Obama i SAD (2008-2016)

Post Reply
UnscarD
Posts: 3235
Joined: 27/12/2002 00:00
Location: Na granici koja polako nestaje, tamo izmedju atoma i bita.

#4051 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by UnscarD »

jefferson wrote:
@UnsecureD, ti meni kazes tebi nelogicno da ja tako i tako. Eto meni nelogicno da ti tako i tako, i sta cemo sad?
Obicno se onda u takvim slucajevima probaju suprostaviti gledista.
Kazes da su Americki motivi odlaska u Iraq suplji. Ipak, pred samu intervenciju, Gallup je radio istrazivanja javnog mjenja i oko 70% Amerikanaca je mislilo da je Sadam odgovoran za 911 a sve kao posljedica agresivne medijske kampanje koja je za cilj imala da odobrovolji javnost za intervenciju. Naravno danas znamo da Sadam nije imao veze niti sa 911, niti sa Al-Qaid-om niti je imao famozno i nikada pronadjeno oruzjeza masovno unistavanje. Sve osnovni razlozi zbog kojih je izvrsena intervencija. Ovo je jedan od svjezijih primjera manipulativnog izvjestavanja Americkih mainstream medija.
Kako je moguce tvrditi nakon ovoga da su mediji nezavisni kada je veoma jasno kakvu su ulogu imali?
Ako odvojis 45 minuta i pogledas barem prvi dio filma ciji sam ti link postao (film nije nikakv youtube video nego ga je radio jedan od najpoznatijih Australiskih novinara) vidjet ces jasan primjer sprege medija i CIA-e u slucaju pokusaja obaranja vlade Huge Chaveza..stvar ide dotle da se biraju uglovi kamere koji snimaju demonstracije i onda se Americkom narodu prikazuje video na kojem se vide pristalice Huge Chaveza kako pucaju na masu demonstranata. Srecom, postojao je i snimak iz drugog ugla i na tom snimku se vidi da oni ne pucaju na demonstrante nego se brane od CIA-inih snajperista koji su pucali na demonstrante sa unaprijed pripremljenim planom da se Hugine pristalice okrive za masakr. Kasnije ide prilog FOX-a koji je nedvosmisleno ukompnovan tako da ispadne da ipak pucaju na demonstrante. Orwellova 1984 na dijelu.
User avatar
2407
Posts: 4437
Joined: 26/07/2007 21:32
Location: on a 50 milion year trip...

#4052 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by 2407 »

Ljudi nemojte se fakat trudit oko jeffersona, za ostale ne znam i necu da govorim ali mislim da nisu ni oni daleko(izvinjavam se ako grijesim). Dovoljan dokaz jeste da samo pogledate jeffovu raspravu na temi 11.09. stvarni ili fiktivni napad. U toj temi mu je user pod nickom nikad_izvini nasao dokaze i pobio sve njegove navode, a jeff je samo preskako pitanja izbjegavajuci da direktno odgovara i glavna argumentacija mu je bila: ja gledo dokumentaraca na NGC-u :lol: :lol: :lol: I on sad trazi neku konstruktivnu raspravu :lol: :lol: :lol: Pogledajte kako samo konstruktivno izbjegava ono sto trazi :-) :D
Fakat se ne vrijedi truditi jer oni treze nemoguce. Oni traze licna priznanja Perlea, Wolfofitza, Kristola, Busha.... i to da budu u, kakvom po njima, relevantnom medjskom izvoru a i to kada bi im se predstavilo, sto zanju da je nemoguce, oni bi nasli nesto da to banaliziraju ili bi jednostavno preskocili i nastavili svojim putem kao sto je W. Churchill rekao : "Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on.
Pozdrav

p.s.
11.09. predtavlja prelomnu tacku necijih shvatanja glede ovih stvari. Nacin gledanja na 11.09., bukvalno, predstavlja onu scenu iz Matrixa kada Morpheus govori Neo-u:
"You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed, and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you just how deep the rabbit hole goes."
User avatar
suncica24
Posts: 4319
Joined: 22/03/2006 21:29
Location: Na vrh brda gdje vrba mrda

#4053 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by suncica24 »

E sto usraste temu, to je nevjerovatno :D

Nego, da se pokusamo vratiti. Izgleda Obama ostavlja Gatesa, sto je prilicno veliki korak natrag, kako za amerikance, tako i "posmatrace".
Comments?


(CNN) -- President-elect Barack Obama will announce his national security team -- including Sen. Hillary Clinton as secretary of state -- at an event Monday morning, according to two officials.
Sen. Hillary Clinton will be nominated to be Barack Obama's secretary of state, sources say.


The Obama transition team announced Sunday that Obama will unveil the full team at a press conference in Chicago, Illinois, around 10:40 a.m. ET.

CNN and CNN.com will carry the event live.

The officials said Obama is also expected to finally confirm that he is keeping Defense Secretary Robert Gates in his current post. Obama plans to name retired Marine Gen. Jim Jones as his national security adviser at the White House, the officials said.

Also, two sources close to the transition said Obama will nominate Susan Rice as United Nations ambassador; Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano as homeland security secretary; and Eric Holder as attorney general. Video Watch: CNN's Ed Henry discusses the security team »

The officials said that after much contemplation, Jones has privately indicated in the last few days that he plans to take the job as national security adviser. But a source close to Jones said he still has to have one more private meeting Sunday that will finalize the decision one way or the other.

CNN has previously reported Clinton and Gates are on track for the State and Defense posts.

"There's a lot of people in Washington that feel relieved. These are known quantities, they've been around for a while," said CNN senior political analyst Bill Schneider on CNN's "Late Edition Sunday." "And there's criticism. Some on the left say, 'Wait a minute -- we voted for change.'"

Last week, Obama pushed back against criticism that his Cabinet picks failed to reflect the change he called for during the election.

"What we are going to do is combine experience with fresh thinking. But understand ... the vision for change comes first and foremost ... from me. That's my job," he said.

Amy Walter, editor-in-chief of National Journal's "The Hotline," said Sunday that there's the "vision and there's the managing, which is who is getting out front, who is actually setting the pace. I think you'll see Obama keeping his team in line, keeping them on the same page."

All of the selections are people who have been mentioned often during weeks of fevered speculation about the likely nominees. In fact, retiring Republican Sen. John Warner, a veteran member of the Armed Services Committee, released a statement Saturday night praising all three nominees, even before they had been officially announced at Monday's planned rollout. Video Watch why some think Gates shouldn't stay »

"The triumvirate of Gates, Clinton and Jones to lead Obama's 'national security team' instills great confidence at home and abroad; and, further strengthens the growing respect for the President-elect's courage and ability to exercise sound judgment in selecting the 'best and the brightest' to implement our nation's security policies," Warner said.
Don't Miss

* BigThink.com: Jim Jones speaks out
* Obama Cabinet vetting historically fast
* Gates expected to stay on as defense secretary

To some, the choice demonstrates bipartisanship and conveys that Obama has the self-confidence in his leadership abilities to keep one of the more widely respected members of the Bush administration.

"We've got confidence, continuity, and I still think the mission to get out of [Iraq] as soon as possible will be accomplished. So I think it's a great choice," Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel told CNN's "Larry King Live" last week.

Others say keeping Gates could delay the change that Obama promised during his campaign, because it could lead to potential policy conflicts over missile defense funding and a speedy Iraq pullout.

"If we don't have good civilian personnel alongside our good military personnel, we're not going to reform. It can't happen. You need the right people to make it work," former Pentagon comptroller Dov Zakheim said.

