BHCluster wrote:Smrcak15 wrote:
Na samom pocetku grafike koju si ti postavio pise "Kuran opisuje planine kao klin(korijen) koji drzi koru kao sidro"! Zar ne? A ti onda kazes:
ovo kaze Garzione a ne Kuran, Kuran kaze planine kao klinovi, i da su ti klinovi poput sidra
Zasto lazes?
Onda idu dva citata iz Kuran, u prvom planine su KLINOVI, a u drugom planine su sidra. Sto apsolutno nema nikakve veze sa onim o cemu profesor Garzione kaze u svome istrazivanju.
dok Garzione tvrdi da planine ima korijenje koje drze koru kao sidro.
On the surface, the buckling manifests itself as a rising mountain range, but beneath the crust, the buckling creates a heavy, high-density "root" that holds the crust down like an anchor, says Garzione.
Da ti pojednostavnim, ona tu ne govori o planini nego kori (kontinentala/okeanska). a onda paragraf ispod ti sve objasnila:
However, according to Garzione, the delamination theory suggests that instead of eroding slowly away, the root heats up and oozes downward like a drop of molasses until it abruptly breaks free and sinks into the hot fluid mantle. The mountains above, suddenly free of the weight of the blob, would rush upward
Znaci nikakva sidra ni klinovi nego proces stvaranja planina prema njenoj teoriji. 100% suprotno od onogo sto pise u tvojoj grafici iznad.
Sta je ovo sad 6, 7 ili je 8:0 za mene?
Na samom pocetku grafike koju si ti postavio pise "Kuran opisuje planine kao klin(korijen) koji drzi koru kao sidro"!
ne opisiva bas tako ali je to zakljucak na osnovu sta Kuran kaze i sta kaze taj geolog.
Kuran kaze da su planine kao klinovi, na drugom mjestu kaze da su planine kao sidra,
dok taj geolog ona spoji ta dva izraza, govoreci umjesto klin kaze korjen, i da taj korjen drzi koru kao sidro,
i na osnovu opisa u Kuranu i geologovog objasnjenja se zakljucuje taj naslov. tako to posmatraj.
Onda idu dva citata iz Kuran, u prvom planine su KLINOVI, a u drugom planine su sidra. Sto apsolutno nema nikakve veze sa onim o cemu profesor Garzione kaze u svome istrazivanju.
ma sta to ti covjce pricas , kako nema veze , znas li ti engleski
http://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/tak ... the-andes/
evo i drugi intervju sa njom
Several years ago (2006-2008), Garzione and several colleagues provided the first estimates of the timing and rates of the surface uplift of the central Andes (“Mountain Ranges Rise Much More Rapidly than Geologists Expected”) by measuring the ancient surface temperatures and rainfall compositions preserved in the soils of the central Altiplano, a plateau in Bolivia and Peru that sits about 12,000 feet above sea level. Garzione concluded that portions of the dense lower crust and upper mantle that act like an anchor on the base of the crust are periodically detached and sink through the mantle as the thickened continental plate heats up. Detachment of this dense anchor allows the Earth’s low density upper crust to rebound and rise rapidly.
...
She found that the southern Altiplano region rose by about 2.5 kilometers between 16 million and 9 million years ago, which is considered a rapid rate in geologic terms. Garzione speculates that the pulsing action relates to a dense root that grows at the boundary of the lower crust and upper mantle. As the oceanic plate slips under the continental plate, the continental plate shortens and thickens, increasing the pressure on the lower crust. The basaltic composition of the lower crust converts to a very high-density rock called eclogite, which serves as an anchor to the low-density upper crust. As this root is forced deeper into the hotter part of the mantle, it heats to a temperature where it can be rapidly removed (over several million years), resulting in the rapid rise of the mountain range.
vidis i da ovdje spominje da je taj korjen kao sidro, koje se istopi kroz milione godina
dok Garzione tvrdi da planine ima korijenje koje drze koru kao sidro.
On the surface, the buckling manifests itself as a rising mountain range, but beneath the crust, the buckling creates a heavy, high-density "root" that holds the crust down like an anchor, says Garzione.
Da ti pojednostavnim, ona tu ne govori o planini nego kori (kontinentala/okeanska). a onda paragraf ispod ti sve objasnila:
pa ti covjce ne znas engleski
ona tu ne govori o planini
a onda kaze
the buckling manifests itself as a rising mountain range, (ispupcenje se manifestuje kao uzdignute planinsko podrucje)
je li ti uopste znas sta znaci Mountain????
a onda paragraf ispod ti sve objasnila:
However, according to Garzione, the delamination theory suggests that instead of eroding slowly away, the root heats up and oozes downward like a drop of molasses until it abruptly breaks free and sinks into the hot fluid mantle. The mountains above, suddenly free of the weight of the blob, would rush upward
Znaci nikakva sidra
ni klinovi nego proces stvaranja planina prema njenoj teoriji. 100% suprotno od onogo sto pise u tvojoj grafici iznad.
aaa boze dragi je li moguce
to sto ona naziva korjen ispod planine, a Kuran naziva klin , to je dva imena sto opisuju istu stvar, sad je li ona nazvala korjen ili klin svejedno, ista je stvar u pitanju.
ne zaptas se kako Kuran moze da zna da uopste nesto ima ispod Planine, korjen ili klin, kada se golim ocima gleda u planinu, samo se vidi vanjski gornji dio, a ono sto je ispod se ne vidi.
