Donald J Trump - Predsjednik USA All About

[Acid25]

A bice i vorld pis.

[daddy-kool]

[burgundy]

Dobar izbor.





Buducnost i proslost.

[daddy-kool]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin ... 70046.html

Donald Trump wipes $3.5bn off Lockheed Martin market value with single tweet

Ode Air Force One, sad haman ide i F35.

Make Russia great again!

[madner]

100% je u pravu za F-35. Losiji a skuplji avion nije napravljen.

[daddy-kool]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... source=fbb

When he ran for president, Trump realized that on Islam, as on trade, Republican elites were out of step with the Republican base. Trump distinguished himself from his rivals not by proposing a different strategy against ISIS. He distinguished himself by suggesting that the problem was not merely ISIS, or even “radical Islam,” but Muslims in general. Republican leaders reacted to Trump’s call for banning Muslim immigration to the U.S. with revulsion. But, according to surveys, more than seven in 10 GOP voters supported it.

Trump also broke with his establishment rivals by taking a softer line on Russia. Maybe financial interests motivated him. Maybe he just likes authoritarian tough-guys. Whatever the reason, the deviation seemed politically dangerous given the overwhelming hostility to Putin among GOP foreign-policy elites. But Trump’s pro-Putin line hasn’t hurt him. In fact, Republicans as a whole have grown markedly less anti-Russian since 2014.

Partly, they’re aping Trump. But there’s something deeper at work. Ideological conservatives loathe Putin because he represents an authoritarian challenge to the American-backed order in Europe and the Middle East. But many civilizational conservatives, who once opposed the Soviet Union because of its atheism, now view Putin’s Russia as Christianity’s front line against the new civilizational enemy: Islam. Among the alt-right, Putin is a very popular man. He’s popular because he resists the liberal, cosmopolitan values that Muslims supposedly exploit to undermine the West. Richard Spencer, who was until recently married to a pro-Putin Russian writer, has called Russia the “sole white power in the world.” Matthew Heimbach, another prominent figure in the alt-right, recently told Business Insider that “Russia is the leader of the free world.” In 2013, Pat Buchanan penned a column entitled, “Is Vladimir Putin a paleoconservative? In the culture war for mankind’s future, is he one of us?”

Trump is building on this shift to recast GOP foreign policy. He’s moving it away from an ideological confrontation with authoritarian Russia and toward a civilizational conflict with Islam. Trump’s choice for National Security Advisor, General Michael Flynn, has tweeted that “fear of Muslims is rational” and that Islam is “like cancer” When asked in August about Putin, he explained that America “beat Hitler because of our relationship with the Russians” and we should renew that partnership in the new world war against “radical Islamism.” Trump’s chief strategist, Steve Bannon, likes to talk about the “long history of the Judeo-Christian West struggle against Islam … a war of immense proportions” that continues to this day. And in that struggle, he’s argued, “we the Judeo-Christian West really have to look at what he’s [Putin] talking about as far as traditionalism goes—particularly the sense of where it supports the underpinnings of nationalism.” Unlike the globalists of the European Union, Bannon argues, Putin believes in “sovereignty,” which makes him a valuable ally in America’s civilizational fight.

This is the backdrop to the looming conflict between Donald Trump and congressional Republicans like John McCain and Lindsey Graham who want to investigate Russia’s efforts to elect him. Will the GOP define Americanism as the defense of a set of universal principles or as the defense of a racial and religious heritage? The answer won’t only help determine how well liberal democracy fares overseas. It will help determine how well it fares at home.

[daddy-kool]

100% je u pravu za F-35. Losiji a skuplji avion nije napravljen.

F-35 jeste preskup, ali daleko je od lošeg.

Malo odmjerenosti u tweet-ovima ne bi bilo zgoreg, izborna kampanja je završena, sada je ovo i njegov projekat.

[Drvenija87]

[General War]

100% je u pravu za F-35. Losiji a skuplji avion nije napravljen.

A zasto? RAptor je mnogo skuplji bio.

[raoul duke]

Sreco moja, tvoja sklonost nespretnim replikama na moje postove je jedna od rijetkih stvari na ovoj temi koja mi podigne raspolozenje.

