Avionske nesrece

Rasprave na razne teme... Ako ne znate gdje poslati poruku, pošaljite je ovdje.

Moderators: Benq, O'zone

Post Reply
sretjko
Posts: 410
Joined: 29/01/2014 00:32

#526 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by sretjko »

xxl mudonja wrote:
Ma.Le.Na wrote:u ovom slucaju malezijskog aviona...ne bi bilo ni cudno da je oboren
ako se ne javlja...ne reaguje..leti prema nekom gradu
pa i ja bih razmislila da li da ga oborim :-)
pa i da je oboren MORAJU biti krhotine i olupina
ali je KVAKA što ih NEMA !!!!!
kako ti znas da ih nema? mi znamo samo ono sto dobijamo putem medija, a ne znamo da li postoji cenzura.
Googlerica
Posts: 1971
Joined: 28/12/2013 02:03
Location: Hangar One

#527 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Googlerica »

Zviz wrote:
Googlerica wrote:
i da dodam,proppelerasi se dignu u nebo za 30 sekundi,a jet-ovi se penju 3 minute :)
preformance im je totlano drugaciji,ovi sa propelerima se jednostavno lakse "mrdaju" u zraku, tako je jefferssone :thumbup:

Zviz,kako mislis "zapeo" , hvala :-D ( jes' se ti meni ozenio :kiss: )
No, dobro, a veznao za "zapeo" sam mislio, kad bi dijelom dodirnuo vodu i tim izgubio kontrolu. Po rijecima nekih medija eto avio proletio u dugu dimenziju vremena... prije ce biti, da je a explodirao odjednom, ali opet da vec tri dana nemogu naci nista je cudno - jedino da je tako explodirao, da je sve se fakticki stopilo u pepeo, jel moguce nemam pojma.

@googlerica,

Nebi zelio nista prognozirati unapried ali mislim da ide na dobro :D


dobro jutro Zviz , moj prvi post na ovoj temi je bio komentar o gubitku ptiska i eksploziji ( postoje razni uzroci) , nema sanse da se avion pretvori u prah i pepeo :skoljka:
Ma.Le.Na wrote:kolika je mogucnost da se obaranje aviona, slucajno ili namjerno, zataska?
da li je moguce medijima prikriti stvarnu istinu i "sakriti" toliku kolicinu plutajucih ostataka?
Malena,jeste,moguce je medijima sakriti isitnu , agencije za prtragu od strane 6 nacija ne smiju nista pricati o tome,a drugo,sto je veci broj timova,pretraga rada je kompleksnija,vjeruj mi,medij ne zna sve kao sto znaju timovi koji prterazuju teren ; Uporno se pise o obranjau aviona,no takva prica je dugo trajala sa franczima
User avatar
@mba
Posts: 3208
Joined: 22/08/2011 12:57
Location: Çanakkale

#528 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by @mba »

pao kao sto je i onaj francuski prije par godina!

citam skoro da je promjenio putanju i tako 1h letio, dok ga vojni radar nije locirao na nekih 9000m!
Last edited by @mba on 12/03/2014 12:19, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
BadCopy
Posts: 2941
Joined: 18/09/2013 23:01
Location: Beton

#530 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by BadCopy »

U sustini avion moze biti i u PM kad ne znaju koliko je jos bio u zraku.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505 mit Tapatalk
sretjko
Posts: 410
Joined: 29/01/2014 00:32

#531 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by sretjko »

nema veze koliko je kina poslala aviona i brodova kad bilo ko od tih spasilaca ako nesto ugleda mora obavijestiti svog nadredjenog a ne medije a nadredjeni onda svog nadredjenog i dalje se odlucuje sta ce i hoce li ista dospjeti u javnost. da li je primjera radi iko vidio ijedno tijelo iz AF447 dok su ih izvlacili a izvukli su ih 154? pa naravno da nije. sve se moze sakriti ako je to cilj.
zanima me, da li je postojala mogucnost da je avion letio jos iha-ha na zapad i pao negdje u indijski okean? :roll:
Googlerica
Posts: 1971
Joined: 28/12/2013 02:03
Location: Hangar One

#532 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Googlerica »

Gray wrote:Jedna mogućnost:

http://mh370lost.tumblr.com/?og=1



What happened to MH370?

Has anyone considered if the below FAA Airworthiness Directive could be a clue the MH370 investigation?

