Evo šta mene navodi na pomisao da Visočica i Plješevica nisu u potpunosti prirodne strukture.
Ovo je slikano na Pleševici.
A ovo na visočici
A ovo je pak slikano na lokaltetu Gornja vratnica.
Na svim do sada otkopanim lokacijama na Plješevici i u Gornjoj vratnici, slojevi kamena ili ploča su vodoravni ili približno vodoravni. Međutim, na Visočici su te kamene ploče ili blokovi (ili kakogod već) paralelne sa stranicama "piramide" ili brda ako više volite. Iz ovoga bi se dalo zaključiti da su te formacije nastale na različite načine pogotovo imajući u vidu i da se i materijali tih kamenih «ploča» znatno razlikuju. Samo što se meni čini da su preblizu da bi mogle biti potpuno prirodne.
Druga stvar koja mi je neobična, a što se jasno vidi na zadnjoj slici, jeste to da se između dva okamenjena sloja mogu nalaziti slojevi rastresitog materijala. Možda ovo ima sasvim logično i jasno objašnjenje, ali ja nisam geolog pa ne znam.
Ne bih smio staviti "ruku u vatru" da su to piramide ali ne bih odbacio ni mogućnost da je u nastajanje tih struktura umješana i ljudska ruka.
A što se tiče naučnog dokazivanja, kako angažovati bilo koga «priznatog» kada svi u startu apriori odbacuju bilo kakvu mogućnost da te strukture nisu nastale prirodno. S druge strane kako smatrati ozbiljnim pristup g. Hardinga koji je prolazeci kroz Visoko, bez da svrati na «sporne» lokacije ustvrdi kako su to geološke formacije. Takav pristup se ne razlikuje puno od Osmanagićevog. I kolike su šanse da će se neko od evropskih arheologa usuditi protivrječiti opštem stavu.
Zar vi stvarno mislite da su i naučnici "bezgrešni", da i među njima nema sujete, zavisti,... Za Boga miloga, pa i oni su ljudi. Chupo gore spomenu koliko je trebalo da se prihvati objašnjenje za nastanak Scablands-a (preko 20 godina).
One of the most interesting debates in the history of geology has to do with the origins of the Channeled Scabland region in eastern Washington State - so named by J Harlen Bretz because of the region's distinctive channels with intervening "scabs" of loess or soil covering the underlying basaltic rock. But how, exactly, were these channels and scabs formed? Were they formed over millions of years of time by process of erosion currently active in the region or were they formed by some other means?
By the time of the early twentieth century, the most prominent scientists of the day were decidedly "uniformitarian" in their thinking. That is, they believed that the regular observed processes of usual geologic events acting over vast periods of time were able to explain most if not all of the observed geologic record. J Harlen Bretz, who earned his Ph.D. in geology from the University of Chicago, was the first geologist to seriously challenge this notion, but it was by no means an easy. The process to change the prevailing dogma of the day was a tremendous struggle for Bretz despite his use of a great deal of very good evidence - and that is what is most interesting about this story.
http://www.detectingdesign.com/harlenbretz.html
The Channeled Scablands are unique geological erosion features in the U.S. state of Washington. They were created by the cataclysmic Missoula Floods that swept periodically across eastern Washington and down the Columbia River Plateau during the Pleistocene epoch. Geologist J Harlen Bretz coined the term in a series of papers in the 1920s. Debate over the origin of the Scablands raged for forty years and is one of the great battles in the history of earth science. "It was the biggest flood in the world for which there is geological evidence," writes Norman Maclean in A River Runs Through It.
Bretz conducted meticulous research and published many papers during the 1920s describing the Channeled Scablands. His theories of how they were formed required short but immense water flows, for which Bretz had no explanation (the source of the water was never the focus of his research). Bretz's theories met with vehement opposition from geologists of the day, who tried to explain the features with uniformitarianism theories.
J.T. Pardee first suggested in 1925 to Bretz that the draining of a glacial lake could account for flows of the magnitude needed. Pardee continued his research over the next 30 years, collecting and analyzing evidence that eventually identified Lake Missoula as the source of the Spokane Floods and creator of the Channeled Scablands.
Research on open channel hydraulics in the 1970s put Bretz's theories on solid scientific ground.
Pardee's and Bretz's theories were accepted only after decades of painstaking work and fierce scientific debate. It is worth noting that many of the most vocal critics of Bretz and Pardee never studied the Channeled Scablands with their own eyes. In 1979 Bretz received the highest medal of the Geological Society of America, the Penrose Medal, to recognize that he had developed one of the great ideas in the earth sciences.
http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/projects/geoweb ... lands0.HTM
