Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
-
seldzuk
- Posts: 2832
- Joined: 04/06/2007 18:51
#3601 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
stratforov tekst od neki dan
The UAE and Saudi War on the Muslim Brotherhood Could Be Trouble for the U.S.
Geopolitical Diary
Monday, November 17, 2014 - 18:58 Text Size Print
The UAE Cabinet approved a list of 83 designated terrorist organizations on Saturday, including al Qaeda and the Islamic State. Much more significant, though, was the inclusion of many Muslim organizations based in the West that are believed to be allied with the Muslim Brotherhood movement. Prominent among them are two American Muslim groups: the Council on American Islamic Relations and the Muslim American Society.
The decision to put two mainstream U.S. Muslim groups on its list of terrorist organizations is part of an initiative, together with the Saudis, to undermine the Islamist movement known as the Muslim Brotherhood. The move is unlikely to succeed, but it could cause problems between the U.S. government and the American Muslim community.
Ever since the Muslim Brotherhood's rise in the aftermath of the 2011 Arab Spring, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia have felt deeply threatened by the Islamist movement. Both countries supported the July 2013 coup that toppled the Brotherhood-led government of Mohammed Morsi in Egypt. They continue to use their financial might to prop up the government of former military chief President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. In addition, they are trying to make sure that the Brotherhood in the region is generally weakened, or even decimated.
What is a Geopolitical Diary? George Friedman Explains.
From their perspective, the Islamism of the Muslim Brotherhood is a far greater threat to the monarchies than even the jihadism of al Qaeda and the Islamic State. Given the armed insurrectionist approach of the jihadists, the Saudis and Emiratis can crack down on them using coercive means more easily.
But for them, the Brotherhood is a much more insidious threat. Not only does it oppose violence as a means of achieving its political goals, but it also seeks democracy. Therefore, the Brotherhood is not just difficult to counter; it promotes a political system that is a threat to the monarchical systems of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
What is worse for the Gulf Arabs is that the Brotherhood is seen as a legitimate political force in the West. Earlier this year, the Saudis and Emiratis pressured the British government to crack down on British Muslim groups that were part of the global Brotherhood network. London launched an inquiry into the movement within its borders, resulting in an unpublished report that cleared the Brotherhood of links to terrorism.
Frustrated, the Gulf Arabs are pursuing a different tack. By declaring the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim American Society (MAS) as terrorist organizations, they are trying to exploit a fault line within the United States. There is a sizable lobby within the U.S. government that is interested in cracking down on those and other Muslim groups. The Emiratis and Saudis hope the lobby will use the United Arab Emirates' announcement to push in this direction.
While CAIR has for years operated as a nonprofit advocacy entity, in 2007 U.S. authorities named it an unindicted co-conspirator along with about 250 other groups and individuals in a case against the Holy Land Foundation charity. The charity was convicted of supporting Hamas, a designated terrorist organization in the United States, though no formal charges have been brought against CAIR. As a result, it will not take much for groups within the United States that are hostile to CAIR to use the UAE decision against the group.
The goal of the Emiratis and Saudis is to get U.S. authorities focused on CAIR and MAS so that they can use that to press Washington to take action against the Muslim Brotherhood. They are unlikely to get their wish given the lack of evidence that the Brotherhood is engaged in terrorism and given the U.S. focus on fighting jihadists — an effort that requires the Americans to work with moderate forces.
On the domestic front, however, CAIR and MAS could face legal issues. Large numbers of American Muslims support the groups, especially CAIR. Putting them under closer klix could upset American Muslims — exactly the outcome that the Islamic State and al Qaeda want.
Read more: The UAE and Saudi War on the Muslim Brotherhood Could Be Trouble for the U.S. | Stratfor
Follow us: @stratfor on Twitter | Stratfor on Facebook
The UAE and Saudi War on the Muslim Brotherhood Could Be Trouble for the U.S.
Geopolitical Diary
Monday, November 17, 2014 - 18:58 Text Size Print
The UAE Cabinet approved a list of 83 designated terrorist organizations on Saturday, including al Qaeda and the Islamic State. Much more significant, though, was the inclusion of many Muslim organizations based in the West that are believed to be allied with the Muslim Brotherhood movement. Prominent among them are two American Muslim groups: the Council on American Islamic Relations and the Muslim American Society.
