AUTENTIČNOST vs DOGMA, (islam, Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Rasprave o vjerskim temama.
Post Reply
User avatar
asurbanipal
Posts: 6692
Joined: 28/06/2010 15:54
Location: opet sam ti u kafani

#476 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by asurbanipal »

arzuhal wrote:
To zna na koncu biti baš tužno, kada se pogleda sa strane, prođe i onaj humoristični momenat...

Gledam neki dan Čajlakovića na TV Igman. Drži ders u jednoj džamiji. I sad, onako u stilu učitelja u pačijoj školi koji se obraća djeci, on pita prisutne džematlije, "znate li šta je mudžiza ?". Nastade muk od 10-ak sekundi, a onda on onako lagano i polako reče definiciju mudžize od jedne i po rečenice. Onda opet muk od 10-ak sekundi i poče on sa nekom sasvim drugom temom. Eto, to je taj humoristični momenat...
User avatar
asurbanipal
Posts: 6692
Joined: 28/06/2010 15:54
Location: opet sam ti u kafani

#477 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by asurbanipal »

arzuhal wrote:
Mene ne interesuje kako ti vjeruješ i u šta vjeruješ, to jeste tvoja osobna stvar, sasvim je OK. Mene samo pođahkad zainteresuje kada ti ili neko sličan tebi - neko ko pokaže da ne razumije ni osnovno značenje riječi dogma ili bilo kojeg sličnog termina kojeg koristi a ne razumije ga - počne da priča o stvarima o kojima nema dovoljno znanja, dakle površno, a popraćeno beslovesnim potcjenjivanjem, emocijama i sl.

Znam vrlo dobro šta znači dogma, u definicionom, pojmovnom, ali i u suštinskom smislu, zbog čega služi i zašto se koristi. U islamu imaš npr. dogmu i izvan šarta, tako imaš razvijenu dogmu od nedodirljivosti pojedinih ashaba i Muhammedovih žena, mit o "četvorici pravednih halifa", itd. Kod vehabija se ne smije npr. dovoditi u pitanje Sahih Buharija, u suprotnom snosiš odgovornost za posljedice :mrgreen: Za mene lično, to su samo historijske ili povijesne ličnosti i u tome kontekstu ih i posmatram.
User avatar
Towelie
Posts: 7487
Joined: 03/05/2013 19:29

#478 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by Towelie »

Was Prophet Mohammed Illiterate?


Muslim scholars and the entire Muslim world will tell us that prophet Mohammed was an illiterate man who could not read or write. They tell you this information to make the miracle of the Quran sound even more miraculous disregarding that such statements create some obvious questions:

According to historians, the prophet Mohammed encouraged his followers to learn to read and write and teach others the same so as to spread knowledge throughout the world. How is it that a man who led by example never learnt to read and write himself?
The Quran was transmitted to us through the prophet Mohammed’s own lips over a period of 23 years. Is it conceivable that the man who was in contact with God’s words and who was careful to have them written down and copied never bothered to learn to read what he was having written?
The prophet Mohammed was reputed to be a skilful tradesman, having done some successful enterprises for his first wife “Khadija”. Any student of history knows that numbers as we know them weren’t developed until decades after the prophet’s death. All trade was done with letters having numeric values (A=1, B=2, G=3, D=4, H=5, etc..). How could the prophet be a successful trader without knowing the letters?.
Although the above questions may seem obvious to any rationale human being, they do not appear so to those who have engulfed themselves in fabricated tales where truth and deception mix. The case that Islamic scholars use to prove that the prophet Mohammed was illiterate is the use of the word “Ummy” in the Quran when referring to the prophet. The scholars have said that “Ummy” means “Illiterate” and that God is the one who supports this story.

Let us look at ALL the verses in the Quran which use the word “Ummy”:

“…and tell those who have received the scriptures and the Ummien have you submitted?…” (3/20)

“And from the people of the scriptures are those whom if you entrust him with an ounce he will return it to you, and those whom if you entrust him with a Dinar he will not return it to you unless you are persistent, that is because they said: We have no obligation to the Ummien, and they say upon God falsehood while they are fully aware“(3/75)

“The ones who follow the Ummy messenger prophet whom they find written in their Torah and Gospel…” (7/157)

“And from them are Ummien who do not know the scriptures except wishes and they only follow conjecture” (2/78)

“He is the One Who sent to the Ummien a messenger from amongst them…” (62/2)

“…believe in God and His messenger the Ummy prophet who believes in God…” (7/158)

For the sake of clarity I have kept the word “Ummy” in its original form without translating it so the reader may draw his/her own conclusions. If we, as the Islamic scholars have previously done, use the word “Illiterate”, then we get some strange and non-sensible verses.

The Arabs of Mecca were very well known for their strength in poetry and their deep grasp of the Arabic language. These people were neither Jews nor Christians, but they believed that they followed the religion of Abraham.

Since the Arab’s were never recipients of any heavenly scripture then they could be correctly described as “Gentiles”, and since the prophet Mohammed was raised from amongst the Arabs then he too was a “Gentile” before receiving the scriptures.

Therefore, a more accurate translation of the word "Ummy" would be "Gentile" since a gentile is a term used on any who have not received the scriptures, which is exactly what the Arabs were, and NOT "Illiterate" as people would have us believe.
User avatar
Towelie
Posts: 7487
Joined: 03/05/2013 19:29

#479 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by Towelie »

Nisi mi odgovorio na pitanja, ni na argumentaciju, kojom se potvrđuje da su hadisi zapisivani u doba Allahovog Poslanika savs. A ja cu tebi odgovoriti, i to knjigom, u kojoj imas sve sto te zanima sa dokazima i izvorima.
Prvo, treba da znas da je sam Poslanik a.s. zabranio zapisivanje od njega bilo cega sto nije Kur'an.

Ibn Saeed Al-Khudry reported that the messenger of God had said,
"Do not write anything from me except Quran. Anyone who wrote anything other than the Quran shall erase it." [Ahmed, Vol. 1, Page 171, and Sahih Moslim, Zuhd, Book 42, Number 7147]

A sad o istorijatu zapisivanja hadisa:

The four guided Khalifas who ruled the Muslim Umma (nation) after the death of the prophet Muhammed, respected the command of the Prophet and prohibited the writing and collection of hadiths. They accepted that the Quran is fully detailed and that it is the only source of religion (6:114).


