Forum Klix.ba

Kozojebi uspjeha imaju samo tamo gdje im iza ledja stoje "neutralne" drzave Turska i Jordan.

Cim iza ledja nema nikoga, kozojebi ga popuse, kao u Zoru ili uz libanonsku granicu gdje ih je Hezbollah stjerao na planinske vrhove i u vrtace. A planirali su da im Libanon bude najjaca logisticka baza, zbog blizine glavnim gradovima u Siriji Homsu, Hami i Damasku, gdje su kozojebi popusili rat i ostaje im samo da krepavaju od gladi ili da se predaju. Vjerovatno njihov najveci poraz je Hama, simbolicki "najrebelskiji" grad u Siriji. I kad su se pokusali pribliziti gradu, Hasan ih je isjecako nazad do Moreka.

Takodje imaju i niz neuspjeha i tamo gdje im je iza ledja Turska i Jordan, napad na Latakiju preko Kesaba, propao. Aleppo, trzaju i koprcaju se, ali nisu uspjeli zauzeti grad. Kobane, vec se sve zna o tome. Qamishli i Hasaka, takodje pusiona.

Mada, pada Assad, uskoro, samo sto nije

Stomak me zabolio

Braca Bosanci u Kurdistanu, Kobaniju....

A fakat jel ovo stvarno trava ?

I zašto uvijek nose papuce a ne cizme ili makar šprinterice, zar su i one zabranjene ...

DuckZz wrote:A fakat jel ovo stvarno trava ?

I zašto uvijek nose papuce a ne cizme ili makar šprinterice, zar su i one zabranjene ...

Tesko je ovako uociti...

A papuce su konza!

Inace, Ameri se vrnuli u Kobane nakon nekoliko dana izbivanja..... Dok ih nije bilo, Kurdi su fino napredovali... Sad bi to trebalo ici jos brze....



Inace, u kontonu Cizre i okolini gradica Tel Tamer potop ISILa. Jucer su izgubili blizu 40 boraca.... I danas su pretrpili teske gubitke....

Negdje u kantonu Cizre, vjerovatno....

sarajevoxxxx wrote:U policijskoj stanici u Idlibu revolucionari pronašli dokumente na kojima su se nalazili imena građana iz Idliba koji idu na sabah:

dječak sa šibicama wrote:Kozojebi uspjeha imaju samo tamo gdje im iza ledja stoje "neutralne" drzave Turska i Jordan.

Cim iza ledja nema nikoga, kozojebi ga popuse, kao u Zoru ili uz libanonsku granicu gdje ih je Hezbollah stjerao na planinske vrhove i u vrtace. A planirali su da im Libanon bude najjaca logisticka baza, zbog blizine glavnim gradovima u Siriji Homsu, Hami i Damasku, gdje su kozojebi popusili rat i ostaje im samo da krepavaju od gladi ili da se predaju. Vjerovatno njihov najveci poraz je Hama, simbolicki "najrebelskiji" grad u Siriji. I kad su se pokusali pribliziti gradu, Hasan ih je isjecako nazad do Moreka.

Takodje imaju i niz neuspjeha i tamo gdje im je iza ledja Turska i Jordan, napad na Latakiju preko Kesaba, propao. Aleppo, trzaju i koprcaju se, ali nisu uspjeli zauzeti grad. Kobane, vec se sve zna o tome. Qamishli i Hasaka, takodje pusiona.

Mada, pada Assad, uskoro, samo sto nije

To sine,reci im.Kozojebi imaju samo uspjeha tamo gdje im iza ledja stoje Turska i Jordan.Takodjer kozojebi imaju i neuspjeha tamo gdje im iza ledja stoje Turska i Jordan.

I mrtav ladan pomenu podršku spolja i Hezbolah u istoj rečenici...heh, Asadovac i logika...

HARIDŽIJE aka KOZOJEBI U AKCIJI RUŠENJA ISLAMSKIH SVETINJA :

Kikibombona wrote:



Stomak me zabolio

Braca Bosanci u Kurdistanu, Kobaniju....

"Nema vise demokrata da se drogiraju, hvala Allahu napustili su ovo sve"

cbrt wrote:I mrtav ladan pomenu podršku spolja i Hezbolah u istoj rečenici...heh, Asadovac i logika...

Odavno nisam vidio vise gorcine u jednom komentaru. Neka, neka..

