Forum Klix.ba

burgundy wrote:
Sta si ovim mislio?Da je Milan kriv i Galijani sto se istrazuje Conte?Smijesan si prijatelju.Prvo svako normalan zna da ovo nema veze sa Juventusom,jer se Conte optuzuje za stvari koje su se desile za vrijeme dok je bio trener Sijene,a drugo jednostavno pitanje zasto bi Conte htio nagodbu sa italijanskim savezom ako nije kriv.Iskreno ne bih volio da okrive Contea,jer bi to ugrozilo i oslabilo italijansku ligu,a to nikom normalnom nije u interesu,ali optuzivati Milan je stvarno bezobrazno i licemjerno.

burgundy wrote:
Nista uvejrili ste me.Berluskoni i Galijani su krivi za optuzbe pritiv Contea.Treba ih objesit nasred Milana.Sram ih bilo mafija pokvarena.

burgundy wrote:Vazda bio Ne stvarno smijesni ste mi.Milan je isto bio zrtveno janje od totonera pa do calciopolija.Milan moze namjestat utakmice i raditi za korist sebe,ali nikad na stetu drugih.Mozete optuzivat,i optuzbe mogu ici u Milano ali ne na adresu Via Turati.

elmirčo wrote:

burgundy wrote:Vazda bio Ne stvarno smijesni ste mi.Milan je isto bio zrtveno janje od totonera pa do calciopolija.Milan moze namjestat utakmice i raditi za korist sebe,ali nikad na stetu drugih.Mozete optuzivat,i optuzbe mogu ici u Milano ali ne na adresu Via Turati.

dok jednom ne smrkne, drugom ne svane

hau jes no wrote:jubentini i bilanisti se svadjaju ko je veci kriminalac ........ neprocjenljivo

burgundy wrote:

hau jes no wrote:jubentini i bilanisti se svadjaju ko je veci kriminalac ........ neprocjenljivo

Ako si printerista mozda vas i vidimo na Kosevu ko zna

hau jes no wrote:

burgundy wrote:

hau jes no wrote:jubentini i bilanisti se svadjaju ko je veci kriminalac ........ neprocjenljivo

Ako si printerista mozda vas i vidimo na Kosevu ko zna

vazda su velikani dolazili na kosevo, manchester, real evo sad mozda dolazi i najveci italijanski klub

hau jes no wrote:

burgundy wrote:

hau jes no wrote:jubentini i bilanisti se svadjaju ko je veci kriminalac ........ neprocjenljivo

Ako si printerista mozda vas i vidimo na Kosevu ko zna

vazda su velikani dolazili na kosevo, manchester, real evo sad mozda dolazi i najveci italijanski klub

“The prosecutor claims Masiello’s changing testimony was ‘progressively enriched’ rather than contradictory. But it is a progressive climax towards illogicality.

“As Masiello tries to make his version of events more useful to the prosecutor, he contradicts himself so much that we can’t even work out what role Bonucci had in this match.

“Masiello spoke twice to the Cremona prosecutors, once in Bari, and he never mentioned the Udinese-Bari match. On February 7 Iacovelli was the first to talk about Udinese-Bari, including Masiello but not Bonucci.

“When Masiello discovered through the newspapers that Iacovelli had talked – which is in itself damaging the evidence – then Masiello brought Bonucci into it.

“However, even here Masiello cannot get his story straight. First he said he asked Bonucci for the fix the week before the training camp, then he said specifically in the locker room. In the meantime, Bonucci proves he couldn’t have been there at that date because he was on international duty.

“So Masiello is asked about the circumstances of their meeting again, because the dates don’t match up. Masiello changes it to before the trip to Udine, which is his fourth testimony and fourth change, but it’s not enough.

“When he testifies on July 10 and ‘perfectly remembers’ Bonucci was not present during the week, so the meeting happened on the team bus to Udine. But Bonucci was there from Thursday and trained regularly each day.