Abu Bakr at one point was not sure whether to keep what he knows of hadiths or not. He had collected 500 hadiths during very long companionship of the prophet Muhammed, but he could not sleep the night until he burned them. Omar Ibn Al-Khattab insisted on destroying the hadiths collected by his son Abdullah. Islamic history mentioned the story of Omar Ibn Al-Khattab restraining four of the Prophet's companions because of their insistence on telling hadiths, these were Ibn Masoud, Abu Al-Dardaa, Abu Masoud Al-Anssary and Abu Tharr Al-Ghaffary. Omar called Abu Hurayra a liar and threatened to send him back to Yemen where he came from if he does not stop telling these lies about the prophet Muhammed. He stopped until Omar died then started again.


Omar is also reported to have stated that he had desired to write down a collection of the Prophet's sayings, but refrained for fear of the Muslims choosing to abandon the teachings of the Quran in favour of the hadith.

"I wanted to write the Sun'an, and I remembered a people who were before you, they wrote other books to follow and abandoned the book of God. And I will never, I swear, replace God's book with anything" Jami' Al-Bayan 1/67

Ali Ibn Abu Talib, the fourth Khalifa in one of his speeches said, "I urge all those who have writings taken from the Messenger of God to go home and erase it. The people before you were annihilated because they followed the hadiths of their scholars and left the book of their Lord." (Sunan Al-Daramy)

Khalifa Omar Ibn Abdul Aziz, the beginning of the end

Abu Hurayra narrated more hadiths than anybody else including Abu Bakr, Omar, Ali, and Aysha who lived with the Prophet all their lives. In less than two years of being with the Prophet, Abu Hurayra narrated more hadiths than all these companions of the Prophet altogether. He narrated 5374 hadiths. Ibn Hanbal quoted 3848 of his hadiths in his book. The Guided Khalifas who ruled the Muslim Umma after the death of the prophet Muhammed respected the Prophet's wish in not writing anything but the Quran and denounced any attempt of writing the hadiths and sunna. Their example was followed for the first two centuries after the Prophet's death. By that time, the lies about the prophet Muhammed was widespread and the people deserted the Quran to look for hadiths, that is when the Khalifa Omar Ibn Abdel-Aziz issued an order to permit the writing of hadiths and sunna thinking that the genuine hadith would be recorded and that this would thus would put an end to the lies about the prophet Muhammed. In his ruling he disregarded the commandments of God in the Quran and the teachings of the prophet Muhammed and the examples of his predecessors and the objection of many of the scholars in his time. Since then Islam moved from the religion of God, the Quran, to the infamous hadiths and sunna that were originally prohibited by God and His Prophet.


The early writings of hadith

As for the notion that hadiths were written as early as the Prophet's time, this is historically correct but the Prophet himself and those who ruled after him condemned these writings and looked at those who wrote these hadiths with disgrace. The hadith books mentioned that the prophet Muhammed burned the collected hadiths, and was very angry at people making "another book with the book of Allah." Abu Baker and Omar Ibn Al-Khattab, were also reported to burn the hadiths collections.


This prohibition of hadiths was continued until Omar Ibn Abdel-Aziz permitted the writing of hadiths and sunna, then many books and (Kararees) appeared containing hadiths, e.g. Ibn Greeg, Malik Ibn Anas, Mohammed Ibn Is'haq. The most famous from among these were the book of Malik Ibn Anas, (Al-Muwattaa) which had about 500 hadiths. At the end of the second century the books known as (Masaned) appeared, e.g. the Masnad of Ahmed Ibn Hanbal that has about 40,000 hadiths. In the first half of the third century the famous six books of hadiths appeared and these are the books used by many of the scholars these days. 1- Sahih Bukhari. 2- Sahih Moslem. 3- Sunan Abu Daoud. 4-Sunan Al-Termethy. 5-Sunan Al-Nesaay. 6- Sunan Ibn Mageh.

Eto ti kad se hadisi zapisuju. Da vise zavrsimo s tom pricom.

Ako te konkretno zanima ikindijski farz, on se nalazi na 169. strani, Allah te uputio na pravi put.


http://d1.islamhouse.com/data/bs/ih_boo ... _zikra.pdf
Na 169. strani se nalazi jacijski farz, ali posto se klanjaju isto hajde i da prihvatim.

Kaze se ovde kako jacijski farz ima 4 rekata, prva 2 se uce naglas, a druga 2 u sebi, a zatim nastavlja a nigde ne spominje hadise koji dokazuju da jacija ima 4 rekata. niti sta se na kojem uci. Na sledecoj strani saznajemo koje je pojedine sure ucio ponekad na jaciji, sto nam ne znaci puno jer je bilo situacija kad nije ucio te sure, nego neke druge. Jedino sto se moze iz ovoga svega derivirati jeste da se na jacijskom farzu uci neka kur'anska sura. I to je sve. Cak nije precizirano na kom se rekatu uci, a na kojem ne.

Imal kakva bolja argumentacija od Sajove ili je to top class sto mozes da ponudis? :D
zahson
Posts: 110
Joined: 10/05/2016 10:00

#480 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by zahson »

Towelie wrote:
Nisi mi odgovorio na pitanja, ni na argumentaciju, kojom se potvrđuje da su hadisi zapisivani u doba Allahovog Poslanika savs. A ja cu tebi odgovoriti, i to knjigom, u kojoj imas sve sto te zanima sa dokazima i izvorima.
Prvo, treba da znas da je sam Poslanik a.s. zabranio zapisivanje od njega bilo cega sto nije Kur'an.

Ibn Saeed Al-Khudry reported that the messenger of God had said,
"Do not write anything from me except Quran. Anyone who wrote anything other than the Quran shall erase it." [Ahmed, Vol. 1, Page 171, and Sahih Moslim, Zuhd, Book 42, Number 7147]

A sad o istorijatu zapisivanja hadisa:

The four guided Khalifas who ruled the Muslim Umma (nation) after the death of the prophet Muhammed, respected the command of the Prophet and prohibited the writing and collection of hadiths. They accepted that the Quran is fully detailed and that it is the only source of religion (6:114).


