Forum Klix.ba

dr_Evil wrote: ↑27/10/2025 16:17

palermo wrote: ↑27/10/2025 15:50 Pa ako te zena uhvati in flangtanti sa drugom zenom, sta radis ? Vices, nisam zeno dina mi, podmetnuli je dusmani.

Tako da se Nerki vala nema sta prebacivati zbog ove odbrane.

Poznavao jednog, mislio se izvuci od zene tako sto prizna

Vjecita_zavrzlama wrote: ↑27/10/2025 14:30

Sefket007 wrote: ↑27/10/2025 14:23 Nema gore osobe za sve nas u FBIH od Nikšića i njegove kafanske ekipe iz SDPa...

Blago je reci da su odron i katastrofa.

A sto to? Jel to bolja dzamijska oko Bakira i Seke? niksic je blizi narodu u tom smislu

A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑27/10/2025 16:11

Haris.ba wrote: ↑27/10/2025 16:08 Direktor se potvrdjuje u parlamentu.

De ne provaljuj se.

Parlament nije politička potvrda?

Parlament potvrđuje, Predsjednik potpisuje dekret, vrlo konkretno.

Nema potpisa, nema direktora.

Seawolf wrote: ↑27/10/2025 16:15
Gdje je tu javni konkurs, ako predsjednik države imenuje, a državni parlament potvrđuje?

Haris.ba wrote: ↑27/10/2025 17:17

A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑27/10/2025 16:11

Haris.ba wrote: ↑27/10/2025 16:08 Direktor se potvrdjuje u parlamentu.

De ne provaljuj se.

Parlament nije politička potvrda?

Parlament potvrđuje, Predsjednik potpisuje dekret, vrlo konkretno.

Nema potpisa, nema direktora.

Kako ujeda kada pokazes na primjeru koji si ti naveo kako ljudi to rijese.

U parlamentu se biraju i sudije ustavnog suda. Biraju se nezavisni revizori, biraju se clanovi raznih bitnih komisija.

Hajde u parlament da se bira direktor elektroprivrede. Pa ces da vidis kada vise ljudi ti cita biografiju kako ide, a kako ide kada je dovoljno da se Nerminu svidjas.

A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑27/10/2025 17:24 Ukratko, u većini modernog svijeta javne firme su pod puno većom političkom kontrolom nego kod nas. Dosta je modela, načina, ali se svede na političku kontrolu nad javnim preduzećim, što je potpuno normalno.

xoklix wrote: ↑27/10/2025 17:04 Ma zapošljavanje podobnih je bilo i biti će, u razvijenim državama moraš biti i podoban i sposoban, kod nas samo ovo prvo. Meni je gore da premijer preko poruka urgira za zapošljavanje, koliki glupson moraš biti za takvo nešto, još ovaj drugi iz policije
I to u vremenima kad tajne službe,presretanje signala,poruka i sl. nikad nije bilo aktivnije.

A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑26/10/2024 12:49
Haj molim te, ne budi toliko glup, pa da moram da te satarem kao što ću sada. Iz dokumenta koji nisi pročitao, a odnosi se na direktore:

U Australiji se Ministri pitaju tokom biranja Direktora.

Finally, some countries such as Australia have a broader approach to
the independence of boards. They take into consideration not only the
independence of board members, but also the separation of the Board
Chairman from the CEO. It is then the role of the Board to select the CEO,
although responsible Ministers are consulted as part of this process.

Već spomenuta Francuska.

In a number of cases there is a direct political dimension to the nomination
with the direct involvement of the Council of Ministries or even the President,
such as in France for Chairmen and CEOs of some large SOEs.

i ne samo to. Ovo je gore nego kod nas.

