Forum Klix.ba

citroen wrote:

ljubav_aha wrote:Did the Koran or the practice of Islam influence the people you interviewed or those whose stories were included in the collection?

I am not an expert on the Koran and the stories don’t really examine how the religion influences belief or practice. The Koran really didn’t come up much in conversation. In Afghanistan people brought up Shari’a, though, explaining that for any event to be proven as against Islamic law, you need four witnesses to the act, so if something happens in private it’s legally as if it never happened. This is the same law that is unfortunately used very badly against women, if raped with no witnesses. But the same concept of witnesses works to protect homosexual acts that have no witnesses; it’s as if they never occurred, according to Shari’a law. It is important to note that I speak to people who tend to speak some English or who tend to have activist natures, and people who speak English are more influenced by Western culture and so they tend to be more liberal on religious issues – that is one thing that biases my work. Even the act of having translators impacts the conversation.

ljubav_aha wrote:

bijela wrote:afganistan - neiscrpni izvor saznanja o šerijatskom pravu.

ali ne iskljuciv izvor

ljubav_aha wrote:

citroen wrote:

ljubav_aha wrote:Did the Koran or the practice of Islam influence the people you interviewed or those whose stories were included in the collection?

I am not an expert on the Koran and the stories don’t really examine how the religion influences belief or practice. The Koran really didn’t come up much in conversation. In Afghanistan people brought up Shari’a, though, explaining that for any event to be proven as against Islamic law, you need four witnesses to the act, so if something happens in private it’s legally as if it never happened. This is the same law that is unfortunately used very badly against women, if raped with no witnesses. But the same concept of witnesses works to protect homosexual acts that have no witnesses; it’s as if they never occurred, according to Shari’a law. It is important to note that I speak to people who tend to speak some English or who tend to have activist natures, and people who speak English are more influenced by Western culture and so they tend to be more liberal on religious issues – that is one thing that biases my work. Even the act of having translators impacts the conversation.

sta je znaci,afganisanci ga nisu dobro informisali

http://www.ahl-alquran.com/English/show ... in_id=6157

"Proof of adultery or rape liable to Hadd shall be one of the following:

(a) The accused makes confession, or

(b) There are at least four Muslim adult male witnesses.”[xi]



hm

bijela wrote:

ljubav_aha wrote:

bijela wrote:afganistan - neiscrpni izvor saznanja o šerijatskom pravu.

ali ne iskljuciv izvor

ne da nije isključivi nego ne bi trebao biti nikakav (za onog ko otprilike, ako ništa više, zna u kakvom je haosu afganistan)

citroen wrote:Procitaj boldirano na pocetku tvog posta

Ductus Holedocus wrote:Bog kaze...da je sve u paru stvoreno...


pametnom i jedna dosta!

Ductus Holedocus wrote:Ko sto je i ostala razvrat nastala..nastao je i on..

Ductus Holedocus wrote:Ko sto je i ostala razvrat nastala..nastao je i on..

ljubav_aha wrote:

Ductus Holedocus wrote:Bog kaze...da je sve u paru stvoreno...


pametnom i jedna dosta!

kako je stvoren homoseksulac

ljubav_aha wrote:

Ductus Holedocus wrote:Bog kaze...da je sve u paru stvoreno...


pametnom i jedna dosta!

kako je stvoren homoseksulac

karbofix wrote:

ljubav_aha wrote:

Ductus Holedocus wrote:Bog kaze...da je sve u paru stvoreno...


pametnom i jedna dosta!

kako je stvoren homoseksulac

oj boze nije stvoren ni homoseksualac ni heteroseksualac, niti bilo ko i bilo sta.....stvoren je ČOVJEK kome je dat RAZUM....zbog toga sto covjek ima izbor, odgovarat ce za svoja djela, za razliku od npr. vuka ciji je zivot - lovi, jedi, razmnozavaj se...i on tu ne moze nista....... jedan ČOVJEK je odabrao da bude homoseksualac....ok! ko vjeruje u Boga zna da ce on za to odgovorati kao i svi ostali!

ljubav_aha wrote:
vecina gej populacije kazu kako osjecali privlacnost prema istom polu u ranim godinama djetinjstva_sto se desilo sa razumom djeteta
mnoga istrazivanja usmjeravaju znacaj genetike,ali ne iskljucuju uticaj sredine

tranquil wrote:

ljubav_aha wrote:

Ductus Holedocus wrote:Bog kaze...da je sve u paru stvoreno...


pametnom i jedna dosta!

kako je stvoren homoseksulac

Neki su već razmišljali o tome.

karbofix wrote:

ljubav_aha wrote:
vecina gej populacije kazu kako osjecali privlacnost prema istom polu u ranim godinama djetinjstva_sto se desilo sa razumom djeteta
mnoga istrazivanja usmjeravaju znacaj genetike,ali ne iskljucuju uticaj sredine

to je ono dosh'o mali kuci kaze tati: "tata, jedan djecak iz razreda mi govori da sam peder."
kaze njemu otac:"sutra mu lijepo u skoli pukni samarcinu..."
kad ce njemu sin:"ali tata, on je meni tako sladak"
sad ozbiljno
nisam sad psiholog da govorim sta se desilo sa razumom djeteta...ugl mislim da je to neki oblik poremecaja

bailaor wrote:To je bolest nista drugo...treba to nazvati pravim imenom.

idealnaM wrote:
"A picture is worth a thousand words"

ljubav_aha wrote:

karbofix wrote:

ljubav_aha wrote:
vecina gej populacije kazu kako osjecali privlacnost prema istom polu u ranim godinama djetinjstva_sto se desilo sa razumom djeteta
mnoga istrazivanja usmjeravaju znacaj genetike,ali ne iskljucuju uticaj sredine

to je ono dosh'o mali kuci kaze tati: "tata, jedan djecak iz razreda mi govori da sam peder."
kaze njemu otac:"sutra mu lijepo u skoli pukni samarcinu..."
kad ce njemu sin:"ali tata, on je meni tako sladak"
sad ozbiljno
nisam sad psiholog da govorim sta se desilo sa razumom djeteta...ugl mislim da je to neki oblik poremecaja

karbofix,istrazivanja genteike jednojajcanih blizanca je prilicno dokazala uticaj genetike,znaci,Bog je stvorio taj genetski kod

karbofix wrote:

ljubav_aha wrote:karbofix,istrazivanja genteike jednojajcanih blizanca je prilicno dokazala uticaj genetike,znaci,Bog je stvorio taj genetski kod

ok! znači...homoseksualac je homoseksualac zato što ga Bog stvorio takvim. da li je lopov - lopov, zato što ga bog stvorio takvim? da li je ubica - ubica, zato što ga bog stvorio takvim? nije mi to sad baš najjasnije

ljubav_aha wrote:

karbofix wrote:

ljubav_aha wrote:karbofix,istrazivanja genteike jednojajcanih blizanca je prilicno dokazala uticaj genetike,znaci,Bog je stvorio taj genetski kod

ok! znači...homoseksualac je homoseksualac zato što ga Bog stvorio takvim. da li je lopov - lopov, zato što ga bog stvorio takvim? da li je ubica - ubica, zato što ga bog stvorio takvim? nije mi to sad baš najjasnije

pisem o genetskom kodu

profili ubica i lopova mogu biti uzrokovani bioloskim i socijalnim faktorima ,naravno,uzajamno

ali geneza seksulanog usmjerenja je vlro kompleksna