Abu Bakr at one point was not sure whether to keep what he knows of hadiths or not. He had collected 500 hadiths during very long companionship of the prophet Muhammed, but he could not sleep the night until he burned them. Omar Ibn Al-Khattab insisted on destroying the hadiths collected by his son Abdullah. Islamic history mentioned the story of Omar Ibn Al-Khattab restraining four of the Prophet's companions because of their insistence on telling hadiths, these were Ibn Masoud, Abu Al-Dardaa, Abu Masoud Al-Anssary and Abu Tharr Al-Ghaffary. Omar called Abu Hurayra a liar and threatened to send him back to Yemen where he came from if he does not stop telling these lies about the prophet Muhammed. He stopped until Omar died then started again.


Omar is also reported to have stated that he had desired to write down a collection of the Prophet's sayings, but refrained for fear of the Muslims choosing to abandon the teachings of the Quran in favour of the hadith.

"I wanted to write the Sun'an, and I remembered a people who were before you, they wrote other books to follow and abandoned the book of God. And I will never, I swear, replace God's book with anything" Jami' Al-Bayan 1/67

Ali Ibn Abu Talib, the fourth Khalifa in one of his speeches said, "I urge all those who have writings taken from the Messenger of God to go home and erase it. The people before you were annihilated because they followed the hadiths of their scholars and left the book of their Lord." (Sunan Al-Daramy)

Khalifa Omar Ibn Abdul Aziz, the beginning of the end

Abu Hurayra narrated more hadiths than anybody else including Abu Bakr, Omar, Ali, and Aysha who lived with the Prophet all their lives. In less than two years of being with the Prophet, Abu Hurayra narrated more hadiths than all these companions of the Prophet altogether. He narrated 5374 hadiths. Ibn Hanbal quoted 3848 of his hadiths in his book. The Guided Khalifas who ruled the Muslim Umma after the death of the prophet Muhammed respected the Prophet's wish in not writing anything but the Quran and denounced any attempt of writing the hadiths and sunna. Their example was followed for the first two centuries after the Prophet's death. By that time, the lies about the prophet Muhammed was widespread and the people deserted the Quran to look for hadiths, that is when the Khalifa Omar Ibn Abdel-Aziz issued an order to permit the writing of hadiths and sunna thinking that the genuine hadith would be recorded and that this would thus would put an end to the lies about the prophet Muhammed. In his ruling he disregarded the commandments of God in the Quran and the teachings of the prophet Muhammed and the examples of his predecessors and the objection of many of the scholars in his time. Since then Islam moved from the religion of God, the Quran, to the infamous hadiths and sunna that were originally prohibited by God and His Prophet.


The early writings of hadith

As for the notion that hadiths were written as early as the Prophet's time, this is historically correct but the Prophet himself and those who ruled after him condemned these writings and looked at those who wrote these hadiths with disgrace. The hadith books mentioned that the prophet Muhammed burned the collected hadiths, and was very angry at people making "another book with the book of Allah." Abu Baker and Omar Ibn Al-Khattab, were also reported to burn the hadiths collections.


This prohibition of hadiths was continued until Omar Ibn Abdel-Aziz permitted the writing of hadiths and sunna, then many books and (Kararees) appeared containing hadiths, e.g. Ibn Greeg, Malik Ibn Anas, Mohammed Ibn Is'haq. The most famous from among these were the book of Malik Ibn Anas, (Al-Muwattaa) which had about 500 hadiths. At the end of the second century the books known as (Masaned) appeared, e.g. the Masnad of Ahmed Ibn Hanbal that has about 40,000 hadiths. In the first half of the third century the famous six books of hadiths appeared and these are the books used by many of the scholars these days. 1- Sahih Bukhari. 2- Sahih Moslem. 3- Sunan Abu Daoud. 4-Sunan Al-Termethy. 5-Sunan Al-Nesaay. 6- Sunan Ibn Mageh.

Eto ti kad se hadisi zapisuju. Da vise zavrsimo s tom pricom.

Ako te konkretno zanima ikindijski farz, on se nalazi na 169. strani, Allah te uputio na pravi put.


http://d1.islamhouse.com/data/bs/ih_boo ... _zikra.pdf
Na 169. strani se nalazi jacijski farz, ali posto se klanjaju isto hajde i da prihvatim.

Kaze se ovde kako jacijski farz ima 4 rekata, prva 2 se uce naglas, a druga 2 u sebi, a zatim nastavlja a nigde ne spominje hadise koji dokazuju da jacija ima 4 rekata. niti sta se na kojem uci. Na sledecoj strani saznajemo koje je pojedine sure ucio ponekad na jaciji, sto nam ne znaci puno jer je bilo situacija kad nije ucio te sure, nego neke druge. Jedino sto se moze iz ovoga svega derivirati jeste da se na jacijskom farzu uci neka kur'anska sura. I to je sve. Cak nije precizirano na kom se rekatu uci, a na kojem ne.

Imal kakva bolja argumentacija od Sajove ili je to top class sto mozes da ponudis? :D

Ama postoje argumenti da se uce sure. I imas slobodu izbora da ucis sta hoces. Sta je tu sporno.

NE MOZES UZETI JEDAN HADIS, i donjeti propis. Skupe se svi hadisi o toj temi, i onda se donosi sud. Ulema rekla svoje. Ko si ti ba, neznalice.
User avatar
Towelie
Posts: 7487
Joined: 03/05/2013 19:29

#481 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by Towelie »

zahson wrote:
Towelie wrote:
Nisi mi odgovorio na pitanja, ni na argumentaciju, kojom se potvrđuje da su hadisi zapisivani u doba Allahovog Poslanika savs. A ja cu tebi odgovoriti, i to knjigom, u kojoj imas sve sto te zanima sa dokazima i izvorima.
Prvo, treba da znas da je sam Poslanik a.s. zabranio zapisivanje od njega bilo cega sto nije Kur'an.

Ibn Saeed Al-Khudry reported that the messenger of God had said,
"Do not write anything from me except Quran. Anyone who wrote anything other than the Quran shall erase it." [Ahmed, Vol. 1, Page 171, and Sahih Moslim, Zuhd, Book 42, Number 7147]

A sad o istorijatu zapisivanja hadisa:

The four guided Khalifas who ruled the Muslim Umma (nation) after the death of the prophet Muhammed, respected the command of the Prophet and prohibited the writing and collection of hadiths. They accepted that the Quran is fully detailed and that it is the only source of religion (6:114).