In a few OECD countries the selection of CEO remains a political prerogative
of the government and there is no political will to change and return this critical
responsibility to SOE boards. Nomination of the CEO by the government can lead
to a weakening of their legitimacy. This is the case in France where practical
modalities of CEO nomination have been criticised, without questioning the
government power to nominate them, as this is considered as “logical and
necessary”. CEOs are “often nominated as a matter of urgency, depending on political
changes, without real adequacy between their experience and the enterprise’s culture”.
The Douste-Blazy Parliamentary Report recommends to develop the promotion
of internal managers and to apply “minimal guaranties of transparency and
objectivity”15

Svjedočenje člana NO u francuskom telekomu. CEO nas ništa ne pita, sve završava sa vladom

“Since
my nomination in 2002, I have not had any contact with Ministries or representatives
from the government while I was representing the state in France Telecom’s board.
Lacking any other direction, I always considered that my mission was to support the
action taken by the CEO, who was trusted by the state and who had not taken any
important strategic decision without the state’s consent. I would have found it normal to
be consulted or instructed about what the state was expecting from us, which never
happened… It is quite serious. It means that board members are appointed and then
they are free.”

U Koreji, Predsjednik i ministri biraju CEO-a tj direktora.

For all these
reasons the Act established that the appointed executives had to be chosen
among the employees with the only exception of the CEO that is still appointed
by the President under the recommendation of the Supervisory Minister.
Each of these boards had to be composed of a maximum 10 members including
the chairman, the CEO, one representative from the Economic Planning Board
and the Supervisory Ministry and civilians with particular expertise. CEO and
Chairman were appointed by the President; the other board members were
appointed by the Supervisory Minister at the recommendation of the
Chairman

U Japanu i Italiji, direktore imenuju ministri

In some other countries, the board is officially in charge of nominating the
CEO but de facto there is a strong interaction, in the form of consultation
with the concerned Ministries (in Italy) or even approval from the Ministry
in charge (in Japan).

u Velikoj Britaniji jako slično, gdje nadzorni odbor predlaže ministru, koji odobrava direktora.

In the UK, the Chairman of the Board usually chairs the selection panel for
the CEO and other board members. This panel then makes an appointment
recommendation to the responsible minister

Kanada, NO predlaže, a vlada odobrava, a postoji sistem gdje se NO i ne pitaju uopće.

In Canada, three models of selecting CEOs have been identified in Crown
Corporations, even though the government now favours a board empowering
model. In the first one, “Centre selects”, the board is not even consulted. In the
“Centre searches” model, the government runs the search and recruitment
process but consults with the board, including on selection criteria or for input to
the short list of candidates. In the “Board search model”, the Board leads the
search process, conducts interviews (as well as the Minister) and recommends a
shortlist to the government, which makes the final decision

Molim te, ne brukaj se više, nego nešto nauči iz svega ovoga. Iskoristi kognitivnu disonancu u kojoj se nalaziš da iz svega izađeš obrazovaniji i pametniji. Odnosi se na sve ostale koji su se primili ovog jalovog posla i ubjeđivanja da politika ne smije imati ikakav uticaj.

A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑27/10/2025 17:39 Odnosi se na sve ostale koji su se primili ovog jalovog posla i ubjeđivanja da politika ne smije imati ikakav uticaj.

shbc wrote: ↑27/10/2025 15:28

MMM1977 wrote: ↑27/10/2025 14:35 Dakle, ostala nam je još NS da se nije izblamirala a znamo doseg iste. Dodamo još HDZ i SNSD/Pederina i eto nam političke kaše kakva ne postoji nigdje na svijetu. Čemu se nadati i šta očekivati kada od rata naovamo na vlasti se smjenjuju lopov do lopova. Mamicu vam jebem svima redom. Isto kao da živimo po 500 godina a ne po 60 normalnih i vi nam uzeste pola tog života.

Ma izblamirali su se i oni sa onim glasanjem da se omoguci isplata plata u kesu i zaobidju sankcije za crnolistase.

Govnari na sve strane. Jedino sto covjeka baci jos vise u depresiju je kad vidi da su Rumeni, Sebijina kucka i Zlatni alkos alternativa...