Pa mora vam neko dizati raspolozenje nakon haoticnog poraza, jadni moji liberali

[Tito_i_Partija]

Ahahahaha.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... nistration

Donald Trump has chosen former Texas governor Rick Perry to head the US Department of Energy, a transition official said, putting him in charge of the agency he proposed eliminating during his bid for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination

Koji show jebote. Prvo onaj sto je tuzio EPA postaje direktor iste, sad ovaj sto je htjeo da ukine ministarstvo Energije postaje glavni istog. Anbilivabl.

[omar little]

tesko da ce ovo ukinuti. moze samo stesati budzet, sto im je i cilj, na ustrub ovog ciscenja i research.

Today, DOE’s $32 billion budget can basically be split into four big categories:

40 percent, or $13 billion, is dedicated to designing, maintaining, and testing the US nuclear weapons arsenal. Much of this work is done at the sprawling array of national research labs that the DOE operates around the country, like Los Alamos in New Mexico.

20 percent, or $6 billion, is dedicated to handling nuclear waste and cleaning up the messes spawned by the nuclear weapons programs of the Cold War era — such as the contaminated soil around Oak Ridge National Lab in Tennessee.

Another 20 percent goes toward basic science research in the national labs — things like high-energy physics, nuclear physics, and computing research.

Finally, only 20 percent is devoted to what we typically think of as “energy” programs, including R&D toward new oil and gas drilling techniques, advanced nuclear reactors, renewables, and energy efficiency. There’s also ARPA-e, a federal venture capital fund of sorts that funds long-shot energy technologies like batteries, advanced wind turbines, and cleaner biofuels.

[madner]

100% je u pravu za F-35. Losiji a skuplji avion nije napravljen.

A zasto? RAptor je mnogo skuplji bio.

Raptor je u svojoj ulozi odlican, tako da se cijena moze oprostiti.

F35 je kao lovac losiji od F16, kao A jednako los. Pokusaj da se napravi avion koji bi bio sve u jednom ima isti rezultata kao i prije, skupo a ispodprosjecan proizvod.

[General War]

100% je u pravu za F-35. Losiji a skuplji avion nije napravljen.

A zasto? RAptor je mnogo skuplji bio.

Raptor je u svojoj ulozi odlican, tako da se cijena moze oprostiti.

F35 je kao lovac losiji od F16, kao A jednako los. Pokusaj da se napravi avion koji bi bio sve u jednom ima isti rezultata kao i prije, skupo a ispodprosjecan proizvod.

Onako samo da podsjetim avion je VTOL, jedini -posto harierima isticu resursi...nova tehnologija koja treba da se isproba od radara, motora do sistema.
ni nalik ni jednom, a posebno f 16.
Sustinski i stara baba se moze nataci, ali kad vec moze mlada cura sto da ne.

[fakat]

Trumpova politika je fakat drugačija, umjesto lobista multinacionalnih kompanija koji su uticali
na politiku u Washingtonu sada direktno na pozicije u vladi dovodi čelne ljude tih istih kompanija.
Da se ljudi ne pate. Kakav potez u borbi protiv establišmenta i globalizacijskih trendova!

[fakat]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... source=fbb

When he ran for president, Trump realized that on Islam, as on trade, Republican elites were out of step with the Republican base. Trump distinguished himself from his rivals not by proposing a different strategy against ISIS. He distinguished himself by suggesting that the problem was not merely ISIS, or even “radical Islam,” but Muslims in general. Republican leaders reacted to Trump’s call for banning Muslim immigration to the U.S. with revulsion. But, according to surveys, more than seven in 10 GOP voters supported it.

Trump also broke with his establishment rivals by taking a softer line on Russia. Maybe financial interests motivated him. Maybe he just likes authoritarian tough-guys. Whatever the reason, the deviation seemed politically dangerous given the overwhelming hostility to Putin among GOP foreign-policy elites. But Trump’s pro-Putin line hasn’t hurt him. In fact, Republicans as a whole have grown markedly less anti-Russian since 2014.

Partly, they’re aping Trump. But there’s something deeper at work. Ideological conservatives loathe Putin because he represents an authoritarian challenge to the American-backed order in Europe and the Middle East. But many civilizational conservatives, who once opposed the Soviet Union because of its atheism, now view Putin’s Russia as Christianity’s front line against the new civilizational enemy: Islam. Among the alt-right, Putin is a very popular man. He’s popular because he resists the liberal, cosmopolitan values that Muslims supposedly exploit to undermine the West. Richard Spencer, who was until recently married to a pro-Putin Russian writer, has called Russia the “sole white power in the world.” Matthew Heimbach, another prominent figure in the alt-right, recently told Business Insider that “Russia is the leader of the free world.” In 2013, Pat Buchanan penned a column entitled, “Is Vladimir Putin a paleoconservative? In the culture war for mankind’s future, is he one of us?”

