Po meni ovo sa odbijanjem rukovanja je vrlo nategnuto. Jer evo živimo u periodu kada nema rukovanja, odnosno nije preporučeno, pa se rukujemo lakovima ili stisnutom pesnicom ili nikako. Naravno ne poredim ovo dvoje ali reći da je odbijanje rukovanja fundamentalistički koncept kulture je apsurd i mislim da bi po svoj logici to trebalo pasti na Sudu za ljudska prava.
Zna li ti uopce o cemu pricas !'? Znas li ti sta znaci rukovanje? On ne zeli da se rukuje sa zenama ne iz higijenskih razloga, moza cak ni iz reigijskih razloga (to mu je samo paravan), negon zato sto ZENSKO smatra nizim bicima...
Da te posjetim
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handshake
Its purpose is to convey trust, respect, balance, and equality. If it is done to form an agreement
Ako ćemo o fundamentalizmu po meni je veći fundamentalizam vjerovati isto po religiji da je moj narod izabran od Boga i bogu najmili u odnosu na druge narode. Dakle po toj logici ja smatram da smo "mi" "moj narod" bolji i vrijedniji od ostalih. Znamo o kome govorim ili?
Ne, ne znam o kome govoris, ali takva je svaka religija...
Odbijanje rukovanja po meni nije u opšte sporno jer rastemo i živimo u različitim kulturama i religijama, dogmama...itd. Ako neko ne želi da se rukuje, recimo žena, da li je insistiranje na rukovanju možda između ostalog i potencijalni seksualni napad?
Dakle mi insistiramo na tome da nekoga dodirnemo makar i dlanovim?
Jesi li ti normalan!? Rukovanje vidis kao seksualni napad.
Rukovanje se moze gledat kao seksualni napad samo u tim zaostalim bliskoistocnim drzavama gdje svaki kontakt medu spolovima
taboo...
Čemu to siljenje i prisila? Neko ko ima loše namjere njemu sigurno sam čin rukovanja neće nipta značiti ako želi da postigne svoj cilj. Ne znam nisam pametan ali sve ovo u 2020. godini izgleda smiješno. Odbijanje rukovanja u islamu nije od jučer. Nametati nekome neke norme isto tako nije dobro.
Znaci dodes u neku zemlju, u ovom slucaju Njemacku, ta ti drzava sve omuguci, i ti ne samo da ne postujes njene zakone nego ni obicaje, i jos povrh svega toga mislis da je pola njihove populacije (zene) manje vrijedno od tebe. I to je normalno jer je to vjerska sloboda. I ovo se sve desava u Njemackoj u 21st. Ne u nekoj bliskoistocnoj drzavi ili multikonfesionalnoj...
Meni su sva ta abrahamska vjerovnaja smiješna ali nisam ni za nepoštivanje tih dogmi oni koji vjeruju u njih. Po meni Nijemci ove prave grešku ali njihova zemlja njjihovi zakoni pa znaju najbolje šta rade.
Ne znas sta dogma znaci, googlaj malo... A i dogme se mogu promjenit...
Što se tiče Armenije i "genocida" mislim ako ćemo stvari gledati pravno tamo se nije desio genocid jer niti jedan sud nije presudio da jeste. Pravno dakle genocida nema, zločina naravno ima. Nemoj samo sada ovo porediti sa Srebrenicom jer su svi relavantni sudovi rekli o tome svoje pa komparacija nikako ne bi bila umjesna.
Da li ti cujes sebe sta pricas!?
Znaci genocid nikad nije postojao, zato jer nijedan sud to nije utvrdio, nevazno sto su milioni poginuli samo sto su bili druge vjere, ali papir je najvazniji jebes ljudske zivote...?
Kazes nije nijedan su presudio, evo dat cu ti ja hrpu kojih jest pa ti sebi izaberi koji ti odgovara.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_ ... anizations
International organizations
United Nations
The 1948 UN War Crimes Commission Report
On May 15, 1948, the United Nations Economic and Social Council presented a 384 page report prepared by the United Nations War Crimes Commission (UNWCC),[6] set up in London (October 1943) to collect and collate information on war crimes and war criminals.[7] :129 The report was a response to the request by the UN Secretary-General to make arrangements for "the collection and publication of information concerning human rights arising from trials of war criminals, quislings and traitors, and in particular from the Nürnberg and Tokyo Trials." The report had been prepared by members of the Legal Staff of the Commission. The report is highly topical in regard to the Armenian Genocide
The 1985 UN Genocide Report, the "Whitaker Report"
Catholic Church
In 2015, Pope Francis said that the Armenian Genocide was "considered the first genocide of the 20th century"
International Association of Genocide Scholars
In 1997 the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) passed a resolution unanimously recognizing the Ottoman massacres of Armenians as genocide:[12][13]
That this assembly of the Association of Genocide Scholars in its conference held in Montreal, June 11–13, 1997, reaffirms that the mass murder of over a million Armenians in Turkey in 1915 is a case of genocide which conforms to the statutes of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide. It further condemns the denial of the Armenian Genocide by the Turkish government and its official and unofficial agents and supporters.
The IAGS recognized the 1915 genocide in three different resolutions,
The IAGS has consistently identified the Ottoman massacres of Armenians as genocide.
International Center for Transitional Justice
In February 2002, an independent legal opinion commissioned by the International Center for Transitional Justice concluded that the Ottoman massacre of Armenians in 1915–1918 "include[d] all of the elements of the crime of genocide as defined in the [Genocide] Convention, and legal scholars as well as historians, politicians, journalists and other people would be justified in continuing to so describe them".[17] From page 2 of the report:
In 2007, the Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity wrote a letter[18] signed by 53 Nobel Laureates re-affirming the Genocide
European Parliament
On April 15, 2015, the European Parliament
Council of Europe
The Council of Europe recognized the Armenian Genocide on May 14, 2001.[31]
American Jewish organizations
On November 7, 1989, the Union for Reform Judaism passed a resolution on recognition of the Armenian Genocide.[32]
In 2014 the American Jewish Committee recognized the Armenian Genocide as a historical fact.[34][35]
In October 2015, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs published a resolution calling on the U.S. government to recognize the World War I-era Turkish massacres of Armenians as a genocide.[36]
Central Council of Jews in Germany
In April 2015, the Central Council of Jews in Germany
European People's Party
On March 3, 2015
Other
Other organizations which have recognized the Armenian Genocide include:
World Council of Churches[42]
European Green Party[43]
Mercosur Parliament[44]
Latin American Parliament[45]
Interparliamentary Assembly on Orthodoxy[46]
European Alliance of YMCAs[47]
Andean Parliament[48]
Centrist Democrat International[49]
Central American Parliament[50]
Global Greens[51]
Permanent Peoples' Tribunal
In 1984 the Permanent Peoples' Tribunal made a verdict that the Armenian Genocide is "an 'international crime' for which the Turkish state must assume responsibility", and that the United Nations and each of its members "have the right to demand this recognition and to assist the Armenian people to that end".[52][53]
Presbyterian Church (USA)
On June 20, 2014, the Presbyterian Church (USA)
Jeli ti dovoljno?
P.S A šta recimo sa pripadnicima Sikizma kojih je u Njemačkoj oko 20.000, oni se isto ne rukuju već imaju specifičan pozdrav pogotovo kada su u pianju pripadnici drugog spola. I oni su fundamentalisti i prate fundamentalistički koncept. Ovo sam samo naveo kao plastičan primjer da će ovaj siguran sam dobiti presudu na Sudu za ljudska prava.
Nigdje nisam nasao podatak da Sikhi ne smiju rukovat sa zenama.
