DaysleepeR wrote: ↑27/02/2025 23:08
ITNet wrote: ↑27/02/2025 16:32
DaysleepeR wrote: ↑27/02/2025 15:08
Ne bih se složio da ne govore ništa, poredak u testiranjima je bio validan za prvih nekoliko utrka, barem do prvih nadogradnji u Barceloni.
Vremena ne govore puno u ovom trenutku, sve do zadnjeg kruga zadnjeg dana, kada većina ekipa sa prvim vozačima stavi najmekše gume i obiđu jedan brzi krug sa minimumom goriva.
Najbolji uvid u to kako ko stoji daju stručnjaci koji stoje pored staze i gledaju kako vozači napadaju najteže krivine.
To radi Edd Straw sa The Race.
Ima ovdje analiza sa staze
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/hami ... st-so-far/
Mislim da te top vremena iz 2024 testiranja (npr. Zhou bio 4) i kada su ostvarena (Sainz koji je najbrzi i neki ostali ostvarili vrijeme 2 dan) malo jebe u toj konstantaciji, Top vremena nista ne znace kod testiranja, simulacije trke kazu mnogo vise i dublje
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-t ... /10579237/
Volim kad neki strucnjaci ovako padnu na sitnicama pa pokazu da ne barataju bas tematikom
Rent free.
Ne znam sto imas potrebu stalno da skaces na moje postove.
Pogledaj rezultate prvih utrka prosle sezone pa ces vidjeti ko je bio u vrhu. Na kraju krajeva, imas ovu sezonu pa prati.
Zato sto bubnes nebulozu neku a furas se ovdje kao neki strucnjak zato te prozivam i prozivacu vazda za takve stvari
Eto bubnuo si opet nesto i dokazi te pobijaju, pogledaj ti te rezultate trka, Zou bio na testu koji? Zavrsio prvu trku 11, drugu 18 o cemu ti pricas?, Koji je Lando bio na testovima? a koji u prvih par trka?
Tvrdis najbolju krugovi zadnji dan bla bla bla nije istina najbolji kurg napravljen drugi dan eto dokaza, Kontas li ti ista sta ti se prica?
Daj ti te dokaze za to sto tvrdi, evo ja ti dokazao da bacas nebuloze
Evo jedan clanak o sandbagingu pa procitaj malo, i pazi sta kaze neki drugi strucnjak na to tvoje da top vrmeena govore kao nesto
“The race sims are the best reference,”
https://www.crash.net/f1/feature/106426 ... ger-guilty
DaysleepeR wrote: ↑26/02/2025 12:38
RedBull najlošije izgleda, po analizi Gary Andersona ovo je prošlogodišnji bolid, skoro nikakve razlike nema.
I ovo si rekao neki dan, pa je sutra dan bila druga prica od nekih drugih strucnjaka koji kazu:
However, F1 tech expert Sam Collins thinks he has uncovered the truth.
“I have been spending a lot of time staring at a lot of photos of the Red Bull,” he said on Sky Sports.
“At the end of [Wednesday] I felt like they didn’t understand the car. If someone came to me and said ‘that’s the car they raced at the end of last year’, I would struggle to disagree.
“However, I have heard on the grapevine that the issue Red Bull faced earlier on was a water pressure issue."
“I have seen some photos," Collins continued. "Unfortunately I can’t share them with you.
“But the photos I’ve seen make it clear what’s different about this year’s Red Bull.
“While it looks really similar, on the skin, Christian Horner says it’s 99% new and every surface is different.
“That’s absolutely right - the more you look at the photos, the more you see the little differences on the car.
“Every shape is slightly different.
“A producer yesterday pointed out the angle of the front wing endplates is slightly more inward-facing, they point toward the nose more than they did in Abu Dhabi last year.
“The concept is the same - the pull rod front suspension, the push rod rear.
“That’s a concept that is moving towards being universal for this generation of cars. Unless you speak Italian and you live in Maranello where they chose to do something different.
“Even Mercedes would have evolved towards that concept if these rules stayed in place longer.
“Everybody copied Red Bull’s sidepod concept. You can see the protruding upper edge, the vertical cooling slot, the horizontal cooling slot. That’s a pure Red Bull design.
“But where the big differences are with the Red Bull are underneath the bodywork.
“The water pressure is, I think, relates to the fact that they are running a completely new cooling system on the car.
“They have moved the radiators and heat exchanges around.
“On the sidepods is a distinctive horizontal V-shape which I first saw on Ferrari-powered cars in 2016.
“That concept has carried through to this Red Bull after many years of not really being present in Formula 1.
“So the water pressure issue, with a new cooling system, probably suggests something might not be designed right, or maybe a bit of pipework is chafing, or it’s not as well manufactured as it should be.
“Or could it be the age-old problem of finger trouble, where somebody hasn’t bolted something on as tightly as they should have.
“That’s why you go testing - to find these problems.
“But the car concept itself looks similar to last year.
“The aerodynamic brain power of Red Bull would have been dedicated to this car until January 2. They were not allowed to work on the 2026 car until that date.
“After that date? I don’t know how much goes into next year’s Red Bull, and how much goes into this year’s Red Bull and its cooling system.”
At first glance, the RB21 which broke cover in 2025 did not appear to look significantly different to its predecessor.
But Red Bull boss Horner has pointed out that last year’s car won more races than anybody despite the team conceding the constructors’ championship to McLaren.
Ti zakuco sa svojim nebulozama, slusas/citas 2-3 covjeka/portala i sve sto oni napisu ti se drzis toga kao pjan plota, ja kad volim neku temu procitam o njoj 31242 clanka, osobe, misljenja, pa neko svoje misljenje imam, zato te i prozavim nebi li ti otvorio malo oci, pogledao stvari i sa neke druge strane, a ne ko delegati kakvi samo svoje neke teroji zavjere