The president-elect has made no secret of his interest in having divergent views within his Cabinet, and Gates has served in various national security roles under Republican presidents, including CIA director during former President George H.W. Bush's administration.

As for Clinton, some observers have raised concerns about her husband, former President Bill Clinton, and suggested that his international business dealings, global foundation and penchant for going off script could present a significant obstacle for the incoming commander-in-chief.

"These are issues that I'm sure are being discussed, and they will have to be worked out, and it's legitimate to ask these questions," said James Carville, a former aide to the Clintons and CNN contributor.

Obama's transition team was given access to Bill Clinton's finances and post-presidential dealings, sources said. As part of the early vetting process, the team looked for any negative information that could jeopardize the prospect of Hillary Clinton as secretary of state.

A particular issue of concern, observers said, was the donor list of Bill Clinton's global foundation, which might show connections to international figures who push policies that could conflict with those of the new Obama administration.

Since exiting the Oval Office eight years ago, Clinton has reportedly raised more than $500 million for the foundation, a significant portion of which financed the construction of his presidential library. The foundation has also doled out millions for AIDS relief in Africa and other charitable causes around the world.

Amid repeated criticism from Sen. Clinton's primary opponents, Bill Clinton would not reveal the extent of the foundation's donor list earlier this year. But The New York Times has reported the list includes some foreign governments, including members of the Saudi royal family, the king of Morocco, a fund connected to the United Arab Emirates, and the governments of Kuwait and Qatar.
advertisement

The former president has also reportedly solicited funds from international business figures connected to human rights abuses that his wife has criticized, including the governments of Kazakhstan and China.

During the New York senator's White House bid, critics repeatedly said that foreign governments and business executives could try to exert influence through donations to the foundation, which prompted a pledge from the former president to publicly disclose all future donors.
UnscarD
Posts: 3235
Joined: 27/12/2002 00:00
Location: Na granici koja polako nestaje, tamo izmedju atoma i bita.

#4054 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by UnscarD »

2407 wrote:Ljudi nemojte se fakat trudit oko jeffersona, za ostale ne znam i necu da govorim ali mislim da nisu ni oni daleko(izvinjavam se ako grijesim). Dovoljan dokaz jeste da samo pogledate jeffovu raspravu na temi 11.09. stvarni ili fiktivni napad. U toj temi mu je user pod nickom nikad_izvini nasao dokaze i pobio sve njegove navode, a jeff je samo preskako pitanja izbjegavajuci da direktno odgovara i glavna argumentacija mu je bila: ja gledo dokumentaraca na NGC-u :lol: :lol: :lol: I on sad trazi neku konstruktivnu raspravu :lol: :lol: :lol: Pogledajte kako samo konstruktivno izbjegava ono sto trazi :-) :D
Fakat se ne vrijedi truditi jer oni treze nemoguce. Oni traze licna priznanja Perlea, Wolfofitza, Kristola, Busha.... i to da budu u, kakvom po njima, relevantnom medjskom izvoru a i to kada bi im se predstavilo, sto zanju da je nemoguce, oni bi nasli nesto da to banaliziraju ili bi jednostavno preskocili i nastavili svojim putem kao sto je W. Churchill rekao : "Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on.
Pozdrav

p.s.
11.09. predtavlja prelomnu tacku necijih shvatanja glede ovih stvari. Nacin gledanja na 11.09., bukvalno, predstavlja onu scenu iz Matrixa kada Morpheus govori Neo-u:
"You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed, and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you just how deep the rabbit hole goes."
Ja sam mislio da probam smisleno objasniti da mediji ipak nisu neovisni jer to stvarno nije tesko dokazati, pa onda dokazati da Americka spoljna politika najvise radi za interese uskih lobija i iz toga bi proizaslo da mediji fakticki rade za te iste lobije...ali sad i ja uvidjam da je to tesko izvodljivo i prihvatam savjet.
Na isto izbjegavanje sam naisao ranije kada sam trazio da mi neko objasni koji je tacno interes prosjecnog Amerikanca u Americkoj bezrezervnoj podrsci Izraelu?
Ipak, kako sam Jeff kaze, ta zemlja mu je dala sve sto ima i to kombinovano sa prirodnom tendencijom da se uklopi u sredinu u kojoj zivi kao posljedicu ima ovakve stavove....i da tesko je to sada promjeniti.
jefferson
Posts: 14969
Joined: 28/08/2007 05:31
Location: U.S.A

#4055 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by jefferson »

2407 wrote:Ljudi nemojte se fakat trudit oko jeffersona, za ostale ne znam i necu da govorim ali mislim da nisu ni oni daleko(izvinjavam se ako grijesim). Dovoljan dokaz jeste da samo pogledate jeffovu raspravu na temi 11.09. stvarni ili fiktivni napad. U toj temi mu je user pod nickom nikad_izvini nasao dokaze i pobio sve njegove navode, a jeff je samo preskako pitanja izbjegavajuci da direktno odgovara i glavna argumentacija mu je bila: ja gledo dokumentaraca na NGC-u :lol: :lol: :lol: I on sad trazi neku konstruktivnu raspravu :lol: :lol: :lol: Pogledajte kako samo konstruktivno izbjegava ono sto trazi :-) :D
Fakat se ne vrijedi truditi jer oni treze nemoguce. Oni traze licna priznanja Perlea, Wolfofitza, Kristola, Busha.... i to da budu u, kakvom po njima, relevantnom medjskom izvoru a i to kada bi im se predstavilo, sto zanju da je nemoguce, oni bi nasli nesto da to banaliziraju ili bi jednostavno preskocili i nastavili svojim putem kao sto je W. Churchill rekao : "Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on.
Pozdrav

p.s.
11.09. predtavlja prelomnu tacku necijih shvatanja glede ovih stvari. Nacin gledanja na 11.09., bukvalno, predstavlja onu scenu iz Matrixa kada Morpheus govori Neo-u:
"You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed, and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you just how deep the rabbit hole goes."
Jesul to oni dokazi koje je taj forumas postavio pa se ispostavilo da ih sam nije procitao?
jefferson
Posts: 14969
Joined: 28/08/2007 05:31
Location: U.S.A

#4056 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by jefferson »

UnscarD wrote:
2407 wrote:Ljudi nemojte se fakat trudit oko jeffersona, za ostale ne znam i necu da govorim ali mislim da nisu ni oni daleko(izvinjavam se ako grijesim). Dovoljan dokaz jeste da samo pogledate jeffovu raspravu na temi 11.09. stvarni ili fiktivni napad. U toj temi mu je user pod nickom nikad_izvini nasao dokaze i pobio sve njegove navode, a jeff je samo preskako pitanja izbjegavajuci da direktno odgovara i glavna argumentacija mu je bila: ja gledo dokumentaraca na NGC-u :lol: :lol: :lol: I on sad trazi neku konstruktivnu raspravu :lol: :lol: :lol: Pogledajte kako samo konstruktivno izbjegava ono sto trazi :-) :D
Fakat se ne vrijedi truditi jer oni treze nemoguce. Oni traze licna priznanja Perlea, Wolfofitza, Kristola, Busha.... i to da budu u, kakvom po njima, relevantnom medjskom izvoru a i to kada bi im se predstavilo, sto zanju da je nemoguce, oni bi nasli nesto da to banaliziraju ili bi jednostavno preskocili i nastavili svojim putem kao sto je W. Churchill rekao : "Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on.
Pozdrav