The decision to put two mainstream U.S. Muslim groups on its list of terrorist organizations is part of an initiative, together with the Saudis, to undermine the Islamist movement known as the Muslim Brotherhood. The move is unlikely to succeed, but it could cause problems between the U.S. government and the American Muslim community.
Ever since the Muslim Brotherhood's rise in the aftermath of the 2011 Arab Spring, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia have felt deeply threatened by the Islamist movement. Both countries supported the July 2013 coup that toppled the Brotherhood-led government of Mohammed Morsi in Egypt. They continue to use their financial might to prop up the government of former military chief President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. In addition, they are trying to make sure that the Brotherhood in the region is generally weakened, or even decimated.
What is a Geopolitical Diary? George Friedman Explains.
From their perspective, the Islamism of the Muslim Brotherhood is a far greater threat to the monarchies than even the jihadism of al Qaeda and the Islamic State. Given the armed insurrectionist approach of the jihadists, the Saudis and Emiratis can crack down on them using coercive means more easily.
But for them, the Brotherhood is a much more insidious threat. Not only does it oppose violence as a means of achieving its political goals, but it also seeks democracy. Therefore, the Brotherhood is not just difficult to counter; it promotes a political system that is a threat to the monarchical systems of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
What is worse for the Gulf Arabs is that the Brotherhood is seen as a legitimate political force in the West. Earlier this year, the Saudis and Emiratis pressured the British government to crack down on British Muslim groups that were part of the global Brotherhood network. London launched an inquiry into the movement within its borders, resulting in an unpublished report that cleared the Brotherhood of links to terrorism.
Frustrated, the Gulf Arabs are pursuing a different tack. By declaring the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim American Society (MAS) as terrorist organizations, they are trying to exploit a fault line within the United States. There is a sizable lobby within the U.S. government that is interested in cracking down on those and other Muslim groups. The Emiratis and Saudis hope the lobby will use the United Arab Emirates' announcement to push in this direction.
While CAIR has for years operated as a nonprofit advocacy entity, in 2007 U.S. authorities named it an unindicted co-conspirator along with about 250 other groups and individuals in a case against the Holy Land Foundation charity. The charity was convicted of supporting Hamas, a designated terrorist organization in the United States, though no formal charges have been brought against CAIR. As a result, it will not take much for groups within the United States that are hostile to CAIR to use the UAE decision against the group.
The goal of the Emiratis and Saudis is to get U.S. authorities focused on CAIR and MAS so that they can use that to press Washington to take action against the Muslim Brotherhood. They are unlikely to get their wish given the lack of evidence that the Brotherhood is engaged in terrorism and given the U.S. focus on fighting jihadists — an effort that requires the Americans to work with moderate forces.
On the domestic front, however, CAIR and MAS could face legal issues. Large numbers of American Muslims support the groups, especially CAIR. Putting them under closer klix could upset American Muslims — exactly the outcome that the Islamic State and al Qaeda want.
Read more: The UAE and Saudi War on the Muslim Brotherhood Could Be Trouble for the U.S. | Stratfor
Follow us: @stratfor on Twitter | Stratfor on Facebook
-
aldinjo
- Posts: 5019
- Joined: 03/07/2011 02:49
#3602 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
U Tunisu favorit na predsjedničkim izborima kandidat koji ima 87 godina.

- ema_
- Posts: 4142
- Joined: 07/04/2011 12:48
- Location: القاهرة
#3603 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Evo, za 28. najavljeni masovni protesti od strane 'selefista' sa aminovanjem od MB - mada se još ne zna hoće li i oni učestvovati. I to - ponijet Kur'ane pa sa njima kao rekvizitima nešto pokušat.
No comment.
No comment.
-
Kat
- Posts: 660
- Joined: 19/12/2009 16:45
#3604 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Oni ljude koji se bore za muslimane pravnim sredstvima na teror listuseldzuk wrote:stratforov tekst od neki dan
The UAE and Saudi War on the Muslim Brotherhood Could Be Trouble for the U.S.