A November 2013 FAA Airworthiness Directive for the 777

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09 ... -23456.htm

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 

certain The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of cracking in the fuselage skin underneath the satellite communication (SATCOM) antenna adapter. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections of the visible fuselage skin and doubler if installed, for cracking, corrosion, and any indication of contact of a certain fastener to a bonding jumper, and repair if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking and corrosion in the fuselage skin, which could lead to rapid decompression and loss of structural integrity of the airplane.

[https://31]

Summary: It’s plausible that a fuselage section near the SATCOM antenna adapter failed, disabling satellite based -  GPS, ACARS, and ADS-B/C - communications, and leading to a slow decompression that left all occupants unconscious. If such decompression left the aircraft intact, then the autopilot would have flown the planned route or otherwise maintained its heading/altitude until fuel exhaustion. 

A slow decompression (e.g. from a golfball-sized hole) would have gradually impaired and confused the pilots before cabin altitude (pressure) warnings sounded. 

Chain of events:

Likely fuselage failure near SATCOM antenna adapter, disabling some or all of GPS, ACARS, ADS-B, and ADS-C antennas and systems. Thus, only primary radars would detect the plane. Primary radar range is usually less than 100nm, and is generally ineffective at high altitudes.If the decompression was slow enough, it’s possible the pilots did not realize to put on oxygen masks until it was too late. (See Helios 522)Also explains why another Pilot thirty minutes ahead heard “mumbling” from MH370 pilots. (VHF comms would be unaffected by SATCOM equipment failure.)With incapacitated pilots, the 777 could continue to fly on Autopilot - programmed to maintain cruise altitude and follow the programmed route. Using the Inertial Reference System (gyroscope based), the plane could navigate without needing GPS. 


Other thoughts:

The plane was [UPDATE: WASNOT] equipped with cellular communication hardware, supplied by AeroMobile, to provide GSM services via satellite. However this is an aftermarket product; it’s not connected through SATCOM (as far as I know). [UPDATE]: However, if the plane flew over or near land, then cellular connectivity is still possible.Interestingly, 19 families signed a statement  alleging they were able to call the MH370 passengers and get their phones to ring, but with no response.When Malaysian Airlines tried to call the phone numbers a day later, the phones did not ring. By this time, fuel would have been exhausted.Note:  777 Passenger Oxygen masks do not deploy until cabin altitude reaches 13,500. Passengers were likely already unconscious by then, if it was a slow decompression. Also remember that this flight was a red-eye, most passengers would be trying to sleep, masking alarming effects of oxygen deprivation. No confirmed debris has been found anywhere near the search area, consistent with the plane having flown for hours after it lost radar contact.

Conclusion:

This was likely not an “explosive decompression” or “inflight disintegration.” This was likely a slow decompression that gradually deprived all crew/passengers of oxygen, leaving the autopilot to continue along the route autonomously.

The aircraft may be at the floor of the East China Sea, Sea of Japan, or the Pacific Ocean thousands of miles northeast from the current search zone.  [UPDATE: Basically, it could be “anywhere”, and we need to use any available radar records to help figure it out. It could have turned in any direction and continued on for hours. This is where the Vietnamese/Malaysia civilian and military radars will help.]


Recommendations:

Investigators should obtain data logs from primary radars throughout mainland China that would have been along the planned route. They may be the best clue as to the trajectory of the aircraft.Investigators should obtain all passengers’ cell phone log and location data. The timing of the last successful cellular connection (ring/SMS/data-packet) can predict how long the plane was in the air. iPhone/iOS location (GPS)data may be available from Apple if subpoenaed. Android location data may be available from Google. Add a secondary search space to include a 300nm+ radius around Beijing, focusing on surrounding bodies of water. Using planned routing trajectory, known autopilot logics, fuel quantities, and weather patterns, it may be possible to define a smaller 50nm * 50nm search space. Consider running the above scenario in MH’s 777-200ER full flight simulator.  Boeing should provide expertise about the SATCOM antenna schematics and autopilot/navigation logic, so as to help plot this second search space. 

opet se vrtimo u krug: ako je bila slow decompression,piloti su imali vremena traziti pomoc,drugo ACARS system bi imao dovolljno vretema poslati signal da nesto nije u redu sa avionom ,ali uvijek postoji istovrmeeno zivse komplikacija
Googlerica
Posts: 1971
Joined: 28/12/2013 02:03
Location: Hangar One

#533 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Googlerica »

xxl mudonja wrote: I na kopnu počela potraga za nestalim avionom

Šef civilne aviokompanije najavio je će Kina u potragu uključiti još dva aviona koji će nadlijetati kopno u potrazi za ostacima Boeinga 777-200EU Malaysia Airlinesa nestalog nakon što je iz Kuala Lumpura poletio prema Pekingu.

