MorningStar wrote: ↑01/02/2020 16:25
Po ko zna koji put , nato ti ne uzima nikakve ozbiljne pare nego te tjera na minimum 3% gdp na SVOJU vojsku da izdvajas.
Nevjerovatno je kako ljudi vrte konstantno istu nebulozu.
Zasto se javljas i jos lafo nesto cinicno kometarises o stvarima kojim nemas pojma, a i ne zelis da znas?
Kao prvo nije 3, nego 2 posto GDP na svoju vojsku
Drugo postoji diretni i indirektni doprinos
•Indirect – or national – contributions are the largest and come, for instance, when a member volunteers equipment or troops to a military operation and bears the costs of the decision to do so.
•Direct contributions are made to finance requirements of the Alliance that serve the interests of all 29 members - and are not the responsibility of any single member - such as NATO-wide air defence or command and control systems. Costs are borne collectively, often using the principle of common funding.
•Within the principle of common funding, all 29 members contribute according to an agreed cost-share formula, based on Gross National Income, which represents a small percentage of each member’s defence budget.
•Common funding arrangements are used to finance NATO’s principal budgets: the civil budget (NATO HQ running costs), the military budget (costs of the integrated Command Structure) and the NATO Security Investment Programme (military capabilities).
•Projects can also be jointly funded, which means that the participating countries can identify the requirements, the priorities and the funding arrangements, but NATO provides political and financial oversight. The funding process is overseen by the North Atlantic Council, managed by the Resource Policy and Planning Board, and implemented by the Budget Committee and the Investment Committee.
Sistem je kompleksan, ali Amerika trazi da se iznosi znatno povecaju
