Forum Klix.ba

Amidza od mog dobrog prijatelja sa posla je bio u ovom avionu sto je isao za Egipat. Oni su inace rodjeni u Egiptu ali on vec godinama radi u Parizu. Krenuo covjek da se ozeni i da povede zenu sa sobom u Pariz. 40ak godina ima. Prijatelj juce nije bio na poslu tako da nisam imao priliku detaljnije pricati sa njim. Samo vidim na Fb sto napise.

ja stvarno ne smijem u avion sjest

Z

sadie_forever wrote:ja stvarno ne smijem u avion sjest

Posalji svekrvu negdje na odmor

Matijevic_Vlado wrote:Z

sadie_forever wrote:ja stvarno ne smijem u avion sjest

Posalji svekrvu negdje na odmor

nije to sala jarane,jest da ja nju ne podnosim i brojim dane kad je vise necu morati vidjati,ali ne zelim joj smrt...ko je jebe

sadie_forever wrote:

Matijevic_Vlado wrote:Z

sadie_forever wrote:ja stvarno ne smijem u avion sjest

Posalji svekrvu negdje na odmor

nije to sala jarane,jest da ja nju ne podnosim i brojim dane kad je vise necu morati vidjati,ali ne zelim joj smrt...ko je jebe

Zasto izjednacavas putovinu avionom sa smrcu?

Edin H. wrote:

sadie_forever wrote:

Matijevic_Vlado wrote: Posalji svekrvu negdje na odmor

nije to sala jarane,jest da ja nju ne podnosim i brojim dane kad je vise necu morati vidjati,ali ne zelim joj smrt...ko je jebe

Zasto izjednacavas putovinu avionom sa smrcu?

Mozda i prezivi, ako je crna kutija

Predugo trajalo - sedam minuta, za teroristicki napad, eksplozivnu naparavu, prekratko za pozar

Edin H. wrote:Predugo trajalo - sedam minuta, za teroristicki napad, eksplozivnu naparavu, prekratko za pozar

Nije teroristicki napad.

Connaisseur Karlin wrote:

Edin H. wrote:Predugo trajalo - sedam minuta, za teroristicki napad, eksplozivnu naparavu, prekratko za pozar

Nije teroristicki napad.

Baterija od laptopa

Edin H. wrote:

Connaisseur Karlin wrote:

Edin H. wrote:Predugo trajalo - sedam minuta, za teroristicki napad, eksplozivnu naparavu, prekratko za pozar

Nije teroristicki napad.

Baterija od laptopa

Tehnicki problem!

Connaisseur Karlin wrote:

Edin H. wrote:
Baterija od laptopa

Tehnicki problem!

Ne servisira to majstor Mugdib iz Velesica.

Edin H. wrote:

Connaisseur Karlin wrote:

Edin H. wrote:
Baterija od laptopa

Tehnicki problem!

Ne servisira to majstor Mugdib iz Velesica.

Nije ni to!

Maj,10,2016, izvjestaj EASA:

Reason:
During design reviews that were conducted following safety recommendations related to in-service
incidents and one accident on another aircraft type, it has been determined that, in specific flight
conditions, the allowable load limits on the vertical tail plane could be reached and possibly
exceeded.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to in-flight detachment of the vertical tail plane, possibly
resulting in loss of control of the aeroplan...

Postavljen je period od 48 mjeseci da se naprave korekcije sistema,do sredine 2017 godine!

Sto je najgore ja vjerujem da je tehnicki problem avioni su postali zapusteni toliko, ,lijepi autobus

sadie_forever wrote:Sto je najgore ja vjerujem da je tehnicki problem avioni su postali zapusteni toliko, ,lijepi autobus

Ja se vozio Centrotransom iz Beograda, zapalile se kocnice niz Karaulu

Connaisseur Karlin wrote:Maj,10,2016, izvjestaj EASA:

Reason:
During design reviews that were conducted following safety recommendations related to in-service
incidents and one accident on another aircraft type, it has been determined that, in specific flight
conditions, the allowable load limits on the vertical tail plane could be reached and possibly
exceeded.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to in-flight detachment of the vertical tail plane, possibly
resulting in loss of control of the aeroplan...

Postavljen je period od 48 mjeseci da se naprave korekcije sistema,do sredine 2017 godine!

Nije ni to.

bice prije da se desila serija dogadjaja koja je dovela do ovoga jer rijetko kada jedna stvar dovede do nesrece nego terorizam.

vade_mecum wrote:bice prije da se desila serija dogadjaja koja je dovela do ovoga jer rijetko kada jedna stvar dovede do nesrece nego terorizam.

Ko na pijaci

'Catastrophic' crash

Many of the papers analyse the release of automated communications data sent by the EgyptAir Airbus which crashed into the Mediterranean on Friday, killing all onboard.

The Sunday Mirror says fire was detected on EgyptAir flight MS804 "two minutes before 66 people died", adding that experts believe it was caused by a bomb. "The relatively short time between smoke warnings and the plane going into a terrible seven-mile plunge suggests something more catastrophic than a cigarette or electrical fire," says the paper.


EgyptAir A320Image copyright Reuters
According to the Sunday People, the fire that brought the aircraft down "was so rapid and catastrophic that experts fear it may have been sparked by a terrorist device".

The Sunday Telegraph quotes an anonymous pilot, who flies the larger Airbus A330 for a European airline, saying he believed the data log "suggested that the windows in the right side of the cockpit were blown out by an explosion inside the aircraft".

Aviation safety specialist David Learmount is quoted in the Sunday Express saying the key question currently is how the fire started, whether that is an "ordinary electrical fire" or was "started deliberately with a small explosion or incendiary device".