p.s.
11.09. predtavlja prelomnu tacku necijih shvatanja glede ovih stvari. Nacin gledanja na 11.09., bukvalno, predstavlja onu scenu iz Matrixa kada Morpheus govori Neo-u:
"You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed, and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you just how deep the rabbit hole goes."
Ja sam mislio da probam smisleno objasniti da mediji ipak nisu neovisni jer to stvarno nije tesko dokazati, pa onda dokazati da Americka spoljna politika najvise radi za interese uskih lobija i iz toga bi proizaslo da mediji fakticki rade za te iste lobije...ali sad i ja uvidjam da je to tesko izvodljivo i prihvatam savjet.
Na isto izbjegavanje sam naisao ranije kada sam trazio da mi neko objasni koji je tacno interes prosjecnog Amerikanca u Americkoj bezrezervnoj podrsci Izraelu?
Ipak, kako sam Jeff kaze, ta zemlja mu je dala sve sto ima i to kombinovano sa prirodnom tendencijom da se uklopi u sredinu u kojoj zivi kao posljedicu ima ovakve stavove....i da tesko je to sada promjeniti.
Americka vanjska politika radi u interesu americkih lobija? Jel stvarno potreban dokaz da bi neko dosao do tog zakljucka?
UnscarD
Posts: 3235
Joined: 27/12/2002 00:00
Location: Na granici koja polako nestaje, tamo izmedju atoma i bita.

#4057 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by UnscarD »

Nisam rekao Americkih lobija nego samo lobija...mozda Jevrejski lobi smatras takodjer Americkim? Ili bankarski lobi? Doduse sigurno oni svi imaju Americki pasos ali tesko da im se interesi podudaraju sa interesima ostatka tvojih sugradjana. Ili mozda ipak mozes da mi objasnis sta tacno prosjecan Amerikanac ima od Americke podrske Izraelu u poslednjih 50 godina (pitanje postavljeno treci put - treca sreca) ?

Jeff, evo ti link na demonstracije koje tvoje komsije sprovode zadnjih dana pa posto zonbrile, veleposlanik i ja nismo u blizini, mozda bi mogao da skoknes umjesto nas pa da nam javis kako je bilo, kakava je atmosfera itd a mozda mozes i da im objasnis kako grijese u svojim zahtijevima da se ukine FED? Posebno mi se svidja ovaj transparent na kojem pise - Obama is not the answer, ending the Federal Reserve fraud is. To otprilike u jednoj recenici uspjesno sublimira dosta onoga sto ti pokusava reci Zonbrile.

Vazno je da se i Americki gradjani napokon bude...

http://forum.cromalternativemoney.org/v ... .php?t=353

(all credits to Danica - original poster)
jefferson
Posts: 14969
Joined: 28/08/2007 05:31
Location: U.S.A

#4058 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by jefferson »

UnscarD wrote:Nisam rekao Americkih lobija nego samo lobija...mozda Jevrejski lobi smatras takodjer Americkim? Ili bankarski lobi? Doduse sigurno oni svi imaju Americki pasos ali tesko da im se interesi podudaraju sa interesima ostatka tvojih sugradjana. Ili mozda ipak mozes da mi objasnis sta tacno prosjecan Amerikanac ima od Americke podrske Izraelu u poslednjih 50 godina (pitanje postavljeno treci put - treca sreca) ?

Jeff, evo ti link na demonstracije koje tvoje komsije sprovode zadnjih dana pa posto zonbrile, veleposlanik i ja nismo u blizini, mozda bi mogao da skoknes umjesto nas pa da nam javis kako je bilo, kakava je atmosfera itd a mozda mozes i da im objasnis kako grijese u svojim zahtijevima da se ukine FED? Posebno mi se svidja ovaj transparent na kojem pise - Obama is not the answer, ending the Federal Reserve fraud is. To otprilike u jednoj recenici uspjesno sublimira dosta onoga sto ti pokusava reci Zonbrile.

Vazno je da se i Americki gradjani napokon bude...

http://forum.cromalternativemoney.org/v ... .php?t=353
(all credits to Danica - original poster)
Americki gradjani se napokon bude? Ma nemoj jarane! Evo ti nekoliko primjera:
Kada se desilo sranje na Tienamenu 1989 godine uvedene su sankcije na vojnu opremu Kini. Prva zemlja koja je prekrsila sankcije: Njemacka!
Najveci protesti protiv politike WTO se desavaju u americi, a najveci protesti protiv rata u Iraku su bili u Americi, posebno u Chicagu!
Nego da ja tebe pitam, sta je sa gradjanima Rusije, Kine, Irana, S.Arabije i ostalih slobodarskih zemalja, gdje su oni?
Sto se tice lobija, pa jevrejskih lobija mogao bi malo dublje uci u analizu kako funkcionise americki kongres pa bi skontao neke stvari oko lobija, ovakvih ili onakvih te stvarno sta znaci ta rijec.
Lobiranje moze biti stvar koja ce nanjeti ogromnu stetu, ali moze biti stvar koja ce donjeti ogromnu korist.
Sto se tice americke politike prema izraelu neko vam je vec rekao sta prosjecni americki gradjanin misli o tome, medjutim, isto tako hajde malo analiticki razmislite sto amerika ali i ostatak industrijskih zemalja hoce tako jakog saveznika u tom regionu, i naravno, odgovor je nafta. Medjutim, nafta nije samo u americkom interesu nego u interesu bilo koje zemlje koja konta imati bilo kakav ekonomski napredak.
Problem u toj prici je sto ti zapadnjaci tretiraju bolje te narode nego njihovi vladari, neki koji imaju podrsku zapada neki koji nemaju, ali sve se svodi na interes, a ovdje to kao predstavlja nesto sto je ravno otkricu tople vode!
Svaka zemlja radi u svom interesu, i ja stvarno nevidim sta je tu sporno! Mi smo najbolji primjer, doduse nasi rade u interesu pojedinaca!
zonbirile
Posts: 11870
Joined: 09/10/2008 12:06

#4059 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by zonbirile »

jefferson wrote:
UnscarD wrote:Nisam rekao Americkih lobija nego samo lobija...mozda Jevrejski lobi smatras takodjer Americkim? Ili bankarski lobi? Doduse sigurno oni svi imaju Americki pasos ali tesko da im se interesi podudaraju sa interesima ostatka tvojih sugradjana. Ili mozda ipak mozes da mi objasnis sta tacno prosjecan Amerikanac ima od Americke podrske Izraelu u poslednjih 50 godina (pitanje postavljeno treci put - treca sreca) ?

Jeff, evo ti link na demonstracije koje tvoje komsije sprovode zadnjih dana pa posto zonbrile, veleposlanik i ja nismo u blizini, mozda bi mogao da skoknes umjesto nas pa da nam javis kako je bilo, kakava je atmosfera itd a mozda mozes i da im objasnis kako grijese u svojim zahtijevima da se ukine FED? Posebno mi se svidja ovaj transparent na kojem pise - Obama is not the answer, ending the Federal Reserve fraud is. To otprilike u jednoj recenici uspjesno sublimira dosta onoga sto ti pokusava reci Zonbrile.