Geopolitical Diary
Monday, November 17, 2014 - 18:58 Text Size Print
The UAE Cabinet approved a list of 83 designated terrorist organizations on Saturday, including al Qaeda and the Islamic State. Much more significant, though, was the inclusion of many Muslim organizations based in the West that are believed to be allied with the Muslim Brotherhood movement. Prominent among them are two American Muslim groups: the Council on American Islamic Relations and the Muslim American Society.
The decision to put two mainstream U.S. Muslim groups on its list of terrorist organizations is part of an initiative, together with the Saudis, to undermine the Islamist movement known as the Muslim Brotherhood. The move is unlikely to succeed, but it could cause problems between the U.S. government and the American Muslim community.
Ever since the Muslim Brotherhood's rise in the aftermath of the 2011 Arab Spring, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia have felt deeply threatened by the Islamist movement. Both countries supported the July 2013 coup that toppled the Brotherhood-led government of Mohammed Morsi in Egypt. They continue to use their financial might to prop up the government of former military chief President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. In addition, they are trying to make sure that the Brotherhood in the region is generally weakened, or even decimated.
What is a Geopolitical Diary? George Friedman Explains.
From their perspective, the Islamism of the Muslim Brotherhood is a far greater threat to the monarchies than even the jihadism of al Qaeda and the Islamic State. Given the armed insurrectionist approach of the jihadists, the Saudis and Emiratis can crack down on them using coercive means more easily.
But for them, the Brotherhood is a much more insidious threat. Not only does it oppose violence as a means of achieving its political goals, but it also seeks democracy. Therefore, the Brotherhood is not just difficult to counter; it promotes a political system that is a threat to the monarchical systems of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
What is worse for the Gulf Arabs is that the Brotherhood is seen as a legitimate political force in the West. Earlier this year, the Saudis and Emiratis pressured the British government to crack down on British Muslim groups that were part of the global Brotherhood network. London launched an inquiry into the movement within its borders, resulting in an unpublished report that cleared the Brotherhood of links to terrorism.
Frustrated, the Gulf Arabs are pursuing a different tack. By declaring the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim American Society (MAS) as terrorist organizations, they are trying to exploit a fault line within the United States. There is a sizable lobby within the U.S. government that is interested in cracking down on those and other Muslim groups. The Emiratis and Saudis hope the lobby will use the United Arab Emirates' announcement to push in this direction.
While CAIR has for years operated as a nonprofit advocacy entity, in 2007 U.S. authorities named it an unindicted co-conspirator along with about 250 other groups and individuals in a case against the Holy Land Foundation charity. The charity was convicted of supporting Hamas, a designated terrorist organization in the United States, though no formal charges have been brought against CAIR. As a result, it will not take much for groups within the United States that are hostile to CAIR to use the UAE decision against the group.
The goal of the Emiratis and Saudis is to get U.S. authorities focused on CAIR and MAS so that they can use that to press Washington to take action against the Muslim Brotherhood. They are unlikely to get their wish given the lack of evidence that the Brotherhood is engaged in terrorism and given the U.S. focus on fighting jihadists — an effort that requires the Americans to work with moderate forces.
On the domestic front, however, CAIR and MAS could face legal issues. Large numbers of American Muslims support the groups, especially CAIR. Putting them under closer klix could upset American Muslims — exactly the outcome that the Islamic State and al Qaeda want.
Read more: The UAE and Saudi War on the Muslim Brotherhood Could Be Trouble for the U.S. | Stratfor
Follow us: @stratfor on Twitter | Stratfor on Facebook
Teroristi: Thania, Maria, Floyd advokati CAIR-a
- Kikibombona
- Posts: 34325
- Joined: 29/06/2013 08:48
#3605 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
A kazu meni ovi na temi da ce selefije preuzeti Egipat.ema_ wrote:Evo, za 28. najavljeni masovni protesti od strane 'selefista' sa aminovanjem od MB - mada se još ne zna hoće li i oni učestvovati. I to - ponijet Kur'ane pa sa njima kao rekvizitima nešto pokušat.
No comment.
Kakvi diletanti.
Samo naprijed Sisi i u kost sa ekstremistima i vjerskim fanaticima.