Kina je rasporedila i deset svojih satelita koji bi trebali pomoći u potrazi. Sateliti se kontroliraju iz baze Xian na sjeveru zemlje, a koristit će visoku rezoluciju i druge tehnologije kako bi pomogli u potrazi i operacijama spašavanja aviona.

U veliku potragu uključeni su vojni avioni, vojni brodovi, brodice obalne straže i civilni brodovi iz deset zemalja, no njihovi napori da pronađu bilo kakav trag dosad su se pokazali uzaludnima. Potraga je proširena i na širi pojas Tajlandskog zaljeva i Južnokineskog mora te na Malajski prolaz zapadno od Malezije.

U međuvremenu, malezijska vojska objavila je kako vjeruje da je nestali avion letio još više od sat vremena nakon što je nestao s radara kontrole leta, promijenio kurs i kretao se prema zapadu preko Malajskog prolaza. Malezijske vlasti prije su objavile da je let MH370 nestao oko sat vremena nakon polijetanja iz Kuala Lumpura prema Pekingu.

Oficir indonezijske vojne avijacije Umar Fathur rekao je da ih je Malezija obavijestila da je avion bio iznad Južnokineskog mora na dvadesetak kilometara od Kota Bharu u Maleziji kada se vratio ka moreuzu i potom nestao.

Vlasti ne isključuju nijedan mogući uzrok nestanka aviona, uključujući kvar, grešku pilota, sabotažu ili terorizam.

Stručnjaci ističu da su sve manje sigurni šta se desilo sa avionom. Neki smatraju da je veliki prekid struje, najvjerovatnije, objašnjenje za prestanak rada transpondera i komunikacionog sistema.

U to je vrijeme bio na otprilike pola puta između malezijskog istočnog grada Kota Bharua i krajnjeg juga Vijetnama, na visini od oko 10.670 metara, prenosi Dnevnik.hr.

http://www.avaz.ba/globus/svijet/i-na-k ... im-avionom
avaz zna sto se desava u avionu kad nestane struje :lol:
sretjko
Posts: 410
Joined: 29/01/2014 00:32

#534 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by sretjko »

xxl mudonja wrote:
sretjko wrote:nema veze koliko je kina poslala aviona i brodova kad bilo ko od tih spasilaca ako nesto ugleda mora obavijestiti svog nadredjenog a ne medije ......
ma ja ba, angažovali tolike snage onako iz zajebacije, s naredbom da ako šta vide da NIPOŠTO ne javljaju, nego da nastave dalje da se zajebavaju

mene interesuje kako na današnjem nivou tehnološke razvijenosti ne postoji neki GPS lokator u avionu kojem ne može ništa ni atomska bomba, a kamoli da se sruši avion
sta ti mislis ako ga je vojska oborila da ce reci "jeste, mi smo ga oborili, jbg, nije namjerno, izvinite". :zoka: naravno da ce uciniti sve da zataskaju slucaj ili da ga prikazu drugacije nego sto jeste. i naravno da nece obican spasilac, mornar ili vojnik kad ugleda dio aviona nazvati medije nego ce prvo obavijestiti svog nadredjenog, to je vojna hijerarhija, s tim nema zajebancije.
ako se otkrije avion nece dati u javnost iste sekunde. :roll:
User avatar
sabinna38
Posts: 240
Joined: 03/01/2014 19:38
Contact:

#535 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by sabinna38 »

E ako nije nista od navedenog onda je NLO !!! :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :?

:run:
Gray
Posts: 4037
Joined: 14/06/2005 02:47

#536 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Gray »

Googlerica wrote:
Gray wrote:Jedna mogućnost:

http://mh370lost.tumblr.com/?og=1



What happened to MH370?

Has anyone considered if the below FAA Airworthiness Directive could be a clue the MH370 investigation?

A November 2013 FAA Airworthiness Directive for the 777

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09 ... -23456.htm

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 

certain The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of cracking in the fuselage skin underneath the satellite communication (SATCOM) antenna adapter. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections of the visible fuselage skin and doubler if installed, for cracking, corrosion, and any indication of contact of a certain fastener to a bonding jumper, and repair if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking and corrosion in the fuselage skin, which could lead to rapid decompression and loss of structural integrity of the airplane.