Abu Bakr at one point was not sure whether to keep what he knows of hadiths or not. He had collected 500 hadiths during very long companionship of the prophet Muhammed, but he could not sleep the night until he burned them. Omar Ibn Al-Khattab insisted on destroying the hadiths collected by his son Abdullah. Islamic history mentioned the story of Omar Ibn Al-Khattab restraining four of the Prophet's companions because of their insistence on telling hadiths, these were Ibn Masoud, Abu Al-Dardaa, Abu Masoud Al-Anssary and Abu Tharr Al-Ghaffary. Omar called Abu Hurayra a liar and threatened to send him back to Yemen where he came from if he does not stop telling these lies about the prophet Muhammed. He stopped until Omar died then started again.


Omar is also reported to have stated that he had desired to write down a collection of the Prophet's sayings, but refrained for fear of the Muslims choosing to abandon the teachings of the Quran in favour of the hadith.

"I wanted to write the Sun'an, and I remembered a people who were before you, they wrote other books to follow and abandoned the book of God. And I will never, I swear, replace God's book with anything" Jami' Al-Bayan 1/67

Ali Ibn Abu Talib, the fourth Khalifa in one of his speeches said, "I urge all those who have writings taken from the Messenger of God to go home and erase it. The people before you were annihilated because they followed the hadiths of their scholars and left the book of their Lord." (Sunan Al-Daramy)

Khalifa Omar Ibn Abdul Aziz, the beginning of the end

Abu Hurayra narrated more hadiths than anybody else including Abu Bakr, Omar, Ali, and Aysha who lived with the Prophet all their lives. In less than two years of being with the Prophet, Abu Hurayra narrated more hadiths than all these companions of the Prophet altogether. He narrated 5374 hadiths. Ibn Hanbal quoted 3848 of his hadiths in his book. The Guided Khalifas who ruled the Muslim Umma after the death of the prophet Muhammed respected the Prophet's wish in not writing anything but the Quran and denounced any attempt of writing the hadiths and sunna. Their example was followed for the first two centuries after the Prophet's death. By that time, the lies about the prophet Muhammed was widespread and the people deserted the Quran to look for hadiths, that is when the Khalifa Omar Ibn Abdel-Aziz issued an order to permit the writing of hadiths and sunna thinking that the genuine hadith would be recorded and that this would thus would put an end to the lies about the prophet Muhammed. In his ruling he disregarded the commandments of God in the Quran and the teachings of the prophet Muhammed and the examples of his predecessors and the objection of many of the scholars in his time. Since then Islam moved from the religion of God, the Quran, to the infamous hadiths and sunna that were originally prohibited by God and His Prophet.


The early writings of hadith

As for the notion that hadiths were written as early as the Prophet's time, this is historically correct but the Prophet himself and those who ruled after him condemned these writings and looked at those who wrote these hadiths with disgrace. The hadith books mentioned that the prophet Muhammed burned the collected hadiths, and was very angry at people making "another book with the book of Allah." Abu Baker and Omar Ibn Al-Khattab, were also reported to burn the hadiths collections.


This prohibition of hadiths was continued until Omar Ibn Abdel-Aziz permitted the writing of hadiths and sunna, then many books and (Kararees) appeared containing hadiths, e.g. Ibn Greeg, Malik Ibn Anas, Mohammed Ibn Is'haq. The most famous from among these were the book of Malik Ibn Anas, (Al-Muwattaa) which had about 500 hadiths. At the end of the second century the books known as (Masaned) appeared, e.g. the Masnad of Ahmed Ibn Hanbal that has about 40,000 hadiths. In the first half of the third century the famous six books of hadiths appeared and these are the books used by many of the scholars these days. 1- Sahih Bukhari. 2- Sahih Moslem. 3- Sunan Abu Daoud. 4-Sunan Al-Termethy. 5-Sunan Al-Nesaay. 6- Sunan Ibn Mageh.

Eto ti kad se hadisi zapisuju. Da vise zavrsimo s tom pricom.

Ako te konkretno zanima ikindijski farz, on se nalazi na 169. strani, Allah te uputio na pravi put.


http://d1.islamhouse.com/data/bs/ih_boo ... _zikra.pdf
Na 169. strani se nalazi jacijski farz, ali posto se klanjaju isto hajde i da prihvatim.

Kaze se ovde kako jacijski farz ima 4 rekata, prva 2 se uce naglas, a druga 2 u sebi, a zatim nastavlja a nigde ne spominje hadise koji dokazuju da jacija ima 4 rekata. niti sta se na kojem uci. Na sledecoj strani saznajemo koje je pojedine sure ucio ponekad na jaciji, sto nam ne znaci puno jer je bilo situacija kad nije ucio te sure, nego neke druge. Jedino sto se moze iz ovoga svega derivirati jeste da se na jacijskom farzu uci neka kur'anska sura. I to je sve. Cak nije precizirano na kom se rekatu uci, a na kojem ne.

Imal kakva bolja argumentacija od Sajove ili je to top class sto mozes da ponudis? :D

Ama postoje argumenti da se uce sure. I imas slobodu izbora da ucis sta hoces. Sta je tu sporno.

NE MOZES UZETI JEDAN HADIS, i donjeti propis. Skupe se svi hadisi o toj temi, i onda se donosi sud. Ulema rekla svoje. Ko si ti ba, neznalice.
Nije bitno ko sam ja, niti da li sam znalica ili neznalica, nego ima li ili nema hadisa. A bice da nema, jer cim ih nije nasao Sajo, koji je vama vehabijama top ulema, necete ni vi.

Uvek me mozete veoma lako demantovati i razotkriti moje neznanje time sto cete naci hadise. :-D
User avatar
arzuhal
Posts: 20825
Joined: 03/06/2008 11:26
Location: u čajdžinici "Kod nefsu-l-levvame"

#482 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by arzuhal »

Towelie wrote:
Nisi mi odgovorio na pitanja, ni na argumentaciju, kojom se potvrđuje da su hadisi zapisivani u doba Allahovog Poslanika savs. A ja cu tebi odgovoriti, i to knjigom, u kojoj imas sve sto te zanima sa dokazima i izvorima.
Prvo, treba da znas da je sam Poslanik a.s. zabranio zapisivanje od njega bilo cega sto nije Kur'an.