-
Avetinho
- Posts: 7135
- Joined: 07/09/2012 21:22
- Location: Ja sam odavle
#3606 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Ne znam kako se onda mozes cuditi kad "vjerski fanatici" krenu "u kost" protiv "kjafira", kad i sam zagovaras rjesenje silom.Kikibombona wrote:A kazu meni ovi na temi da ce selefije preuzeti Egipat.ema_ wrote:Evo, za 28. najavljeni masovni protesti od strane 'selefista' sa aminovanjem od MB - mada se još ne zna hoće li i oni učestvovati. I to - ponijet Kur'ane pa sa njima kao rekvizitima nešto pokušat.
No comment.![]()
Kakvi diletanti.
Samo naprijed Sisi i u kost sa ekstremistima i vjerskim fanaticima.
- Kikibombona
- Posts: 34325
- Joined: 29/06/2013 08:48
#3607 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Ja sam po tom pitanju maksimalno principijelan.Avetinho wrote: Ne znam kako se onda mozes cuditi kad "vjerski fanatici" krenu "u kost" protiv "kjafira", kad i sam zagovaras rjesenje silom.
Portiv ateistickih fanatika isto tako treba u kost, kao i protiv vjerskih. Protiv fasista isto. U kost protiv svakoga ko remeti mir i pokusava isprovocirati opste nasilje.
Valjda je jasno da sa fanaticima i ekstremistima ne pali lijepa rijec.
I ne mislim da treba biti nasilan u fizickom smislu. Naprotiv, uvijek sam protiv upotrebe fizicke sile. To je posljednja metoda koju treba iskoristiti. Ja sam za to da Egipat pohapsi ekstremiste i vjerske fanatike koji prijete sigurnosti drzave.
- Kikibombona
- Posts: 34325
- Joined: 29/06/2013 08:48
#3608 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
http://www.advance.hr/vijesti/sisi-za-v ... palestinu/
Svaka mu je zlatna
Jedini normalan arapski lider.
Svaka mu je zlatna
Jedini normalan arapski lider.
-
Avetinho
- Posts: 7135
- Joined: 07/09/2012 21:22
- Location: Ja sam odavle
#3609 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Taj tvoj "jedini normalan lider u Arapa" je naslijepo pohapsio i na smrt osudio stotine gradjana Egipta iskljucivo zbog njihove politicke afilijacije, ni zbog kakvog zlocina. Ne bih mu bio u kozi kad vjetar jednom promijeni smijer.Kikibombona wrote:Ja sam po tom pitanju maksimalno principijelan.Avetinho wrote: Ne znam kako se onda mozes cuditi kad "vjerski fanatici" krenu "u kost" protiv "kjafira", kad i sam zagovaras rjesenje silom.
Portiv ateistickih fanatika isto tako treba u kost, kao i protiv vjerskih. Protiv fasista isto. U kost protiv svakoga ko remeti mir i pokusava isprovocirati opste nasilje.
Valjda je jasno da sa fanaticima i ekstremistima ne pali lijepa rijec.
I ne mislim da treba biti nasilan u fizickom smislu. Naprotiv, uvijek sam protiv upotrebe fizicke sile. To je posljednja metoda koju treba iskoristiti. Ja sam za to da Egipat pohapsi ekstremiste i vjerske fanatike koji prijete sigurnosti drzave.
- japin_mutapi
- Posts: 11829
- Joined: 11/06/2011 19:00
- Location: Uostalom, mislim da genocidne Kartagene treba demontirati.
#3610 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
kad pestanu kapati milijarde petrodolara iz saudijeAvetinho wrote:Taj tvoj "jedini normalan lider u Arapa" je naslijepo pohapsio i na smrt osudio stotine gradjana Egipta iskljucivo zbog njihove politicke afilijacije, ni zbog kakvog zlocina. Ne bih mu bio u kozi kad vjetar jednom promijeni smijer.Kikibombona wrote:Ja sam po tom pitanju maksimalno principijelan.Avetinho wrote: Ne znam kako se onda mozes cuditi kad "vjerski fanatici" krenu "u kost" protiv "kjafira", kad i sam zagovaras rjesenje silom.
Portiv ateistickih fanatika isto tako treba u kost, kao i protiv vjerskih. Protiv fasista isto. U kost protiv svakoga ko remeti mir i pokusava isprovocirati opste nasilje.
