Forum Klix.ba

listopad wrote:

Mohamad Sissoko wrote:Sta ti je to radikalni kapitalizam?

Pogledaj na Wikipediji.

Trump expected to nominate Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson secretary of state

omar little wrote:

Trump expected to nominate Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson secretary of state

eto.

omar little wrote:

Trump expected to nominate Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson secretary of state

eto.

Pandakonda wrote:Neke bi šlag opalio da je Romneya izabrao kako se nagađalo

"We're gonna have the best minds negotiating for us."
-Donald J Trump.

Acid25 wrote:

omar little wrote:

Trump expected to nominate Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson secretary of state

eto.

A nije brko?

sumirprimus wrote:ko je ono upozoravo na ove iz vojno industrijdkog kompleksa?ajk??

...

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

V.

Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we -- you and I, and our government -- must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

VI.

Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

...

Tillerson has close ties with Vladimir Putin; the two men have been associates since Tillerson represented Exxon’s interests in Russia during Boris Yeltsin's premiership.[14] John Hamre, the president and CEO of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (for which Tillerson is a board member), states that Tillerson "has had more interactive time with Vladimir Putin than probably any other American with the exception of Henry Kissinger."[14]

Tillerson is a friend of Igor Sechin,[15] the leader of the Kremlin's Siloviki faction,[16] who is "widely believed to be Russia's second-most powerful person" after President Putin.[17]

In 2011, on behalf of ExxonMobil, Tillerson signed an agreement with Russia for drilling in the Arctic that could be valued up to $300 billion.[18] Although the company began drilling in the Kara Sea in summer 2014, sanctions against Russia during the Ukrainian crisis brought the project to a halt in September of that year.[19][20]

In 2013, Tillerson was awarded the Order of Friendship by Putin.[12]

Pandakonda wrote:Ovaj ne negira globalno zagrijavanje, koju li će mu manu sada naći (35:17)

jeza u ledja wrote:

Pandakonda wrote:Ovaj ne negira globalno zagrijavanje, koju li će mu manu sada naći (35:17)

Ok, sad definitivno. Ti si stvarno neozbiljan forumas.

Niko ne negira globalno zagrijavanje, odnosno noviji termin "klimatske promjene". I to i ovaj covjek kaze - "nobody's debating that". Koliko neupucen stavrno trebas biti u problem da ni to ne znas? Globalno zagrijavanje vidis kroz prozor uostalom. U stvari, posto si ti ocigledno klinac, ti se ne sjecas kako je bilo 80ih ili 90ih, koliko je vise snjega bilo i koliko je manje bilo vruce ljeti.

Ono oko cega se vodi debata je koliko su aktivnosti ljudi doprinjele tim klimatskim promjenama, od cega je najznacajnije sagorijevanje fosilnih goriva. I to i ovaj T-Rex dalje govori, tj. dovodi u pitanje tacnost modela naucnika sto se tice ljudskog doprinosa klimatskim promjenama. Znaci nije tacno da priznaje znacajan uticaj ljudske aktivnosti na klimatske promjene.

Inace, ovih 5 minuta sto sam ga slusao, covjek zvuci pametno. Haj bar nesto.

No i dalje mi nije jasno kako ovaj moze biti kandidat za MVP, nikako?

CEO of Exxon, arguably one of the biggest companies on the planet.

Tillerson does not deny the effect of CO2 emissions. He does, however, call into question the validity of scientific models predicting the future - a view shared by Scott Adams.

Tillerson has worked in the IPCC(the panel that gives reports on climate change) and has peer reviewed the studies done. Face it, whether people like it or not, Climate change is a huge part of a secretary of state's job today.

Tillerson is of the view that we can and we must adapt to changing climate. Adaptation and not mitigation should be the focus.

Tillerson has had business dealings in multiple countries, including war torn regions, in the world and has served in the council of foreign relations.

jeza u ledja wrote: No i dalje mi nije jasno kako ovaj moze biti kandidat za MVP, nikako?

raoul duke wrote:

jeza u ledja wrote: No i dalje mi nije jasno kako ovaj moze biti kandidat za MVP, nikako?

Ti idalje prosipas suplju ovdje.. Nadji si nesto dugo za zabavu, ne ide ti politika

Acid25 wrote:Od Trumpa gori su postali njegovi fanboy klokani. Nalaze opravdanja za svaki retardiran potez narandže i ne vide ništa loše u tome da likovi kao Rex sjede u vladi. Svi se furaju na anonymouse, kao neki anticorporation warriors, ali kad Trump kara ima da ćutiš.

jeza u ledja wrote: Trump je biznismen, on ce popraviti ekonomiju za sve nas.

raoul duke wrote:Je li to govoris sa istom sigurnoscu kao za Clinton pobjedu
Endemicna vrsta

aratet wrote:Ne vidim u cemu je problem sa ovim Tillersonom, lik je bio na celu jedne od najmocnijih kompanija i ima izgradjene veze sirom Svijeta.

jeza u ledja wrote:

aratet wrote:Ne vidim u cemu je problem sa ovim Tillersonom, lik je bio na celu jedne od najmocnijih kompanija i ima izgradjene veze sirom Svijeta.

Valjda je to pozicija za koju trebas imati iskustva sa vanjskom politikom? Sta znaci protokol, sta znaci diplomacija, sta znace odnosi u svijetu, gdje je fakin Nikaragva ili kurac palac. Da nisi tupan koji ce prvi dan posla napraviti gaf tipa da razgovaras sa predsjednicom Tajvana. Kineze, Njemce, Tunguzijce, ne zanima celebrity status americkog predsjednika, drame ili upisi na Tviteru. Ne interesuje svakog ekstravagantnost, soumensip i ostale zajebancije. Kad Trump napravi neki gaf tipa Tajvan (a to je samo pocetak), bojim se da malo ozbiljniji igraci na svjetskoj sceni nece imati strpljenja za te gluposti. Al dobro, sta Ameriku boli kita, mozemo sve sami. Dosta smo se mi njima prilagodjavali, nek se oni nama malo prilagodjavaju. Fak jea!

Sta mislis recimo kako ce prvi covjek najvece naftne kompanije na svijetu gledati na recimo odnose na Bliskom Istoku? Znamo sta je napravio posljednji covjek na vlasti koji je imao veze sa naftaskom industrijom. Ili na primjer sta ce prvi covjek naftne industrije uraditi po pitanju busenja nafte na Arktiku, ili sporazuma o klimatskim promjenama. Regulacije? Pff, poderat ih. Svakako samo sputavaju industriju. Dzobs! Svima ce nam donjeti dzobs, kao sto su i ranije kad su imali vlast. A bice i vorld pis.

jeza u ledja wrote: Kad Trump napravi neki gaf tipa Tajvan (a to je samo pocetak), bojim se da malo ozbiljniji igraci na svjetskoj sceni nece imati strpljenja za te gluposti. Al dobro, sta Ameriku boli kita, mozemo sve sami. Dosta smo se mi njima prilagodjavali, nek se oni nama malo prilagodjavaju. Fak jea!