Ibn Saeed Al-Khudry reported that the messenger of God had said,
"Do not write anything from me except Quran. Anyone who wrote anything other than the Quran shall erase it." [Ahmed, Vol. 1, Page 171, and Sahih Moslim, Zuhd, Book 42, Number 7147]
Ali kako možeš biti siguran da je Poslanik, alejhi-selam, zabranio zapisivanje hadisa, ima li ajet o tome? :mrgreen:
User avatar
Towelie
Posts: 7487
Joined: 03/05/2013 19:29

#483 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by Towelie »

arzuhal wrote:
Towelie wrote:
Nisi mi odgovorio na pitanja, ni na argumentaciju, kojom se potvrđuje da su hadisi zapisivani u doba Allahovog Poslanika savs. A ja cu tebi odgovoriti, i to knjigom, u kojoj imas sve sto te zanima sa dokazima i izvorima.
Prvo, treba da znas da je sam Poslanik a.s. zabranio zapisivanje od njega bilo cega sto nije Kur'an.

Ibn Saeed Al-Khudry reported that the messenger of God had said,
"Do not write anything from me except Quran. Anyone who wrote anything other than the Quran shall erase it." [Ahmed, Vol. 1, Page 171, and Sahih Moslim, Zuhd, Book 42, Number 7147]
Ali kako možeš biti siguran da je Poslanik, alejhi-selam, zabranio zapisivanje hadisa, ima li ajet o tome? :mrgreen:
Ima. I to nekoliko ajeta.
User avatar
arzuhal
Posts: 20825
Joined: 03/06/2008 11:26
Location: u čajdžinici "Kod nefsu-l-levvame"

#484 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by arzuhal »

Towelie wrote:
Ima. I to nekoliko ajeta.
Pa daj ajete koji zabranjuju zapisivanje riječi i djela Allahovog poslanika, alejhi-selam, ti uzeo navoditi hadise :mrgreen:
zahson
Posts: 110
Joined: 10/05/2016 10:00

#485 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by zahson »

Towelie wrote:
zahson wrote: http://d1.islamhouse.com/data/bs/ih_boo ... _zikra.pdf
Na 169. strani se nalazi ikindijski farz, ali posto se klanjaju isto hajde i da prihvatim.

Kaze se ovde kako jacijski farz ima 4 rekata, prva 2 se uce naglas, a druga 2 u sebi, a zatim nastavlja a nigde ne spominje hadise koji dokazuju da jacija ima 4 rekata. niti sta se na kojem uci. Na sledecoj strani saznajemo koje je pojedine sure ucio ponekad na jaciji, sto nam ne znaci puno jer je bilo situacija kad nije ucio te sure, nego neke druge. Jedino sto se moze iz ovoga svega derivirati jeste da se na jacijskom farzu uci neka kur'anska sura. I to je sve. Cak nije precizirano na kom se rekatu uci, a na kojem ne.

Imal kakva bolja argumentacija od Sajove ili je to top class sto mozes da ponudis? :D

Ama postoje argumenti da se uce sure. I imas slobodu izbora da ucis sta hoces. Sta je tu sporno.

NE MOZES UZETI JEDAN HADIS, i donjeti propis. Skupe se svi hadisi o toj temi, i onda se donosi sud. Ulema rekla svoje. Ko si ti ba, neznalice.[/quote]
Nije bitno ko sam ja, niti da li sam znalica ili neznalica, nego ima li ili nema hadisa. A bice da nema, jer cim ih nije nasao Sajo, koji je vama vehabijama top ulema, necete ni vi.

Uvek me mozete veoma lako demantovati i razotkriti moje neznanje time sto cete naci hadise. :-D[/quote]


Sajo ima argumente, u fus noti pisu hadisi kojima je potkrijepio. Padaju ti u vodu teze neznalice, i pokusaji rusenja sunneta su ti beznacajni.
Ama i da nisu preneseni one koje tvoj sejtan trazi, pa nisu ni potrebni. Ako nije preneseno koju suru je ucio, preneseno je da je da se uci bilo koja sura, ili su preneseni opsti hadisi u vezi namaza, pa je ulema kijasom dokucila, ili, ili. Nije bitno uopste. Prva cetiri izvora serijata su Kuran, Sunnet (hadis), idzma (koncenzus uleme), kijas (analogija). Ja svoju vjeru ne prepustam svom sejtanu i egu, vec je prepustam ulemi. (Hiljade ucenjaka u zadnjih 1400 godina).

Tako mi Onoga u cijoj ruci je moja dusa, ova vjera je jasna, i hadis je jasan, i sunnet je jasan. Nisam pitao jesi li znalica ili neznalica, vec kategoricno tvrdim da si neznalica, i zabludjeli novotar.
Hoces da javno ucimo dovu, i da prizovemo Allahovo prokletstvo na sebe u vezi ove teme? Pa da vidimo ko je sigurniji u ono sto tvrdi, a ko lupa gluposti, i prica pausalno, slijedjenjem sejtana i strasti...?
zahson
Posts: 110
Joined: 10/05/2016 10:00

#486 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by zahson »

zahson wrote:
Towelie wrote:
zahson wrote: http://d1.islamhouse.com/data/bs/ih_boo ... _zikra.pdf
Na 169. strani se nalazi ikindijski farz, ali posto se klanjaju isto hajde i da prihvatim.

Kaze se ovde kako jacijski farz ima 4 rekata, prva 2 se uce naglas, a druga 2 u sebi, a zatim nastavlja a nigde ne spominje hadise koji dokazuju da jacija ima 4 rekata. niti sta se na kojem uci. Na sledecoj strani saznajemo koje je pojedine sure ucio ponekad na jaciji, sto nam ne znaci puno jer je bilo situacija kad nije ucio te sure, nego neke druge. Jedino sto se moze iz ovoga svega derivirati jeste da se na jacijskom farzu uci neka kur'anska sura. I to je sve. Cak nije precizirano na kom se rekatu uci, a na kojem ne.

