da nije nekoliko prijatelja i Fude mi oka forumaskog, pucao bi mi kufer za Amerikom, al' skroz. 97% svjetskih strucnjaka tvrdi da covjekovo djelovanje uzrokuje globalno zagrijavanje, ali avaj ... ima klix par svojih strucnjaka. Govoreci o Barbadosu i Bosni, ono sto je bitno je efekat. Relativno skoro je utvrdjeno da Inuiti na Grenlandu nose veliki procenat tesih metala u krvi. Kako, kad nema nikakve industrije? - Pa, druze vivaldi, tako sto je malo sta staticno na ovom dunjaluku ... zagadjivanje - morski svijet - specificna ishrana. DakleM, za Barbados se ne sekiram, al' mi je Bosna najvaznija.
treba upratit kako ce reagovat svekoliko pucanstvo sutra..danas i juce mu rejting rastao za po 1%. trenutno je na 38%.
Here’s the testimony Comey will give tomorrow. It covers the period when Comey is director of the FBI, Trump is president, and, as Trump knows, Comey is in charge of an investigation into possible collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russian operatives.
As I count them, Comey relates 8 instances that could be used as evidence of Trump's intent to obstruct justice:
1. A January 27 dinner in the White House to which Trump has invited Comey. It's one-on-one between Comey and Trump. Comey senses it as a kind of job interview, even though Comey is already director of the FBI with a 10-year appointment. Trump tells Comey “I need loyalty, I expect loyalty,” to which Comey does not respond. At the end of the dinner, Trump tells Comey “I need loyalty.” Comey replies, “You will always get honesty from me.” Trump pauses and then says “That’s what I want, honest loyalty.” Comey pauses, and says, “You will get that from me.”
2. A February 14 meeting in the Oval Office the day after Michael Flynn resigns. Trump has told others to leave, and he is alone with Comey. Trump tells Comey “I want to talk about Mike Flynn.” Trump then says Flynn hadn’t done anything wrong in speaking with the Russians. “He is a good guy and has been through a lot,” adding “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.” Comey replies only that “he is a good guy.” Come does not say he will “let this go.”
3. A March 30 phone call from Trump to Comey at the FBI, in which Trump describes the Russia investigation as “a cloud” impairing his ability to act on behalf of the country, and asks Comey "what we can do to lift the cloud.”
4. During that same phone call, Trump asks Comey why there had been a congressional hearing about Russia the previous week – at which Comey had, as the Department of Justice directed, confirmed the investigation into possible coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign.
5. During the same call, Comey reminds Trump that the FBI is not now investigating him personally, at which point Trump repeatedly says “We need to get that fact out.” At end of the call, Trump again says he hopes Comey will find a way to get it out that the FBI is not investigating Trump.
6. During the same call, Trump abruptly turns the conversation to FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, saying he hadn’t brought up “the McCabe thing” because Comey had said McCabe was honorable, even though McCabe’s wife had made a campaign donation to Terry McAuliffe’s campaign, and McAuliffe was close to the Clintons.
7. An April 11 phone call from Trump to Comey, in which Trump asks Comey what Comey had done about Trump’s request that he “get out” word that Trump is not personally under investigation. Trump says the investigation is getting in the way of his ability to do his job. Comey suggests Trump deal with the Department of Justice.
8. Trump agrees to go through the Department of Justice, telling Comey it is “because I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know.” Comey does not reply or ask Trump what he means by “that thing.”
On May 9, Trump fires Comey.
Even if none of the 8 instances conclusively proves obstruction of justice, together they show a clear pattern.
This doesn't even include Trump's interview with Lester Holt on NBC and Trump's meeting with Russian officials in the Oval Office -- when in both instances he connects his firing of Comey with the Russian investigation