Clanak u "Economist"-u:

ASSAD ON THE BACK FOOT:

For the rebels fighting against President Bashar Assad, it was a huge victory. On March 28th a collection of Islamist fighters, including Jabhat al-Nusra, an al-Qaeda affiliate, captured the city of Idleb. Long contested, it is only the second big one to fall to the rebels in four years of war. The first, Raqqa, was snatched by the jihadists of Islamic State (IS), who made it the capital of their caliphate. Only three days before the rebels won Idleb, they took Bosra, a town in southern Syria famous for its second-century Roman amphitheatre.

In Idleb the rain helped the rebels by stopping Mr Assad’s regime carrying out air strikes, which it relies on since it has long been short of soldiers on the ground. The embattled president increasingly banks on local and foreign militias. He has had to recruit more widely for the army, yet he cannot trust the conscripts drawn from Syria’s Sunni-majority population. It is said that Sunni pilots are not now allowed to fly aircraft. A well-connected man in Damascus says many are flown by Russians, whose government backs Mr Assad.

Elsewhere he is looking no stronger. His much-heralded offensive to take back Aleppo earlier this year seems to have fizzled. His troops are consolidating in the west, but only thanks to Hizbullah. IS fighters are creeping into his territory from the east. In the south he has gradually been losing ground to the most moderate of Syria’s rebels, as Hizbullah and Iran focus on securing areas nearer Damascus.

Yet it is unlikely that these victories for the rebels will spur America to increase its modest support for them, especially around Idleb, where Jabhat al-Nusra is the strongest force. The southern rebels have received more help, since they have fewer jihadists in their ranks and are less fragmented. But an American plan to train and equip 5,000 vetted men has still to get going. On March 27th Turkey said that the Americans had delayed their plans to start training there, for unspecified reasons.

So Syria’s fate may depend ever more on how well Mr Assad’s regime hangs together—and on Iran. His army and paramilitary forces often clash. Hizbullah men talk of Syrian soldiers firing on them. Syrian soldiers, in turn, are annoyed by Iranian and Hizbullah checkpoints set up to ensure that they stay in line. Syrian soldiers have long found understandings with rebels; sometimes they agree not to fight, while the rebels sometimes buy ammunition from the soldiers. Overall, Mr Assad’s position is being hollowed out. “The regime is in charge of administrative matters,” says the same Damascus man. “But Iran is ever more in control militarily.”

That could pave the way to negotiations, since it still seems unlikely that either side will win militarily. Iran’s rulers may be more pragmatic than Mr Assad, who wants to cling to power at any cost. There are signs that they see him as a burden; Hizbullah certainly does. If nuclear talks with Iran come good, some Syrians hope for a solution in their own country. “We’ll get rid of Mr Assad at some point,” says a Hizbullah commander. “I think Iran is just waiting until the right time.”

http://www.economist.com/news/middle-ea ... -back-foot

dječak sa šibicama wrote:Kozojebi uspjeha imaju samo tamo gdje im iza ledja stoje "neutralne" drzave Turska i Jordan.

Cim iza ledja nema nikoga, kozojebi ga popuse, kao u Zoru ili uz libanonsku granicu gdje ih je Hezbollah stjerao na planinske vrhove i u vrtace. A planirali su da im Libanon bude najjaca logisticka baza, zbog blizine glavnim gradovima u Siriji Homsu, Hami i Damasku, gdje su kozojebi popusili rat i ostaje im samo da krepavaju od gladi ili da se predaju. Vjerovatno njihov najveci poraz je Hama, simbolicki "najrebelskiji" grad u Siriji. I kad su se pokusali pribliziti gradu, Hasan ih je isjecako nazad do Moreka.

Takodje imaju i niz neuspjeha i tamo gdje im je iza ledja Turska i Jordan, napad na Latakiju preko Kesaba, propao. Aleppo, trzaju i koprcaju se, ali nisu uspjeli zauzeti grad. Kobane, vec se sve zna o tome. Qamishli i Hasaka, takodje pusiona.