Imal kakva bolja argumentacija od Sajove ili je to top class sto mozes da ponudis? :D
zahson wrote: Ama postoje argumenti da se uce sure. I imas slobodu izbora da ucis sta hoces. Sta je tu sporno.

NE MOZES UZETI JEDAN HADIS, i donjeti propis. Skupe se svi hadisi o toj temi, i onda se donosi sud. Ulema rekla svoje. Ko si ti ba, neznalice.
Nije bitno ko sam ja, niti da li sam znalica ili neznalica, nego ima li ili nema hadisa. A bice da nema, jer cim ih nije nasao Sajo, koji je vama vehabijama top ulema, necete ni vi.

Uvek me mozete veoma lako demantovati i razotkriti moje neznanje time sto cete naci hadise. :-D
Sajo ima argumente, u fus noti pisu hadisi kojima je potkrijepio. Padaju ti u vodu teze neznalice, i pokusaji rusenja sunneta su ti beznacajni.
Ama i da nisu preneseni one koje tvoj sejtan trazi, pa nisu ni potrebni. Ako nije preneseno koju suru je ucio, preneseno je da je da se uci bilo koja sura, ili su preneseni opsti hadisi u vezi namaza, pa je ulema kijasom dokucila, ili, ili. Nije bitno uopste. Prva cetiri izvora serijata su Kuran, Sunnet (hadis), idzma (koncenzus uleme), kijas (analogija). Ja svoju vjeru ne prepustam svom sejtanu i egu, vec je prepustam ulemi. (Hiljade ucenjaka u zadnjih 1400 godina).

Tako mi Onoga u cijoj ruci je moja dusa, ova vjera je jasna, i hadis je jasan, i sunnet je jasan. Nisam pitao jesi li znalica ili neznalica, vec kategoricno tvrdim da si neznalica, i zabludjeli novotar.
Hoces da javno ucimo dovu, i da prizovemo Allahovo prokletstvo na sebe u vezi ove teme? Pa da vidimo ko je sigurniji u ono sto tvrdi, a ko lupa gluposti, i prica pausalno, slijedjenjem sejtana i strasti...?[/quote]
zahson
Posts: 110
Joined: 10/05/2016 10:00

#487 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by zahson »

Towelie wrote:
Towelie wrote:
zahson wrote: http://d1.islamhouse.com/data/bs/ih_boo ... _zikra.pdf
Na 169. strani se nalazi ikindijski farz, ali posto se klanjaju isto hajde i da prihvatim.

Kaze se ovde kako jacijski farz ima 4 rekata, prva 2 se uce naglas, a druga 2 u sebi, a zatim nastavlja a nigde ne spominje hadise koji dokazuju da jacija ima 4 rekata. niti sta se na kojem uci. Na sledecoj strani saznajemo koje je pojedine sure ucio ponekad na jaciji, sto nam ne znaci puno jer je bilo situacija kad nije ucio te sure, nego neke druge. Jedino sto se moze iz ovoga svega derivirati jeste da se na jacijskom farzu uci neka kur'anska sura. I to je sve. Cak nije precizirano na kom se rekatu uci, a na kojem ne.

Imal kakva bolja argumentacija od Sajove ili je to top class sto mozes da ponudis? :D
zahson wrote: Ama postoje argumenti da se uce sure. I imas slobodu izbora da ucis sta hoces. Sta je tu sporno.

NE MOZES UZETI JEDAN HADIS, i donjeti propis. Skupe se svi hadisi o toj temi, i onda se donosi sud. Ulema rekla svoje. Ko si ti ba, neznalice.
Nije bitno ko sam ja, niti da li sam znalica ili neznalica, nego ima li ili nema hadisa. A bice da nema, jer cim ih nije nasao Sajo, koji je vama vehabijama top ulema, necete ni vi.

Uvek me mozete veoma lako demantovati i razotkriti moje neznanje time sto cete naci hadise. :-D
Sajo ima argumente, u fus noti pisu hadisi kojima je potkrijepio. Padaju ti u vodu teze neznalice, i pokusaji rusenja sunneta su ti beznacajni.
Ama i da nisu preneseni one koje tvoj sejtan trazi, pa nisu ni potrebni. Ako nije preneseno koju suru je ucio, preneseno je da je da se uci bilo koja sura, ili su preneseni opsti hadisi u vezi namaza, pa je ulema kijasom dokucila, ili, ili. Nije bitno uopste. Prva cetiri izvora serijata su Kuran, Sunnet (hadis), idzma (koncenzus uleme), kijas (analogija). Ja svoju vjeru ne prepustam svom sejtanu i egu, vec je prepustam ulemi. (Hiljade ucenjaka u zadnjih 1400 godina).

Tako mi Onoga u cijoj ruci je moja dusa, ova vjera je jasna, i hadis je jasan, i sunnet je jasan. Nisam pitao jesi li znalica ili neznalica, vec kategoricno tvrdim da si neznalica, i zabludjeli novotar.
Hoces da javno ucimo dovu, i da prizovemo Allahovo prokletstvo na sebe u vezi ove teme? Pa da vidimo ko je sigurniji u ono sto tvrdi, a ko lupa gluposti, i prica pausalno, slijedjenjem sejtana i strasti...?
User avatar
Towelie
Posts: 7487
Joined: 03/05/2013 19:29

#488 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by Towelie »

arzuhal wrote:
Towelie wrote:
Ima. I to nekoliko ajeta.
Pa daj ajete koji zabranjuju zapisivanje riječi i djela Allahovog poslanika, alejhi-selam, ti uzeo navoditi hadise :mrgreen:
77:50 mi prvo pada na pamet.
User avatar
arzuhal
Posts: 20825
Joined: 03/06/2008 11:26
Location: u čajdžinici "Kod nefsu-l-levvame"

#489 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by arzuhal »

Towelie wrote:
arzuhal wrote:
Towelie wrote:
Ima. I to nekoliko ajeta.
Pa daj ajete koji zabranjuju zapisivanje riječi i djela Allahovog poslanika, alejhi-selam, ti uzeo navoditi hadise :mrgreen:
77:50 mi prvo pada na pamet.
Ne znam kako ti zaključi iz ovog ajeta da je zabranjeno bilo zapisivati hadise?
zahson
Posts: 110
Joined: 10/05/2016 10:00

#490 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by zahson »

arzuhal wrote:
Towelie wrote:
arzuhal wrote:

Pa daj ajete koji zabranjuju zapisivanje riječi i djela Allahovog poslanika, alejhi-selam, ti uzeo navoditi hadise :mrgreen:
77:50 mi prvo pada na pamet.
Ne znam kako ti zaključi iz ovog ajeta da je zabranjeno bilo zapisivati hadise?

