Forum Klix.ba

daxon wrote:

bitanga_sa_otesa wrote:ima rascipovanih kamiona kolko hoces

Ma sve i da uklone blokadu ostaje tahograf, a vani se sa njim niko ne zeza.

NediM17 wrote: a morel mi dizel ondaK krenut knockat?

Matijevic_Vlado wrote: evo ga 70

bitanga_sa_otesa wrote:

daxon wrote:

bitanga_sa_otesa wrote:ima rascipovanih kamiona kolko hoces

Ma sve i da uklone blokadu ostaje tahograf, a vani se sa njim niko ne zeza.

to ti mislis ,znam ih ja par sto voze bih-vani ,svi imaju vise tahograf traka i svi varaju na tome .da to ne rade ne bi ih bilo nigdje,putovali bi danima i ne bi zaradili nista....

Tkanton wrote:

Matijevic_Vlado wrote: evo ga 70

Otkad auto-put ima samo jednu traku po pravcu

daxon wrote: To je neko prošlo vrijeme, sada svi moraju imati digitalne tahografe.

_mufljuz_ wrote:ako ovaj tegljac ide 80km/h onda audi pravi falš - brzinomjere ipak - sta ti je nas coek nije izas'o dalje od stupa i M17 i popuje o zivotu i autima

Mlad i Nevin wrote:

citroen xm wrote:

Mlad i Nevin wrote:Moj Ford Eskort DIZEL je kostao 550 KM. Za te pare se ne moze kupiti ozbiljan polovan bicikl

Sent from my Grand X Pro using Tapatalk

Je li ti od kupovine do kuće otpao zadnji most?

Ma jok, samo trebalo promijeniti ramena, selene i lafete, veliki servis rega i auto zmaj za samo 1500 KM sveukupno. Kad smo kod autoputa ja sa svojom krntijom ne bih smio voziti preko 90, jednostavno je auto prestar za danasnje relativno visoke putne brzine.

Sent from my Grand X Pro using Tapatalk

apsidejzi wrote:

Graficki

sparky wrote:697 tema u kojoj se u naslovu nalazi ekonomicnost! vozi li iko od cejfa ikad auto?

Drvosjeca iz Dejcica wrote:

sparky wrote:697 tema u kojoj se u naslovu nalazi ekonomicnost! vozi li iko od cejfa ikad auto?

Vozim ja. Neki dan prema Visokom stisnem Fabiju na 195 km/h, onako iz meraka. U povratku normalna vožnja 140-150 km/h. Mene lijepo bude stid sa Fabijom preticati zadnju seriju Audija, BMW-a i Benz-a.

basicm wrote:Joj 90 neka brzina na autoputu!
Za vas je onda i sah ekstremni sport.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Drafting behind a big rig will improve your car’s fuel efficiency.

confirmed

To test this myth, the build team procured a car, a big rig, and a device that could measure a car’s fuel efficiency. They then drove the car behind a moving big rig at various distances ranging from 100 to 2 feet and measured the amount of fuel the car consumed. The Build Team discovered that the closer the car was to the big rig, the less drag is produced, thus the more fuel saved. At just ten feet, the car managed to increase its fuel efficiency by 40%. Drafting at two feet was slightly lower than the ten foot distance, mainly because Grant had to keep working the car pedal to maintain distance from the truck. However, that did not dispute the fact that drafting actually can increase your car’s fuel efficiency. However, the Build Team has warned that drafting is incredibly dangerous because the truck driver may not able to see you and you may not be able to react in time if the truck were to make a sudden stop.

bude wrote:

Drafting behind a big rig will improve your car’s fuel efficiency.

confirmed

To test this myth, the build team procured a car, a big rig, and a device that could measure a car’s fuel efficiency. They then drove the car behind a moving big rig at various distances ranging from 100 to 2 feet and measured the amount of fuel the car consumed. The Build Team discovered that the closer the car was to the big rig, the less drag is produced, thus the more fuel saved. At just ten feet, the car managed to increase its fuel efficiency by 40%. Drafting at two feet was slightly lower than the ten foot distance, mainly because Grant had to keep working the car pedal to maintain distance from the truck. However, that did not dispute the fact that drafting actually can increase your car’s fuel efficiency. However, the Build Team has warned that drafting is incredibly dangerous because the truck driver may not able to see you and you may not be able to react in time if the truck were to make a sudden stop.

goibos wrote:

Drvosjeca iz Dejcica wrote:

sparky wrote:697 tema u kojoj se u naslovu nalazi ekonomicnost! vozi li iko od cejfa ikad auto?

Vozim ja. Neki dan prema Visokom stisnem Fabiju na 195 km/h, onako iz meraka. U povratku normalna vožnja 140-150 km/h. Mene lijepo bude stid sa Fabijom preticati zadnju seriju Audija, BMW-a i Benz-a.

Koja to fabija ide 195 km/h ???

goibos wrote:

Drvosjeca iz Dejcica wrote:

sparky wrote:697 tema u kojoj se u naslovu nalazi ekonomicnost! vozi li iko od cejfa ikad auto?

Vozim ja. Neki dan prema Visokom stisnem Fabiju na 195 km/h, onako iz meraka. U povratku normalna vožnja 140-150 km/h. Mene lijepo bude stid sa Fabijom preticati zadnju seriju Audija, BMW-a i Benz-a.

Koja to fabija ide 195 km/h ???

_Reds_ wrote:Ono sto je meni zanimljivo bilo jeste da pri brzini od 140, auto mi trosi manje u 5, nego u 6 brzini.

Dok na 120, nesto manje trosi 6ta.

Auto je 2.0 TDI.

daxon wrote:

_Reds_ wrote:Ono sto je meni zanimljivo bilo jeste da pri brzini od 140, auto mi trosi manje u 5, nego u 6 brzini.

Dok na 120, nesto manje trosi 6ta.

Auto je 2.0 TDI.

Neprilagođen stepen prenosa trenutnoj brzini kretanja, dakle ne raspolažeš optimalnim obrtnim momentom i naravno da je potrošnja povećana.
Naprimjer, ubaciš u četvrtu pri brzini od 40 km/h, a onda želiš postići brzinu od 60 km/h, tada puno više pritišćeš papučicu gasa, a efekat gasa tj. odaziv je malen pa ga još više pritišćeš i dolazi do povećane potrošnje, da ne govorim o lošijem podmazivanju i većem zagrijavanju motora.

Papučica gasa je ključ za potrošnju, nešto slično ventilu kojim odvrćemo slavinu sa gorivom, što se više odvrće auto više troši, dakle, iz svakog stepena prenosa treba izvući optimum obrtnog momenta kako bi što manje stiskali gas.