Vazno je da se i Americki gradjani napokon bude...

http://forum.cromalternativemoney.org/v ... .php?t=353
(all credits to Danica - original poster)
Americki gradjani se napokon bude? Ma nemoj jarane! Evo ti nekoliko primjera:
Kada se desilo sranje na Tienamenu 1989 godine uvedene su sankcije na vojnu opremu Kini. Prva zemlja koja je prekrsila sankcije: Njemacka!
Najveci protesti protiv politike WTO se desavaju u americi, a najveci protesti protiv rata u Iraku su bili u Americi, posebno u Chicagu!
Nego da ja tebe pitam, sta je sa gradjanima Rusije, Kine, Irana, S.Arabije i ostalih slobodarskih zemalja, gdje su oni?
Sto se tice lobija, pa jevrejskih lobija mogao bi malo dublje uci u analizu kako funkcionise americki kongres pa bi skontao neke stvari oko lobija, ovakvih ili onakvih te stvarno sta znaci ta rijec.
Lobiranje moze biti stvar koja ce nanjeti ogromnu stetu, ali moze biti stvar koja ce donjeti ogromnu korist.
Sto se tice americke politike prema izraelu neko vam je vec rekao sta prosjecni americki gradjanin misli o tome, medjutim, isto tako hajde malo analiticki razmislite sto amerika ali i ostatak industrijskih zemalja hoce tako jakog saveznika u tom regionu, i naravno, odgovor je nafta. Medjutim, nafta nije samo u americkom interesu nego u interesu bilo koje zemlje koja konta imati bilo kakav ekonomski napredak.
Problem u toj prici je sto ti zapadnjaci tretiraju bolje te narode nego njihovi vladari, neki koji imaju podrsku zapada neki koji nemaju, ali sve se svodi na interes, a ovdje to kao predstavlja nesto sto je ravno otkricu tople vode!
Svaka zemlja radi u svom interesu, i ja stvarno nevidim sta je tu sporno! Mi smo najbolji primjer, doduse nasi rade u interesu pojedinaca!
jesi li to pao na glavu,ili došao tobe,nakon 100 stranica,sada ti pišeš ono što drugi govore,ali opet s greškom.Svaka zemlja,a pogotovo Amerika radi u interesu svoje oligarhije,pa se to posljedično može,a ne mora reflektovati kao boljitak za zemlju u cijelini.Počinješ shvatati,još samo ovaj mali korak i nadošao si na pravu istinu.Istorija je najbolja učiteljica,pa se vidi da su Magnum carte ,Englezi dobili prije svih,ali i industriju sa krupnim kapitalom.Pošto voliš paralele iz Bosne-evo kada se završi primarna akumulacija (pokrade i rastali što je preostalo i pozicionira u društvu),onda ide izgradnja pravne države,da bi se to sačuvalo i izgradili mehanizmi među velikima.Normalno,to se reflektuje i dole na raju,pa imaš poštovanje zakona,brže sudstvo i ostalo.Pa za koju godinu imaćeš fondacije filantropa tipa Čengić,Šahinpašić,jer druga generacija neće znati za njihov lopvluk,vidjeće samo njihovu moć i novac.Ovo je već bilo,širom svijeta.
User avatar
_veleposlanik
Posts: 998
Joined: 23/02/2008 02:14

#4060 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by _veleposlanik »

covjece, ovo moze ovako do besvijesti a ja cu i dalje ovako :shock: posmatrati...

UnscarD, Zonbirile i 2407 - svaka cast ljudi, toliko iscrpiti i suziti problematiku radi boljeg shvatanja je meni skoro nemoguce, ali vidim da ni to ne pomaze...

radi se o problemu u covjeku. ovim ne zelim reci da je jefferson i Co zla skupina generalno gledajuci, ali za mene jesu. ja moram da nadjem neko objasnjenje sam sebi oko njihovog gledista, i najlaksi put mi je ipak taj, za mene nisu chisti. takodjer nisu ni glupi, sto samo potvrdjuje moje misljenje...

jefferson govori o lobiju i koristima istog... ne zeli da prihvati chinjenicu da je svako gladno dijete u svijetu ustvari proizvod nase sebicnosti i kompulsivne beskorisne potrosnje - odnosno da je kapitalizam doveden do maksimalnog stepena zla u korist gospodarske elite. ali ima srce da to ostro brani i da govori o ljudskim pravima... chitajte Protokole Zionskih Mudraca, slika moze koliko-toliko postati jasnija...

evo jos jednog iz te klike: http://www.sarajevo-x.com/forum/viewtop ... =1&t=57398
kolega paratrooper o neumorljivim borcima za slobodu, valjda ce doci dan kada ce izmisliti stroj koji ce direktno obrisati sa lica zemlje onog sto ne podrzava sve nametnuto, posebno razmisljanje glavom.


mislim da sam ovo negdje ranije rekao, smatram da se radi o prirodi pojedinca i da, ukoliko je to tacno, malo sta mozemo uciniti osim prepucavanja s drugom stranom... uopste ne vidim zdrav i dobronamjeran pristup ovih bosansko-americkih "humanista", vise americkih neg bosanskih moram reci. usput, odlican dokumentarac, kolege zonbirile, UnscarD, 2407 i svi koji stavljaju razum ispred vlastitog ega: zove se WE, od Arundhati Roy.

sjajno govori o problemima u svijetu i jednom od najvecih: dosadasnja americka medjunarodna politika (da preskocim epitete zlocinacka, krvolocna i slicno). posebno dobra analiza ANTI AMERIKANIZMA, onog sto nas ovi ameropatrioti cesto vole nazvati a mi ponekad ne znamo pravo odgovoriti...

uzivajte ljudi, ja se vise ne zivciram na ovom forumu, samo chillam i klimam glavom :)
User avatar
ahuseino
Posts: 2183
Joined: 19/10/2004 05:44
Location: singularity

#4061 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by ahuseino »

zonbirile wrote:pozz unscar,veleposlaniku
Bio sam banovan,jer sam dozvolio sebi da budem isprovociran od budala na forumu,ali nisam shvatio njihovu igru,dok nisam otišao na forum radiosarajevo.ba,pa otkrio iste ljude pod istim nikom pišu kontra od onoga na ovom forumu.Čak i ovde poslije izbora Hilari malo je splasnulo oduševljenje.Evo još na znanje da je ona bila pravna zastupnica Rockefeller-ove banke u Arkanzasu u optužbi pranja novca i trgovine oružjem sa Iranom i Irakom,preko iste banke.Guverner Arkanzasa je tada bio Vajtrop Rokfeler,pa ga je "smjenio" Bili.U februaru 2008g je predsjednik obavještajnog komiteta Senata Jay Rokfeler,sa govornice podržao kandidaturu Obame i Bidena,"kao pravih ljudi....".
Novoimenovani potparol bijele kuće je vodio kampanju Obame,psiholog na istraživanju ljudskog mozga (CIA radi na tome),zaposlen na Rokfelerovom universitetu N.Jork,trezor drži čovjek iz Bušove i Bilove administracije,bivši direktor FED-a ,savjetuje ga Volker 80g bivši direktor FED-a i ključar trezora još kod oca BUša,savjetnik je i Z.Bžežinski a i mentor Kisinđer je za.Ovo se kod nas na Balkanu zove familijarnost,a kod zanesenjaka Obamom ne znam kako,ali ide babo Buš,pa naš Bili,pa sin Buš dva mandata,pa Obama sa ženom od Bilija i svom predhodnom klikom.
Psiholog radi na istrazivanju mozga :shock: :shock:

Ne mogu da vjerujem :cry:


CIA... :cry: :cry: brrr...