[https://31]

Summary: It’s plausible that a fuselage section near the SATCOM antenna adapter failed, disabling satellite based -  GPS, ACARS, and ADS-B/C - communications, and leading to a slow decompression that left all occupants unconscious. If such decompression left the aircraft intact, then the autopilot would have flown the planned route or otherwise maintained its heading/altitude until fuel exhaustion. 

A slow decompression (e.g. from a golfball-sized hole) would have gradually impaired and confused the pilots before cabin altitude (pressure) warnings sounded. 

Chain of events:

Likely fuselage failure near SATCOM antenna adapter, disabling some or all of GPS, ACARS, ADS-B, and ADS-C antennas and systems. Thus, only primary radars would detect the plane. Primary radar range is usually less than 100nm, and is generally ineffective at high altitudes.If the decompression was slow enough, it’s possible the pilots did not realize to put on oxygen masks until it was too late. (See Helios 522)Also explains why another Pilot thirty minutes ahead heard “mumbling” from MH370 pilots. (VHF comms would be unaffected by SATCOM equipment failure.)With incapacitated pilots, the 777 could continue to fly on Autopilot - programmed to maintain cruise altitude and follow the programmed route. Using the Inertial Reference System (gyroscope based), the plane could navigate without needing GPS. 


Other thoughts:

The plane was [UPDATE: WASNOT] equipped with cellular communication hardware, supplied by AeroMobile, to provide GSM services via satellite. However this is an aftermarket product; it’s not connected through SATCOM (as far as I know). [UPDATE]: However, if the plane flew over or near land, then cellular connectivity is still possible.Interestingly, 19 families signed a statement  alleging they were able to call the MH370 passengers and get their phones to ring, but with no response.When Malaysian Airlines tried to call the phone numbers a day later, the phones did not ring. By this time, fuel would have been exhausted.Note:  777 Passenger Oxygen masks do not deploy until cabin altitude reaches 13,500. Passengers were likely already unconscious by then, if it was a slow decompression. Also remember that this flight was a red-eye, most passengers would be trying to sleep, masking alarming effects of oxygen deprivation. No confirmed debris has been found anywhere near the search area, consistent with the plane having flown for hours after it lost radar contact.

Conclusion:

This was likely not an “explosive decompression” or “inflight disintegration.” This was likely a slow decompression that gradually deprived all crew/passengers of oxygen, leaving the autopilot to continue along the route autonomously.

The aircraft may be at the floor of the East China Sea, Sea of Japan, or the Pacific Ocean thousands of miles northeast from the current search zone.  [UPDATE: Basically, it could be “anywhere”, and we need to use any available radar records to help figure it out. It could have turned in any direction and continued on for hours. This is where the Vietnamese/Malaysia civilian and military radars will help.]


Recommendations:

Investigators should obtain data logs from primary radars throughout mainland China that would have been along the planned route. They may be the best clue as to the trajectory of the aircraft.Investigators should obtain all passengers’ cell phone log and location data. The timing of the last successful cellular connection (ring/SMS/data-packet) can predict how long the plane was in the air. iPhone/iOS location (GPS)data may be available from Apple if subpoenaed. Android location data may be available from Google. Add a secondary search space to include a 300nm+ radius around Beijing, focusing on surrounding bodies of water. Using planned routing trajectory, known autopilot logics, fuel quantities, and weather patterns, it may be possible to define a smaller 50nm * 50nm search space. Consider running the above scenario in MH’s 777-200ER full flight simulator.  Boeing should provide expertise about the SATCOM antenna schematics and autopilot/navigation logic, so as to help plot this second search space. 

opet se vrtimo u krug: ako je bila slow decompression,piloti su imali vremena traziti pomoc,drugo ACARS system bi imao dovolljno vretema poslati signal da nesto nije u redu sa avionom ,ali uvijek postoji istovrmeeno zivse komplikacija

Nije poenta u vremenu, nego da ako je bila slow decompression piloti nisu ni shvatili šta je problem dok nije bilo prekasno ili dok nisu izgubili svijest, kao sa grčkim avionom prije par godina.

Mislim da previše tražite neke zavjere, ko je gledao redovno air crash investigation zna kakve sve sitnice i gluposti kada se nagomilaju mogu dovesti do pada aviona, a i koliko je teško naći avion.
radostan dan
Posts: 27324
Joined: 31/01/2010 20:26
Location: madera

#537 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by radostan dan »

za ove pristalice teorije da je nestalo struje i da je imao fore još sat vremena da leti, bez mogućnosti komunikacije....nešto mi to manjkavo...