Trump is building on this shift to recast GOP foreign policy. He’s moving it away from an ideological confrontation with authoritarian Russia and toward a civilizational conflict with Islam. Trump’s choice for National Security Advisor, General Michael Flynn, has tweeted that “fear of Muslims is rational” and that Islam is “like cancer” When asked in August about Putin, he explained that America “beat Hitler because of our relationship with the Russians” and we should renew that partnership in the new world war against “radical Islamism.” Trump’s chief strategist, Steve Bannon, likes to talk about the “long history of the Judeo-Christian West struggle against Islam … a war of immense proportions” that continues to this day. And in that struggle, he’s argued, “we the Judeo-Christian West really have to look at what he’s [Putin] talking about as far as traditionalism goes—particularly the sense of where it supports the underpinnings of nationalism.” Unlike the globalists of the European Union, Bannon argues, Putin believes in “sovereignty,” which makes him a valuable ally in America’s civilizational fight.

This is the backdrop to the looming conflict between Donald Trump and congressional Republicans like John McCain and Lindsey Graham who want to investigate Russia’s efforts to elect him. Will the GOP define Americanism as the defense of a set of universal principles or as the defense of a racial and religious heritage? The answer won’t only help determine how well liberal democracy fares overseas. It will help determine how well it fares at home.

Odlican clanak

[Acid25]

Ipak Brko upada.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/joh ... 9c3dfe4971

Ko to tamo obogaćuje uranijum?

[omar little]

in 1984, still in his thirties, he told the Washington Post that he wanted to negotiate nuclear treaties with the Soviets. “It would take an hour and a half to learn everything there is to learn about missiles,” he said. “I think I know most of it anyway.” According to Bruce G. Blair, a research scholar at the Program on Science and Global Security, at Princeton, Trump encountered a U.S. nuclear-arms negotiator at a reception in 1990 and offered advice on how to cut a “terrific” deal with a Soviet counterpart. Trump told him to arrive late, stand over the Soviet negotiator, stick his finger in his chest, and say, “Fuck you!”

“I want to take everything back from the world that we’ve given them,” he said in April, 2015.

stariji clanak, ali svejedno obavezno stivo. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/ ... first-term

[Pandakonda]

Kanye za Press Secretary

[breba]

Ahahahaha.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... nistration

Donald Trump has chosen former Texas governor Rick Perry to head the US Department of Energy, a transition official said, putting him in charge of the agency he proposed eliminating during his bid for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination

Koji show jebote. Prvo onaj sto je tuzio EPA postaje direktor iste, sad ovaj sto je htjeo da ukine ministarstvo Energije postaje glavni istog. Anbilivabl.

Da je show, jeste. Trump koristi kontroverzu i konflikt kao nacin da dodje do cilja koji nije nuzno onaj koji javno zastupa i koji sluzi samo za "leverage". Carrier, Boeing, Kina 35% tarife, zid, NATO, F35 itd. Sve drasticne pozicije iz kojih ako izvuce pola od onog sto je prijetio svi budu sretni da su ista izvukli.
Koga drugog postaviti na te pozicije ako ne one koji smatraju da te agencije ne treba ni da postoje. Jos ce birokrate u tim agencijama biti sretne kad se sve zavrsi jer ce Trump da iskoci kao veliki spasioc dvije prekrasne farme na vjetar u odredjenom trenutku.

[hatemondays]

Konacno su stvari jasnije, dakle super bogatasi su uzeli konacno vlast u svoje ruke, ameri svoje ruke vise nece prljati krvlju svjetske sirotinje, fino unajmiti security company na celu sa Putinom.Putin ce odradjivati prljavi posao a gospoda ce to sve fino placati.Vec duze vremena ovaj odnos sa Putinom je takav kakav je pocev od Gruzije, Ukrajine, oborenog malezijskog aviona i sada Sirijom.Nece mu nista jer radi za njih.Kad prodje sva ova jebhana svi cemo mi biti jos siromasniji oni jos vise bogatiji.
Volio bih da grijesim ali ovo sto se desava u Siriji ce se desti i onaj nasoj napacenoj zemlji ali ovaj put nas nece niko mrdnuti malim prstom za nas.Opasan presedan je postavljen sa stranim uplitanjem u rat u Siriji.Sad svako moze poslati trupe u pomoc kome misle da treba.Brko od Istanbula je skontao na vrijeme bolje biti security nego livada.Evo prognoze Saudija i ostali padobranci (UAE, Katar itd.) su slijedeci na listi vrijeme je i da i oni plate ceh.Kad je mogao Gonedafi najebati najebace i ovi.Izrael uziva sa kokicama i pivom u ruci.
Kazem volio bih da grijesim ali cini mi se da smo tek sada otisli u 3pm.......

