Ne znam taj vic.
Uvozimo autodijelove npr., ko zna šta još sve ne.
Ne znam taj vic.
Postavimo @_BataZiv_0809 za glavnog uvoznika i direktora firme.
zamisli Hamu kako Ćopa pitu u Hootersu
Domaći proizvod i strani oba imaju cijenu 100 dolara, rokneš tarifu 30% za strani proizvod on poskupi na 130, domaći proizvodjač svoj proizvod digne na 120 jer će tu imat i cjenovnu prednost, i veći profit a i osigurat će se od neminovne inflacije u ostatku ekonomije. Kupcu je samim tim sve bar 20% skuplje, a uz to i ugrožavaš odnose sa svim zemljama oko sebe.shape of despair wrote: ↑03/04/2025 00:10 Morel u 2 reda objasnjenje zasto su ove carine negativne za usa,ako su? Kako to tramp ako su negativne ih uvodi, slom berze, recesija u usa itd. thanks
tramvajtrojka wrote: ↑03/04/2025 00:00
sjecas li se ovoga blama u štrosi![]()
i ovoga no boob pr promašaja od teksta na klixu
![]()
lokal radio brat bratu mjesec dana
![]()
Hvala. A zar carinu ne plaća kupac? Znaci sad ce usa placati nesto iz EU 20% skuplje a u cilju zapravo smanjena uvoza i razvitka domace usa proizvodnje. Pa ne proizvodi usa sve zivo, svako treba uvoziti nestoNisamsdaali wrote: ↑03/04/2025 00:15Domaći proizvod i strani oba imaju cijenu 100 dolara, rokneš tarifu 30% za strani proizvod on poskupi na 130, domaći proizvodjač svoj proizvod digne na 120 jer će tu imat i cjenovnu prednost, i veći profit a i osigurat će se od neminovne inflacije u ostatku ekonomije. Kupcu je samim tim sve bar 20% skuplje, a uz to i ugrožavaš odnose sa svim zemljama oko sebe.shape of despair wrote: ↑03/04/2025 00:10 Morel u 2 reda objasnjenje zasto su ove carine negativne za usa,ako su? Kako to tramp ako su negativne ih uvodi, slom berze, recesija u usa itd. thanks
Kupac jedini plaća tarife i snosi njihove troškove
The claim that Bosnia and Herzegovina imposes a 70% tariff on U.S. goods appears to be a misinterpretation or miscalculation. Standard import tariffs in Bosnia and Herzegovina for countries with Most Favored Nation (MFN) status, including the United States, are set at 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15%, depending on the product category. Additionally, a 17% Value Added Tax (VAT) is applied to all imported goods, and certain products like oil derivatives, tobacco, beverages, alcoholic drinks, and coffee are subject to excise taxes.
Even when combining the highest tariff rate (15%) with the VAT (17%), the total does not approach 70%. This discrepancy suggests that the 70% figure may include other factors or be based on specific products with exceptionally high duties, though such cases are not evident in the available data. Therefore, the basis for the 70% tariff claim remains unclear and may not accurately reflect the general tariff structure imposed by Bosnia and Herzegovina on U.S. goods.
Da, sve troškove na koje nailazi proizvodjač snosi kupac. Carine mogu imati efekta u smislu povećavanja produktivnosti i peglanja trgovinskog bilansa, ali samo ako su usko targetirane na pojedinačne industrije i pojedinačne zemlje, recimo EU je vrlo striktna oko uvoza poljoprivrednih proizvoda zbog njihove zajedničke poljoprivredne politike. A blanko tarife kakve je uveo trump su nonsens.shape of despair wrote: ↑03/04/2025 00:30Hvala. A zar carinu ne plaća kupac? Znaci sad ce usa placati nesto iz EU 20% skuplje a u cilju zapravo smanjena uvoza i razvitka domace usa proizvodnje. Pa ne proizvodi usa sve zivo, svako treba uvoziti nestoNisamsdaali wrote: ↑03/04/2025 00:15Domaći proizvod i strani oba imaju cijenu 100 dolara, rokneš tarifu 30% za strani proizvod on poskupi na 130, domaći proizvodjač svoj proizvod digne na 120 jer će tu imat i cjenovnu prednost, i veći profit a i osigurat će se od neminovne inflacije u ostatku ekonomije. Kupcu je samim tim sve bar 20% skuplje, a uz to i ugrožavaš odnose sa svim zemljama oko sebe.shape of despair wrote: ↑03/04/2025 00:10 Morel u 2 reda objasnjenje zasto su ove carine negativne za usa,ako su? Kako to tramp ako su negativne ih uvodi, slom berze, recesija u usa itd. thanks
Kupac jedini plaća tarife i snosi njihove troškove
Nisamsdaali wrote: ↑03/04/2025 00:33 ali ne uzima u obzir razliku izmedju 19. vijeka i današnjeg dana
ko ovo piše?Velkoski wrote: ↑03/04/2025 00:33The claim that Bosnia and Herzegovina imposes a 70% tariff on U.S. goods appears to be a misinterpretation or miscalculation. Standard import tariffs in Bosnia and Herzegovina for countries with Most Favored Nation (MFN) status, including the United States, are set at 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15%, depending on the product category. Additionally, a 17% Value Added Tax (VAT) is applied to all imported goods, and certain products like oil derivatives, tobacco, beverages, alcoholic drinks, and coffee are subject to excise taxes.
Even when combining the highest tariff rate (15%) with the VAT (17%), the total does not approach 70%. This discrepancy suggests that the 70% figure may include other factors or be based on specific products with exceptionally high duties, though such cases are not evident in the available data. Therefore, the basis for the 70% tariff claim remains unclear and may not accurately reflect the general tariff structure imposed by Bosnia and Herzegovina on U.S. goods.![]()
Nijesmo ni mi šugavi
evo još analize čika gpt-aWhy it could hurt the U.S. economy hard:
1. Tariffs = hidden tax on consumers
When the U.S. slaps tariffs on imports, the cost is usually passed to American buyers, not foreign sellers.
So, if you add a 35% tariff on clothes, electronics, or machinery — prices go up.
Inflation rises. People’s money buys less. That hurts lower- and middle-income families the most.
2. U.S. manufacturing isn’t immune
American factories rely heavily on imported parts and materials.
Tariffs on things like steel, semiconductors, or machine tools raise costs for U.S. producers — and make American-made products less competitive both locally and globally.
3. Retaliation hurts exports
Countries hit by U.S. tariffs will retaliate — and many already have.
That hurts U.S. farmers, automakers, tech companies — anyone selling overseas.
China, the EU, and even smaller economies like Turkey or Mexico can strategically target U.S. industries.
4. Supply chains are not easily replaced
Moving production back to the U.S. sounds great politically, but it's slow and expensive.
Decades of outsourcing can't be reversed overnight. In the meantime, shortages and bottlenecks cause price spikes — again hitting U.S. consumers.
So could it crash the U.S. economy?
Not immediately. The U.S. is big, diversified, and resilient.
But a prolonged tariff war, especially if global partners retaliate, could lead to recession-like conditions:
Slower growth
Higher prices
Rising unemployment in export-heavy sectors
Market uncertainty (which investors hate)
Bottom line
Yes — this strategy risks backfiring. It may boost certain industries in the short term (like steel or textiles), but across the economy, it’s likely to raise the cost of living, fuel inflation, and hurt consumers and businesses alike.