šta je sa putnicima,posadom, mobilnim, ajfonima...nije se moglo nazvati, javiti, dojaviti - stanje, pozicija?

ako može objašnjenje...
User avatar
sema911s
Posts: 5146
Joined: 04/03/2013 15:37
Location: mene nosi mutna rijeka

#538 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by sema911s »

xxl mudonja wrote:
sretjko wrote:nema veze koliko je kina poslala aviona i brodova kad bilo ko od tih spasilaca ako nesto ugleda mora obavijestiti svog nadredjenog a ne medije ......
ma ja ba, angažovali tolike snage onako iz zajebacije, s naredbom da ako šta vide da NIPOŠTO ne javljaju, nego da nastave dalje da se zajebavaju

mene interesuje kako na današnjem nivou tehnološke razvijenosti ne postoji neki GPS lokator u avionu kojem ne može ništa ni atomska bomba, a kamoli da se sruši avion

postoji li takav materijal da mu nemozes nista, ako znas ista o elekto-uredjajima onda ovo pitanje glupo,. i da postoji da li bi bilo isplativo ga ugradjivat i koristit,.
User avatar
Edin H.
Posts: 53258
Joined: 08/10/2004 22:36
Location: Tirana

#539 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Edin H. »

12 zemalja sa 42 broda i 39 aviona pretrazuje podrucje od 43000 kilometara :shock:

Da li ce i BH Airlines ponuditi strucnu pomoc?
Googlerica
Posts: 1971
Joined: 28/12/2013 02:03
Location: Hangar One

#540 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Googlerica »

Edin H. wrote:12 zemalja sa 42 broda i 39 aviona pretrazuje podrucje od 43000 kilometara :shock:

Da li ce i BH Airlines ponuditi strucnu pomoc?


eto prilike za vjezbe istrzivanja svih 12 dzrava :D zad treba poceti praviti paniku :D
User avatar
sema911s
Posts: 5146
Joined: 04/03/2013 15:37
Location: mene nosi mutna rijeka

#541 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by sema911s »

radostan dan wrote:za ove pristalice teorije da je nestalo struje i da je imao fore još sat vremena da leti, bez mogućnosti komunikacije....nešto mi to manjkavo...

šta je sa putnicima,posadom, mobilnim, ajfonima...nije se moglo nazvati, javiti, dojaviti - stanje, pozicija?

ako može objašnjenje...
ako letis preko mora,., gdje su ti bazne stanice,.,na sta ce se nakacit telefon,., ono znas kazu zemlja ko lopta,. a signal kako putuje,. a ako je krenulo sta po zlu, vecinom se desi tako brzo da kada si uplasen nemozes ragovat nikako,,.,

zamisli letis na 5000m,. pocne oko tebe sve skakat lupat, raspad sistema, vriska dreka, vec vidis bjelo svijetlo, oprastas se od tijela,. i tebi da padne napamet mobitel sto nradi, a ovaj do tebe ti cupa pojas da se duplo sveze,. svi bi da se spase a a nemoze,.,
Googlerica
Posts: 1971
Joined: 28/12/2013 02:03
Location: Hangar One

#542 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Googlerica »

Gray wrote:
Googlerica wrote:

opet se vrtimo u krug: ako je bila slow decompression,piloti su imali vremena traziti pomoc,drugo ACARS system bi imao dovolljno vretema poslati signal da nesto nije u redu sa avionom ,ali uvijek postoji istovrmeeno zivse komplikacija

Nije poenta u vremenu, nego da ako je bila slow decompression piloti nisu ni shvatili šta je problem dok nije bilo prekasno ili dok nisu izgubili svijest, kao sa grčkim avionom prije par godina.

Mislim da previše tražite neke zavjere, ko je gledao redovno air crash investigation zna kakve sve sitnice i gluposti kada se nagomilaju mogu dovesti do pada aviona, a i koliko je teško naći avion.
kolega,pricataj svaki post na mojoj temi,i slobodno reci da li sam nekad spomenula teorije zavjere i ostale gluposti ;-)

meni ne treba gledanje emisija,radial sma radove za istrazivanje avio nesrece,i upravo ovakvo ponasanje publike i medija je ocekivajuce :)
User avatar
Kemal Malovčić
Posts: 9090
Joined: 19/03/2012 01:03

#543 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Kemal Malovčić »

I kažu svijet mali, pa đe mali, eroplan se izgubi u njemu.
User avatar
Edin H.
Posts: 53258
Joined: 08/10/2004 22:36
Location: Tirana

#544 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Edin H. »

Image

Pa ti sad skontaj jarane :-)
golman
Posts: 2684
Joined: 23/01/2014 22:33
Location: na golu

#545 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by golman »

Nije mi jasno kako ne mogu locirati taj avion.Ili možda neće???
Googlerica
Posts: 1971
Joined: 28/12/2013 02:03
Location: Hangar One

#546 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Googlerica »

radostan dan wrote:za ove pristalice teorije da je nestalo struje i da je imao fore još sat vremena da leti, bez mogućnosti komunikacije....nešto mi to manjkavo...

