hadzinicasa wrote: ↑02/02/2022 11:05
no_sikiriki wrote: ↑02/02/2022 10:55
jah vjerovatno si u pravu, na engl. spousal support. što znači da može i muškarac primati pod istim uslovima.
naravno da moze. to je izdrzavanje bivseg supruznika. bez obzira na spol. odnosi se na sve. jednako kao sto je alimentacija vezana za dijete i uplacuje se roditelju koji je dobio starateljstvo. ali to je za dijete odnosno djetetovo. za razliku od naknade za izdrzavanje.
Sve to lijepo zvuči na forumu, ali vaše ponašanje u realnosti je drugo. Samo 3% muškaraca prima alimentacije.
Of the 400,000 people in the United States receiving post-divorce spousal maintenance, just 3 percent were men, according to Census figures. Yet 40 percent of households are headed by female breadwinners -- suggesting that hundreds of thousands of men are eligible for alimony, yet don't receive it.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmajohnso ... 5f70a254b9
Pogledati razmišljanje prosječnog muškarca oko parazitskog moljakanja zvanog alimentacija.
Keith Craig agrees. His lawyer said should make a case for spousal support, as he had given up his public school teaching career to stay home with their two children while his then-wife earned more than $100,000. After his wife filed for divorce, Craig cobbled together adjunct professor jobs and freelance writing gigs, but sustained for four years on dinners of potato chips and canned soup and "an allowance from my parents." Asking for alimony was not an option.
"I'd love to have that money, but I'd never hit a girl and I'd never beg from a girl -- and I see palimony as begging ," says Craig, who at age 53 attributes his attitude, in part, to his generation. But not entirely. "If the roles were reversed and I were ordered to pay her alimony, I would just as soon jump off a cliff or dump $50,000 into legal proceedings to fight it," says Craig who today works in marketing at a technology firm.
Onaj "toksični patrijarhat" kojeg tako strastveno mrzite i čije vas "zaostavštine" drže budnim noću je upravo ono što vas spašava od ravnopravnog plaćanja tog supporta. Muškarci, za razliku od većine žena, znaju da razvod treba zavržiti dostojanstveno, da svako treba da ide svojim putem i da nema nefer obaveze prema bivšem supružniku, čak i kada supružnik u teoriji ima zakonsko pravo da bude takav parazit.
Sa druge strane žene ne da većinom nemaju tu osobinu kod mužnje muškarca nakon razvoda, nego u slučaju kada muškarac zatraži support, uz pomoć sudija rade upravo ono na šta se vi ovdje žalite da je metoda opresivnog patrijarhalnog sistema i kolutate očima kako neko "tako razmišlja u 21. vijeku i misli da je alimentacija pomoć ženi":
Meanwhile, female breadwinners never pay alimony without a contentious battle. "Every guy in that situation has to go through a fight, while (breadwinning) guys go into the divorce accepting they have to pay," says Rosen. Then, facing humiliation, stress and expense of that fight, they are further disincentivized from pursuing spousal support. "Men are essentially shamed into not receiving alimony," Ressa says.
Adds Rosen: "Her attitude is always, 'Dude, get a job.'"
Depending on in which part of the country you live, the judge may say the same thing.
pa eto, ne moras biti u braku, plati neku ženu koja ce biti s tobom 24 sata dnevno po 5 KM sat(neka minimum satnica
) pa vidi koliko ce te izaci mjesecno
. Mozes i po potrebi placat, ono 3 sata rucak da ti pravi samo sto je satnica veca, jedno 15 KM, ciscenje stana jel dva sata satnica 10 KM
Znam da ima i onih koje ne podrzavaju feminizam jer zele, citiram "da se svi slazu" 
