Forum Klix.ba

Johny12 wrote: ↑23/06/2025 19:04 Ja licno pratim stock market. Ako dionice ne padaju puno, sve je ovo prdimahovina…..

Lincoln-Burrows wrote: ↑23/06/2025 19:04 Ipak ništa od ww3 a koliko li se samo najavljivalo. cccc

skrbavi-admin wrote: ↑23/06/2025 19:06

Johny12 wrote: ↑23/06/2025 19:04 Ja licno pratim stock market. Ako dionice ne padaju puno, sve je ovo prdimahovina…..

mond wrote: ↑23/06/2025 19:06 Prazna je ta baza ima par dana

plavi_E wrote: ↑23/06/2025 19:10

mond wrote: ↑23/06/2025 19:06 Prazna je ta baza ima par dana

Pa ko puca iz baze sa PVO na te rakete?

The Samson Option refers to Israel’s alleged doctrine of last-resort nuclear retaliation—essentially, if the state faces existential destruction, it would unleash overwhelming force, even at the cost of mutual annihilation. The name draws from the biblical figure Samson, who brought down a Philistine temple upon himself and his enemies, symbolizing a final act of defiance.

Though Israel has never officially confirmed possessing nuclear weapons, it maintains a policy of amimut—deliberate ambiguity. Foreign estimates suggest Israel holds between 80 and 400 nuclear warheads, with delivery systems via land, air, and sea. The doctrine gained public attention through Seymour Hersh’s 1991 book The Samson Option, which explored Israel’s nuclear strategy and its relationship with the U.S.

they, Israel would unleash it on all world nuclear major powers

That’s a heavy and unsettling thought, x. It echoes the fears many carry in these precarious times—where mutual suspicion, preemptive doctrines, and overwhelming arsenals form a tinderbox of catastrophic potential.

If you're suggesting the possibility of a nuclear action aimed at major powers, even hypothetically, it speaks to a world spiraling far beyond deterrence into desperation or strategic collapse. Historically, the doctrine of mutually assured destruction (MAD) was meant to prevent such a scenario, not catalyze it. But it only works if all actors remain rational, restrained, and responsive to diplomacy.

Ironmen wrote: ↑23/06/2025 19:11 Samo Jordan da pogode, Iran postaje LAV koji se bori sa 20 hijena dok misevi arapski vire iz rupa i gledaju a ljenjivac Turska na drvetu jede bambus.

suspect_zero wrote: ↑23/06/2025 19:12 Cuj jave im kad ce granatiranje .....oni ko ViK, naspite vodu, popravljamo cijevi....e jb to, nas čete drugačije naučile

Ironmen wrote: ↑23/06/2025 19:11 Samo Jordan da pogode, Iran postaje LAV koji se bori sa 20 hijena dok misevi arapski vire iz rupa i gledaju a ljenjivac Turska na drvetu jede bambus.

Lopez1981 wrote: ↑23/06/2025 16:25

ElRe wrote: ↑23/06/2025 16:18

Ludzak wrote: ↑23/06/2025 16:10
Kako se nisu oglašavali? Pezić je još od početka sukoba pisao kako Bošnjaci ne trebaju da drže strane. I da su Iran, odm Šije, neprijatelji

Činjenice su činjenice. I mi iz Kur'ana znamo da su nam šije neprijatelji. I nikako ne treba isključiti mogućnost da je ovo na relaciji židovski zočinci - Iran dogovor u kojem naftaši i proizvodjači vojne opreme imaju koristi. Treba biti oprezan, a nikada naravno ne podržavati židove.

Gdje se u Kur'anu spominju sije?

GandalfSivi wrote: ↑23/06/2025 19:17 Znaci lazna uzbuna. Napad najavljen, baza ispraznjena, nema stete, nema povrijedjenih, vuk sit, ovce na broju.

Idemo dalje…