stakasa wrote:Saul Alvarez wrote:
Jedan kriminalac manje.
Kako ce ga onako roknut, jos mu na zemlji lezi. Nije ono normalno
Stakasa pa nije to Bosna da Mirza Hatic mase pistoljem na tv.
Zandari su cisti ko suza , dosli na poziv covjek prijet pistoljem, on se opiro oni probali fizicku silu posto je ovo stari kriminalac koji je vagao 143 kg nije islo lako , onda su ga tazerom opalili ni to nije radilo i onda zandari vide da pokusava izvaditi pistolj iz djepa, zandar mu prisloni pistolj na prsa i kaze prestani ili te nema on i dalje nastavi i to je bilo to.
A evo ti zakonske odredbe :
If an officer shoots a suspect accused of a misdemeanor for a reason other than self-defense, the officer can be held liable for criminal charges and damages for injuries to the suspect. This standard was demonstrated in the Iowa case of
Klinkel v. Saddler, 211 Iowa 368, 233 N.W. 538 (1930), where a sheriff faced a Wrongful Death lawsuit because he had killed a misdemeanor suspect during an arrest. The sheriff said he had used deadly force to defend himself, and the court ruled in his favor.
When police officers are arresting someone for a felony, the courts have given them a little more leeway. The police may use all the force that is necessary to overcome resistance, even if that means killing the person they are trying to arrest. However, if it is proved that an officer used more force than was necessary, the officer can be held criminally and civilly liable. In Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1, 105 S. Ct. 1694, 85 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1985), the Supreme Court ruled that it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment for police officers to use deadly force to stop fleeing felony suspects who are nonviolent and unarmed. The decision, with an opinion written by Justice byron r. white, said, in part, "We conclude that such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."
A evo ti Sterlingovog dosijea:
9/09/96 aggravated battery
10/31/97 2nd degree battery
1/06/98 simple battery
5/04/00 public intimidation
9/20/00 carnal knowledge of a juvenile
9/04/01 domestic violence
5/24/05 burglary of an inhabited dwelling place
7/11/05 receiving stolen things
9/12/05 burglary of inhabited dwelling place
3/17/06 simple criminal damage to property, simple robbery, simple theft, drug possession, misrepresentation during booking, simple battery, aggravated battery
4/12/06 aggravated battery, simple criminal damage to property, disturbing the peace, unauthorized entry
4/04/08 domestic abuse battery
6/03/09 resisting an officer, drug possession, receiving stolen things, possession of stolen firearm, illegal carrying of a weapon with CDs, sound reproduct without consent
10/12/09 illegal carrying of weapon, marijuana possession
8/13/15 failure to register as a sex offender
4/08/16 failure to register as a sex offender
6/14/16 ecstacy and marijuana possession
Znaci osudjivan za krivicna djela, seksualni napad na maloljetnika, odbio da se registruje ko seksualni manijak, nasilje u domacinstvu.
Nije smjeo dotaknuti oruzije a kamo ga imati na sebi, i znao da sad kada ga uhapse ide u zatvor na 10 godina za posjedovanje pistolja i zastrasivanje pistoljem.
zao mi je, i zelim ti da se sto prije izlijecis. 
), itd., ostavljam zainteresovanim.
vise vakih koka nego Naser Oric