[relativno84]

[Gojeni H]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... source=fbb

When he ran for president, Trump realized that on Islam, as on trade, Republican elites were out of step with the Republican base. Trump distinguished himself from his rivals not by proposing a different strategy against ISIS. He distinguished himself by suggesting that the problem was not merely ISIS, or even “radical Islam,” but Muslims in general. Republican leaders reacted to Trump’s call for banning Muslim immigration to the U.S. with revulsion. But, according to surveys, more than seven in 10 GOP voters supported it.

Trump also broke with his establishment rivals by taking a softer line on Russia. Maybe financial interests motivated him. Maybe he just likes authoritarian tough-guys. Whatever the reason, the deviation seemed politically dangerous given the overwhelming hostility to Putin among GOP foreign-policy elites. But Trump’s pro-Putin line hasn’t hurt him. In fact, Republicans as a whole have grown markedly less anti-Russian since 2014.

Partly, they’re aping Trump. But there’s something deeper at work. Ideological conservatives loathe Putin because he represents an authoritarian challenge to the American-backed order in Europe and the Middle East. But many civilizational conservatives, who once opposed the Soviet Union because of its atheism, now view Putin’s Russia as Christianity’s front line against the new civilizational enemy: Islam. Among the alt-right, Putin is a very popular man. He’s popular because he resists the liberal, cosmopolitan values that Muslims supposedly exploit to undermine the West. Richard Spencer, who was until recently married to a pro-Putin Russian writer, has called Russia the “sole white power in the world.” Matthew Heimbach, another prominent figure in the alt-right, recently told Business Insider that “Russia is the leader of the free world.” In 2013, Pat Buchanan penned a column entitled, “Is Vladimir Putin a paleoconservative? In the culture war for mankind’s future, is he one of us?”

Trump is building on this shift to recast GOP foreign policy. He’s moving it away from an ideological confrontation with authoritarian Russia and toward a civilizational conflict with Islam. Trump’s choice for National Security Advisor, General Michael Flynn, has tweeted that “fear of Muslims is rational” and that Islam is “like cancer” When asked in August about Putin, he explained that America “beat Hitler because of our relationship with the Russians” and we should renew that partnership in the new world war against “radical Islamism.” Trump’s chief strategist, Steve Bannon, likes to talk about the “long history of the Judeo-Christian West struggle against Islam … a war of immense proportions” that continues to this day. And in that struggle, he’s argued, “we the Judeo-Christian West really have to look at what he’s [Putin] talking about as far as traditionalism goes—particularly the sense of where it supports the underpinnings of nationalism.” Unlike the globalists of the European Union, Bannon argues, Putin believes in “sovereignty,” which makes him a valuable ally in America’s civilizational fight.

This is the backdrop to the looming conflict between Donald Trump and congressional Republicans like John McCain and Lindsey Graham who want to investigate Russia’s efforts to elect him. Will the GOP define Americanism as the defense of a set of universal principles or as the defense of a racial and religious heritage? The answer won’t only help determine how well liberal democracy fares overseas. It will help determine how well it fares at home.

Odlican clanak

Zaista odlican tekst. Hvala @daddy-kool

Ponasanje krscanske desnice iliti Christian Right, tokom borbe za republikanskog kandidata ali i kasnije tokom predsjednickih izbora, je mozda najvece pomjeranje tog dijela glasacke grupe u zadnjih nekoliko decenija. Pitanje je u kojem pravcu se to 'pomjeranje' desava.
Jer Trump bi, po nekadasnjim stavovima krsanske desnice, bio i Antikrist i Dedzal, ali su ovaj put bili nevjerovatno tihi i pasivni ... a mozda je tako samo na povrsini.

[AenemA]

Da mogu kako zaspati iduce 4 godine...

[bole1st]

Da mogu kako zaspati iduce 4 godine...

Prije ce bit 8.