Experts, says the Sun on Sunday, "were unable to explain how it fell so rapidly that the crew sent no mayday signals".

The Mail on Sunday quotes Simon Hradecky of the website Aviation Herald, which released the automated Acars maintenance messages from the crashed jet. He says the airliner's oxygen supply could have been breached, causing the fire to spread more quickly, so that it "becomes catastrophic within three minutes".

According to the Sunday Times, the information sent by the jet's onboard computer "might help explain what happened, but not why" and examination of the wreckage "will be vital".

But it may be "weeks or even months" before investigators find the Airbus's black box data recorders, notes the Observer, adding that "part of the search area has a seabed with challenging geology, and few have forgotten the two-year search needed to find the same parts of an Air France flight that crashed into the Atlantic in 2009".

Edin H. wrote:

vade_mecum wrote:bice prije da se desila serija dogadjaja koja je dovela do ovoga jer rijetko kada jedna stvar dovede do nesrece nego terorizam.

Ko na pijaci

'Catastrophic' crash

Many of the papers analyse the release of automated communications data sent by the EgyptAir Airbus which crashed into the Mediterranean on Friday, killing all onboard.

The Sunday Mirror says fire was detected on EgyptAir flight MS804 "two minutes before 66 people died", adding that experts believe it was caused by a bomb. "The relatively short time between smoke warnings and the plane going into a terrible seven-mile plunge suggests something more catastrophic than a cigarette or electrical fire," says the paper.


EgyptAir A320Image copyright Reuters
According to the Sunday People, the fire that brought the aircraft down "was so rapid and catastrophic that experts fear it may have been sparked by a terrorist device".

The Sunday Telegraph quotes an anonymous pilot, who flies the larger Airbus A330 for a European airline, saying he believed the data log "suggested that the windows in the right side of the cockpit were blown out by an explosion inside the aircraft".

Aviation safety specialist David Learmount is quoted in the Sunday Express saying the key question currently is how the fire started, whether that is an "ordinary electrical fire" or was "started deliberately with a small explosion or incendiary device".

Experts, says the Sun on Sunday, "were unable to explain how it fell so rapidly that the crew sent no mayday signals".

The Mail on Sunday quotes Simon Hradecky of the website Aviation Herald, which released the automated Acars maintenance messages from the crashed jet. He says the airliner's oxygen supply could have been breached, causing the fire to spread more quickly, so that it "becomes catastrophic within three minutes".

According to the Sunday Times, the information sent by the jet's onboard computer "might help explain what happened, but not why" and examination of the wreckage "will be vital".

But it may be "weeks or even months" before investigators find the Airbus's black box data recorders, notes the Observer, adding that "part of the search area has a seabed with challenging geology, and few have forgotten the two-year search needed to find the same parts of an Air France flight that crashed into the Atlantic in 2009".

sve stoji samo ne vidim rezon srusiti avion iznad mora. ako je bomba u pitanju logicnije mi je bilo srusiti ga na evropskom tlu.

Ms kakva bomba. Nema sanse da su u Parizu uspjeli ukrcati bombu na avion

insomnia78 wrote:Ms kakva bomba. Nema sanse da su u Parizu uspjeli ukrcati bombu na avion

I ja sumnjam, ali sta je sa prethodnim letovima koje si ti postavio.

Edin H. wrote:

insomnia78 wrote:Ms kakva bomba. Nema sanse da su u Parizu uspjeli ukrcati bombu na avion

I ja sumnjam, ali sta je sa prethodnim letovima koje si ti postavio.

negdje sam procitao da je avio bio u eritreji i tunisu prije pariza ali zar nije logicnije srusiti avion u okolici pariza nego negdje na mediteranu

Edin H. wrote:

insomnia78 wrote:Ms kakva bomba. Nema sanse da su u Parizu uspjeli ukrcati bombu na avion

I ja sumnjam, ali sta je sa prethodnim letovima koje si ti postavio.

Nisam ja
Vidis, o tome nisam razmisljao

insomnia78 wrote:

Edin H. wrote:

insomnia78 wrote:Ms kakva bomba. Nema sanse da su u Parizu uspjeli ukrcati bombu na avion

I ja sumnjam, ali sta je sa prethodnim letovima koje si ti postavio.

Nisam ja
Vidis, o tome nisam razmisljao

Preuzeo bi neko odgovornost dosad. Nije poenta izvrsit teroristicki napada a da se ne zna da je to teroristicki napad

Edin H. wrote:

Connaisseur Karlin wrote:Maj,10,2016, izvjestaj EASA:

Reason:
During design reviews that were conducted following safety recommendations related to in-service
incidents and one accident on another aircraft type, it has been determined that, in specific flight
conditions, the allowable load limits on the vertical tail plane could be reached and possibly
exceeded.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to in-flight detachment of the vertical tail plane, possibly
resulting in loss of control of the aeroplan...

Postavljen je period od 48 mjeseci da se naprave korekcije sistema,do sredine 2017 godine!

Nije ni to.

Dobro,sad vidim da si postavio mogucnost pozara tokom leta. Ako je tako,vjerovatno se desio u dijelu kod kabine i gally ,a jedna od najgorih opcija pozara jeste pozar vezan za oxugen system.

Evo kako izgleda avion nakon takvog pozara ,ali u fazi prije leta,na aerodromu:





Najcesce se pokusava poslati poruka za pomoc ili za opis dogadjanja tokom leta od strane pilota,ali,naravno,posotje situacje kad se komunikacija uopste ne moze uspostaviti iz pilotkse kabine!