Valjda je jasno da sa fanaticima i ekstremistima ne pali lijepa rijec.
I ne mislim da treba biti nasilan u fizickom smislu. Naprotiv, uvijek sam protiv upotrebe fizicke sile. To je posljednja metoda koju treba iskoristiti. Ja sam za to da Egipat pohapsi ekstremiste i vjerske fanatike koji prijete sigurnosti drzave.
- ema_
- Posts: 4142
- Joined: 07/04/2011 12:48
- Location: القاهرة
#3611 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Kikibombona wrote:Ja sam po tom pitanju maksimalno principijelan.Avetinho wrote: Ne znam kako se onda mozes cuditi kad "vjerski fanatici" krenu "u kost" protiv "kjafira", kad i sam zagovaras rjesenje silom.
Portiv ateistickih fanatika isto tako treba u kost, kao i protiv vjerskih. Protiv fasista isto. U kost protiv svakoga ko remeti mir i pokusava isprovocirati opste nasilje.
Valjda je jasno da sa fanaticima i ekstremistima ne pali lijepa rijec.
I ne mislim da treba biti nasilan u fizickom smislu. Naprotiv, uvijek sam protiv upotrebe fizicke sile. To je posljednja metoda koju treba iskoristiti. Ja sam za to da Egipat pohapsi ekstremiste i vjerske fanatike koji prijete sigurnosti drzave.
+1000
Ja ne znam ko može uopće podržavati nasilje i nered na ulicama i kome je to u interesu da se ometa normalan život?
Egipat je itekako u boljem stanju nego prošle godine u isto vrijeme, od toliko novoizgrađenih cesta i infrastukture, uređenijeg prometa, uvedenih sankcija i prometne policije, do turizma za koji statistike kažu da je do 200% veći broj turista nego inače i sad je nekome u interesu drugi Irak ili šta već uraditi
I ma koliko neki (aman 'upućeni') osuđivali, prije ću dati glas Sisiju nego bandi sa Sinaja (oni što su dali prisegu ISISU nedavno) ili dvoličnim 'selefistima' koji su ispali prava đubrad još kad je Morsija trebalo svrgnuti, a sad se glumi neki Islam. Sve to treba u zatvore za dobro onih koji žele mir i prosperitet Egiptu.
- Kikibombona
- Posts: 34325
- Joined: 29/06/2013 08:48
#3612 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
ema_ wrote: +1000
Ja ne znam ko može uopće podržavati nasilje i nered na ulicama i kome je to u interesu da se ometa normalan život?
Egipat je itekako u boljem stanju nego prošle godine u isto vrijeme, od toliko novoizgrađenih cesta i infrastukture, uređenijeg prometa, uvedenih sankcija i prometne policije, do turizma za koji statistike kažu da je do 200% veći broj turista nego inače i sad je nekome u interesu drugi Irak ili šta već uraditi![]()
I ma koliko neki (aman 'upućeni') osuđivali, prije ću dati glas Sisiju nego bandi sa Sinaja (oni što su dali prisegu ISISU nedavno) ili dvoličnim 'selefistima' koji su ispali prava đubrad još kad je Morsija trebalo svrgnuti, a sad se glumi neki Islam. Sve to treba u zatvore za dobro onih koji žele mir i prosperitet Egiptu.
Sukob zele ovi GRANDE MUSLIMANI koji dozivljavaju ushicenje na svaki masakr ISIL monstruma. Vecinu ih karakterise intelektualna skucenost i otudjenost od tipicnog bosanskog covjeka kojeg dozivljavaju kao kjafira.
Nikako ne mogu prikriti zlurada ocekivanja da u Egiptu bukne kao u Siriji i Iraku. Mene su ovdje ubjedjivali da ce u Egiptu sigurno eskalirati kada je narod otjerao ihvanije. Odmah mi je bilo jasno da su to njihove ZELJE a ne objektivne prognoze.
Sve su to karakteristike vjerskih fanatika. Zadrtost, agresivnost, iskljucivost, arogantnost. Slicni su kao jaje jajetu, roboti koje pokrece mrznja prema drugom i drugacijem. Njihova je parola 'ili po nasem ili nikako'.
