#57726 Re: Ukrajina
Posted: 06/03/2022 16:01
Starudije padaju ko muhe, dok ne dodju moderniji sa sposobnijim posadama jelte
Pa ne čitaj šta piše ...simplytovarish wrote: ↑06/03/2022 15:57Ja sad moram čitati tuđa sranja jer je bio moderator. Dovoljno što moram čitati trolerske postove i sda propagandu pojedinaca iz "uprave", sad moramo trpiti i bivše. Ima li to u pravilima foruma? Meni se čini da nema.
Edit: ima nas koji nismo seksualno neiživljeni, pa nam fali ženskih slika na forumu.
Ma kakav prodor, krila su im šuplja od granice, moze im doci ko hoce, nemaju ljudstva Rusi, samo stavljaju duz ceste punktove sa dva tri vozila.Occasionally wrote: ↑06/03/2022 15:58 Po svemu sudeći proboj Ukrajinaca je bio minimum 10 km po dubini
Ovo treba cijeloj Rusiji pokazati.sumirprimus wrote: ↑06/03/2022 15:52
A ko nije poslusao trebao bi pogotvu ovi zabrinuti i neutralni!
S prevodom na engleski ruski zarobljenik o zabludama i sramoti
Ako će nas poslušati imamo samo jedan savjetzlajaBHF wrote: ↑06/03/2022 12:30 Sta mislite kakva ce situacija biti za pola godine?
Da li ce Rusi osvojiti sve, ili ce to biti dio drzave, naprimjer jug i istok.... Da li ce i Kijev?
Da li ce NATO odluciti za jos vecu podrsku Ukrajincima i slati im avione, tenkove, pa da Ukrajincni mogu krenuti s protivofanzivom?
Ja mislim da zapad nece dozvoliti potpuni pad Ukrajine. Znaci, dobivat ce dovoljno pomoci, da se odrze u zivotu.
Ocekujem da ce Rusi stati u odredjenom momentu, jer ce uvidjeti da je zauzimanje cijele Ukrajine nemoguce, ili preskupo (To su vec shvatili) i onda ce teritoriju od Odesse do Donbasa, i gore do sjevera, istocno od Dnjepra proglasiti nekom republikom ili drzavom.
Stvorio bi se zamrznuti konflikt.....dok bi Rusi bili pod sankcijama i krvarili.
Nakon toga, Boga pitaj..... Misilim da bi se Rusija kad tad povukla i da bi cijela teritorija, ukljucujuci Donbas i Krim vratili Ukrajincima. Ali koliko vremena treba da prodje je pitanje.....i u kakvom stanju ce tada Ukrajina biti i koliko ce naroda situ napustiti...
Najbolji scenarij za Ukrajiu je da NATO krene sa ozbiljnijim naoruzavanjem. Znaci avioni i ostalo..... Da se Rusi zaustave i da se povrati odredjena teritorija. Mozda bi nakon toga Rusi bili spremni za pregovore.
Kao sto su neki ovde piisali, ja sam za konkretniju pomoc i na raspolaganju al svojoj drzaviHelios wrote: ↑06/03/2022 16:15 Sumir sta čekaš pokaži se na bojnom polju.Izgleda da bi ti najviše volio da bukne rat u cijeloj Evropi.Takav sam dojam stekao, ti bi najviše volio da se puca svugdje samo ne u tvojoj sobi,da imaš internet i da postavljaš video klipove.
Ili idi u Ameriku tamo neće biti rata,oni rat instaliraju negdje drugo,uglavnom Evropa nahebe a oni nas žale.
Kao i današnji protesti u NY ,vicu parole No fly zone a fakticki ne znaju da bi tek to dovelo do još većeg stradanja ukrajine i njenih naroda.
Ja se iskreno nadam da ce Ukrajina pobijediti,ali se iskreno nadam da neće izbiti veliki rat pa da cu ni kriv ni dužan i ja i moja familija biti po drugi put u životu u ratu.
Muka naša nečija radost.
Ja sam bio na protestima protiv Putina i Rusije u gradu gdje živim, donirao sam mnogo za pomoć ukrajincima zajedno sa radnim kolegama.Sljeperi pomoći, medicinskih potrepštine i lijekova smo organizirali.Tako da me se ne svrstava na stranu agresora.
Ali trebalo bi malo prikočiti,manje pisati a više stvarno djelovati.
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War art. 27, Aug. 12, 1949, 6 U.S.T. 3516.
Obviously, these provisions do not expressly ban filming of POWs but protects them from acts of “intimidation and … insults and public curiosity.”
The International Red Cross and other international humanitarian groups have long condemned the filming for POWs for propaganda or public messaging.
“Being exposed to ‘public curiosity’ as a prisoner of war, even when such exposure is not accompanied by insulting remarks or actions, is humiliating in itself and therefore specifically prohibited. For the purposes of the present article, ‘public’ should be interpreted as referring to anyone who is not directly involved in handling the prisoners of war, including other members of the Detaining Power. Exposure to public curiosity can take many forms. The prohibition undoubtedly covers parading prisoners in public. Moreover, prisoners must not be exposed to humiliation when they leave their camp for work, are transferred to another facility or are being repatriated. In modern conflicts, the prohibition also covers, subject to the considerations discussed below, the disclosure of photographic and video images, recordings of interrogations or private conversations or personal correspondence or any other private data, irrespective of which public communication channel is used, including the internet. Although this is seemingly different from being marched through a hostile crowd, such disclosure could still be humiliating and jeopardize the safety of the prisoners’ families and of the prisoners themselves once they are released.”
Nek se zna !
I oni takodjer, kao i rusi, zarobljeni u nekoj slavnoj proslosti pa cine jednu glupost nakon druge da vrate nepovratno.KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑06/03/2022 15:37Nisu više dio EU, nemaju fond za finansiranje iz Brisela. Njih je Brexit ekonomski potresao.
wow snimali ih kakav uzas unbelivblInfotreker wrote: ↑06/03/2022 16:23Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War art. 27, Aug. 12, 1949, 6 U.S.T. 3516.
Obviously, these provisions do not expressly ban filming of POWs but protects them from acts of “intimidation and … insults and public curiosity.”
The International Red Cross and other international humanitarian groups have long condemned the filming for POWs for propaganda or public messaging.
“Being exposed to ‘public curiosity’ as a prisoner of war, even when such exposure is not accompanied by insulting remarks or actions, is humiliating in itself and therefore specifically prohibited. For the purposes of the present article, ‘public’ should be interpreted as referring to anyone who is not directly involved in handling the prisoners of war, including other members of the Detaining Power. Exposure to public curiosity can take many forms. The prohibition undoubtedly covers parading prisoners in public. Moreover, prisoners must not be exposed to humiliation when they leave their camp for work, are transferred to another facility or are being repatriated. In modern conflicts, the prohibition also covers, subject to the considerations discussed below, the disclosure of photographic and video images, recordings of interrogations or private conversations or personal correspondence or any other private data, irrespective of which public communication channel is used, including the internet. Although this is seemingly different from being marched through a hostile crowd, such disclosure could still be humiliating and jeopardize the safety of the prisoners’ families and of the prisoners themselves once they are released.”