Brate, on i njegov mozak, zakljucuju sto plejada najvece uleme, Allahovih prijatelja, i nasljednika Allahovog poslanika, u 1400 godina nije zakljucila. Pa zar nam treba sta vise?
User avatar
Towelie
Posts: 7487
Joined: 03/05/2013 19:29

#491 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by Towelie »

Ne znam kako ti zaključi iz ovog ajeta da je zabranjeno bilo zapisivati hadise?[/quote]
Ako je Kur'an jedini hadis u koji treba verovati, onda se dovodi u pitanje legitimitet bilo kakvih drugih hadisa, a samim time i njihovo zapisivanje. Ista poruka je u 45:6:Pa u koji će hadis45:6 nakon Allaha i ajeta Njegovih vjerovati?
User avatar
arzuhal
Posts: 20825
Joined: 03/06/2008 11:26
Location: u čajdžinici "Kod nefsu-l-levvame"

#492 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by arzuhal »

Towelie wrote: Ako je Kur'an jedini hadis u koji treba verovati, onda se dovodi u pitanje legitimitet bilo kakvih drugih hadisa, a samim time i njihovo zapisivanje. Ista poruka je u 45:6:Pa u koji će hadis45:6 nakon Allaha i ajeta Njegovih vjerovati?
Ali šta ako je sve to što je zapisano u zbirkama hadisa, ustvari, objava od Allaha? Šta ako je to sve dio Kur'ana? Jer Allah kaže da poslanik ne govori po svojoj volji i svom hiru?

53:3-4

Zamisli koliko je objave zagubljeno!
User avatar
Towelie
Posts: 7487
Joined: 03/05/2013 19:29

#493 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by Towelie »

arzuhal wrote:
Towelie wrote: Ako je Kur'an jedini hadis u koji treba verovati, onda se dovodi u pitanje legitimitet bilo kakvih drugih hadisa, a samim time i njihovo zapisivanje. Ista poruka je u 45:6:Pa u koji će hadis45:6 nakon Allaha i ajeta Njegovih vjerovati?
Ali šta ako je sve to što je zapisano u zbirkama hadisa, ustvari, objava od Allaha? Šta ako je to sve dio Kur'ana? Jer Allah kaže da poslanik ne govori po svojoj volji i svom hiru?

53:3-4

Zamisli koliko je objave zagubljeno!
De daj nam nastavak te sure da vidimo sta to Poslanik ne govori po hiru svome? :D
User avatar
arzuhal
Posts: 20825
Joined: 03/06/2008 11:26
Location: u čajdžinici "Kod nefsu-l-levvame"

#494 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by arzuhal »

Towelie wrote:
arzuhal wrote:
Towelie wrote: Ako je Kur'an jedini hadis u koji treba verovati, onda se dovodi u pitanje legitimitet bilo kakvih drugih hadisa, a samim time i njihovo zapisivanje. Ista poruka je u 45:6:Pa u koji će hadis45:6 nakon Allaha i ajeta Njegovih vjerovati?
Ali šta ako je sve to što je zapisano u zbirkama hadisa, ustvari, objava od Allaha? Šta ako je to sve dio Kur'ana? Jer Allah kaže da poslanik ne govori po svojoj volji i svom hiru?

53:3-4

Zamisli koliko je objave zagubljeno!
De daj nam nastavak te sure da vidimo sta to Poslanik ne govori po hiru svome? :D
Posluži se prevodom sam, i ja sam za suru el-Murselat, hvala lijepo :lol:
User avatar
Towelie
Posts: 7487
Joined: 03/05/2013 19:29

#495 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by Towelie »

1. Tako Mi zvijezde kad zalazi, (Korkut)1. Tako mi zvijezde kad nestane (kolapsirajući),53:1 (Mlivo)
مَا ضَلَّ صَاحِبُكُمْ وَمَا غَوَىٰ ﴿٢﴾
2. vaš drug* nije s Pravoga puta skrenuo i nije zalutao! (Korkut)2. Nije zalutao drug53:2 vaš, niti skrenuo, (Mlivo)
وَمَا يَنطِقُ عَنِ ٱلْهَوَىٰٓ ﴿٣﴾
3. On ne govori po hiru svome - (Korkut)3. I ne govori po želji. (Mlivo)
إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحْىٌۭ يُوحَىٰ ﴿٤﴾
4. to je samo Objava koja mu se obznanjuje, (Korkut)4. To je jedino Objava - objavljuje se. (Mlivo)
عَلَّمَهُۥ شَدِيدُ ٱلْقُوَىٰ ﴿٥﴾
5. uči ga Jedan ogromne snage, (Korkut)5. Uči ga Jedan žestokih sila, (Mlivo)


Ko je Jedan zestokih sila?Dzibril, sto se jasno vjdi u nastavku sure. Sta je Dzibril poducavao Poslanika? Kur'an i nista vise. Sta Poslanik ne govori po hiru svome? Kur'an i nista vise.
User avatar
arzuhal
Posts: 20825
Joined: 03/06/2008 11:26
Location: u čajdžinici "Kod nefsu-l-levvame"

#496 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by arzuhal »

Towelie wrote:1. Tako Mi zvijezde kad zalazi, (Korkut)1. Tako mi zvijezde kad nestane (kolapsirajući),53:1 (Mlivo)
مَا ضَلَّ صَاحِبُكُمْ وَمَا غَوَىٰ ﴿٢﴾
2. vaš drug* nije s Pravoga puta skrenuo i nije zalutao! (Korkut)2. Nije zalutao drug53:2 vaš, niti skrenuo, (Mlivo)
وَمَا يَنطِقُ عَنِ ٱلْهَوَىٰٓ ﴿٣﴾
3. On ne govori po hiru svome - (Korkut)3. I ne govori po želji. (Mlivo)
إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحْىٌۭ يُوحَىٰ ﴿٤﴾
4. to je samo Objava koja mu se obznanjuje, (Korkut)4. To je jedino Objava - objavljuje se. (Mlivo)
عَلَّمَهُۥ شَدِيدُ ٱلْقُوَىٰ ﴿٥﴾
5. uči ga Jedan ogromne snage, (Korkut)5. Uči ga Jedan žestokih sila, (Mlivo)