General Sisi je rekao NIKAKO. I dobit ce po glavi svi koji podrzavaju ekstremizam i zele Egiptu sirijski ili libijski scenarij.
-
aldinjo
- Posts: 5019
- Joined: 03/07/2011 02:49
#3613 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Gdje ti živiš živa bila pa pišeš ovakve gluposti?ema_ wrote:Kikibombona wrote:Ja sam po tom pitanju maksimalno principijelan.Avetinho wrote: Ne znam kako se onda mozes cuditi kad "vjerski fanatici" krenu "u kost" protiv "kjafira", kad i sam zagovaras rjesenje silom.
Portiv ateistickih fanatika isto tako treba u kost, kao i protiv vjerskih. Protiv fasista isto. U kost protiv svakoga ko remeti mir i pokusava isprovocirati opste nasilje.
Valjda je jasno da sa fanaticima i ekstremistima ne pali lijepa rijec.
I ne mislim da treba biti nasilan u fizickom smislu. Naprotiv, uvijek sam protiv upotrebe fizicke sile. To je posljednja metoda koju treba iskoristiti. Ja sam za to da Egipat pohapsi ekstremiste i vjerske fanatike koji prijete sigurnosti drzave.
+1000
Ja ne znam ko može uopće podržavati nasilje i nered na ulicama i kome je to u interesu da se ometa normalan život?
Egipat je itekako u boljem stanju nego prošle godine u isto vrijeme, od toliko novoizgrađenih cesta i infrastukture, uređenijeg prometa, uvedenih sankcija i prometne policije, do turizma za koji statistike kažu da je do 200% veći broj turista nego inače i sad je nekome u interesu drugi Irak ili šta već uraditi![]()
I ma koliko neki (aman 'upućeni') osuđivali, prije ću dati glas Sisiju nego bandi sa Sinaja (oni što su dali prisegu ISISU nedavno) ili dvoličnim 'selefistima' koji su ispali prava đubrad još kad je Morsija trebalo svrgnuti, a sad se glumi neki Islam. Sve to treba u zatvore za dobro onih koji žele mir i prosperitet Egiptu.
-
aldinjo
- Posts: 5019
- Joined: 03/07/2011 02:49
#3614 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Ubjedljivo najgluplji postovi od ovog simpatizera ubice muslimana i munafika na ovom forumu.Avetinho wrote:Taj tvoj "jedini normalan lider u Arapa" je naslijepo pohapsio i na smrt osudio stotine gradjana Egipta iskljucivo zbog njihove politicke afilijacije, ni zbog kakvog zlocina. Ne bih mu bio u kozi kad vjetar jednom promijeni smijer.Kikibombona wrote:Ja sam po tom pitanju maksimalno principijelan.Avetinho wrote: Ne znam kako se onda mozes cuditi kad "vjerski fanatici" krenu "u kost" protiv "kjafira", kad i sam zagovaras rjesenje silom.
Portiv ateistickih fanatika isto tako treba u kost, kao i protiv vjerskih. Protiv fasista isto. U kost protiv svakoga ko remeti mir i pokusava isprovocirati opste nasilje.
Valjda je jasno da sa fanaticima i ekstremistima ne pali lijepa rijec.
I ne mislim da treba biti nasilan u fizickom smislu. Naprotiv, uvijek sam protiv upotrebe fizicke sile. To je posljednja metoda koju treba iskoristiti. Ja sam za to da Egipat pohapsi ekstremiste i vjerske fanatike koji prijete sigurnosti drzave.
- ema_
- Posts: 4142
- Joined: 07/04/2011 12:48
- Location: القاهرة
#3615 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
@aldinjo
Tamo gdje ti nisi ni primirisao, al zato glumiš upućenog. Kad budeš živio u Egiptu koju godinu javi se.
Tamo gdje ti nisi ni primirisao, al zato glumiš upućenog. Kad budeš živio u Egiptu koju godinu javi se.
-
aldinjo
- Posts: 5019
- Joined: 03/07/2011 02:49
#3616 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
A ti vjerovatno živiš pa onakve nebuloze pišeš!?ema_ wrote:@aldinjo
Tamo gdje ti nisi ni primirisao, al zato glumiš upućenog. Kad budeš živio u Egiptu koju godinu javi se.