šta je sa putnicima,posadom, mobilnim, ajfonima...nije se moglo nazvati, javiti, dojaviti - stanje, pozicija?

ako može objašnjenje...
nisma pristalica teroja zavjere,ali umoriste sa pricom o mobitelima :-)

ako u avionu nestane struje,ima rezerva ( procitja prethodne trsi stranice)eh sad kolika je sansa da se rezervno napajnje struje ne funkionira za rad avionike ,ne znam,ali u svako avio nesreci nikad,ali nikad nije uzrok jedan faktor :!:
User avatar
Ma.Le.Na
Posts: 12031
Joined: 12/10/2009 11:12
Location: ..na magarecoj klupi

#547 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Ma.Le.Na »

ja bih ga trazila lijevo od sumatre :-)
ko ce reci da je nije preletio i nastavio u tom smjeru :-)

bar bi jedan avion poslala iznad tog podrucja
sretjko
Posts: 410
Joined: 29/01/2014 00:32

#548 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by sretjko »

golman wrote:Nije mi jasno kako ne mogu locirati taj avion.Ili možda neće???
ko zna kakve se igre igraju. AF447 su locirali u sred okeana, na duplo vecoj dubini nego sto su ove gdje je nestao malezijski avion. ali u AF447 su bili vecinom francuzi, zatim nijemci i mnogi drugi zapapdno evropski drzavljani, medju njima i vodeci ljudi nekih jakih evropskih kompanija. francuska je cak poslala i svoju nuklearnu podmornicu kao i ono neko cudo sto je istrazivalo titanik.
a u malezijskom avionu je bila vecinom kineska i malezijska populacija te poneki amer, ili zapadno evropljanin. mozda hoce da se pokaze da je kina nesposobna ili hoce da se pridobije kineska naklonost za vrijeme koje dolazi.

@malena,i ja sam tog misljenja. mozda je pao u indisjki okean. :-)
User avatar
Truba
Posts: 93530
Joined: 17/03/2004 09:36
Location: Vizantija
Grijem se na: Plin i struju
Horoskop: Vodolija
Contact:

#549 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by Truba »

možda je pao na kompno?
možda ne mogu naći jer gledaju na pogrešnom mjestu
možda svjedočimo začetku jednog novog trenda otimačina aviona?
možda svjedočimo nastanku nove misterije

ovo je zaista čudno
jefferson
Posts: 14969
Joined: 28/08/2007 05:31
Location: U.S.A

#550 Re: Avionske nesrece

Post by jefferson »

sretjko wrote:
golman wrote:Nije mi jasno kako ne mogu locirati taj avion.Ili možda neće???
ko zna kakve se igre igraju. AF447 su locirali u sred okeana, na duplo vecoj dubini nego sto su ove gdje je nestao malezijski avion. ali u AF447 su bili vecinom francuzi, zatim nijemci i mnogi drugi zapapdno evropski drzavljani, medju njima i vodeci ljudi nekih jakih evropskih kompanija. francuska je cak poslala i svoju nuklearnu podmornicu kao i ono neko cudo sto je istrazivalo titanik.
a u malezijskom avionu je bila vecinom kineska i malezijska populacija te poneki amer, ili zapadno evropljanin. mozda hoce da se pokaze da je kina nesposobna ili hoce da se pridobije kineska naklonost za vrijeme koje dolazi.

@malena,i ja sam tog misljenja. mozda je pao u indisjki okean. :-)
AF447 je lociran od strane Brazilske mornarice 8 sati nakon pada, stoga mojne tih ubleha!
AF447 se znalo gdje pao odmah, ostalo ej bilo do tehnologije kako izvuci crne kutije, a trebalo im je dvije godine za to. Rep AF447 nikad niej potonuo, kao i milioni komada aviona, sjedista itd, te je lociran nakon 8 sati.
Post Reply