Mada, pada Assad, uskoro, samo sto nije

ozibljan?
ja sma mislio da us ovde ozbiljni samo sax i kiki

Opetja033 wrote:Clanak u "Economist"-u:

ASSAD ON THE BACK FOOT:

For the rebels fighting against President Bashar Assad, it was a huge victory. On March 28th a collection of Islamist fighters, including Jabhat al-Nusra, an al-Qaeda affiliate, captured the city of Idleb. Long contested, it is only the second big one to fall to the rebels in four years of war. The first, Raqqa, was snatched by the jihadists of Islamic State (IS), who made it the capital of their caliphate. Only three days before the rebels won Idleb, they took Bosra, a town in southern Syria famous for its second-century Roman amphitheatre.

In Idleb the rain helped the rebels by stopping Mr Assad’s regime carrying out air strikes, which it relies on since it has long been short of soldiers on the ground. The embattled president increasingly banks on local and foreign militias. He has had to recruit more widely for the army, yet he cannot trust the conscripts drawn from Syria’s Sunni-majority population. It is said that Sunni pilots are not now allowed to fly aircraft. A well-connected man in Damascus says many are flown by Russians, whose government backs Mr Assad.

Elsewhere he is looking no stronger. His much-heralded offensive to take back Aleppo earlier this year seems to have fizzled. His troops are consolidating in the west, but only thanks to Hizbullah. IS fighters are creeping into his territory from the east. In the south he has gradually been losing ground to the most moderate of Syria’s rebels, as Hizbullah and Iran focus on securing areas nearer Damascus.

Yet it is unlikely that these victories for the rebels will spur America to increase its modest support for them, especially around Idleb, where Jabhat al-Nusra is the strongest force. The southern rebels have received more help, since they have fewer jihadists in their ranks and are less fragmented. But an American plan to train and equip 5,000 vetted men has still to get going. On March 27th Turkey said that the Americans had delayed their plans to start training there, for unspecified reasons.

So Syria’s fate may depend ever more on how well Mr Assad’s regime hangs together—and on Iran. His army and paramilitary forces often clash. Hizbullah men talk of Syrian soldiers firing on them. Syrian soldiers, in turn, are annoyed by Iranian and Hizbullah checkpoints set up to ensure that they stay in line. Syrian soldiers have long found understandings with rebels; sometimes they agree not to fight, while the rebels sometimes buy ammunition from the soldiers. Overall, Mr Assad’s position is being hollowed out. “The regime is in charge of administrative matters,” says the same Damascus man. “But Iran is ever more in control militarily.”

That could pave the way to negotiations, since it still seems unlikely that either side will win militarily. Iran’s rulers may be more pragmatic than Mr Assad, who wants to cling to power at any cost. There are signs that they see him as a burden; Hizbullah certainly does. If nuclear talks with Iran come good, some Syrians hope for a solution in their own country. “We’ll get rid of Mr Assad at some point,” says a Hizbullah commander. “I think Iran is just waiting until the right time.”

http://www.economist.com/news/middle-ea ... -back-foot

Moze li ime ovog zapovjednika? Moglo je komotno pisati i "says Opetja33"

Sitni banovicki najbolje gori

salik79 wrote:

Opetja033 wrote:Clanak u "Economist"-u:

ASSAD ON THE BACK FOOT:

For the rebels fighting against President Bashar Assad, it was a huge victory. On March 28th a collection of Islamist fighters, including Jabhat al-Nusra, an al-Qaeda affiliate, captured the city of Idleb. Long contested, it is only the second big one to fall to the rebels in four years of war. The first, Raqqa, was snatched by the jihadists of Islamic State (IS), who made it the capital of their caliphate. Only three days before the rebels won Idleb, they took Bosra, a town in southern Syria famous for its second-century Roman amphitheatre.

In Idleb the rain helped the rebels by stopping Mr Assad’s regime carrying out air strikes, which it relies on since it has long been short of soldiers on the ground. The embattled president increasingly banks on local and foreign militias. He has had to recruit more widely for the army, yet he cannot trust the conscripts drawn from Syria’s Sunni-majority population. It is said that Sunni pilots are not now allowed to fly aircraft. A well-connected man in Damascus says many are flown by Russians, whose government backs Mr Assad.

Elsewhere he is looking no stronger. His much-heralded offensive to take back Aleppo earlier this year seems to have fizzled. His troops are consolidating in the west, but only thanks to Hizbullah. IS fighters are creeping into his territory from the east. In the south he has gradually been losing ground to the most moderate of Syria’s rebels, as Hizbullah and Iran focus on securing areas nearer Damascus.