The Jews are coming...
http://www.hulu.com/watch/1378/saturday ... ypto-recut
User avatar
ahuseino
Posts: 2183
Joined: 19/10/2004 05:44
Location: singularity

#4062 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by ahuseino »

HoustonPiramidiotIzPotaje wrote:
hik--meta wrote:ne pises za cia i national security direktorske pozicije gdje bi ako harman prodje bilo veselo...
koga boli za agrikulturu i kukuruz u nebraski?
a evo ova sva trojica ovih za treasury jesu jevreji. stari volcker npr je iskamcio hrpu love od svicaraca za aipac, a sa holbrooke-om je tijesno saradjivao na istim stvarima dok je dick bio glavni u njemackoj.
Ne samo da je Obama cionist, nego je i Crni panterist, komunist, truli kapitalist, feminist, kanzaski rednek, katolicist i terorist.
Osim toga svi u vladi su mu crnci, jer koga briga za agrikulturu i kukuruz u Nebraski. Pogledaj ko je Predsjednik!

Pa, *ebo te, ovo je najveca od svih dosadasnjih najvecih zavjera!

Zaboravio si ... "gay"... ;-)
UnscarD
Posts: 3235
Joined: 27/12/2002 00:00
Location: Na granici koja polako nestaje, tamo izmedju atoma i bita.

#4063 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by UnscarD »

jefferson wrote:
Najveci protesti protiv politike WTO se desavaju u americi, a najveci protesti protiv rata u Iraku su bili u Americi, posebno u Chicagu!
Pa naravno...nisu bas svi Amerikanci slijepi. Protestvuju zbog toga sto taj rat kao i svaki drugi koji je Amerika vodila nema veze sa interesima Americkog naroda nego iskljucivo sa interesima uske grupe ljudi. To upravo i pokusavam da ti kazem svo vrijeme.
jefferson wrote: Nego da ja tebe pitam, sta je sa gradjanima Rusije, Kine, Irana, S.Arabije i ostalih slobodarskih zemalja, gdje su oni?
Ne razumijem sta je pitanje? Ako pricas o ljudskim slobodama, u Americi su vece ali ja nikada nisam ni tvrdio suprotno mada bi i tu nakon PATRIOT ACT-a moglo da se udje u detaljnu analizu. Problem je sto se ljudskim pravima u Kini bavi pola svijeta i za Kinu niko ne tvrdi da je bastion gradjanske slobode kao sto vole da kazu u Americi za sebe.
jefferson wrote:
Sto se tice americke politike prema izraelu neko vam je vec rekao sta prosjecni americki gradjanin misli o tome, medjutim, isto tako hajde malo analiticki razmislite sto amerika ali i ostatak industrijskih zemalja hoce tako jakog saveznika u tom regionu, i naravno, odgovor je nafta. Medjutim, nafta nije samo u americkom interesu nego u interesu bilo koje zemlje koja konta imati bilo kakav ekonomski napredak.
Nevjerovatno...da li dobro razumijem ili hoces u osnovi da mi kazes da je potpuno nelegitimna podrska Izraelu (koju cak i ne podrzava vecina Amerikanaca i pored upiranja medija iz petnih zila da Hriscansku tradiciju Amerike pretvore u Judeo-Hriscansku) opravdana i normalna zato da bi Joe natankao V8 Mustanga jeftnije ? Onda je vjerovatno uredu i oboriti demokratsku Venecuelansku vladu iz istog razloga? Tebi je to normalno? I koja to jos industriski razvijena zemlja podrzava Izrael?
jefferson wrote:
Problem u toj prici je sto ti zapadnjaci tretiraju bolje te narode nego njihovi vladari, neki koji imaju podrsku zapada neki koji nemaju, ali sve se svodi na interes, a ovdje to kao predstavlja nesto sto je ravno otkricu tople vode!
Svaka zemlja radi u svom interesu, i ja stvarno nevidim sta je tu sporno! Mi smo najbolji primjer, doduse nasi rade u interesu pojedinaca!
Pa sporno je kada se u tom procesu rada za svoj interes prekrsi nekolicina medjunarodnih zakona, ostatak ljudi ostavi da zivi u krajnjoj bijedi itd...
Sto je najgore od svega, to cak nije ni za interes Americkog gradjana nego kao sto sam ti napisao nekoliko puta, za interes veoma uske skupine ljudi. Oni koji su ovoga postali svjesni, prvi su upravo u Americi izmislili slogan "not in my name" jer posteni "hard working" amerikanac ne zeli da se u njegovo ime proliva krv niti da radi njegovog uzivanja drugi pate.

Da probam da uprostim pitanje maximalno. Da li ti zaista vjerujes da je interes tebe kao gradjana Amerike koji radis od jutra do sutra isti kao interes onih 1% ELITE koji su vlasnici 90% Amerike ? Ako to mislis, onda si mnogo naivan i kao i ostalih tvojih zemljaka koji to isto misle (a ima ih) zao mi Vas je.
Last edited by UnscarD on 01/12/2008 16:42, edited 2 times in total.
UnscarD
Posts: 3235
Joined: 27/12/2002 00:00
Location: Na granici koja polako nestaje, tamo izmedju atoma i bita.

#4064 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by UnscarD »

ahuseino wrote:
zonbirile wrote:pozz unscar,veleposlaniku
Bio sam banovan,jer sam dozvolio sebi da budem isprovociran od budala na forumu,ali nisam shvatio njihovu igru,dok nisam otišao na forum radiosarajevo.ba,pa otkrio iste ljude pod istim nikom pišu kontra od onoga na ovom forumu.Čak i ovde poslije izbora Hilari malo je splasnulo oduševljenje.Evo još na znanje da je ona bila pravna zastupnica Rockefeller-ove banke u Arkanzasu u optužbi pranja novca i trgovine oružjem sa Iranom i Irakom,preko iste banke.Guverner Arkanzasa je tada bio Vajtrop Rokfeler,pa ga je "smjenio" Bili.U februaru 2008g je predsjednik obavještajnog komiteta Senata Jay Rokfeler,sa govornice podržao kandidaturu Obame i Bidena,"kao pravih ljudi....".
Novoimenovani potparol bijele kuće je vodio kampanju Obame,psiholog na istraživanju ljudskog mozga (CIA radi na tome),zaposlen na Rokfelerovom universitetu N.Jork,trezor drži čovjek iz Bušove i Bilove administracije,bivši direktor FED-a ,savjetuje ga Volker 80g bivši direktor FED-a i ključar trezora još kod oca BUša,savjetnik je i Z.Bžežinski a i mentor Kisinđer je za.Ovo se kod nas na Balkanu zove familijarnost,a kod zanesenjaka Obamom ne znam kako,ali ide babo Buš,pa naš Bili,pa sin Buš dva mandata,pa Obama sa ženom od Bilija i svom predhodnom klikom.
Psiholog radi na istrazivanju mozga :shock: :shock:

Ne mogu da vjerujem :cry:


CIA... :cry: :cry: brrr...


The Jews are coming...
http://www.hulu.com/watch/1378/saturday ... ypto-recut
Ne radi link...izbaci "Sorry, currently our video library can only be streamed from within the United States". ;-)
User avatar
Šeha
Posts: 1666
Joined: 11/08/2005 13:46

#4065 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by Šeha »

UnscarD wrote:
Ne radi link...izbaci "Sorry, currently our video library can only be streamed from within the United States". ;-)
Eto! I onda kazu nema zavjere :x :x :x
:D
UnscarD
Posts: 3235
Joined: 27/12/2002 00:00
Location: Na granici koja polako nestaje, tamo izmedju atoma i bita.