Ko je Jedan zestokih sila?Dzibril, sto se jasno vjdi u nastavku sure. Sta je Dzibril poducavao Poslanika? Kur'an i nista vise. Sta Poslanik ne govori po hiru svome? Kur'an i nista vise.
Odakle to zaključuješ, zašto ubacuješ u ajete ono što ne piše? Stoji da Poslanik ne govori po hiru svome nego da je to Objava koja mu se objavljuje, nema nigdje - Kur'an. A melek Džibril, alejhi-selam, je dolazio Poslaniku, alejhi-selam, pa ga podučavao namazu i namaskim vremenima, pa ga poučio redoslijedu kur'anskih sura (jer nisu poredane u mushafu po redu objavljivanja), itd. Ovo sve znamo iz hadisa.

U ajetu se ne kaže: to je Kur'an, nego - objava.
User avatar
Towelie
Posts: 7487
Joined: 03/05/2013 19:29

#497 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by Towelie »

Sarajmen wrote:Objavu, piše ti doslovno i decidno u ajetu, i po Korkutu i Mlivi.
A sta je Objava? :D
User avatar
arzuhal
Posts: 20825
Joined: 03/06/2008 11:26
Location: u čajdžinici "Kod nefsu-l-levvame"

#498 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by arzuhal »

Towelie wrote:
Sarajmen wrote:Objavu, piše ti doslovno i decidno u ajetu, i po Korkutu i Mlivi.
A sta je Objava? :D
Pa piše ti u ajetima: ono što se Poslaniku objavljuje/donosi mu se, a on to obznanjuje i ne govori po svojoj želji, po svojoj volji i pameti :-D
User avatar
Towelie
Posts: 7487
Joined: 03/05/2013 19:29

#499 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by Towelie »

arzuhal wrote:
Towelie wrote:1. Tako Mi zvijezde kad zalazi, (Korkut)1. Tako mi zvijezde kad nestane (kolapsirajući),53:1 (Mlivo)
مَا ضَلَّ صَاحِبُكُمْ وَمَا غَوَىٰ ﴿٢﴾
2. vaš drug* nije s Pravoga puta skrenuo i nije zalutao! (Korkut)2. Nije zalutao drug53:2 vaš, niti skrenuo, (Mlivo)
وَمَا يَنطِقُ عَنِ ٱلْهَوَىٰٓ ﴿٣﴾
3. On ne govori po hiru svome - (Korkut)3. I ne govori po želji. (Mlivo)
إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحْىٌۭ يُوحَىٰ ﴿٤﴾
4. to je samo Objava koja mu se obznanjuje, (Korkut)4. To je jedino Objava - objavljuje se. (Mlivo)
عَلَّمَهُۥ شَدِيدُ ٱلْقُوَىٰ ﴿٥﴾
5. uči ga Jedan ogromne snage, (Korkut)5. Uči ga Jedan žestokih sila, (Mlivo)


Ko je Jedan zestokih sila?Dzibril, sto se jasno vjdi u nastavku sure. Sta je Dzibril poducavao Poslanika? Kur'an i nista vise. Sta Poslanik ne govori po hiru svome? Kur'an i nista vise.
Odakle to zaključuješ, zašto ubacuješ u ajete ono što ne piše? Stoji da Poslanik ne govori po hiru svome nego da je to Objava koja mu se objavljuje, nema nigdje - Kur'an. A melek Džibril, alejhi-selam, je dolazio Poslaniku, alejhi-selam, pa ga podučavao namazu i namaskim vremenima, pa ga poučio redoslijedu kur'anskih sura (jer nisu poredane u mushafu po redu objavljivanja), itd. Ovo sve znamo iz hadisa.

U ajetu se ne kaže: to je Kur'an, nego - objava.
Objava (wahj) se na drugim mestima u Kur'anu koristi u kontekstu onoga sto Bog objavljuje(11:37, 20:114) i to nije nista drugo doli Kur'an.
User avatar
arzuhal
Posts: 20825
Joined: 03/06/2008 11:26
Location: u čajdžinici "Kod nefsu-l-levvame"

#500 Re: BOŽANSKA VJERA vs Islam, (Hriščanstvo, Judaizam itd.)

Post by arzuhal »

Towelie wrote: Objava (wahj) se na drugim mestima u Kur'anu koristi u kontekstu onoga sto Bog objavljuje(11:37, 20:114) i to nije nista drugo doli Kur'an.

إِذْ أَوْحَيْنَا إِلَىٰ أُمِّكَ مَا يُوحَىٰ
أَنِ اقْذِفِيهِ فِي التَّابُوتِ فَاقْذِفِيهِ فِي الْيَمِّ فَلْيُلْقِهِ الْيَمُّ بِالسَّاحِلِ يَأْخُذْهُ عَدُوٌّ لِي وَعَدُوٌّ لَهُ


Korkut: kada smo majku tvoju nadahnuli (evhajna) onim što se samo nadahnućem stječe: 'Metni ga u sanduk i u rijeku baci, rijeka će ga na obalu izbaciti, pa će ga i Moj i njegov neprijatelj prihvatiti.'
Mlivo: Kad smo objavili majci tvojoj šta je objavljeno: "Ubaci ga u tabut i baci ga u rijeku, pa će ga izbaciti rijeka na obalu, uzeće ga neprijatelj Moj i neprijatelj njegov."

Sura Ta-Ha, 38-39.

Pitanje za tebe: da li je Musaova majka dobila kur'anski ajet koji joj ga je spustio melek Džibril, alejhi-selam, ili je čula ove riječi o spuštanju malog Musaa u korpu/sanduk direktno od Allaha, ili kako se već to desilo, i kako se zvala ta objava njoj? Jel ovo znači da je Musaova majka bila Allahov poslanik?
Post Reply