-
Avetinho
- Posts: 7135
- Joined: 07/09/2012 21:22
- Location: Ja sam odavle
#3617 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Gdje ti vidis da ja simpatiziram ubice muslimana?aldinjo wrote:Ubjedljivo najgluplji postovi od ovog simpatizera ubice muslimana i munafika na ovom forumu.Avetinho wrote:Taj tvoj "jedini normalan lider u Arapa" je naslijepo pohapsio i na smrt osudio stotine gradjana Egipta iskljucivo zbog njihove politicke afilijacije, ni zbog kakvog zlocina. Ne bih mu bio u kozi kad vjetar jednom promijeni smijer.Kikibombona wrote:
Ja sam po tom pitanju maksimalno principijelan.
Portiv ateistickih fanatika isto tako treba u kost, kao i protiv vjerskih. Protiv fasista isto. U kost protiv svakoga ko remeti mir i pokusava isprovocirati opste nasilje.
Valjda je jasno da sa fanaticima i ekstremistima ne pali lijepa rijec.
I ne mislim da treba biti nasilan u fizickom smislu. Naprotiv, uvijek sam protiv upotrebe fizicke sile. To je posljednja metoda koju treba iskoristiti. Ja sam za to da Egipat pohapsi ekstremiste i vjerske fanatike koji prijete sigurnosti drzave.
- ema_
- Posts: 4142
- Joined: 07/04/2011 12:48
- Location: القاهرة
#3618 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
@aldinjo
Ne znam ko ti je rekao da si ovdje ovlašten da govoriš jel ko piše nebuloze i gluposti.
Moja lokacija jasno piše. Sad je pitanje ko priča napamet samo.
Ne znam ko ti je rekao da si ovdje ovlašten da govoriš jel ko piše nebuloze i gluposti.
Moja lokacija jasno piše. Sad je pitanje ko priča napamet samo.
- limeni
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: 30/12/2007 00:39
#3619 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
momak ti si ovdje izgleda zalutao.ema_ wrote:@aldinjo
Ne znam ko ti je rekao da si ovdje ovlašten da govoriš jel ko piše nebuloze i gluposti.
Moja lokacija jasno piše. Sad je pitanje ko priča napamet samo.
- Challenger__
- Posts: 26509
- Joined: 25/03/2012 09:31
- Location: In weiter Ferne, so nah!
- Contact:
#3620 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Limeni. Ema je žensko, živi u Kairu i ne bih rekao da je zalutala.

- ema_
- Posts: 4142
- Joined: 07/04/2011 12:48
- Location: القاهرة
#3621 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Džaba, nothing beats kojekakve analize i stručna mišljenja bh populacije
.
- Challenger__
- Posts: 26509
- Joined: 25/03/2012 09:31
- Location: In weiter Ferne, so nah!
- Contact:
#3622 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Tlapnje. To su tlapnje komplikovanih bosanskih seljaka koji ne znaju ni šta je dobro za njih, a kamo li za druge.
p.s.


p.s.

- ema_
- Posts: 4142
- Joined: 07/04/2011 12:48
- Location: القاهرة
#3623 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
A vidim onaj gore piše kako se u Egiptu priprema 'tlo za dugotrajni rat' , mislim ono, rat u kući bio svakome željnog nasilja, krvoprolića i fesada bilo koje vrste.
Egipat ide u još bolje dane aBd!
Egipat ide u još bolje dane aBd!
- Challenger__
- Posts: 26509
- Joined: 25/03/2012 09:31
- Location: In weiter Ferne, so nah!
- Contact:
#3624 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Aman Ema, to je seljačka zloba. Zloba koja je urođena primitivcu koji se ne raduje svom uspjehu nego tuđem neuspjehu. Crkava se od zlobe što i u Egiptu nije pakao kao u Libiji, Siriji ili Iraku.
Seljačka posla.
Seljačka posla.
- ema_
- Posts: 4142
- Joined: 07/04/2011 12:48
- Location: القاهرة
#3625 Re: Egipat (pročitati prvi post)
Tuga, Boga mi. 