#4066 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by UnscarD »

Šeha wrote:
UnscarD wrote:
Ne radi link...izbaci "Sorry, currently our video library can only be streamed from within the United States". ;-)
Eto! I onda kazu nema zavjere :x :x :x
:D
:-D
User avatar
_veleposlanik
Posts: 998
Joined: 23/02/2008 02:14

#4067 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by _veleposlanik »

UnscarD wrote:
Šeha wrote:
UnscarD wrote:
Ne radi link...izbaci "Sorry, currently our video library can only be streamed from within the United States". ;-)
Eto! I onda kazu nema zavjere :x :x :x
:D
:-D
vidis, valjda na ovo misli jefferson kada kaze: "znaju bolje nego amerikanci a nikada nisu zakoracili Amerikom" :D :D
zonbirile
Posts: 11870
Joined: 09/10/2008 12:06

#4068 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by zonbirile »

ahuseino wrote:
zonbirile wrote:pozz unscar,veleposlaniku
Bio sam banovan,jer sam dozvolio sebi da budem isprovociran od budala na forumu,ali nisam shvatio njihovu igru,dok nisam otišao na forum radiosarajevo.ba,pa otkrio iste ljude pod istim nikom pišu kontra od onoga na ovom forumu.Čak i ovde poslije izbora Hilari malo je splasnulo oduševljenje.Evo još na znanje da je ona bila pravna zastupnica Rockefeller-ove banke u Arkanzasu u optužbi pranja novca i trgovine oružjem sa Iranom i Irakom,preko iste banke.Guverner Arkanzasa je tada bio Vajtrop Rokfeler,pa ga je "smjenio" Bili.U februaru 2008g je predsjednik obavještajnog komiteta Senata Jay Rokfeler,sa govornice podržao kandidaturu Obame i Bidena,"kao pravih ljudi....".
Novoimenovani potparol bijele kuće je vodio kampanju Obame,psiholog na istraživanju ljudskog mozga (CIA radi na tome),zaposlen na Rokfelerovom universitetu N.Jork,trezor drži čovjek iz Bušove i Bilove administracije,bivši direktor FED-a ,savjetuje ga Volker 80g bivši direktor FED-a i ključar trezora još kod oca BUša,savjetnik je i Z.Bžežinski a i mentor Kisinđer je za.Ovo se kod nas na Balkanu zove familijarnost,a kod zanesenjaka Obamom ne znam kako,ali ide babo Buš,pa naš Bili,pa sin Buš dva mandata,pa Obama sa ženom od Bilija i svom predhodnom klikom.
Psiholog radi na istrazivanju mozga :shock: :shock:

Ne mogu da vjerujem :cry:


CIA... :cry: :cry: brrr...


The Jews are coming...
http://www.hulu.com/watch/1378/saturday ... ypto-recut

po koji put je ovo.Nekad sve pročitaj,poenta je bila da je rokfelerov čovjek,evo njegov rad iz 1993,a dugo,dugo je bio tamo.Što tako visokoumno ne prokomentarisa Hilari,i o njoj ima svegapored navedenog.Čuo si za Whitewater?Šta je sa ovim zadnjim nizom od 16g vladanja,a predhodne su još veselije.Ne moraš ništa reći,ovo ti nije prvi put.
zonbirile
Posts: 11870
Joined: 09/10/2008 12:06

#4069 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by zonbirile »

ahuseino
RB and Cdc2 Expression in Brain: Correlations with 3H-Thymidine
Incorporation and Neurogenesis
Hirotaka J. Okano,ls* Donald W. Pfaff,’ and Robert B. Gibbs’
‘Laboratory of Neurobiology and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021 and 2Graduate Studies
omar little
Posts: 17275
Joined: 14/03/2008 21:14

#4070 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by omar little »

auuu, odmorish se od foruma par dana :D, dodjes nazad misleci nesto se promijenilo.... :shock: :? kako vam se, svega vam, vise da ponavljati jedno te isto i zar vam te pretjerane paranoje ne utjecu negativno na zivot te stavove u istom. :? jedno je znatizelja, kuriozitet, intelektualna stimulacija, zelja za razmisljanjem ali, brate, pretjeraste ga.
zonbirile
Posts: 11870
Joined: 09/10/2008 12:06

#4071 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by zonbirile »

omar litle
šta je problem,jednostavno ignoriraš.Splasno vam entuzijazam oko Obame.
User avatar
_veleposlanik
Posts: 998
Joined: 23/02/2008 02:14

#4072 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by _veleposlanik »

omar little - nadri intelektualka :) vise smajlica nabaca neg jakih stavova i validnih ideja :)

izvinjavam se, kada ga ti zbombas onda moram i ja :)
User avatar
jeza u ledja
Posts: 50276
Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20

#4073 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by jeza u ledja »

UnscarD wrote: Ja sam mislio da probam smisleno objasniti da mediji ipak nisu neovisni jer to stvarno nije tesko dokazati, pa onda dokazati da Americka spoljna politika najvise radi za interese uskih lobija i iz toga bi proizaslo da mediji fakticki rade za te iste lobije....
A jel? Evo ja juce postavih link za jucerasnji intervju sa Ted Turnerom pa je ljudima bilo mrsko da ga gledaju. Evo, potrudio sam se da pronadjem transkript intervjua sa Meet the Press.

Samo za vas sam podebljao najinteresantnije dijelove:

-----------------------------------------
MR. BROKAW: We're back now with a special edition of MEET THE PRESS with a very special guest, one of the most familiar figures in American life, Ted Turner, of course; champion sailor, founder of CNN, environmentalist and also restaurateur these days. He's out with a new book called "Call Me Ted," about his life story. He has just turned 70. This is a more familiar figure for me, the one on the back.

Because, Ted, it's no secret we see each other across the Great Plains and across the western United States. It is Thanksgiving weekend. What are you most thankful for, besides the fact that at age 70 you're still standing vertical?

MR. TED TURNER: Be healthy and be alive and that my family's healthy.

MR. BROKAW: And what about you personally in terms of your own goals now at this age? You're not going to go off to some kind of a rest home, but do you have some big plans in mind?

MR. TURNER: Well, I'm still working with the U.N. Foundation, the Turner Foundation and the Nuclear Threat Initiative to get rid of nuclear weapons; change over our energy system to a clean, renewable, locally produced energy system and phase out fossil fuels; eliminate poverty and disease; make sure everybody gets an education. And I'm talking about the whole world, too, which we--all these things we can do if we put our mind to it.

MR. BROKAW: That's not a very short shopping list. But let's talk about the current conditions in this country. America is in economic turmoil. To use a phrase from your old profession of a professional racer, we're sailing through some very stormy seas. This is what you often say about your life: "Don't worry about the wind; adjust the sails." We're going to have to be pretty good adjusting the sails, aren't we, to get through all of this?

MR. TURNER: Well, what happened, I, I think, the way I see it, is we spent more money than we could afford for years and years and years. And you could do that for a while, but eventually it catches up with you and it's time to pay the piper.

MR. BROKAW: But, Ted, for a long time CNN was on the ragged edge of going into bankruptcy or having to be sold, because you were skating so close to that ragged edge financially.

MR. TURNER: That's true. But, but I made it, and I did it without any federal bailout, too. And I was trying to build a viable financial enterprise, which I did. And while we had a lot of debt at the time, it was debt that we could, that we could support, not debt that we couldn't support.