Haris.ba wrote: ↑27/10/2025 17:42 Kako je ovom Akciji vlast udarila u glavu.

Da nemas nekih licnih momenata u ovoj svoj prici. Je li se i tebi oduzimao mobitel?
Mnogo te ovo sve oko Neke potreslo.

Nomination of CEOs
In a number of countries SOE boards do not fulfil what should be one of
their key functions, the nomination and removal of CEOs (cf. Annex I.5):
● SOE boards are clearly in charge of nominating the CEO only in a few
countries such as Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, New Zealand,
and Norway. It is also the case in Austria, but special statutory provisions
apply regarding the process, in terms of transparency, vacation notice,
delays, etc.
● In some other countries it is the GSM which nominates the CEO, as is the
case of Korea’s GICs and Hungary.
● SOE boards are clearly not in charge of nominating CEOs in several OECD
countries, such as Belgium, France, Mexico and Turkey. In France, in the
largest SOEs CEOs are nominated by Presidential Decrees, in accordance
usually with the ownership entity which proposes candidates based on
their competencies. In the Mexican case, even senior executives two levels
below the CEO are appointed and removed by the ownership entity.
● In some other countries, the board is officially in charge of nominating the
CEO but de facto there is a strong interaction, in the form of consultation
with the concerned Ministries (in Italy) or even approval from the Ministry
in charge (in Japan)
In the UK, the Chairman of the Board usually chairs the selection panel for
the CEO and other board members. This panel then makes an appointment
recommendation to the responsible minister.
● In Korea, in the case of GOCs, the Board sets up a specific Recommendation
Committee, but the CEO must be approved by the sector ministry and is
even often directly appointed by the country’s President

A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑27/10/2025 17:52

Do tada, još malo udaranja u glavu, ali argumentima

anelsol wrote: ↑27/10/2025 18:36 Kako se niko ne osvrne na uhljebljivanje HDZ-ovih kadrova. Oni su šampioni u tome. Npr. Autocestama u Mostaru ne možeš progaziti kroz zgradu od raznih HDZ podobnika.Dokle se ide u izmišljanne radnih mjesta u tom predizeću pokazuje i činjenica da imaju radnika na kopir aparatu .

Haris.ba wrote: ↑27/10/2025 18:55

anelsol wrote: ↑27/10/2025 18:36 Kako se niko ne osvrne na uhljebljivanje HDZ-ovih kadrova. Oni su šampioni u tome. Npr. Autocestama u Mostaru ne možeš progaziti kroz zgradu od raznih HDZ podobnika.Dokle se ide u izmišljanne radnih mjesta u tom predizeću pokazuje i činjenica da imaju radnika na kopir aparatu .

Zato sto imaju minimum inteligencije i o tome ne raspravljaju po porukama.

A, i ako se sta nadje. Dokaz ce isprariti dok bude putovao do suda.

Velkoski wrote: ↑27/10/2025 16:05

A_A_AKCIJA wrote: ↑27/10/2025 16:03

Velkoski wrote: ↑27/10/2025 16:00 to nije najveći problem i dalje ti i ne treba čitati post, bar dok ne identifikuješ najveći problem

Najveći problem je što glupani misle da je afera tu da bi država išla naprijed.

Apsolutno suprotno.

Afera je tu da se iznudi dogovor o zaštiti kriminalaca.

I u sjeni toga, Nikšić je prašina u odnosu šta je iza svega.

Da se nikada i nikome ne ponovi Fadil

Afera je tu jer je Nikšić korumpirano govno i ni on nije tu da bi država išla naprijed.

Sve ostalo je manje bitno i nije najveći problem.

moonco wrote: ↑27/10/2025 17:52 Forto se boji SA taksista

Thorgerson wrote: ↑27/10/2025 17:33 Ovo je za ostavke i kraj price. Sve ovo sto je danas izjavio ce im se odbiti od glavu. Mozda ne 2026, ali zavrsit ce kao SDA. Jednom jesu. I opet ce.