Yet it is unlikely that these victories for the rebels will spur America to increase its modest support for them, especially around Idleb, where Jabhat al-Nusra is the strongest force. The southern rebels have received more help, since they have fewer jihadists in their ranks and are less fragmented. But an American plan to train and equip 5,000 vetted men has still to get going. On March 27th Turkey said that the Americans had delayed their plans to start training there, for unspecified reasons.

So Syria’s fate may depend ever more on how well Mr Assad’s regime hangs together—and on Iran. His army and paramilitary forces often clash. Hizbullah men talk of Syrian soldiers firing on them. Syrian soldiers, in turn, are annoyed by Iranian and Hizbullah checkpoints set up to ensure that they stay in line. Syrian soldiers have long found understandings with rebels; sometimes they agree not to fight, while the rebels sometimes buy ammunition from the soldiers. Overall, Mr Assad’s position is being hollowed out. “The regime is in charge of administrative matters,” says the same Damascus man. “But Iran is ever more in control militarily.”

That could pave the way to negotiations, since it still seems unlikely that either side will win militarily. Iran’s rulers may be more pragmatic than Mr Assad, who wants to cling to power at any cost. There are signs that they see him as a burden; Hizbullah certainly does. If nuclear talks with Iran come good, some Syrians hope for a solution in their own country. “We’ll get rid of Mr Assad at some point,” says a Hizbullah commander. “I think Iran is just waiting until the right time.”

http://www.economist.com/news/middle-ea ... -back-foot

Moze li ime ovog zapovjednika? Moglo je komotno pisati i "says Opetja33"

Sitni banovicki najbolje gori

Sta koga briga kako se zove

Bitno je da je ideja tu. Ass-sadista je donji, kako god okrenes. Lik koji je unistio Siriju. Deset miliona izbjeglica. Pa gdje su ti ljudi, od cega su pobjegli, zasto se Ass-sadista o njima ne brine, sta rade, od cega zive. Vazno je da Esmica dobro zivi, da ovdasnji navijaci povremeno bace drkicu prema njoj, a za gubitnike bas nas briga.

mislim ima li smisla vise,ovde neko stalno baca neke drkice,dokad?i na što?a da ne govorim o sramoti.

sumirprimus wrote:mislim ima li smisla vise,ovde neko stalno baca neke drkice,dokad?i na što?a da ne govorim o sramoti.

Sta bi Rambo rek'o na sve to?!

salik79 wrote:

sumirprimus wrote:mislim ima li smisla vise,ovde neko stalno baca neke drkice,dokad?i na što?a da ne govorim o sramoti.

Sta bi Rambo rek'o na sve to?!

ha jebiga ovde bi uvrijedio vecinu kad bi sitiro ramba,uz uglavljen svoj amandman...

il ne mislimo na istog ramba,amadeus ramba?

sumirprimus wrote:il ne mislimo na istog ramba,amadeus ramba?

Ako je rijec o bacanju drkice necu valjda Sly-ja citirati!?

salik79 wrote:

sumirprimus wrote:il ne mislimo na istog ramba,amadeus ramba?

Ako je rijec o bacanju drkice necu valjda Sly-ja citirati!?

sto sta fali,ako pumpas biceps triceps,i slay je in..

sumirprimus wrote:

salik79 wrote:

sumirprimus wrote:il ne mislimo na istog ramba,amadeus ramba?

Ako je rijec o bacanju drkice necu valjda Sly-ja citirati!?

sto sta fali,ako pumpas biceps triceps,i slay je in..

Pa, ako cemo o samim zacecima karijere govoriti... Imas ga pravo

Jam'te pederluka
I ja mislim da je Assad gotov, ne mora znaciti i SAA
Od onog intervjua imam takakv osjecaj u vezi njega
Samo ne znam jos na koji nacin

insomnia78 wrote: I ja mislim da je Assad gotov, ne mora znaciti i SAA
Od onog intervjua imam takakv osjecaj u vezi njega
Samo ne znam jos na koji nacin

Sultan će ga zaćerati...


Možda mu neko od vehabija sihire poturi...


Drugi način ne vidim...

to je pogrdna rijec,politicki korektno bi bilo reci gej!
pukli su ko kruske,pitanje je samo da li glavnu ulogu preuzimaju jahaci apokalipse,il apokalipsa jahaca?