MR. BROKAW: Did you think at some point during those early days of CNN that it was really a fool's mission, that you couldn't pull this off?

MR. TURNER: No. I--before I started CNN, I knew I didn't have enough money to see it through and I didn't know how much it was going to, going to take. I was kind of like Columbus when he set out to discover the new world. He didn't know where he was going when he left, he didn't know where he was when he got there and he didn't know where he'd been when he got back. But I had it--but I thought it through very carefully for several years and went over all the things that could go wrong, because even before, even before I started CNN, I knew what the greatest threat to it would be and that was a right-wing news network. And in fact, Fox came along and was the greatest threat ( :D ). And I had, I had a solution to that, and that was Headline News. I could've--when I first heard that Fox was going to get started, I could've taken Headline News and transferred it over to a right-wing network and hired Rush Limbaugh and let it be the right-wing network and pre-empted Fox. But by the time we were so successful by the time that Fox announced that they were going to start a news network that I just couldn't do it because I'm not really a hard right-winger.

MR. BROKAW: And that was also the time, though, when you were really at war with Rupert Murdoch.

MR. TURNER: Yeah. Well, I was at war with him for a long time, many years. I'm glad that we have it behind us, I think.

MR. BROKAW: And why do you have it behind you?

MR. TURNER: Well, he--when he announced that he was going green, I sent him a congratulatory note because I do that with everybody that goes green that's of consequence. And he wrote me back and said, "Why don't we have lunch?" So I invited him, invited him to lunch and he was the only person I really didn't like, and it hurt, it hurts you when you don't like somebody. It doesn't really hurt them. And so I don't know, I guess I was just--had the Christmas spirit. It was before the economy turned south, too, I might add. So I just--we decided to bury the hatchet. After all, he's in his mid-70s now and I don't think he's nearly the threat that he was when he was younger.

MR. BROKAW: You're not very sympathetic to what's going on in Detroit. Let's share...

MR. TURNER: Well, I am. Really, I don't like to see anybody do--not doing well, but I'm afraid--I saw it coming years ago, Detroit was going--headed for a crash, and it's amazing to me that they didn't see it, either, you know, and start building smaller cars, more fuel efficient cars a long time ago. Because anybody, anybody with half a brain could see we're going to have, you know, big disruptions in the fossil fuel business.

MR. BROKAW: Let me read you what you had to say about it recently. "If we give the Big Three automakers a $25 billion bailout, they're going to blow through it by the first of March. They won't know what to do with it. Let them go bankrupt and get Toyota to buy them out." A lot of jobs are connected to the American automobile industry. Do you think that the government ought not to have any role in trying to put them back together?

MR. TURNER: I don't, I really don't know, but I feel like that it would be a lot better if we're going to put--if the United States government's going to put money in anything, why not put it into clean, renewable energy and create jobs for the future instead of trying to keep alive a smoke stack industry of the past whose days--the days of big automobiles are over. The days of fossil fuel are over.

MR. BROKAW: Let me ask you about your personal life. You had a difficult childhood. I read your book. I've heard a lot of the stories from you personally, but I was surprised by how difficult it was when you were a youngster growing up. You were in boarding school at the age of four. You had a demanding and alcoholic father that you loved very much. He cut you off when you went to college, when you didn't perform the way that he hoped that you would. It made you work hard because he made you work hard. You also wanted to earn his respect and affection. What was the lasting effect of all of that on you? First positively and then negatively?

MR. TURNER: Well, I think it made me a better, made me a better person overall. I approached it that way, too. I've always tried to look at the positive side of things and move forward rather than look at the negative side and just stay put.

MR. BROKAW: You were at Brown and you wanted to be a classics major. You were--you remain to this day someone who's deeply interested in history, classics and books. And when you announced that to your dad, he wrote you a long, detailed letter.

MR. TURNER: Well, he, he, he really wanted me to go to business school. He was very practical. And--but Brown was a liberal arts college, and he knew that when I went there. Even the economics courses I took were economic theory. They weren't how to balance, balance books and the sort of thing I would have gotten if I'd have gone to, say, Wharton or, or to a business school. That--but that's where he decided later on, where, where I ought to be. But I was already at Brown. It was really an attack on a liberal, liberal arts education. And there are reasons why, there are reasons why I, I had a liberal arts education, and I was extremely successful in business. And I think I would have not been as successful if it had not been for my classical background, because I learned about Alexander the Great and Pericles and Aristotle, and I think it made me a better businessman.

MR. BROKAW: Your father was in the billboard business.

MR. TURNER: That's right.

MR. BROKAW: You like to say, "Early to bed, early to rise."

MR. TURNER: Actually, that came from a friend of mine who was a radio salesman.

MR. BROKAW: Yeah?

MR. TURNER: Work like hell and advertise. It was just a joke.

MR. BROKAW: But throughout the course of your career you have been known by a variety of nicknames: "The Mouth of the South."

MR. TURNER: I don't like that one particularly.

MR. BROKAW: "Captain Outrageous."

MR. TURNER: I don't mind that one.

MR. BROKAW: How much of that, however, is a true expression of what you're feeling at the time, and how much of that is a kind of a marketing device to draw attention to Ted Turner and all of his enterprises?

MR. TURNER: No. I, I, I never use those terms to describe myself, they just--you know, sometimes you get hung with that sort of thing.

MR. BROKAW: Is that part of your...

MR. TURNER: It's hard to shake.

MR. BROKAW: Is that part of your past now?

MR. TURNER: I would like to think so.

MR. BROKAW: The other thing that I read in the book that I thought was very touching in a lot of ways was that very, very difficult time, that tragic time in your life when your father took his own life when you were a young man, 24 years old, I think, at the time. And as you reflected on it, he had really achieved everything that he set out to do.

MR. TURNER: Well, he told me that. He had--he set his goals too low and he suggested to me that I don't do that, to set goals high, high enough to--so they can't be achieved in your lifetime, and then you'll always be motivated to keep working and keep engaged. And I'll never retire. I read in a book somewhere that the average man dies within 24 months of retirement, no matter when he retires.

MR. BROKAW: When you met Barack Obama, I guess maybe for only--the only time that you've met him...

MR. TURNER: A few minutes.

MR. BROKAW: You met him for a few minutes in Atlanta. Describe for me that exchange.

MR. TURNER: Well, we had a, we had a very, very cordial meeting. I told him that I was really excited about meeting him. I'd wanted to meet him for a long time. And he said, "I wanted to meet you for a long time, too." And I offered to help in any way I could, and said I don't want anything in return. He said, "You don't need anything." This is true, I don't need any bailout from the government. I, I once gave the government $32 million to make up the shortfall for the dues. The government was a little short, so I had to bail them out.


MR. BROKAW: Among other things, however, you were lobbying for getting rid of nuclear weapons in the world.

MR. TURNER: Well, I, I think I did, but he's already written papers where he's said he's for doing that.

MR. BROKAW: You're very close to Sam Nunn, the former senator from Georgia who is one of the co-chairs of the Nuclear Threat Initiative, which is backed by Richard Lugar of Indiana and Warren Buffett, among others. Do you think there's the realistic possibility, given the time that you've spent in Russia over the years and the United States now, that we can rid the world of nuclear weapons if the United States and Russia were to take the lead?

MR. TURNER: Absolutely, no question in my mind. It--I--there--it's a big if, but I really believe it could be done because we did the Goodwill Games with the Russians, and if you approach them properly they are very reasonable, pragmatic, practical people.