“Evidently something doesn’t fit here, there are illogical discrepancies. Masiello also testified with discrepancies over whether the fix was meant to be an ‘over’ with many goals, a draw with goals or specifically 2-2.

“Then Masiello said he was passive on the second and third goals on purpose. But why? If it was meant to be a 2-2 for the betting syndicate, why would he favour a 3-2 result for Udinese?

“De Tullio testified that Masiello sorted the ‘fix’ Udinese-Bari all by himself and is just a big liar.”

Udinese's lawyer: "Even Palazzi knows that Masiello is a liar."

Atticus Finch wrote:Današnje saslušanje koje je uključilo Bonuccija i Pepea, je, ustvari, pokazalo nestabilnost i vrlo izvjesni kolaps optužnice, prvenstveno ka Bonucciju. Advokat Gian Pietro Bianchi je sistematski oborio sve navode optužnice, a na to najbolje upućuje nervoza, te stalno prekidanje saslušanja od strane Palazzija. Ne bih da prejudiciram, pošto sa ovim mafijašima ništa nije sigurno, ali Juventini imaju dobre izglede, posebno kad se uzme u obzir da je do prije par dana Bonuccijev slučaj bio najteži. Marotta koji je prisustvovao saslušanju, je zajedno sa Bonuccijem i Pepeom krenuo prema Salernu, na utakmicu Juventus-Malaga.

Evo par stavki koje je iznio advokat Bianchi:

“The prosecutor claims Masiello’s changing testimony was ‘progressively enriched’ rather than contradictory. But it is a progressive climax towards illogicality.

“As Masiello tries to make his version of events more useful to the prosecutor, he contradicts himself so much that we can’t even work out what role Bonucci had in this match.

“Masiello spoke twice to the Cremona prosecutors, once in Bari, and he never mentioned the Udinese-Bari match. On February 7 Iacovelli was the first to talk about Udinese-Bari, including Masiello but not Bonucci.

“When Masiello discovered through the newspapers that Iacovelli had talked – which is in itself damaging the evidence – then Masiello brought Bonucci into it.

“However, even here Masiello cannot get his story straight. First he said he asked Bonucci for the fix the week before the training camp, then he said specifically in the locker room. In the meantime, Bonucci proves he couldn’t have been there at that date because he was on international duty.

“So Masiello is asked about the circumstances of their meeting again, because the dates don’t match up. Masiello changes it to before the trip to Udine, which is his fourth testimony and fourth change, but it’s not enough.

“When he testifies on July 10 and ‘perfectly remembers’ Bonucci was not present during the week, so the meeting happened on the team bus to Udine. But Bonucci was there from Thursday and trained regularly each day.

“Evidently something doesn’t fit here, there are illogical discrepancies. Masiello also testified with discrepancies over whether the fix was meant to be an ‘over’ with many goals, a draw with goals or specifically 2-2.

“Then Masiello said he was passive on the second and third goals on purpose. But why? If it was meant to be a 2-2 for the betting syndicate, why would he favour a 3-2 result for Udinese?

“De Tullio testified that Masiello sorted the ‘fix’ Udinese-Bari all by himself and is just a big liar.”

Udinese's lawyer: "Even Palazzi knows that Masiello is a liar."

Bonucci i Pepe odbijaju svaku mogućnost nagodbe, potpuno sigurni u svoju nevinost.

salle_eh1986 wrote:Dobra utakmica večeras naših...nije ni ova Malaga loša, nije zadžabe bila četvrta u primeri
Ići će oni u grupe lige prvaka i ovaj meč je pravo mjerilo naše snage, a to je četvrtfinale LP minimum

Sarajevo1946 wrote:Oni će teško ići u grupe jer će ih Uefa vjerovatno izbaciti.

Sarajevo1946 wrote:Ma imaju nekakve strašne dugove, taj milijarder što ih je preuzeo lopina neka, neće da plaća igrače, šta li već. Malaga propada uglavnom, finansijska im je dubioza. Nevezano za temu, nego eto reko, da spomenem.