MR. BROKAW: You met Vladimir Putin when he was just an aide to the mayor of St. Petersburg. He picked up you and Jane Fonda, to whom you were married at the time. But as you have watched him since then, most people see not in his eyes a soulful person, but the eyes--three letters, as someone has put it: KGB. That he is...

MR. TURNER: Well, he had that background. But you know, we have an FBI and, and, and, and, and we're not prejudice against somebody who's worked at the FBI. It's an honorable place to work. And the KGB, I think, was an honorable place to work. And it, it gave people in the former Soviet Union, a communist country, an opportunity to do something important and worthwhile.


MR. BROKAW: But in the meantime, it appears that he's very much more interested in just causing difficulty for the United States, getting in our face in a manner of speaking.

MR. TURNER: Well, wait. We're the ones--in my opinion, we're the ones that started that. We're the ones that started by putting the Star Wars system in Czechoslovakia and Poland when they wanted to be part of it. We've said that that system is only to protect us from Iran or protect Europe from Iranian missiles. So why didn't we cooperate with the Russians? Why have we constantly been pushing--we've been pushing on the Russians all the time.
MR. BROKAW: Your friend, Jimmy Carter, tried to be friendly with Leonid Brezhnev, and for his friendliness what did Brezhnev do?

MR. TURNER: Hell, I don't remember. It was before I...

MR. BROKAW: He invaded Afghan...

MR. TURNER: ...got involved.

MR. BROKAW: He invaded Afghanistan.

MR. TURNER: Well, we invaded Afghanistan, too, and it's a lot further--at least it's on the border of the Soviet Union or the former Soviet Union or Russia. A lot of these countries have changed names several times.

MR. BROKAW: But, Ted, don't try to go there in terms of justifying that. I mean, it is--the fact is that the Russians--it was a naked...

MR. TURNER: Why can't I try and justify it?

MR. BROKAW: It was naked aggression on the part of the Russians at the time.

MR. TURNER: Well, going into Iraq was naked aggression on the part of the United States.

MR. BROKAW: Yeah, but big power politics and changing big power politics requires everyone to come to the table, and that includes the Russians, not just the United States.

MR. TURNER: They'll come if we invite them, I'm sure.

MR. BROKAW: And what about Fidel Castro, who's your old friend ( :D )? And he's no longer, it appears, in day-to-day power in Cuba?

MR. TURNER: It appears that he's quite ill. I'm sure that's the case. He wouldn't have disappeared if he wasn't real ill.

MR. BROKAW: Do you think the United States should normalize relations with Cuba?

MR. TURNER: Absolutely. They should have done it a long time ago. We did after the war with Vietnam and Vietnam fought a shooting war with us and we lost and we still have normalized relations with them. I mean, I don't think there's any, any hatred at all, and we killed three million Vietnamese during that war.


MR. BROKAW: Do you think 10 years from now we'll be off carbon-based fuels in this country?

MR. TURNER: I sure hope so. It's possible, but it's going to require--and that's, that's where the jobs could come from. It will create millions of jobs. And we don't just need solar panels and windmills and geothermal installations, we also need a new grid. It's going to cost about $1 trillion. But we need a new grid anyway that goes from coast to coast and border to border. So we can move the solar power from the Southwest where the best place to put solar panels are, out in the deserts of New Mexico, Arizona, Southern California and southern Nevada, and carry it--bring that electricity with a new digital grid all the way to New York. And then out on the Great Plains is the best place for wind. So we have to have a new grid, too, to move--to move this power from where it originates to where it's used.


MR. BROKAW: There's a very poignant part of "Call Me Ted," your book, toward the end when there's a discussion of faith and Christianity. Your former wife, Jane Fonda, discovered faith and became an active Christian. But your good friend Jimmy Carter also talked about it, and I'd like to share with our viewers what he had to say in your book.

"We have been distressed"--talking about Rosalynn and Jimmy Carter--"in the past when Ted has said things like `Christians are losers.' He knows I'm a Christian and he knows I'm not a loser, but he says things in the heat of the moment and often underestimates the permanence of what he says."

Did Jimmy Carter talk to you about becoming a better Christian?

MR. TURNER: Yes.

MR. BROKAW: You were in an early stage in your life, as you once said to me, kind of a hellfire and brimstone guy. You went...

MR. TURNER: I was. I went to a very religious school that had evangelists come periodically and I was saved, I don't know, six or seven times, including once at Billy Graham's Crusade.

MR. BROKAW: And how do you feel about it now at the age of 70?

MR. TURNER: I still pray when my friends are ill. I make the prayers fairly short because I don't want to load up the wires, there's a lot of messages going, I'm sure.

MR. BROKAW: Well, you said something else that I thought was very Turner-like when that came up. You were talking about praying for your friends, and one of your other friends said, "Ted, I thought you were an agnostic, didn't believe in God," and here's what you said. "I think God will let me in heaven; he may not let me sit on the 50 yard line, but I think I can get into the end zone."

MR. TURNER: I think that's true.

MR. BROKAW: And here's what Jane Fonda has...

MR. TURNER: Because, you know, I give a lot of money to those less fortunate than myself and that's one of the tenets of all religions. You know, the wealthy should help those less fortunate than themselves.

MR. BROKAW: And here's what...

MR. TURNER: Alms for the poor, right?

MR. BROKAW: Here's what your friend and former wife, Jane Fonda, had to say: "He believes that there's a God but he can't allow himself to have that become an event or an experiential revelation because that opens you up to everything and he can't truly open his soul to the Holy Spirit, or whatever you want to call it."

Does she have your number there?

MR. TURNER: Well, the very fact that we got divorced, obviously, means we disagreed about some things. And you know, I talk to her every week and I'm very fond of Fonda. But I don't agree with her about everything.

MR. BROKAW: Ted, I know how much you love the land. You've got a lot of it and I know how much you love the anthems to the land. This is a special edition of MEET THE PRESS. We've never done this before, but could you sing one verse of "Home on the Range" for us?

MR. TURNER: (Singing) Oh, give me a home where the buffalo roam and the deer and the antelope play, where seldom is heard a discouraging word and the skies are not cloudy all day.

MR. BROKAW: Ted Turner. The name of the book is "Call Me Ted." And I'm pleased to do that, Ted.

MR. TURNER: Thank you, Tom.

MR. BROKAW: Thanks for being here.

MR. TURNER: My pleasure.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Eh sad, dakle prvo Ted Turner nigdje ne spominje npr. etanol (iliti 'psenicne preradjevine' kako rece veleposlanik, mada to nema veze sa psenicom al neise), vec spominje vjetar i solarnu energiju. Ted Turner je vlasnik najvise zemljista u Americi. Dalje, kako to da Turner rat u Iraku naziva americkom agresijom? Kako to da brani Putina, Castra? Kako to da se protivi podsticaju auto kompanijama? Znaci vlasnik CNNa, vjerovatno najvece globalne medijske kuce, ima stavove potpuno drukcije od americkih politicara bilo koje orjentacije. Kako se to uklapa u vase teorije o medijskoj zavjeri?
Last edited by jeza u ledja on 01/12/2008 18:08, edited 1 time in total.
zonbirile
Posts: 11870
Joined: 09/10/2008 12:06

#4074 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by zonbirile »

jeza
znaš li ti engleski?
User avatar
jeza u ledja
Posts: 50276
Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20

#4075 Re: President Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Post by jeza u ledja »

zonbirile wrote:jeza
znaš li ti engleski?
Sto, jel ti treba neko da ti prevede?
Post Reply